Skip to main content

Developing Factors for Socio-Ecohydrological Resilience

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Handbook of Disaster Risk Reduction for Resilience

Abstract

All life relies on water. The abundance, scarcity, and capacity of hydrological systems impact resilience and vulnerability of social and ecological systems everywhere. Socio-ecohydrological systems encompass this convergence. Resilience theory provides a structured way of defining these systems, developing factors, and identifying points of strength and vulnerability. Defining these systems and the influential factors driving them is necessary in order to understand system behavioral response to stresses. This fundamental knowledge of a system can then be used to inform any potential disaster risk reduction. Comprehensive methods of evaluating resilience help support decision-making and water resources management. Two approaches are presented. One approach presented is an internal assessment in which the system is defined using a resilience lens, and another is an external assessment in which the resilience of the system is evaluated after the system framework has been developed. These contrasting approaches to ecohydrological resilience are then implemented in two case studies, Nepal and New Mexico, USA, where diverse conditions exemplify the use of these methods for a range of system conditions and stresses.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 119.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 159.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Adger, W. N. (2006). Vulnerability. Resilience, vulnerability, and adaptation: A cross-cutting theme, the international human dimensions programme on. Global Environmental Change, 16, 268–281.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alessa, L., et al. (2008). The arctic water resource vulnerability index: An integrated assessment tool for community resilience and vulnerability with respect to freshwater. Environmental Management, 42, 523–541.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Allen, C. R., Angeler, D. G., Garmestani, A. S., Gunderson, L. H., & Holling, S. (2014). Panarchy: Theory and application. Ecosystems, 17, 578–589.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, E. P., Pringle, C. M., & Freeman, M. C. (2008). Quantifying the extent of river fragmentation by hydropower dams in the Sarapiquí River Basin, Costa Rica. Aquatic Conservation: Marine and Freshwater Ecosystems, 18, 408–417.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Babel, M. S., Pandey, V. P., Rivas, A. A., & Wahid, S. M. (2011). Indicator-based approach for assessing the vulnerability of freshwater resources in the Bagmati River Basin, Nepal. Environmental Management, 48, 1044.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Benson, M. H., & Craig, R. K. (2017). Regime change for New Mexico watersheds. In The end of sustainability: Resilience and the future of environmental governance in the anthropocene (Environment and Society). University Press of Kansas.

    Google Scholar 

  • Benson, M. H., & Garmestani, A. S. (2011). Can we manage for resilience? The integration of resilience thinking into natural resource management in the United States. Rochester: Social Science Research Network. http://papers.ssrn.com/abstract=1858934. Zugegriffen: 2. September 2015.

  • Berkes, F., Folke, C., & Colding, J. (Eds.). (1998). Linking social and ecological systems: Management practices and social mechanisms for building resilience. Cambridge/New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brauman, K. A., Daily, G. C., Duarte, T. K., & Mooney, H. A. (2007). The nature and value of ecosystem services: An overview highlighting hydrologic services. Annual Review of Environment and Resources, 32, 67–98.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Certini, G. (2005). Effects of fire on properties of forest soils: A review. Oecologia, 143, 1–10.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chambers, R. (1989). Editorial introduction: Vulnerability, coping and policy. IDS Bulletin, 20, 1–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chang, S. E., & Shinozuka, M. (2004). Measuring improvements in the disaster resilience of communities. Earthquake Spectra, 20, 739–755.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cosens, B., & Gunderson, L. (2018). Practical Panarchy for Adaptive Water Govesrnance: Linking Law to Social-Ecological Resilience. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-72472-0.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Davis, T. (2019, August 18). Rancher focuses on keeping his land healthy. Albuquerque Journal. https://www.abqjournal.com/1355178/rancher-focuses-on-keeping-his-land-healthy.html

  • Falkenmark, M., & Widstrand, C. (1992). Population and water resources: A delicate balance. Population Bulletin, 47, 1–36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Folke, C., & Berkes, F. (2000). Linking social and ecological systems for resilience and sustainability. In Linking social and ecological systems : Management practices and social mechanisms for building resilience (p. 12). Cambridge/New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fontaine, M. M., & Steinemann, A. C. (2009). Assessing vulnerability to natural hazards: Impact-based method and application to drought in Washington state. ASCE: Natural Hazard Review, 10, 11–18.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gallopín, G. C. (2006). Linkages between vulnerability, resilience, and adaptive capacity. Global Environmental Change, 16, 293–303.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grennel. (2018, July 16). Why 96 million plastic ‘shade balls’ dumped into the LA Reservoir may not save water. PBS News Hour. https://www.pbs.org/newshour/science/why-96-million-plastic-shade-balls-dumped-into-the-la-reservoir-may-not-save-water

  • Gunderson, L. H., & Holling, C. S. (Eds.). (2002). Panarchy: Understanding transformations in human and natural systems. Washington, DC: Island Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gunderson, L., & Light, S. S. (2006). Adaptive management and adaptive governance in the everglades ecosystem. Policy Sciences, 39, 323–334.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gunderson, L. H, Kinzig, A., Quinlan, A., Walker, B., & Cundhill, G. (2010). Assessing resilience in social-ecological systems: Workbook for practitioners. Version 2, Resilience Alliance.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hofste, R., et al. (2019). Aqueduct 3.0: Updated decision-relevant global water risk indicators. World Resource Institute. https://www.wri.org/publication/aqueduct-30

  • Holling, C. S., & Meffe, G. K. (1996). Command and control and the pathology of natural resource management. Conservation Biology, 10, 328–337.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hosseini, S., Barker, K., & Ramirez-Marquez, J. E. (2016). A review of definitions and measures of system resilience. Reliability Engineering & System Safety, 145, 47–61.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huang, Y., & Cai, M. (2009). Methodologies guidelines: Vulnerability assessment of freshwater resources to environmental change. Nairobi: UNEP.

    Google Scholar 

  • Janauer, G. A. (2000). Ecohydrology: Fusing concepts and scales. Ecological Engineering, 16, 9–16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kjellen, M., & McGranahan, G. (1997). Comprehensive assessment of the freshwater resources of the world. Stockholm Environment Institute, Sweden: Stockholm.

    Google Scholar 

  • Korb, K., & Nicholson, A. (2004). Bayesian artificial intelligence. Boca Raton: CRC Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Liu, X., Wang, Y., Peng, J., Braimoh, A. K., & Yin, H. (2013). Assessing vulnerability to drought based on exposure, sensitivity and adaptive capacity: A case study in middle Inner Mongolia of China. Chinese Geographical Science, 23, 13–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mahoney, John & Rood, Stewart. (1998). Streamflow Requirements for Cottonwood Seedling Recruitment - An Integrative Model. Wetlands. 18. 634-645. 10.1007/BF03161678.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morrison, R.R., Stone, M.C. (2014). Spatially implemented Bayesian network model to assess environmental impacts of water management. Water Resour. Res. 50, 8107–8124. https://doi.org/10.1002/2014WR015600

    Google Scholar 

  • Nepal, and United Nations Development Programme (Nepal), Hrsg. (2014). Nepal human development report 2014: Beyond geography, unlocking human potential. Kathmandu: Government of Nepal, National Planning Commission, Nepal.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Nilsson, C. (2005). Fragmentation and flow regulation of the world’s large river systems. Science, 308, 405–408.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pandey, V. P., Babel, M. S., Shrestha, S., & Kazama, F. (2010). Vulnerability of freshwater resources in large and medium Nepalese river basins to environmental change. Water Science & Technology, 61, 1525.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pandey, V. P., Babel, M. S., Shrestha, S., & Kazama, F. (2011). A framework to assess adaptive capacity of the water resources system in Nepalese river basins. Ecological Indicators, 11, 480–488.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sharma, R., & Awal, R. (2013). Hydropower development in Nepal. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 21, 684–693.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shrestha, M. L. (2000). Interannual variation of summer monsoon rainfall over Nepal and its relation to Southern Oscillation Index. Meteorology and Atmospheric Physics, 75, 21–28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smit, B., & Wandel, J. (2006). Adaptation, adaptive capacity and vulnerability. Global Environmental Change, 16, 282–292.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Spindle, B. (2019). “We can’t waste a drop.” India is running out of water. The Wall Street Journal, CCLXXIV(43), A1–A8.

    Google Scholar 

  • The Nature Conservancy of NM. (2018). Rio Grande Water Fund: Wildfire and Water Source Protection 2018 Annual Report. Retrieved from https://www.nature.org/content/dam/tnc/nature/en/documents/tnc_RioGrandWaterFund_2018.pd

  • Theresa, D. (2019, August 23). Aquifer on the rebound. Albuquerque Journal. https://www.abqjournal.com/1357776/aquifer-on-the-rebound.html

  • Uusitalo, L., 2007. Advantages and challenges of Bayesian networks in environmental modelling. Ecol. Model. 203, 312–318. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2006.11.033

    Google Scholar 

  • Vörösmarty, C. J., et al. (2010). Global threats to human water security and river biodiversity. Nature, 467, 555–561.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Walker, B., & Salt, D. (2012). Resilience practice: Building capacity to absorb disturbance and maintain function. Washington, DC: Island Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Walker, B., et al. (2002). Resilience management in social-ecological systems: A working hypothesis for a participatory approach. Conservation Ecology, 6, 1–14.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang, C., & Blackmore, J. M. (2009). Resilience concepts for water resource systems. Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management, 135, 528–536.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Woods, D., & Branlat, M. (2006). Essential characteristics of resilience. In Resilience engineering (pp. 21–34). Farnham: Ashgate Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • World Health Organization. (2017). Guidelines for drinking-water quality. Geneva: WHO.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zalewski, M., McClain, M. E., & Eslamian, S. (2016). New challenges and dimensions of ecohydrology, part I, ecohydrology and hydrobiology. Special Issue, 16(1), 1–70.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Lauren Victoria Jaramillo .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Jaramillo, L.V., Stone, M.C., Benson, M.H. (2021). Developing Factors for Socio-Ecohydrological Resilience. In: Eslamian, S., Eslamian, F. (eds) Handbook of Disaster Risk Reduction for Resilience. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-61278-8_17

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics