Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Project management: Recent developments and research opportunities

  • Published:
Journal of Systems Science and Systems Engineering Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper studies the business process known as project management. This process has exhibited a remarkable growth in business interest over the last 15 years, as demonstrated by a 1000% increase in membership in the Project Management Institute since 1996. This growth is largely attributable to the emergence of many new diverse business applications that can be successfully managed as projects. The new applications for project management include IT implementations, research and development, new product and service development, corporate change management, and software development. The characteristics of modern projects are typically very different from those of traditional projects such as construction and engineering, which necessitates the development of new project management techniques. We discuss these recent practical developments. The history of project management methodology is reviewed, from CPM and PERT to the influential modern directions of critical chain project management and agile methods. We identify one important application area for future methodological change as new product and service development. A list of specific research topics within project management is discussed. The conclusions suggest the existence of significant research opportunities within project management.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. agilemanifesto.org. (2001). Manifesto for Agile Software Development. Available via DIALOG. http://agilemanifesto.org/

  2. Amram, M. & Kulatilaka, N. (1999). Real Options: Managing Strategic Investment in an Uncertain World. Harvard Business School Press, Boston, MA

    Google Scholar 

  3. Aumann, R. & Serrano, R. (2008). An economic index of riskiness. Journal of Political Economy, 116: 810–836

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Bertsimas, D. & Sim, M. (2004). The price of robustness. Operations Research, 52: 35–53

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  5. Brânzei, R., Ferrari, G., Fragnelli, V. & Tijs, S. (2002). Two approaches to the problem of sharing delay costs in joint projects. Annals of Operations Research, 109: 359–374

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  6. Brown, D.B. & Sim, M. (2009). Satisficing measures for analysis of risky positions. Management Science, 55: 71–84

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  7. Cai, X., Hall, N.G. & Zhang, F. (2012). Cooperation and contract design in project management. Working paper, Department of Systems Engineering and Engineering Management, Chinese University of Hong Kong

  8. Castro, J., Gómez, D. & Tejada, J. (2008). A polynomial rule for the problem of sharing delay costs in PERT networks. Computers & Operations Research, 35: 2376–2387

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  9. Cooper, R.G., Edgett, S.J. & Kleinschmidt, E.J. (2000). New problems, new solutions: making portfolio management more effective. Research-Technology Management, 43: 18–33

    Google Scholar 

  10. Corbett, C. & Muthulingam, S. (2007). Adoption of voluntary environmental standards: the role of signaling and intrinsic benets in the diffusion of the LEED green building standards. Working paper, Anderson Graduate School of Management, UCLA

  11. Dickinson, M.W., Thornton, A.C. & Graves, S. (2001). Technology portfolio management: optimizing interdependent projects over multiple time periods. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 48: 518–527

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Fox, G.E., Baker, N.R. & Bryant, L.J. (1984). Economic models for R&D project selection in the presence of project interactions. Management Science, 30: 890–902

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Goh, J. & Hall, N.G. (2012). Total cost control in project management via satisficing. Working paper, revised for publication, Fisher College of Business, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio

    Google Scholar 

  14. Goh, J. & Sim, M. (2010). Distributionally robust optimization and its tractable approximations. Operations Research, 58: 902–917

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  15. Goldratt, E.M. (1997). The Critical Chain. North River Press, Great Barrington, MA

    Google Scholar 

  16. Hall, N.G., Long, Z., Qi, J. & Sim, M. (2011). Managing underperformance risk in project portfolio selection. Working paper, Fisher College of Business, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio

    Google Scholar 

  17. Huchzermeier, A. & Loch, C.H. (2001). Project management under risk: using the real options approach to evaluate exibility in R&D. Management Science, 47: 85–101

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Hurwicz, L. (1972). On informationally decentralized systems. In: McGuire, C.B., Radner, R. (eds.), Decisions and Organization. North-Holland, Amsterdam, Netherlands

    Google Scholar 

  19. Kellerer, H., Pferschy, U. & Pisinger, D. (2004). Knapsack Problems. Springer, Berlin, Germany

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  20. Kerzner, H. (2009). Project Management: A Systems Approach to Planning, Scheduling, and Controlling, 10th edition. Wiley, Hoboken, NJ

    Google Scholar 

  21. Kim, Y.W. & Ballard, G. (2000). Is the earned-value method an enemy of work flow? Working paper, Department of Civil and Environmental Enginering, University of California at Berkeley, Berkeley, CA

    Google Scholar 

  22. Klastorin, T.D. (2004). Project Management: Tools and Trade-Offs, 1st edition. Wiley, Hoboken, NJ

    Google Scholar 

  23. Kotnour, T. (2000). Organizational learning practices in the project management environment. International Journal of Quality & Reliability Management, 17: 393–406

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Lukas, J.A. (2008). Earned value analysis — Why it doesn’t work. AACE International Transactions, EVM.01.1-EVM.01.10

  25. Markowitz, H.M. (1959). Portfolio Selection: Efficient Diversification of Investments. Wiley, New York

    Google Scholar 

  26. Myerson, R. (1979). Incentive compatibility and the bargaining problem. Econometrica, 47: 61–73

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  27. MSDN Blogs. (2009). Architecture makes agile processes scalable. Available via DIALOG. http://blogs.msdn.com/b/nickmalik/archive/2009/05/19/architecture-makes-agile-processesscalable.aspx. Cited May 19, 2012

  28. objectmentor.com. (2012). Agile/XP object mentor success stories. Available via DIALOG. http://www.objectmentor.com/omSolutions/agile_customers.html

  29. Parkinson, C.N. (1955). Parkinson’s law. Economist, November 19

  30. Parkinson, C.N. (1958). Parkinson’s Law: The Pursuit of Progress. John Murray, London, UK

    Google Scholar 

  31. Patrick, F.S. (1998). Critical chain scheduling and buffer management: getting out from between Parkinson’s rock and Murphy’s hard place. Available via DIALOG. http://www.focusedperformance.com

  32. Peleg, B. & Sudhölter, P. (2003). Introduction to the Theory of Cooperative Games. Kluwer, Boston, MA

    Book  Google Scholar 

  33. Pich, M.T., Loch, C.H. & De Meyer, A. (2002). On uncertainty, ambiguity, and complexity in project management. Management Science, 48: 1008–1023

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  34. Project Management Institute. (2008). A Guide to the Project Management Body of Knowledge, 4th edition

  35. Raz, T., Barnes, R. & Dvir, D. (2003). A critical look at critical chain project management. Project Management Journal, 36: 24–32

    Google Scholar 

  36. Roy, A.D. (1952). Safety-first and the holding of assets. Econometrica, 20: 431–449

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  37. Royal Commission on Environmental Pollution. (2007). The urban environment. Available via DIALOG http://www.official-documents.gov.uk/document/cm70/7009/7009.pdf

  38. Schindler, M. & Eppler, M.J. (2003). Harvesting project knowledge: a review of project learning methods and success factors. International Journal of Project Management, 21: 219–228

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Schonberger, R.J. (1981). Why projects are always late: a rationale based on manual simulation of a PERT/CPM network. Interfaces, 11: 66–70

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Smith, P.G. (2007). Flexible Product Development: Building Agility for Changing Markets. John Wiley, Hoboken, NJ

    Google Scholar 

  41. White, D. & Fortune, J. (2002). Current practice in project management: an empirical study. International Journal of Project Management, 20: 1–11

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Wikipedia. (2011). Parkinson’s law. Available via DIALOG. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Parkinson’s_Law

  43. Wikipedia. (2012). Earned value management. Available via DIALOG. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Earned_value_management

  44. wwwF. (2010). Living planet report. Available via DIALOG. http://wwf.panda.org/about_our_earth/all_publications/living_planet_report

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Management Sciences Fisher College of Business, The Ohio State University, Ohio, USA

    Nicholas G. Hall

Authors
  1. Nicholas G. Hall
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Nicholas G. Hall.

Additional information

Nicholas G. Hall is Professor of Management Sciences in the Fisher College of Business at The Ohio State University. He holds B.A., M.A. degrees in economics from the University of Cambridge, a professional qualification in accounting, and a Ph.D. (1986) from the University of California at Berkeley. His main research interests are in tactical operations issues, especially project management, scheduling and pricing, public policy and sports management problems. He is the author of over 70 refereed publications, and has given over 260 academic presentations, including 88 invited presentations in 20 countries, 6 conference keynote presentations and 6 INFORMS tutorials. A 2008 citation study ranked him 13th among 1,376 scholars in the operations management field. He is a Fellow of the Institute for Decision Making under Uncertainty of the Chinese Academy of Sciences. He won the Faculty Outstanding Research Award of the Fisher College of Business in 1998 and 2005.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Hall, N.G. Project management: Recent developments and research opportunities. J. Syst. Sci. Syst. Eng. 21, 129–143 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11518-012-5190-5

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11518-012-5190-5

Keywords

Search

Navigation