Skip to main content

Assessing Cognitive Load in Adaptive Hypermedia Systems: Physiological and Behavioral Methods

  • Conference paper
Adaptive Hypermedia and Adaptive Web-Based Systems (AH 2004)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNCS,volume 3137))

Abstract

It could be advantageous in many situations for an adaptive hypermedia system to have information about the cognitive load that the user is currently experiencing. A literature review of the methods proposed to assess cognitive load reveals: (1) that pupil size seems to be one of the most promising indicators of cognitive load in applied contexts and (2) that its suitability for use as an on-line index in everyday situations has not yet been tested adequately. Therefore, the aim of the present study was to evaluate the usefulness of the pupil size index in such situations. To this end, pupil diameter and event-related brain potentials were measured while subjects read texts of different levels of difficulty. As had been hypothesized, more difficult texts led to lower reading speed, higher subjective load ratings, and a reduced P300 amplitude. But text difficulty, surprisingly, had no effect on pupil size. These results indicate that pupil size may not be suitable as an index of cognitive load for adaptive hypermedia systems. Instead, behavioral indicators such as reading speed may be more suitable.

We thank Boris Brandherm for many fruitful discussions and the research group of Axel Mecklinger for invaluable support in the EEG part of the study.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Wilson, G.F., Eggemeier, F.T.: Psychophysiological assessment of workload in multi-task environments. In: Damos, D.L. (ed.) Multiple-Task Performance, pp. 329–360. Taylor and Francis, London (1991)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Tsang, P., Wilson, G.F.: Mental workload. In: Salvendy, G. (ed.) Handbook of Human Factors and Ergonomics, pp. 417–449. Wiley, New York (1997)

    Google Scholar 

  3. O’Donnell, R.D., Eggemeier, F.T.: Workload assessment methodology. In: Boff, K., Kauffmann, L., Thomas, J. (eds.) Handbook of Perception and Human Performance, pp. 42–1–42–49. Wiley, New York (1986)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Beatty, J.: Task-evoked pupillary responses, processing load, and the structure of processing resources. Psychological Bulletin 91, 276–292 (1982)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Kramer, A.F.: Physiological metrics of mental workload: A review of recent progress. In: Damos, D.L. (ed.) Multiple-Task Performance, pp. 279–327. Taylor and Francis, London (1991)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Hyönä, J., Tommola, J., Alaja, A.M.: Pupil dilation as a measure of processing load in simulaneous interprtation and other language tasks. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 48A, 598–612 (1995)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Just, M.A., Carpenter, P.A.: The intensity dimension of thought: Pupillometric indices of sentence processing. Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology 47(2), 310–339 (1993)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Dionisio, D.P., Granholm, E., Hillix, W.A., Perrine, W.F.: Differentiation of deception using pupillary responses as an index of cognitive processing. Psychophysiology 38, 205–211 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Sirevaag, E.J., Kramer, A.F., Coles, M.G., Donchin, E.: Resource reciprocity: An eventrelated brain potential analysis. Acta Psychologica 70, 77–97 (1989)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Friedman, D., Cycowicz, Y.M., Gaeta, H.: The novelty P3: An event-related brain potential (ERP) sign of the brain’s evaluation of novelty. Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews 25(4), 355–373 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Ullsperger, P., Freude, G., Erdmann, U.: Auditory probe sensitivity to mental workload changes - an event-related potential study. International Journal of Psychophysiology 40, 201–209 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Iqbal, S.T., Zheng, X.S., Bailey, B.P.: Task-evoked pupillary response to mental workload in human-computer interaction. In: Proceedings of the ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, Vienna, Austria, pp. 1477–1480 (2004)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2004 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Schultheis, H., Jameson, A. (2004). Assessing Cognitive Load in Adaptive Hypermedia Systems: Physiological and Behavioral Methods. In: De Bra, P.M.E., Nejdl, W. (eds) Adaptive Hypermedia and Adaptive Web-Based Systems. AH 2004. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 3137. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-27780-4_26

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-27780-4_26

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-22895-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-27780-4

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics