Skip to main content

Progress and Cost Control

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
An Introduction to Project Modeling and Planning

Part of the book series: Springer Texts in Business and Economics ((STBE))

Abstract

Together with planning and scheduling, project monitoring and control is an important responsibility of project managers. Monitoring the project includes the collection, recording, organization and presentation of project realization data. Control, on the other hand, involves the analysis of the data with the purpose of preparation of action plans to prevent deviations from the current plan where possible, and mitigate their adverse consequences. As a project monitoring method, we present the Earned Value Management (EVM). We describe the EVM metrics and associated graphical data display tools and discuss how to use them to make time and cost predictions. Impacts of escalation and inflation are considered. Finally, the advantages and limitations of using EVM are discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 69.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Anbari, F. T. (2003). Earned value project management method and extensions. Project Management Journal, 34(4), 12–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Batselier, J., & Vanhoucke, M. (2015). Construction and evaluation framework for a real-life project database. International Journal of Project Management, 33(3), 697–710.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brandon, D. M., Jr. (1998). Implementing earned value easily and effectively. Project Management Journal, 29(2), 11–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Colin, J., & Vanhoucke, M. (2014). Setting tolerance limits for statistical project control using earned value management. Omega, 49, 107–122.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hall, N. G. (2012). Project management: Recent developments and research opportunities. Journal of Systems Science and Systems Engineering, 21(2), 129–143.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hazır, Ö. (2015). A review of analytical models, approaches and decision support tools in project monitoring and control. International Journal of Project Management, 33(4), 808–815.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hazır, Ö., & Shtub, A. (2011). Effects of the information presentation format on project control. Journal of Operational Research Society, 62, 2157–2161.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Henderson, K. (2005). Earned schedule in action. The Measurable News, 8, 23–30.

    Google Scholar 

  • Manship, K. (2018) Implementing earned value management on agile projects. Thesis of master of science, Applied Information Management and the Graduate School of the University of Oregon, OR.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martens, A., & Vanhoucke, M. (2018). An empirical validation of the performance of project control tolerance limits. Automation in Construction, 89, 71–85.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Naeni, L. M., Shadrokh, S., & Salehipour, A. (2011). A fuzzy approach for the earned value management. International Journal of Project Management, 29(6), 764–772.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Olsson, N. O., & Bull-Berg, H. (2015). Use of big data in project evaluations. International Journal of Managing Projects in Business, 8(3), 491–512.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schmidt, K. W., & Hazır, Ö. (2019). Formulation and solution of an optimal control problem for industrial project control. Annals of Operations Research, 280(1–2), 337–350.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sethi, S., & Thompson, G. (2002). Optimal control theory: Applications to management science and economics (2nd ed.). Boston, MA: Kluwer Academic Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shtub, A., Bard, J., & Globerson, S. (2014). Project management: Processes, methodologies, and economics. (new international edition). New York: Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vanhoucke, M. (2009). Measuring time: Improving project performance using earned value management (Vol. 136). New York: Springer Science and Business Media.

    Google Scholar 

  • Venkataraman, R. R., & Pinto, J. K. (2010). Cost and value management in projects. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wauters, M., & Vanhoucke, M. (2016). A comparative study of artificial intelligence methods for project duration forecasting. Expert Systems with Applications, 46, 249–261.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Webb, A. (2003). Using earned value: A project manager’s guide. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Ulusoy, G., Hazır, Ö. (2021). Progress and Cost Control. In: An Introduction to Project Modeling and Planning. Springer Texts in Business and Economics. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-61423-2_10

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics