Skip to main content
Log in

The languaging of models: The understanding and communication of models with particular reference to Stafford Beer's cybernetic model of organization structure

  • Papers
  • Published:
Systems practice Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Scientific models are not descriptors nor are they pointers toward some neutral, objective reality, but are consensual conventions which enable particular understanding and coordination of activity in a community of observers. Impeccable communication of a model entails making visible this activeconsensual function, rather than simply pursuing a more detailed investigation of the phenomenon considered as the source or origin for the model.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Beer, S. (1966).Design and Control: The Meaning of Operational Research and Management Cybernetics, Wiley, Chichester.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beer, S. (1981).Brain of the Firm, ed. Wiley, Chichester.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beer, S. (1984). The viable system model: Its provenance, development, methodology and pathology,J. Oper. Res. Soc. 35 (1)7–25.

    Google Scholar 

  • Benedict, R. (1935).Patterns of Culture, Routledge, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buckminster Fuller, R. (1975).Synergetics, Macmillan, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Espejo, R, and Garcia, O. (1984). A tool for distributed planning.Proceedings Orwellian Symposium and International Conference on Systems Research, Information and Cybernetics, Baden Baden, West Germany.

    Google Scholar 

  • Espejo, R and Harnden, R. (1989). The VSM-an ongoing conversation. In Espejo, R., and Harnden, R. (eds.),The Viable System Model: Interpretations and Applications of Stafford Beer's VSM, Wiley, Chichester.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harnden, R. (1989a). Outside and then: An interpretative approach to the VSM. In Espejo, R., and Harnden, R. (eds.),The Viable System Model, Wiley, Chichester.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harnden, R. (1989b). Technology for Enabling: The Implications for Management Science of a Hermenautics of Distinction, Ph.D. thesis, The Management Centre, Aston University, Birmingham, U.K.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuhn, T. (1970).The Structure of Scientific Revolutions, Second Edition, Enlarged, University of Chicago Press, Chicago.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maturana, H. (1978). Biology of language: The Epistemology of reality, In Miller, G., and Lenneberg, E. (eds.),Psychology and Biology of Language and Thought-Essays in Honor of Eric Lenneberg, Academic Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maturana, H. (1988a). Reality: The search for objectivity or the quest for a compelling argu-ment.Irish Psychol. 9(1), 25–82.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maturana, H. (1988b). Ontology of observing: The biological foundations of self consciousness and the physical domain of existence, InConference workbook for “Texts in Cybernetic Theory,” an In Depth Exploration of the Thought of Humberto R. Maturana, William, T. Powers, and Ernst von Glasersfeld, American Society of Cybernetics, Felton, Calif. Oct. 18–23.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maturana, H., and Varela, F. (1980).Autopoieses and Cognition: The Realization of the Living, Reidel, Dordrecht.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maturana, H., and Varela, F. (1987).The Tree of Knowledge: The Biological Roots of Human Understanding, Shambhala, Boston.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rorty, R. (1980).Philosophy and the Mirror of Nature, Basil Blackwell, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Varela, F. (1989). Reflections on the circulation of concepts between a biology of cognition and systemic family therapy,Family Proc. 28(1), 15–24.

    Google Scholar 

  • Von Foerster, H. (1979). Cybernetics of cybernetics, In Krippendorff, K. (ed.),Communication and Control in Society, Gordon and Breach, New York.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

This paper is a result of research undertaken by the author while part of the Doctoral Programme at Aston Business School, Brimingham, U.K.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Harnden, R.J. The languaging of models: The understanding and communication of models with particular reference to Stafford Beer's cybernetic model of organization structure. Systems Practice 3, 289–302 (1990). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01062733

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01062733

Key words

Navigation