Skip to main content

Social Autopoietic Systems

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Uninterrupted Knowledge Creation

Part of the book series: SpringerBriefs in Business ((BRIEFSBUSINESS))

Abstract

Niklas Luhmann developed an elaborate theory of social and cognitive systems, which combines Maturana and Varela’s notion of cognition with Husserlian phenomenology (Arnoldi 2006, p. 117). That is, Luhmann developed the idea of autopoiesis of social systems and recognized that this use of autopoiesis could be problematic (Luhmann 1986, p. 172). As humans are central elements of social systems, it follows that, to be considered as an autopoietic system, a social system must be self-reproducing in terms of humans (Bednarz 1988, p. 61). How could this be possible? Luhmann proposed a very intelligent solution to this paradox. He redefined social systems as being realized in a domain of communication. In other words, the constituent elements of a social system are communications. Therefore, the social system is understood as a network of communication that emerges over time (Nassehi 2005, p. 181). Subsequently, the conditions for autopoiesis have to be evaluated in terms of the self-production of communication (Teubner 1991, p. 235). In fact, Luhmann understands communication not as a diffusion of meaning or information from one person to another but as an autopoietic system that appears out of the doubly dependent meeting of subjects (Arnoldi 2006, p. 116). As a corollary, we can consider that Luhmann’s theory is an autopoietic theory of communication (Mingers 2010, p. 158).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Åkeström Andersen N (2003) The undecidability of decision. In: Bakken T, Hernes T (eds) Autopoietic organization theory: drawing on Niklas Luhmann’s social systems perspective. Abstract, Oslo, pp 235–258

    Google Scholar 

  • Allee V (1997) The knowledge evolution. Butterworth-Heinemann, Boston

    Google Scholar 

  • Argyris C (1993) Knowledge for action: a guide to overcoming barriers to organizational change. Jossey-Bass Publishers, San Francisco

    Google Scholar 

  • Arnoldi J (2006) Autopoiesis. Theory Cult Soc 23:2–3

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Astley WG, Zammuto RF (1992) Organization science, managers, and language games. Organ Sci 3:443–461

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bakken T, Hernes T (2002a) Autopoietic organization theory: drawing on Niklas Luhmann’s social systems perspective. Abstrakt, Liber, Copenhagen Business School, Copenhagen

    Google Scholar 

  • Bednarz J (1988) Autopoiesis: the organizational closure of social systems. Syst Res 5:57–64

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bickerton D (1993) Language and species. University of Chicago Press, Chicago

    Google Scholar 

  • Black M (1962) Models and metaphors. Cornell University Press, Ithaca

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Currie G, Brown AD (2003) A narratological approach to understanding processes of organizing in a UK hospital. Hum Relat 56(5):563–586

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Czarniawska B (1997) Narrating the organization: dramas of institutional identity. University of Chicago Press, Chicago

    Google Scholar 

  • Denning S (2001) The springboard: how storytelling ignites action in knowledge-era organizations. Butterworth Heinemann, Boston

    Google Scholar 

  • Easton G, Araujo L (1993) Language, metaphors and networks. Adv Int Mark 5:67–85

    Google Scholar 

  • Eisenberg EM (1984) Ambiguity as a strategy in organizational communication. Commun Monogr 51:227–242

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Giddens A (1990) The consequences of modernity. Polity Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Harnden R (1990) The languaging of models: the understanding and communication of models with particular reference to Stafford Beer’s cybernetic model of organization structure. Syst Pract 3(3):289–302

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harrison PR (1995) Niklas Luhmann and the theory of social systems. In: Roberts D (ed) Reconstructing theory: Gadamer, Habermas, Luhmann. Melbourne University Press, Victoria, pp 65–90

    Google Scholar 

  • Hernes T (2008) Understanding organization as process: theory for tangled world. Routledge, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Horrocks A, Callahan JL (2006) The role of emotion and narrative in the reciprocal construction of identity. Hum Resour Dev Int 9(1):69–83

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ingold T (1986) Evolution and social life. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Koskinen KU (2010a) Autopoietic knowledge systems in project-based companies. Palgrave Macmillan, Houndmills, Basingstoke, Hampshire

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Koskinen KU (2010b) Recursive view of the project-based companies’ knowledge management. J Knowl Manag 14(2):258–268

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Koskinen KU (2013) Knowledge production in organizations: a processual autopoietic view. Springer, Heidelberg

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Lakoff G, Johnson M (1980) Metaphors we live by. University of Chicago Press, Chicago

    Google Scholar 

  • Leroy F, Ramanantsoa B (1997) The cognitive and behavioral dimension of organizational learning in a merger: an empirical study. J Manag Stud 34(6):871–894

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Luhmann N (1984) Soziale Systeme. Suhrkamp, Frankfurt am Main

    Google Scholar 

  • Luhmann N (1986) The autopoiesis of social systems. In: Geyer F, van der Zouwen J (eds) Sociocybernetic paradoxes. Sage, Beverly Hills, pp 172–192

    Google Scholar 

  • Luhmann N (1988) The unity of the legal system. In: Teubner G (ed) Autopoietic law, a new approach to law and society. Walter de Gruyter, Berlin, pp 12–35

    Google Scholar 

  • Luhmann N (1990a) The autopoiesis of social systems. In: Luhmann N (ed) Essays of self-reference. Columbia University Press, New York, pp 1–20

    Google Scholar 

  • Luhmann N (1992) Die Wissenschaft der Gesellshaft. Suhrkamp, Frankfurt am Main

    Google Scholar 

  • Luhmann N (1993) Soziologische Aufklärung 3: Soziales System, Gesellschaht, Organisation. Westdeutscher Verlag, Opladen

    Google Scholar 

  • Luhmann N (1994) Die Wissenschaft der Gesellschaft. Suhrkamp, Frankfurt am Main

    Google Scholar 

  • Luhmann N (1995a) Gesellschaftsstruktur und Semantik 4: Studien zur Wissenssoziologie der modernen Gesellschhaht. Suhrkamp, Frankfurt am Main

    Google Scholar 

  • Luhmann N (1997) Die Gesellschaft der Gesellschaft. Suhrkamp, Franfurt am Main

    Google Scholar 

  • Luhmann N (2000) Organisation und Entscheidung. Westdeutscher Verlag, Opladen

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Maier GW, Prange C, von Rosenstiel L (2001) Psychological perspectives of organizational learning. In: Dierkes M, Berthoin Antal A, Child J, Nonaka I (eds) Handbook of organizational learning and knowledge. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 14–34

    Google Scholar 

  • Maturana HR (1970) Biology of cognition. In: Maturana HR, Varela FJ (eds) Autopoiesis and cognition: the realization of the living. Reidel, Dordrecht, pp 5–58

    Google Scholar 

  • Maturana HR (2002) Autopoiesis, structural coupling and cognition: a history of these and other notions in the biology of cognition. Cybern Human Knowing 9:5–34

    Google Scholar 

  • Maturana HR, Varela F (1980) Autopoiesis and cognition: the realization of the living. Reidel, Dordrecht

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Maurer K (2010) Communication and language in Niklas Luhmann’s systems-theory. www.fflch.usp.br/dlm/alemao/pandaemoniumgermanicum

  • Meyer AD (1984) Mingling decision making metaphors. Acad Manag Rev 9:6–17

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mingers J (1995) Self-producing systems: implications and applications of Autopoiesis. Plenum Press, New York

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Mingers J (2010) Realising systems thinking: knowledge and action in management science. Springer, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Mintzberg H, Waters JA (1990) Studying deciding: an exchange of views between Mintzberg and Waters, Pettirew, and Butler. Organ Stud 11:1–16

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morgan G (1996) Images of organization, 2nd edn. Sage, Thousand Oaks

    Google Scholar 

  • Nassehi A (2005) Organizations as a decision machines: Niklas Luhmann’s theory of organized social systems. In: Jones C, Munro R (eds) Contemporary organization theory. Blackwell Publishing, Oxford, pp 178–191

    Google Scholar 

  • Parkin M (2003) Tales for coaching. Kogan Page, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Pihlanto P (2005) From economic man to the holistic individual. A quest for a realistic notion of the human actor. In: Tengblad S, Solli R, Czarniawska B (eds) The art of science. Liber and Copenhagen Business School Press, Copenhagen, pp 87–110

    Google Scholar 

  • Pihlanto P (2009) Decision-maker in focus: holistic individual in the theater of consciousness. LAP LAMBERT Academic Publishing AG and Co. KG, Köln

    Google Scholar 

  • Reissman CK (1993) Narrative analysis. Sage, Newbury Park

    Google Scholar 

  • Rescher N (1996) Process metaphysics. An introduction to process philosophy. State University of New York Press, Albany

    Google Scholar 

  • Seidl D, Becker KH (2005) Niklas Luhmann and organization studies. Liber and Copenhagen Business School Press, Oslo

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor C (1985) Human agency and language: philosophical papers 1. Cambridge University Press, New York

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Teubner G (1991) Autopoiesis and steering: how politics profit from the normative surplus of capital. In: in’t Veld RJ, Schaap L, Terneer CJAM, van Twist MJW (eds) Autopoiesis and configuration theory: new approaches to social steering. Kluwer, Dordrecht, pp 127–134

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Tsoukas H (1991) The missing link: a transformational view of metaphors in organizational science. Acad Manag Rev 16(3):566–585

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Usher RS (1989) Locating experience in language: towards a poststructuralist theory of experience. Adult Educ Q 40(1):23–32

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Von Foerster H (2003) On constructing a reality. In: Understanding: essays on cybernetics and cognition. Springer, New York, pp 211–227

    Google Scholar 

  • Von Krogh G, Roos J (1995a) Organizational epistemology. St Martin’s Press, New York

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Von Krogh G, Roos J (1995b) Conversation management. Eur Manag J 13(4):390–394

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weick KE (1979) The social psychology of organizing. Random House, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Wittgenstein L (2009) Philosophical investigations. Wiley-Blackwell, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Ylijoki OH (2005) Academic nostalgia: a narrative approach to academic work. Hum Relat 58(5):555–575

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Koskinen, K.U., Breite, R. (2020). Social Autopoietic Systems. In: Uninterrupted Knowledge Creation. SpringerBriefs in Business. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-57303-4_7

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics