Skip to main content

Serendipitous Learning Fostered by Brain State Assessment and Collective Wisdom

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Brain Function Assessment in Learning (BFAL 2020)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNAI,volume 12462))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

Serendipitous discovery, invention or artistic creation are among the most exciting and utmost relevant phenomena strongly related to human learning. At the moment, there are very few measurable criteria helping to understand and foster serendipity. In other papers [1,2,3] we have presented, discussed and exemplified a new paradigm/model/method/system/environment – called ViewpointS – that represents our efforts to overcome many current existing limitations in generic Information Systems or search engines (e.g.: Google) as well as in other social media (e.g.: recommender systems) offering information retrieval solutions based on the proximity of available resources. We also have also exposed how ViewpointS may facilitate serendipitous discovery in an unprecedented way. In this paper, we wish to further motivate this last conjecture by proposing to explore two main research directions that did not convey sufficient attention by previous researchers (in particular those active in recommender systems): 1. assessing brain states in order to understand and forecast serendipitous human learning events triggered by emotions; 2. enhancing collective wisdom, since Human-Computer Interactions do not occur today between a human and a single machine (or algorithm), but within a community of humans and machines that continuously update “knowledge” beyond the scene. Both directions (assessment of brain states, collective wisdom) are currently on separate ways; we propose to combine them within one unified approach called ViewpointS.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    This paper has the objective to stimulate reflections about an ambitious, but equally modest and feasible, collaborative, large, long term research project for understanding, forecasting and stimulating serendipitous learning, i.e.: discovering, inventing, creating. At the same time we claim this project to be a concrete step towards digital sovereignty since it enables to personalize -thus control and trust- effectively the individual and collective information spaces, differently from current search engines, social networks and recommender systems.

  2. 2.

    From: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Learning: Humans learn before birth and continue until death as a consequence of ongoing interactions between people and their environment.

  3. 3.

    Rationalism and empiricism exist and balance each other since centuries in the philosophy of Science, as much as idealism and materialism. In the brain, logical thinking is associated to emotions; in Society it occurs probably the same. It is not rational to negate the interest of serendipitous events and the associated processes.

  4. 4.

    Margaret Boden is a major actor in the historical development of Artificial Intelligence.

  5. 5.

    This section is a revised, annotated version of the similar section of another paper. On purpose, we use the same very simple example in order to support quite different conjectures about the properties of ViewpointS; in this case serendipity.

  6. 6.

    This is obviously an extremely simplified tutoring system!

  7. 7.

    This is obviously an oversimplification: in the real prototype available, the KM is visualized and the notion of proximity (short path) is reified by real distances in the visualized graph. Another way to convey the same message without visualization is to give a list of answers in order of increasing distance. In this case the difference with Google’s answers is evident.

References

  1. Cerri, Stefano A., Lemoisson, P.: Tracing and enhancing serendipitous learning with viewpointS. BFAL 2017. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 10512, pp. 36–47. Springer, Cham (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-67615-9_3

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  2. Lemoisson, P., Surroca, G., Jonquet, C., Cerri, S.A.: ViewpointS: when social ranking meets the semantic web. In: FLAIRS 17 Conference Proceedings, Florida Artificial Intelligence Research Society Conference, North America, May 2017. https://www.aaai.org/ocs/index.php/FLAIRS/FLAIRS17/paper/view/15432. Accessed: 17 Aug 2020

  3. Lemoisson, P., Surroca, G., Jonquet, C., Cerri, S.A.: ViewPointS: capturing formal data and informal contributions into an evolutionary knowledge graph. Int. J. Knowl. Learn. 12(2), 119–145 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Edelman, G. M.: Neural Darwinism: The Theory of Neuronal Group Selection. Basic Books (1989)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Van Andel, P.: Serendipiteit: de paradox van de ongezochte vondst: ‘toevallige’ ontdekkingen, uitvindingen en creaties uit wetenschap, techniek en kunst, PhD thesis, Un. Groningen (1989), also published (in Dutch) as a book with Bert Andreae

    Google Scholar 

  6. Van Andel, P.: Anatomy of the unsought finding. serendipity: origin, history, domains, traditions, appearances, patterns and programmability. Br. J. Philos. Sci. 45(2), 631–648 (1994). Oxford University Press. http://www.jstor.org/stable/687687. (verified 8 March 2020)

  7. Corneli, J., et al.: Modelling serendipity in a computational context (2014). https://arxiv.org/abs/1411.0440. (Submitted on 3 Nov 2014 (v1), last revised 30 Aug 2019 (v7))

  8. Cerri, S.A., Loia, V., Maffioletti, S., Fontanesi, P., Bettinelli, A.: Serendipitous acquisition of web knowledge by agents in the context of Human Learning. In: THAI−ETIS, Varese, Italy; June 21−22, 1999, pp. 1–25 (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Toms, E.G.: Serendipitous information retrieval. In: Proceedings of the First {DELOS} Network of Excellence Workshop on Information Seeking, Searching and Querying in Digital Libraries, {DELOS} 2000, Zurich, Switzerland, December 11–12, 2000, ERCIM Workshop Proceedings, 01/W001, ERCIM (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Makri, S., Blandford, A.: Coming across information serendipitously - Part 1: a process model. J. Doc. 68(5), 684–705 (2012). http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/00220411211256030

  11. Makri, S., Tammera, T.M.: Serendipity in future digital information environments. In: Accidental Information Discovery, pp. 81–114. Chandos Publishing (2016). http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/B9781843347507000054. (verified 11 March 2020)

  12. Weigl, D.M., Emsley, I., Page, K.R.: Serendipity in context: prioritised contextual browsing in large-scale digital libraries. In: Proceedings of the Association for Information Science and Technology, vol. 55, 1, pp. 544–553 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1002/pra2.2018.14505501059. (verified 16 March 2020)

  13. Chirita, C.: Modelling serendipity in a service-oriented context. In: AISB Symposium (2017). http://ccg.doc.gold.ac.uk/serendipitysymposium/. (verified 11 March 2020)

  14. Kotkov, D., Veijalainen, J., Wang, S.: Challenges of serendipity in recommender systems. In: Majchrzak, T.A., Traverso, P., Monfort, V., Krempels, K.-H. (eds.) WEBIST 2016: Proceedings of the 12th International Conference on Web Information Systems and Technologies, vol. 2, pp. 251–256. SCITEPRESS, Setúbal (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  15. de Lima, A.P., Marques Peres, S.: Limits to Surprise in Recommender Systems. eprint = {1807.03905}, archivePrefix = {arXiv}, primaryClass = {cs.IR} (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Frasson, C., Kostopoulos, G.: Brain function assessment in learning. In: First International Conference, BFAL 2017, Patras, Greece, September 24–25, 2017, Proceedings. Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence, vol. 10512, pp. XV, 215. Springer International Publishing (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Lemoisson, P. and Cerri, S.A.: ViewpointS: a Collective Brain. This volume

    Google Scholar 

  18. Lemoisson, P., Rakotondrahaja, C.M.H., Andriamialison, A.S.P., Sankar, H.A., Cerri, S.A.: VWA: viewpoints web application to assess collective knowledge building. In: Nguyen, N.T., Chbeir, R., Exposito, E., Aniorté, P., Trawiński, B. (eds.) ICCCI 2019. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 11683, pp. 3–15. Springer, Cham (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-28377-3_1

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Stefano A. Cerri .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Cerri, S.A., Lemoisson, P. (2020). Serendipitous Learning Fostered by Brain State Assessment and Collective Wisdom. In: Frasson, C., Bamidis, P., Vlamos, P. (eds) Brain Function Assessment in Learning. BFAL 2020. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 12462. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-60735-7_14

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-60735-7_14

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-60734-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-60735-7

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics