Skip to main content

Assessment of Governance Gaps in Landslide Risk Reduction—A Case Study from Kattippara Panchayath, Kozhikode District

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Proceedings of SECON 2020 (SECON 2020)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Civil Engineering ((LNCE,volume 97))

  • 711 Accesses

Abstract

Landslides are hazards which frequently occur and affect the life of human, animals and damage properties. Kattippara Panchayath is a highly landslide prone area in which landslides had occurred in different locations and public have been asked to stay away from this area. Currently there are no effective strategies to reduce the risks of landslides. A Geographic Information System has proved to be a useful tool for analysing and managing landslide related data. Landslide susceptibility map of the study area is prepared using Arc GIS software by combining some of the critical factors like land use pattern, geology, geomorphology etc. It can be used for assessing the risks of landslides, for developing early warning systems and mitigation plans. This paper seeks to identify the existing governance gaps in the study area, to ascertain the status of existing risk reduction measures available, the constraints associated with such measures, and thereby to suggest suitable measures to fill the identified gaps. This paper concludes with a synthesis of governance gaps and opportunities to reduce the risk of such disasters.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Kaya H, Cavu A, Baha S, Calık E, Disaster management and disaster preparedness: examples of practices in California and Turkey, pp 36–47

    Google Scholar 

  2. Government HA, Disaster Management Ministry of Home Affairs

    Google Scholar 

  3. Ninu Krishnan MV, Pratheesh P, Rejith PG, Vijith H (2015) Determining the suitability of two different statistical techniques in shallow landslide initiation susceptibility assessment in the western ghats. Environ Res Eng Manage 70(4):27–39

    Google Scholar 

  4. Trias APL, Lassa J, Surjan A (2019) Connecting the actors, discovering the ties: exploring disaster risk governance network in Asia and the Pacific. Int J Disaster Risk Reduct 33:217–228

    Google Scholar 

  5. Pardeshi SD, Autade SE, Pardeshi SS (2013) Landslide hazard assessment: recent trends and techniques, pp 1–11

    Google Scholar 

  6. Sachithanandan J (2015) Identification of potential landslide vulnerable zones of Wayanad district, Kerala using remote sensing and GIS identification of potential landslide vulnerable zones of Wayanad district, Kerala using remote sensing and GIS dissertation submitted to in, Sept 2015

    Google Scholar 

  7. Kuriakose SL, Muraleedharan C (2009) History of landslide susceptibility and a chorology of landslide-prone areas in the Western Ghats of Kerala, India, pp 1553–1568. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00254-008-1431-9

  8. Fell R, Corominas J, Bonnard C, Cascini L, Leroi E, Savage WZ (2008) Guidelines for landslide susceptibility, hazard and risk zoning for land use planning. Eng Geol 102(3–4):85–98

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Arkkelin D (2014) Using SPSS to understand research and data analysis

    Google Scholar 

  10. Rana R, Singhal R (2015) Chi-Square test and its application in hypothesis testing. J Pract Cardiovasc Sci 1(1):69–71. https://doi.org/10.4103/2395-5414.157577

  11. Sulal NL, Archana KG (2019) Note on post disaster studies for landslides occurred in June 2018 at Idukki District, Kerala, June 2018, pp 1–24

    Google Scholar 

  12. “Geo-Frontiers 2011 © ASCE 2011 3706,” pp 3706–3715, 2011

    Google Scholar 

  13. Sandholz S, Lange W, Nehren U (2018) Governing green change: ecosystem-based measures for reducing landslide risk in Rio de Janeiro. Int J Disaster Risk Reduct 32(June 2017):75–86

    Google Scholar 

  14. Raveendran S (2015) Landslide hazard zonation and vulnerability assessment of western ghats—a case study in Devikulam Taluk of Idukki District, Kerala. 5(6):185–190

    Google Scholar 

  15. Anbalagan R, Singh B (1996) Landslide hazard and risk assessment mapping of mountainous terrains—a case study from Kumaun Himalaya, India. Eng Geol 43(4):237–246. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0013-7952(96)00033-6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Choi KY, Cheung RWM (2013) Journal of rock mechanics and geotechnical landslide disaster prevention and mitigation through works in Hong Kong. Integr Med Res 5(5):354–365

    Google Scholar 

  17. Dai FC, Lee CF, Ngai YY (2002) Landslide risk assessment and management: an overview. Eng Geol 64(1):65–87

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Boulanger RW, Khosravifar A (2012) GeoCongress 2012 © ASCE 2012 3199, GeoCongress 2012, no 303, pp 3199–3208

    Google Scholar 

  19. Yin Y (2011) Recent catastrophic landslides and mitigation in China. J Rock Mech Geotech Eng 3(1):10–18. https://doi.org/10.3724/sp.j.1235.2011.00010

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Anderson MG, Holcombe E, Blake JR, Ghesquire F, Holm-Nielsen N, Fisseha T (2011) Reducing landslide risk in communities: evidence from the Eastern Caribbean. Appl Geography 31(2):590–599

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Beckenstein M (1971) System management, pp 354–356. https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctvbd8hx9.6

  22. Huang R, Li W (2011) Formation, distribution and risk control of landslides in China. J Rock Mech Geotech Eng 3(2):97–116

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Pilgrim NK (1999) Landslides, risk and decision-making in Kinnaur district: bridging the gap between science and public opinion. Disasters 23(1):45–65. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-7717.00104

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to K. Sreerekha .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Sreerekha, K., Jawahar Saud, S. (2021). Assessment of Governance Gaps in Landslide Risk Reduction—A Case Study from Kattippara Panchayath, Kozhikode District. In: Dasgupta, K., Sudheesh, T.K., Praseeda, K.I., Unni Kartha, G., Kavitha, P.E., Jawahar Saud, S. (eds) Proceedings of SECON 2020. SECON 2020. Lecture Notes in Civil Engineering, vol 97. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-55115-5_5

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-55115-5_5

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-55114-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-55115-5

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics