Abstract
Learner models maintain representations of students’ cognitive, metacognitive, affective, personality, social and perceptual skills. This information can be used to adapt the adaptive instructional system’s interactions with the student. Our work on caring assessments has provided us with an opportunity to explore learner modelling issues applied to assessment. This paper elaborates on issues such as the nature of the learner model, types of student emotions in assessment and opportunities for adaptations, and the role of individual differences in student characteristics that could inform an expanded learner model to support fine-tuned adjustments to assessment tasks. Other issues discussed include using cognitive and affective information to implement adaptations, as well as implications for reporting systems and open learner models, supporting student access to these systems, and data privacy and data security challenges.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Shute, V.J., Zapata-Rivera, D.: Adaptive educational systems. In: Durlach, P. (ed.) Adaptive Technologies for Training and Education, pp. 7–27. Cambridge University Press, New York (2012)
Abyaa, A., Khalidi Idrissi, M., Bennani, S.: Learner modelling: systematic review of the literature from the last 5 years. Educ. Technol. Res. Dev. 67(5), 1105–1143 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-018-09644-1
Chrysafiadi, K., Virvou, M.: Student modeling approaches: a literature review for the last decade. Expert Syst. Appl. 40(11), 4715–4729 (2013)
Zapata-Rivera, D.: Toward caring assessment systems. In: Tkalcic, M., Thakker, D., Germanakos, P., Yacef, K., Paris, C., Santos, O. (eds.) Proceedings of Adjunct User Modeling, Adaptation and Personalization Conference, New York, pp. 97–100 (2017)
Zapata-Rivera, D., Jackson, T., Katz, I.R.: Authoring conversation-based assessment scenarios. Des. Recomm. Intell. Tutor. Syst. 3, 169–178 (2015)
Zapata-Rivera, D., Lehman, B., Sparks, J.R., Por, H.-H., James, K.: Identifying and addressing unexpected responses in conversation-based assessments (Research Memorandum No. RM-18-13). Educational Testing Service, Princeton (2018)
Lehman, B., Zapata-Rivera, D.: Student emotions in conversation-based assessments. IEEE Trans. Learn. Technol. 11(1), 1–13 (2018)
Sparks, R., Zapata-Rivera, D., Lehman, B., James, K., Steinberg, J.: Simulated dialogues with virtual agents: effects of agent features in conversation-based assessments. In: Penstein Rosé, C., et al. (eds.) AIED 2018. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 10948, pp. 469–474. Springer, Cham (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-93846-2_88
Sparks, J.R., Peters, S., Steinberg, J., James, K., Lehman, B.A., Zapata-Rivera, D.: Individual difference measures that predict performance on conversation-based assessments of science inquiry skills. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Toronto, Canada (2019)
Zapata-Rivera, D., Vassileva, J.: Exploring opportunities for caring assessments. In: Guin, N., Kumar, A. (eds.) Exploring Opportunities for Caring Assessments Workshop at the Intelligent Tutoring Systems Conference, pp. 81–84 (2018)
Bull, S., Kay, J.: Open learner models. In: Nkambou, R., Bourdeau, J., Mizoguchi, R. (eds.) Advances In Intelligent Tutoring Systems. Studies in computational intelligence, vol. 308, pp. 301–322. Springer, Berlin (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-14363-2_15
Hansen, H.G., Zapata-Rivera, D., White, J.: Framework for the design of accessible intelligent tutoring systems. In: Craig, S.D. (ed.) Tutoring and Intelligent Tutoring Systems, pp. 69–101. Nova Science Publishers, New York (2018)
Verschelden, C.: Bandwidth Recovery: Helping Students Reclaim Cognitive Resources Lost To Poverty, Racism, and Social Marginalization. Stylus, Sterling (2017)
Mislevy, R.J., et al.: On the structure of educational assessments. Measur.: Interdisc. Res. Perspect. 1(1), 3–62 (2003)
Zapata-Rivera, D., Hansen, E., Shute, V.J., Underwood, J.S., Bauer, M.: Evidence-based approach to interacting with open student models. Int. J. Artif. Intell. Educ. 17(3), 273–303 (2007)
Wise, S.L., et al.: Taking the time to improve the validity of low-stakes Tests: the effort-monitoring CBT. Educ. Meas.: Issues Pract. 25(2), 21–30 (2006)
Lehman, B., Jackson, G.T., Forsyth, C.: A (mis)match analysis: examining the alignment between test-taker performance in conventional and game-based assessments. J. Appl. Test. Technol. 20, 17–34 (2019)
Wise, S.L., DeMars, C.E.: An application of item response time: the effort-moderated IRT model. J. Educ. Meas. 43(1), 19–38 (2006)
Zapata-Rivera, D., Liu, L., Chen, L., Hao, J., von Davier, A.A.: Assessing science inquiry skills in an immersive, conversation-based scenario. In: Kei Daniel, B. (ed.) Big Data and Learning Analytics in Higher Education, pp. 237–252. Springer, Cham (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-06520-5_14
Malekzadeh, M., Mustafa, M.B., Lahsasna, A.: A review of emotion regulation in intelligent tutoring systems. Educ. Technol. Soc. 18(4), 435–445 (2015)
D’Mello, S.: A selective meta-analysis on the relative incidence of discrete affective states during learning with technology. J. Educ. Psychol. 105(4), 1082–1099 (2013)
Zeidner, M.: Test Anxiety: the State of the Art. Plenum Press, New York (1998)
Pekrun, R., Goetz, T., Perry, R.P., Kramer, K., Hochstadt, M., Molfenter, S.: Beyond test anxiety: development and validation of the test emotions questionnaire (TEQ). Anxiety Stress Coping 17(3), 287–316 (2004)
Pekrun, R.: The control-value theory of achievement emotions: assumptions, corollaries, and implications for educational research and practice. Educ. Psychol. Rev. 18, 315–341 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-006-9029-9
Lehman, B., Kinsey, D.M., Finn, B.: How do test-takers perceive leveling in scenario-based tasks? An initial exploration. In: The Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, San Francisco, CA (2020, accepted)
Aghaei Pour, P., Hussain, M.S., AlZoubi, O., D’Mello, S., Calvo, R.A.: The impact of system feedback on learners’ affective and physiological states. In: Aleven, V., Kay, J., Mostow, J. (eds.) ITS 2010. LNCS, vol. 6094, pp. 264–273. Springer, Heidelberg (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-13388-6_31
Lehman, B., Sparks, J.R., Zapata-Rivera, D.: When should adaptive assessments care? In: Guin, N., Kumar, A. (eds.) Exploring Opportunities for Caring Assessments Workshop at the Intelligent Tutoring Systems Conference, pp. 87–94 (2018)
Du Bolay, B., Avramides, K., Luckin, R., MartĂnez-MirĂłn, E., MĂ©ndez, G.R., Carr, A.: Towards systems that care: a conceptual framework based on motivation, metacognition, and affect. Int. J. Artif. Intell. Educ. 20(3), 197–229 (2010)
Self, J.: The defining characteristics of intelligent tutoring systems research: ITSs care, precisely. Int. J. Artif. Intell. Educ. 10, 350–364 (1999)
Anthony, J., Qureshi, F., Horvath, S., Bertling, J.P.: Key contextual factors for science achievement [Internal Memorandum]. Educational Testing Service, Princeton (2016)
Braun, H., Coley, R., Jia, Y., Trapani, C.: Exploring what works in science instruction: a look at the eighth-grade science classroom. ETS Policy Information Report. ETS, Princeton (2009)
Duckworth, A.L., Peterson, C., Matthews, M.D., Kelly, D.R.: Grit: perseverance and passion for long-term goals. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 92(6), 1087–1101 (2007)
Dweck, C.S.: Mindset: The New Psychology of Success. Ballantine Books, New York (2006)
Richardson, M., Abraham, C., Bond, R.: Psychological correlates of university students’ academic performance: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Psychol. Bull. 138, 353–387 (2012)
Schneider, M., Preckel, F.: Variables associated with achievement in higher education: a systematic review of meta-analyses. Psychol. Bull. 143(6), 565–600 (2017)
Yaeger, D.S., et al.: Using design thinking to improve psychological interventions: the case of the growth mindset during the transition to high school. J. Educ. Psychol. 108(3), 374–391 (2016)
Sparks, J.R., Steinberg, J., Castellano, K., Lehman, B., Zapata-Rivera, D.: Generating individual difference profiles via cluster analysis: toward caring assessments for science. Paper to be presented at the Annual Meeting of the National Council for Measurement in Education, San Francisco, CA (2020)
Denaux, R., Dimitrova, V., Aroyo, L.: Integrating open user modeling and learning content management for the semantic web. In: Ardissono, L., Brna, P., Mitrovic, A. (eds.) UM 2005. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 3538, pp. 9–18. Springer, Heidelberg (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/11527886_4
Zapata-Rivera, J.D., Katz, I.R.: Keeping your audience in mind: applying audience analysis to the design of interactive score reports. Assess. Educ. Princ. Policy Pract. 21, 442–463 (2014)
Zapata-Rivera, D., et al.: Designing and evaluating reporting systems in the context of new assessments. In: Schmorrow, D.D., Fidopiastis, C.M. (eds.) AC 2018. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 10916, pp. 143–153. Springer, Cham (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-91467-1_12
Hegarty, M.: Advances in cognitive science and information visualization. In: Zapata-Rivera, D. (ed.) Score Reporting Research and Applications. Routledge, New York (2018)
General Data Protection Regulation. Art. 22 GDPR. Automated individual decision-making, including profiling. https://gdpr-info.eu/art-22-gdpr/. Accessed 15 Jan 2020
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this paper
Cite this paper
Zapata-Rivera, D., Lehman, B., Sparks, J.R. (2020). Learner Modeling in the Context of Caring Assessments. In: Sottilare, R.A., Schwarz, J. (eds) Adaptive Instructional Systems. HCII 2020. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 12214. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-50788-6_31
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-50788-6_31
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-50787-9
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-50788-6
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)