Abstract
The possibility to engage in so-called non-driving related activities (NDRAs) is an important benefit of automated driving. However, in the beginning, automated driving functions will be limited to certain sections of a drive, e.g., to highways or less complex city infrastructure. In order to efficiently engage in NDRAs, planning of a trip with regard to the availability of automated driving will become important. Yet, there are no approaches to incorporate the user in the trip planning process. Thus, we have performed scenario-based design approach and a participatory design workshop to derive user requirements for a trip planning human-machine interface (HMI). Amongst others, participants required having the ability to configure general travel profiles, e.g., on-time arrival or maximization of uninterrupted automated driving time. Moreover, the system should provide the user with a comparison of key data on various route options, such as an overview of available levels of driving automation and arrival times. Within this work, a low-fidelity prototype for such an HMI was developed based on derived requirements. For future development, this prototype needs further improvement and evaluation.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
References
SAE International: J3016. Taxonomy and Definitions for Terms Related to Driving Automation Systems for On-Road Motor Vehicles (2018)
König, M., Neumayr, L.: Users’ resistance towards radical innovations. The case of the self-driving car. Transp. Res. Part F Traff. Psychol. Behav. (2017). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trf.2016.10.013
Susilo, Y., Lyons, G., Jain, J., Atkins, S.: Rail passengers’ time use and utility assessment. Transp. Res. Rec. (2013). https://doi.org/10.3141/2323-12
Naujoks, F., Wiedemann, K., Schoemig, N.: The importance of interruption management for usefulness and acceptance of automated driving. In: Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Automotive User Interfaces and Interactive Vehicular Applications, Oldenburg, Germany (2017). https://doi.org/10.1145/3122986.3123000
Pfleging, B., Rang, M., Broy, N.: Investigating user needs for non-driving-related activities during automated driving. In: Alt, F. (ed.) Proceedings of the 15th International Conference on Mobile and Ubiquitous Multimedia (MUM). International Conference on Mobile and Ubiquitous Multimedia (MUM), Rovaniemi, Finland, 12–15 December 2016, pp. 91–99. The Association for Computing Machinery, Inc, New York (2016). https://doi.org/10.1145/3012709.3012735
Hecht, T., Feldhütter, A., Draeger, K., Bengler, K.: What do you do? An analysis of non-driving related activities during a 60 minutes conditionally automated highway drive. In: Ahram, T., Taiar, R., Colson, S., Choplin, A. (eds.) Human Interaction and Emerging Technologies. Proceedings of the 1st International Conference on Human Interaction and Emerging Technologies (IHIET 2019). Human Interaction and Emerging Technologies (IHIET 2019), Nice, 22–24 August 2019, pp. 28–34. Springer, Cham (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-25629-6_5
Janssen, C.P., Iqbal, S.T., Kun, A.L., Donker, S.F.: Interrupted by my car? Implications of interruption and interleaving research for automated vehicles. Int. J. Hum Comput Stud. (2019). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhcs.2019.07.004
Holländer, K., Pfleging, B.: Preparing drivers for planned control transitions in automated cars. In: Abdennadher, S., Alt, F. (eds.) MUM 2018. 17th International Conference on Mobile and Ubiquitous Multimedia. Proceedings, Cairo, Egypt, 25–28 November 2018. The 17th International Conference, Cairo, Egypt, 25–28 November 2018, pp. 83–92. The Association for Computing Machinery, Inc., New York (2018). https://doi.org/10.1145/3282894.3282928
Richardson, N.T., Flohr, L., Michel, B.: Takeover requests in highly automated truck driving. How do the amount and type of additional information influence the driver–automation interaction? MTI (2018). https://doi.org/10.3390/mti2040068
Wandtner, B., Schömig, N., Schmidt, G.: Secondary task engagement and disengagement in the context of highly automated driving. Transp. Res. Part F Traff. Psychol. Behav. (2018). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trf.2018.06.001
Hecht, T., Darlagiannis, E., Bengler, K.: Non-driving related activities in automated driving – an online survey investigating user needs. In: Ahram, T., Karwowski, W., Pickl, S., Taiar, R. (eds.) IHSED 2019. AISC, vol. 1026, pp. 182–188. Springer, Cham (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-27928-8_28
Naujoks, F., Purucker, C., Neukum, A.: Secondary task engagement and vehicle automation – comparing the effects of different automation levels in an on-road experiment. Transp. Res. Part F Traff. Psychol. Behav. (2016). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trf.2016.01.011
Hecht, T., Kratzert, S., Bengler, K.: The effects of a predictive HMI and different transition frequencies on acceptance, workload, usability, and gaze behavior during urban automated driving. Information (2020). https://doi.org/10.3390/info11020073
DIN Deutsches Institut für Normung e.V.: Ergonomics of human-system interaction - Part 210: Human-centred design for interactive systems (DIN EN ISO 9241-210) (2010)
Rosson, M.B., Carroll, J.M., Hill, N.: Usability Engineering. Scenario-Based Development of Human-Computer Interaction. Morgan Kaufmann, San Francisco (2002)
Balsamiq Wireframes Home. Balsamiq Studios, LLC (2020)
Nielsen, J., Molich, R.: Heuristic evaluation of user interfaces. In: Chew, J.C., Carrasco, J.C., Carrasco Chew, J. (eds.) Empowering People. CHI ‘90 Conference Proceedings. The SIGCHI Conference, Seattle, Washington, United States, 1–5 Apr 1990, pp. 249–256. Addison-Wesley, Reading (1992). https://doi.org/10.1145/97243.97281
Volkswagen: Discover Premium (2020). https://webspecial.volkswagen.de/vwinfotainment/de/de/index/infotainment-systeme#/?detail=0e6ebf85-4c68-4218-82ad-a64eadf8e3c4. Accessed 18 Mar 2020
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this paper
Cite this paper
Hecht, T., Sievers, M., Bengler, K. (2020). Investigating User Needs for Trip Planning with Limited Availability of Automated Driving Functions. In: Stephanidis, C., Antona, M. (eds) HCI International 2020 - Posters. HCII 2020. Communications in Computer and Information Science, vol 1226. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-50732-9_48
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-50732-9_48
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-50731-2
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-50732-9
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)