Skip to main content

Research on Safety Risk Management Programme, Procedures and Standards in Aircraft Design and Manufacture Organizations Based on Multi-management Systems Integration

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
HCI International 2020 - Posters (HCII 2020)

Part of the book series: Communications in Computer and Information Science ((CCIS,volume 1226))

Included in the following conference series:

  • 2229 Accesses

Abstract

This paper studies the theoretical background and methods of SMS and other management systems of aircraft design and manufacturing organizations, analyzes the similarities and differences between SMS, DAS, QS and CAS. And the SRM programme is developed based on multi-system integration and the requirements of ICAO Annex 19. This paper also constructs the document system of SRM based on the programme, including procedures of system and work analysis, hazards identification, risk assessment and control, and safety risk assessment standards. This study is of great practice value for construction and implementation of SRM in aircraft design and manufacturing organizations, and will promote the integration of multiple management systems in these organizations.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. ICAO: Annex 19 Safety Management. International Civil Aviation Organization, Montreal, Canada, July 2016

    Google Scholar 

  2. ICAO: Annex 8 Airworthiness of Aircraft. International Civil Aviation Organization, Montreal, Canada, July 2018

    Google Scholar 

  3. CAAC: CCAR 21 Certification Procedures for Products and Parts. Civil Aviation Administration of China, Beijing, China, May 2017

    Google Scholar 

  4. ICAO.Doc.9859 Safety Management Manual. International Civil Aviation Organization, Montreal, Canada (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Li, S., He, P., Lu, Y., Li, J.: Difference analysis between safety management system and airworthiness management system in civil aircraft design and manufacture organization. In: The 5th International Symposium on Knowledge Acquisition and Modeling, London, UK, June 2015, pp. 15–20 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Wolf, H.: The emerging role of safety management systems in aerospace. In: IEEE Aerospace Conference Proceedings, March 2012, pp. 1–11 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Stolzer, A.J., Halford, C.D., Goglia, J.J.: Implementing Safety Management Systems in Aviation. Ashgate Publications (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Stolzer, A.J.: Collegiate aviation maintenance programs: focus on quality or safety? J. Aviat. Aerosp. Educ. Res. 9(2), 3 (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  9. CAAC: AC-21-AA-2013-19 The Requirements for Continuous Airworthiness System of Type Certificate Holder. Civil Aviation Administration of China, Beijing, China, September 2013

    Google Scholar 

  10. IAQG: AS9100D Quality Management System-Requirements for Aviation, Space, and Defense organization. International Aerospace Quality Group, September 2016

    Google Scholar 

  11. AIA: NAS9927 Safety Management System Practice for Design and Manufacturing. Aerospace Industries Association of America (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Sun, Y., Zhang, Y., Li, J.: Study on programme of risk management in aircraft design and manufacture organization. J. Saf. Sci. Technol. 12(8), 132–137 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Yi, W.E.I., Xin-feng, C.H.E.N.: Research of safety risk evaluation for service difficulty report. J. Civ. Aviat. Univ. China 2(5), 42–46 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Werfelman, L.: A New Way to Measure. https://flightsafety.org/asw-article/a-new-way-to-measure/, September 2018

  15. FSF: NTSB Urges Changes in Aircraft Design Assessments. https://flightsafety.org/ntsb-urges-changes-in-aircraft-design-assessments/, September 2019

  16. Chen, J.: Research on Integrated Reengineering of Quality Management System and Safety Management System for Civil Aircraft Test. Shanghai Jiao tong University, June 2014

    Google Scholar 

  17. SAE: ARP4761 Guidelines and Methods for Conducting the Safety Assessment Process on Civil Airborne Systems and Equipment. Society of Automotive Engineers, December 1996

    Google Scholar 

  18. Ericson, C.A.: Hazard Analysis Technique for System Safety. Wiley, Fredericksburg (2005)

    Book  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mei Rong .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Rong, M., Liu, Y., Jiang, W. (2020). Research on Safety Risk Management Programme, Procedures and Standards in Aircraft Design and Manufacture Organizations Based on Multi-management Systems Integration. In: Stephanidis, C., Antona, M. (eds) HCI International 2020 - Posters. HCII 2020. Communications in Computer and Information Science, vol 1226. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-50732-9_59

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-50732-9_59

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-50731-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-50732-9

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics