Skip to main content

Language Background Profiling at Canadian Elementary Schools and Dominant Language Constellations

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Dominant Language Constellations

Part of the book series: Educational Linguistics ((EDUL,volume 47))

Abstract

In a global world of unprecedented migrations and superdiversity, awareness and encouragement of bilingual and multilingual practices are also on the rise. In many contexts, children’s language repertoires can be varied and complex and the notion of a Dominant Language Constellation, a core set of languages highly relevant in an individual’s daily life, can apply from an early age. This chapter focuses on language background profiling at elementary schools in Canada. Such profiling is typically done at initial school entry to inform schools as well as larger regional and provincial educational authorities about the potential diversity, use of and proficiency in different languages by the incoming cohorts (and their families). School registration forms thus typically include questions about children’s first, home, primary, additional, etc. languages. The formulations, number, and combinations of questions may vary to a large degree from one school district to another, and also from province to province. Analysis of such questions can be revealing in terms of educational and societal assumptions and orientations to bi/multilingualism, and in terms of general views of language. I offer a discussion of the notion of a native speaker and certain monolingual norms that ensue from it and can be seen in language background profiling practices at schools. Then, building on previous work and incorporating new data, I provide a general summary of the questions used in a large sample of registration forms from various schools and boards in five Canadian provinces. I situate these within the context of recent multilingual frameworks such as plurilingualism, multicompetence and translanguaging, and then focus specifically on the notion of a Dominant Language Constellation, arguing that its premises may entail benefits for the conceptualization of language background profiling.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. 1.

    Bilingualism in census questionnaires is operationalized as the ability to conduct a conversation in both English and French.

  2. 2.

    Note that the term non-official language can be problematic as it may imply lesser value associated with languages spoken by Indigenous people and immigrants in Canada. I use the terms official and non-official as reported by Statistics Canada while also emphasizing the view that all languages are valuable regardless of legal status.

  3. 3.

    This research does not focus on private schools, which also exist in various forms across the country.

  4. 4.

    Data from francophone school boards in Quebec and in other Canadian provinces is currently being analyzed and will be reported in future publications.

  5. 5.

    Sometimes single schools may also have their individual registration forms, which contributes to even greater variation in profiling questions in a province.

  6. 6.

    Note that even though categories 7 and 11 both refer to ESL, the former focuses on previous instruction received while the latter refers to legal eligibility for ESL support. As such they were kept separate. Also note that questions from categories 10 and 11, whose purpose is to determine legal eligibility for francophone education or ESL support, often asked about the student’s first language or primary (home) language, etc. Even though such questions are of primary interest in this article, they were not collected for the purpose of language profiling but for eligibility determinations, and as such are not included in the analysis, as mentioned above. This is only a technical point since the forms also repeated those questions in a separate section not related to legal eligibility criteria, and in that case such questions were incorporated into categories 1–5, as appropriate.

  7. 7.

    Recall that the data from Prince Edward Island, the smallest Canadian province, is based only on one registration form that covers the schools for the English school board. As such, it is useful to keep in mind that the percentages generated in Fig. 7.1 are based on a single question in category three and category five. Nonetheless, the data are important as they represent an entire educational provincial authority, albeit in a small province.

  8. 8.

    It is worth noting that since this data were first collected, some forms in Ontario have changed and currently allow up to three first languages to be listed. This suggests a welcome change in progress from monolingual to multilingual norms and warrants further investigation and potential reanalysis in future work.

References

  • Aronin, L. (2006). Dominant language constellations: An approach to multilingualism studies. In M. Ó Laoire (Ed.), Multilingualism in educational settings (pp. 140–159). Hohengehren: Schneider Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aronin, L. (2016). Multicompetence and dominant language constellation. In V. Cook & L. Wei (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of linguistic multicompetence (pp. 142–163). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Aronin, L. (2019). Dominant language constellation as a method of research. In E. Vetter & U. Jessner (Eds.), International research on multilingualism breaking with the monolingual perspective (pp.13–26). Cham: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bailey, A. L., & Kelly, K. R. (2013). Home language survey practices in the initial identification of English learners in the United States. Educational Policy, 27(5), 770–804.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bloomfield, L. (1933). Language. New York: Holt, Rinehart, & Winston.

    Google Scholar 

  • Canagarajah, S. (2007). Lingua Franca English, multilingual communities, and language acquisition. Modern Language Journal, 91(5), 921–937.

    Google Scholar 

  • Canagarajah, S. (2009). The plurilingual tradition and the English language in South Asia. AILA Review, 22(1), 5–22.

    Google Scholar 

  • Canagarajah, S. (2016). Crossing borders, addressing diversity. Language Teaching, 49(3), 438–454. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0261444816000069.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chomsky, N. (1957). Syntactic structures. The Hague: Mouton.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Cook, V. J. (1991). The poverty-of-the-stimulus argument and multicompetence. Second Language Research, 7(2), 103–117.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cook, V. (1999). Going beyond the native speaker in language teaching. TESOL Quarterly, 33(2), 185–209.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cook, V. J. (2013). Multi-competence. In C. A. Chapelle (Ed.), The encyclopedia of applied linguistics (pp. 3768–3774). New York: Wiley-Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coste, D., & Simon, D.-L. (2009). The plurilingual social actor: Language, citizenship and education. International Journal of Multilingualism, 6, 168–185. https://doi.org/10.1080/14790710902846723.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coste, D., Moore, D., & Zarate, G. (1997). Competence plurilingue et pluriculturelle. Vers un cadre europeen commun de reference pour l’enseignement et l’apprentissage des langues vivantes: Etudes preparatoires [Plurilingual and pluricultural competence. Toward a common European reference framework for teaching and learning living languages: Preparatory studies]. Strasbourg: Editions du Conseil de l’Europe.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coste, D., Moore, D., & Zarate, G. (2009). Plurilingual and pluricultural competence. Strasbourg: Council of Europe. Retrieved from www.coe.int/t/dg4/linguistic/publications_en.asp?toprint=yes&-40

  • Council of Europe. (2001). The common European framework of reference for languages. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Curdt-Christiansen, X. L. (2013). Family language policy: Sociopolitical reality versus linguistic continuity. Language Policy, 12(1), 1–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dagenais, D., & Moore, D. (2008). Représentations des littératies plurilingues, de l’immersion en français et des dynamiques identitaires chez des parents en chinois. Revue canadienne des langues vivantes, 65(1), 11–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davies, A. (1991). The native speaker in applied linguistics. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • De Houwer, A. (2009). Bilingual first language acquisition. Tonawanda: Multilingual Matters.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • García, O. (2009). Bilingual education in the 21st century: A global perspective. Malden: Basil/Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • García, O., Ibarra Johnson, S., & Seltzer, J. (2017). The translanguaging classroom: Leveraging student bilingualism for learning. Philadelphia: Caslon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kachru, B. B. (1983). The Indianization of english: The english language in India. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kachru, Y., & Smith, L. E. (2008). Cultures, contexts, and world englishes. New York: Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • King, K. A., & Fogle, L. W. (2013). Family language policy and bilingual parenting. Language Teaching, 46(2), 1–13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • King, K. A., Fogle, L., & Logan-Terry, A. (2008). Family language policy. Language and Linguistics Compass, 2(5), 907–922.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lewis, G., Jones, B., & Baker, C. (2012). Translanguaging: Origins and development from school to street and beyond. Educational Research and Evaluation, 18(7), 641–654.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marshall, S., & Moore, D. (2013). 2B or not 2B plurilingual? Navigating languages literacies, and plurilingual competence in postsecondary education in Canada. TESOL Quarterly, 47(3), 472–499.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ontario Ministry of Education. (2016). The Kindergarten program. Retrieved from: https://files.ontario.ca/books/edu_the_kindergarten_program_english_aoda_web_oct7.pdf

  • Ontario Ministry of Education. (2017). Education facts: Schools and school boards, 2015–16. Retrieved from: http://www.edu.gov.on.ca/eng/educationFacts.html

  • Paikeday, T. (1985). The native speaker is dead! Toronto: Paikeday Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Phillipson, R. (1992). Linguistic imperialism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rampton, M. B. H. (1990). Displacing the “native speaker”: Expertise, affiliation, and inheritance. ELT Journal, 44(2), 97–101. https://doi.org/10.1093/eltj/44.2.97.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Slavkov, N. (2016). Search of the right questions: Language background profiling at Ontario public schools. The Canadian Journal of Applied Linguistics, 19(1), 22–45.

    Google Scholar 

  • Slavkov, N. (2018). What is your ‘first’ language in bilingual Canada? A study of language background profiling at publicly funded elementary schools across three provinces. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism, 21(1), 20–37.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Statistics Canada. (2017a) Census in brief: Linguistic diversity and multilingualism in Canadian homes. Retrieved from http://www12.statcan.gc.ca/census-recensement/2016/as-sa/98-200-x/2016010/98-200-x2016010-eng.cfm

  • Statistics Canada. (2017b). Census in brief: English-French bilingualism reaches new heights. Retrieved from http://www12.statcan.gc.ca/census-recensement/2016/as-sa/98-200-x/2016009/98-200-x2016009-eng.cfm

  • Taylor, S. K., & Snoddon, K. (2013). Plurilingualism in TESOL: Promising controversies. TESOL Quarterly, 47(3), 439–445.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wernicke, M. (2017a). Navigating native-speaker ideologies as FSL teacher. Canadian Modern Language Review, 73(2), 208–369.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wernicke, M. (2017b, November 22). The native speaker in L2 education: What is the impact on teacher identity? Paper presented in the Educlang Seminar Series, Faculty of Education, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON, Canada.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams, C. (1994). Arfarniad o ddulliau dysgu ac addysgu yng nghyd-destun addysg uwchradd ddwyieithog [An evaluation of teaching and learning methods in the context of bilingual secondary education]. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Wales, Bangor.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams, C. (2002). A language gained: A study of language immersion at 11–16 years of age. Bangor: University of Wales Bangor, School of Education.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This research has received funding from the Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada (Insight Development Grant # 430-2017-00558) and from the University of Ottawa. Many thanks are due to the following students for assistance with data collection: Stephanie Krulicki, Xiaoyang Zhang, Stephanie Marshall, and Linlan Zhang.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Nikolay Slavkov .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Slavkov, N. (2020). Language Background Profiling at Canadian Elementary Schools and Dominant Language Constellations. In: Lo Bianco, J., Aronin, L. (eds) Dominant Language Constellations. Educational Linguistics, vol 47. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-52336-7_7

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-52336-7_7

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-52335-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-52336-7

  • eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics