Abstract
Science knowledge is of utmost importance for understanding the processes and phenomena around us. Appropriate basic education in science enables critically evaluating the deluge of information from various and diverse media. The learning content of science subjects is perceived as abstract and difficult to understand and learn. One of the challenges of modern science education is learning to understand science concepts, phenomena and processes and to apply them when solving authentic tasks (Wu et al., 2001). The way students process information in science subjects can be supported in solving problems by observing a person with an eye tracker, which is the subject of our research, the theoretical background of which includes the triple nature of chemical concepts, the understanding of submicroscopic representations, and the properties of the eye-tracker method.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Avramiotis, S., & Tsaparlis, G. (2013). Using computer simulations in chemistry problem solving. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 14(3), 297–311.
Bačnik, A., Bukovec, N., Poberžnik, A., Požek Novak, T., Keuc Z., Popič, H., & Vrtačnik M. (2009). Učni načrt, Program srednja šola, Kemija: gimnazija: klasična, strokovna gimnazija [Curriculum, program of secondary school, chemistry: gymnasium: classical, professional gymnasium]. Ljubljana: National Education Institute Slovenia.
Bačnik, A., Bukovec, N., Vrtačnik, M., Poberžnik, A., Križaj, M., Stefanovik, V., Sotlar, K., Dražumerič, S., & Preskar, S. (2011). Učni načrt, Program osnovna šola, Kemija [Curriculum, program of primary school, chemistry]. Ljubljana: National Education Institute Slovenia.
Bassok, M. (1990). Transfer of domain-specific problem solving procedures. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 16(3), 522–533.
Beatty, J., & Lucero-Wagoner, B. (2000). The pupillary system. Handbook of psychophysiology (2nd ed., pp. 142–162). New York: Cambridge University Press.
Bunce, D. M., & Gabel, D. (2002). Differential effects in the achievement of males and females of teaching the particulate nature of chemistry. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 39(10), 911–972.
Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Hillsdale: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Cullipher, S., & VandenPlas, J. R. (2018). Using fixations to measure attention in eye tracking for the chemistry education researcher. In J. R. VadenPlas, S. J. R. Hansen, & S. Cullipher (Eds.), Eye tracking for the chemistry education researcher (pp. 53–72). Washington, DC: American Chemical Society.
Devetak, I. (2012). Zagotavljanje kakovostnega znanja naravoslovja s pomočjo submikroreprezentacij, Analiza ključnih dejavnikov zagotavljanja kakovosti znanja v vzgojno – izobraževalnem sistemu [The analysis of the key factors in ensuring the quality of knowledge in educational system]. Ljubljana: Faculty of Education, University of Ljubljana.
Devetak, I., Drofenik Lorber, E., Juriševič, M., & Glažar, S. A. (2009). Comparing Slovenian year 8 and year 9 elementary school pupils’ knowledge of electrolyte chemistry and their intrinsic motivation. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 10(4), 281–290.
Devetak, I., & Glažar, S. A. (2010). The influence of 16-year-old students’ gender, mental abilities, and motivation on their reading and drawing submicrorepresentations achievements. International Journal of Science Education, 32(12), 1561–1593.
Devetak, I., Vogrinc, J., & Glažar, S. A. (2009). Assessing 16-year-old students’ understanding of aqueous solution at submicroscopic level. Research in Science Education, 39(2), 157–179.
Ferk Savec, V., Hrast, Š., Devetak, I., & Torkar, G. (2016). Beyond the use of an explanatory key accompanying submicroscopic representations. Acta Chimica Slovenica, 63(4), 864–873.
Gegenfurtner, A., Lehtinen, E., & Saljo, R. (2011). Expertise differences in the comprehension of visualisations: A meta-analysis of the eye-tracking research in professional domains. Educational Psychology Review, 23(2), 523–552.
Goldberg, J. H., & Kotval, X. P. (1999). Computer interface evaluation using eye movements: Methods and constructs. International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics, 24(2), 631–645.
Green, H. J., Lemaire, P., & Dufau, S. (2007). Eye movement correlates of younger and older adults’ strategies addition. Acta Psychologica, 125(12), 257–278.
Holmqvist, K., Nyström, M., Andersson, R., Dewhurst, R., Jarodzka, H., & Van de Weijer, J. (Eds.). (2011). Eye tracking: A comprehensive guide to methods and measures. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Hyönä, J., Lorch, R. F., & Kaakinen, J. K. (2002). Individual differences in reading to summarise expository text: Evidence from eye fixation patterns. Journal of Education Psychology, 94(1), 44–55.
Hyönä, J., Lorch, R. F., & Rinck, M. (2003). Eye movement measures to study global text processing. In The mind’s eye, cognitive and applied aspects of eye movement research (pp. 313–334). Elsevier: North Holland.
Johnstone, A. H. (1982). Macro- and micro-chemistry. School Science Review, 64(227), 377–379.
Johnstone, A. H. (1991). Why is science difficult to learn? Things are seldom what they seem. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 7(2), 75–83.
Johnstone, A. H. (2001). Teaching of chemistry-logical or psychological? Chemical Education: Research and Practice in Europe, 1(1), 9–15.
Johnstone, A. H., & El-Banna, H. (1986). Capacities, demands and processes—A predictive model for science education. Education in Chemistry, 23(3), 80–84.
Just, M. A., & Carpenter, P. A. (1980). A theory of reading: From eye fixations to comprehension. Psychological Review, 87(4), 329–354.
Just, M. A., Carpenter, P. A., & Miyake, A. (2003). Neuroindices of cognitive workload: Neuroimaging, pupillometric and event-related potential studies of brain work. Theoretical Issues in Ergonomics Science, 4(1), 56–88.
Kelly, R. M., & Jones, L. L. (2008). Investigating students’ ability to transfer ideas learned from molecular animations of the dissolution process. Journal of Chemical Education, 85(2), 303–309.
Kind, V. (2004). Beyond appearances: Students’ misconceptions about basic chemical ideas (2nd ed.). Durham: Durham University, School of Education.
Koning, B. B., Tabbers, H. K., Rikers, R. M. J. P., & Paas, F. (2009). Towards a framework for attention cueing in instructional animations: Guidelines for research and design. Educational Psychology Review, 21(3), 113–140.
Levy, S. T., & Wilinsky, U. (2009). Crossing levels and representations: The connected chemistry (CC1) curriculum. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 18(3), 224–242.
Löfgren, L., & Hellden, G. (2009). A longitudinal study showing how students use a molecule concept when explaining everyday situations. International Journal of Science Education, 31(4), 1631–1655.
Mahaffy, P. (2004). The future shape of chemistry education. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 5(3), 229–245.
Pallant, J. (2011). SPSS survival manual: A step by step guide to data analysis using SPSS (4th ed.). Crows Nest: Allen & Unwin.
Parchmann, I., Blonder, R., & Broman, K. (2017). Context-based chemistry learning: The relevance of chemistry for citizenship and responsible research and innovation (RRI). In L. Leite, L. Dourado, A. S. Afonso, & S. Morgado (Eds.), Contextualising teaching to improve learning the case of science and geography (pp. 25–39). New York: Nova Science Publishers.
Pavlin, J., Glažar, S. A., Slapničar, M., & Devetak, I. (2019). The impact of studentsʼ educational background, interest in learning, formal reasoning and visualisation abilities on gas context-based exercises achievements with submicro-animations. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 20(3), 633–649.
Phillips, L. M., Norris, S. P., & Macnab, J. S. (2010). Visualisation in mathematics, reading and science education. Dordrecht: Springer.
Planinšič, G., Belina, R., Kukman, I., & Cvahte, M. (2009). Učni načrt, Program srednja šola, Fizika: gimnazija: klasična, strokovna gimnazija [Curriculum, Program of secondary school, physics: Gymnasium: Classical, professional gymnasium]. Ljubljana: National Education Institute Slovenia.
Rayner, K. (2009). Eye movements and attention in reading, scene perception, and visual search. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psyhology, 62(8), 1457–1506.
Russell, J., Kozma, R., Jones, T., Wykoff, J., Marx, N., & Davis, J. (1997). Use of simultaneous-synchronised macroscopic, microscopic, and symbolic representations to enhance the teaching and learning of chemical concepts. Journal of Chemical Education, 74(3), 330–334.
Schultheis, H., & Jameson, A. (2004). Assessing cognitive load in adaptive hypermedia systems: Physiological and behavioral methods. In P. M. E. De Bra & W. Nejdl (Eds.), Adaptive hypermedia and adaptive web-based systems (pp. 225–234). Berlin: Springer.
Slapničar, M., Devetak, I., Glažar, S. A., & Pavlin, J. (2017). Identification of the understanding of the states of water and air among Slovenian students aged 12, 14 and 16 years through solving authentic exercises. Journal of Baltic Science Education, 16(3), 308–323.
Slapničar, M., Tompa, V., Glažar, S. A., & Devetak, I. (2018). Fourteen-year-old students’ misconceptions regarding the sub-micro and symbolic levels of specific chemical concepts. Journal of Baltic Science Education, 17(4), 620–632.
Taber, K. S. (2013). Revisiting the chemistry triplet: Drawing upon the nature of chemical knowledge and the psychology of learning to inform chemistry education. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 14(2), 156–168.
Tien, L. T., Teichert, M. A., & Rickey, D. (2007). Effectiveness of a MORE laboratory module in prompting students to revise their molecular-level ideas about solutions. Journal of Chemical Education, 84(1), 175–180.
Torkar, G., Veldin, M., Glažar, S. A., & Podlesek, A. (2018). Why do plants wilt? Investigating students’ understanding of water balance in plants with external representations at the macroscopic and submicroscopic levels. Eurasia Journal of Mathematic Science Technology & Education, 14(6), 2265–2276.
Tsai, M., Hou, H., Lai, M., Liu, W., & Yang, F. (2012). Visual attention for solving multiple-choice science problem: An eye-tracking analysis. Computer Education, 58(4), 375–385.
Verovnik, I., Bajc, J., Beznec, B., Božič, S., Brdar, U. V., Cvahte, M., Gerlič, I., & Munih S. (2011). Učni načrt, Program osnovna šola, Fizika [Curriculum. Program of primary school. Physics]. Ljubljana: national education institute Slovenia.
West, J. M., Haake, A. R., Rozanski, E. P., & Karn, K. S. (2006). EyePatterns: Software for identifying patterns and similarities across fixation sequences. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the 2006 symposium on eye tracking research & applications (pp. 149–154). New York: ACM Press.
Wu, H. K., Krajcik, J. S., & Soloway, E. (2001). Promoting understanding of chemical representations: Students’ use of a visualisation tool in the classroom. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 38(7), 821–832.
Wu, H. K., & Shah, P. (2004). Exploring visuospatial thinking in learning. Science Education, 88(3), 465–492.
Acknowledgements
This research was supported by the project Explaining Effective and Efficient Problem Solving of the Triplet Relationship in Science Concepts Representations (J5-6814), financed by the Slovenian Research Agency (ARRS).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2021 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Slapničar, M., Tompa, V., Devetak, I., Glažar, S.A., Pavlin, J. (2021). Using an Eye-Tracker to Study Students’ Attention Allocation When Solving a Context-Based Problem on the Sublimation of Water. In: Devetak, I., Glažar, S.A. (eds) Applying Bio-Measurements Methodologies in Science Education Research. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-71535-9_6
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-71535-9_6
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-71534-2
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-71535-9
eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)