Abstract
It could be advantageous in many situations for an adaptive hypermedia system to have information about the cognitive load that the user is currently experiencing. A literature review of the methods proposed to assess cognitive load reveals: (1) that pupil size seems to be one of the most promising indicators of cognitive load in applied contexts and (2) that its suitability for use as an on-line index in everyday situations has not yet been tested adequately. Therefore, the aim of the present study was to evaluate the usefulness of the pupil size index in such situations. To this end, pupil diameter and event-related brain potentials were measured while subjects read texts of different levels of difficulty. As had been hypothesized, more difficult texts led to lower reading speed, higher subjective load ratings, and a reduced P300 amplitude. But text difficulty, surprisingly, had no effect on pupil size. These results indicate that pupil size may not be suitable as an index of cognitive load for adaptive hypermedia systems. Instead, behavioral indicators such as reading speed may be more suitable.
We thank Boris Brandherm for many fruitful discussions and the research group of Axel Mecklinger for invaluable support in the EEG part of the study.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Wilson, G.F., Eggemeier, F.T.: Psychophysiological assessment of workload in multi-task environments. In: Damos, D.L. (ed.) Multiple-Task Performance, pp. 329–360. Taylor and Francis, London (1991)
Tsang, P., Wilson, G.F.: Mental workload. In: Salvendy, G. (ed.) Handbook of Human Factors and Ergonomics, pp. 417–449. Wiley, New York (1997)
O’Donnell, R.D., Eggemeier, F.T.: Workload assessment methodology. In: Boff, K., Kauffmann, L., Thomas, J. (eds.) Handbook of Perception and Human Performance, pp. 42–1–42–49. Wiley, New York (1986)
Beatty, J.: Task-evoked pupillary responses, processing load, and the structure of processing resources. Psychological Bulletin 91, 276–292 (1982)
Kramer, A.F.: Physiological metrics of mental workload: A review of recent progress. In: Damos, D.L. (ed.) Multiple-Task Performance, pp. 279–327. Taylor and Francis, London (1991)
Hyönä, J., Tommola, J., Alaja, A.M.: Pupil dilation as a measure of processing load in simulaneous interprtation and other language tasks. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 48A, 598–612 (1995)
Just, M.A., Carpenter, P.A.: The intensity dimension of thought: Pupillometric indices of sentence processing. Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology 47(2), 310–339 (1993)
Dionisio, D.P., Granholm, E., Hillix, W.A., Perrine, W.F.: Differentiation of deception using pupillary responses as an index of cognitive processing. Psychophysiology 38, 205–211 (2001)
Sirevaag, E.J., Kramer, A.F., Coles, M.G., Donchin, E.: Resource reciprocity: An eventrelated brain potential analysis. Acta Psychologica 70, 77–97 (1989)
Friedman, D., Cycowicz, Y.M., Gaeta, H.: The novelty P3: An event-related brain potential (ERP) sign of the brain’s evaluation of novelty. Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews 25(4), 355–373 (2001)
Ullsperger, P., Freude, G., Erdmann, U.: Auditory probe sensitivity to mental workload changes - an event-related potential study. International Journal of Psychophysiology 40, 201–209 (2001)
Iqbal, S.T., Zheng, X.S., Bailey, B.P.: Task-evoked pupillary response to mental workload in human-computer interaction. In: Proceedings of the ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, Vienna, Austria, pp. 1477–1480 (2004)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2004 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this paper
Cite this paper
Schultheis, H., Jameson, A. (2004). Assessing Cognitive Load in Adaptive Hypermedia Systems: Physiological and Behavioral Methods. In: De Bra, P.M.E., Nejdl, W. (eds) Adaptive Hypermedia and Adaptive Web-Based Systems. AH 2004. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 3137. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-27780-4_26
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-27780-4_26
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-540-22895-0
Online ISBN: 978-3-540-27780-4
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive