Skip to main content

Potentializing on Haptic Feedback Mechanism for Developing Interactive Components for Driver Seat

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
HCI International 2020 – Late Breaking Papers: Digital Human Modeling and Ergonomics, Mobility and Intelligent Environments (HCII 2020)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNISA,volume 12429))

Included in the following conference series:

  • 1309 Accesses

Abstract

Semi-autonomous vehicles might be able to transport the driver autonomously on sections of a journey. However, the driver is required to take control occasionally between different levels of autonomy when needed to complete an end-to-end journey. The transitions between autonomy levels cause safety concerns, as the drivers might not be fully aware or focused on distracting situations, precisely when they are overwhelmed with audio/visual signals. The Poking Seat project aims at redefining the function of a driver seat, approaching an interface offering interactive haptic communications. Since the driver seat is in touch with most of the driver’s body, it seems to be capable of hosting haptic feedback mechanisms as an alternative for frequent audio/visual interactions. This article sheds light on what the haptic feedback mechanisms can add to the interaction between the driver and the car. The investigation starts with a literature review on topics that supports the theoretical dimensions of Poking Seat, such as human-computer interaction, ubiquitous computing, haptics and feedback mechanisms, and soft robotics. Following this literature review, a short report of Poking Seat is crafted with a focus on its multi-dimensional design-research process.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Ishii, H., Ullmer, B.: The grid: tangible bits: towards seamless interfaces between people, bits and atoms. In: Proceedings of CHI 1997, 22–27 March 1997

    Google Scholar 

  2. Fischer, G.: User modeling in human-computer interaction. User Model. User-Adap. Interact. 11, 65–86 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Hardenberg, Ch., Berard, F.: The grid: bare-hand human-computer interaction. In: PUI 2001, Orlando, FL USA (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Ishii, H., Lakatos, D., Bonanni, L., Labrune, J.: Radical Atoms: Beyond Tangible Bits, Toward Transformable Materials (2012). https://doi.org/10.1145/2065327.2065337

  5. Zuckerman, O., Gal-Oz, A.: To TUI or not to TUI: evaluating performance and preference in tangible vs. graphical user interfaces. Int. J. Hum.-Comput. Stud. 71, 803–820 (2013). http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhcs.2013.04.003

  6. British Educational Communications and technology agency. Http://www.becta.org.uk/research

  7. Weiser, M.: Some computer science issues in ubiquitous computing. Commun. ACM 36(7), 75–84 (1993)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Wiener, N.: Cybernetics: Or Control and Communication in the Animal and the Machine. Hermann, and MIT Press, Paris and Cambridge (1961 [1948])

    Google Scholar 

  9. Luli, C.: Information, communication, systems: cybernetic aesthetics in 1960s cultures. In: Kosc, G., Juncker, C., Monteith, S., Waldschmidt-Nelson, B. (eds.) The Transatlantic Sixties: Europe and the United States in the Counterculture. Transcript Verlag (2013). https://www.jstor.org/stable/j.ctv1wxt2b.12

  10. Fugiglando, U., Massaro, E., Santi, P., et al.: Driving behavior analysis through CAN bus data in an uncontrolled environment. IEEE Trans. Intell. Transp. Syst. 20(2), 737–748 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1109/TITS.2018.2836308

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. European Commission. Mobility and Transport: Road safety, Mobility and Transport: Road safety. http://ec.europa.eu/transport/roadsafety/indexen.html. Accessed 12 Oct 2015

  12. Ratti, C., Biderman, A., Greco, K.: Road Frustartion Index (RFI), MIT Senseable city lab in collaboration with Audi (2013). http://senseable.mit.edu/rfi/

  13. The Driver Alcohol Detection System for Safety (DADSS). https://www.rdmag.com/article/2017/08/promising-vehicle-tech-will-detect-drunk-drivers-they-hit-road. Accessed 16 Aug 2017

  14. Dai, J., Teng, J., Bai, X., Shen, Z., Xuan, D.: Mobile phone-based drunk driving detection. In: Proceedings of 4th International Conference on Pervasive Comput. Technol. Healthcare, pp. 1–8 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Ariza, V., Santís-Chaves, M.: Haptic interfaces: kinesthetic vs. tactile systems. Revista EIA 13(26), 13–29 (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Definition What does Haptic Interface mean? https://www.techopedia.com/definition/3638/haptic-interface

  17. Majidi, C.: Soft robotics: a perspective—current trends and prospects for the future. Soft Robot. 1(1), 5–11 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Rogóż, M., Zeng, H., Xuan, C., Wiersma, D., Wasylczyk, P.: Soft robotics: light-driven soft robot mimics caterpillar locomotion in natural scale (advanced optical materials 11/2016). Adv. Opt. Mater. 4(11), 1902 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Gaffary, Y., Lécuyer, A.: The use of haptic and tactile information in the car to improve driving safety: a review of current technologies. Front. ICT 5, 5 (2018). https://doi.org/10.3389/fict.2018.00005

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Scott, J.J., Gray, R.: A comparison of tactile, visual, and auditory warnings for rear-end collision prevention in simulated driving. Hum. Factors 50, 264–275 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1518/001872008X250674

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

Poking Seat is a project defined and developed by Tehran Urban Innovation Centre (TUIC), 2018, in principal collaboration with Soft Haptics and Robotics Lab at the Department of Mechanical Engineering, University College London (UCL). The detailed credit of the project is, as stated in the following:

Project Coordination: Nashid Nabian Academic Support: Helge Wurdemann, Bani Anvari Project Lead: Raha Ashrafi, Mahdi Najafi Design and Research: Sahar Asgari, Hoda Eskandar Nia, Mannan Ghanizadehgerayli, Mohammadreza Hedayati (part-time) The authors would like to especially thank Helge Wurdemann and Bani Anvari for their constant contribution to the project from the beginning.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mahdi Najafi .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Ghanizadehgrayli, M., Eskandar Nia, H., Asgari Tappeh, S., Najafi, M., Nabian, N. (2020). Potentializing on Haptic Feedback Mechanism for Developing Interactive Components for Driver Seat. In: Stephanidis, C., Duffy, V.G., Streitz, N., Konomi, S., Krömker, H. (eds) HCI International 2020 – Late Breaking Papers: Digital Human Modeling and Ergonomics, Mobility and Intelligent Environments. HCII 2020. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 12429. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-59987-4_7

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-59987-4_7

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-59986-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-59987-4

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics