Skip to main content

Atypia of Undetermined Significance

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
The International System for Serous Fluid Cytopathology

Abstract

Atypia of undetermined significance (AUS) is a diagnostic category associated with a lower outcome of malignancy compared to the suspicious for malignancy (SFM) category in all reporting systems. This category includes cases with small numbers of cells that display some features of malignancy but that overlap with reactive changes. Processing artifact, degeneration, and inability to perform ancillary testing to further qualify atypical cells may result in assignment to this category. For peritoneal fluids, benign and borderline gynecologic tumor cells in fluid are also assigned to AUS, even once they are confirmed with ancillary studies, to categorically separate them from negative cases (without any tumor cells) and those that may be malignant. If the features closely approximate malignancy, SFM is the preferred category. In most cases, AUS is a category of last resort, and should be amended to a more specific category after ancillary testing.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 89.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Farahani SJ, Baloch Z. Are we ready to develop a tiered scheme for the effusion cytology? A comprehensive review and analysis of the literature. Diagn Cytopathol. 2019;47(11):1145–59.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Tabatabai ZL, Nayar R, Souers RJ, Crothers BA, Davey DD. Performance characteristics of body fluid cytology analysis of 344 380 responses from the College of American Pathologists Interlaboratory Comparison Program in Nongynecologic Cytopathology. Arch Pathol Lab Med. 2018;142(1):53–8.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Pambuccian SE. What is atypia? Use, misuse, and overuse of the term of atypia in diagnostic cytopathology. J Am Soc Cytopathol. 2015;4(1):44–52.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Wojcik EM. What should not be reported as atypia in urine cytology? J Am Soc Cytopathol. 2015;4(1):30–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Barkan GA, Wojcik EM, Pambuccian SE. A tale of atypia: what can we learn from this? Cancer Cytopathol. 2018;126(6):376–80.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Sundling KE, Cibas ES. Ancillary studies in pleural, pericardial, and peritoneal effusion cytology. Cancer Cytopathol. 2018;126(Suppl8):590–8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Raab SS. Significance of atypical cells in cytologic serous fluid specimens. Am J Clin Pathol. 1999;111(1):11–3.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Vielh, P., Gerhard, R., Lozano, M., Suciu, V. (2020). Atypia of Undetermined Significance. In: Chandra, A., Crothers, B., Kurtycz, D., Schmitt, F. (eds) The International System for Serous Fluid Cytopathology. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-53908-5_4

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-53908-5_4

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-53907-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-53908-5

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics