Skip to main content

Semantics-Driven Conversational Interfaces for Museum Chatbots

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Culture and Computing (HCII 2020)

Abstract

This work addresses the challenges of creating usable and personalized conversational interfaces for broad, yet applicable, domains that require user engagement and learning, such as museum chatbots. Whether the chatbots are standalone or coupled with virtual agents or real-life robots, the functional requirements for interaction that targets specific learning aspects would be expected to be more or less similar. This work reports on experimental semantics-driven conversational interface design for chatbots in museum settings, targeting visitors to converse about exhibits and learn information about their style, the artists, the era, and other aspects related to them. Depending on the semantics (presentation, learning, exploration), chatbot scenarios were designed and evaluated by participants in a formative evaluation. The evaluation show that user requirement perception manifests in expectations on the semantic level, instead of just the technical level. The results between the scenarios are compared to see how the semantics considered for the design transferred to the implementation and to the user perception.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Hachman, M.: Battle of the digital assistants: cortana, siri, and Google Now. PCWorld (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Marcondes, F.S., Almeida, J.J., Novais, P.: A short survey on chatbot technology: failure in raising the state of the art. Adv. Intell. Syst. Comput. 1003, 28–36 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-23887-2_4

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Daniel, G., Cabot, J., Deruelle, L., Derras, M.: Xatkit: a multimodal low-code chatbot development framework. IEEE Access. 8, 15332–15346 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1109/access.2020.2966919

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Hussain, S., Ameri Sianaki, O., Ababneh, N.: A survey on conversational agents/chatbots classification and design techniques. In: Barolli, L., Takizawa, M., Xhafa, F., Enokido, T. (eds.) WAINA 2019. AISC, vol. 927, pp. 946–956. Springer, Cham (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-15035-8_93

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  5. Huang, W., Hew, K.F., Gonda, D.E.: Designing and evaluating three chatbot-enhanced activities for a flipped graduate course. Int. J. Mech. Eng. Robot. Res. 8, 813–818 (2019). https://doi.org/10.18178/ijmerr.8.5.813-818

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Liu, Q., Huang, J., Wu, L., Zhu, K., Ba, S.: CBET: design and evaluation of a domain-specific chatbot for mobile learning. Univ. Access Inf. Soc. (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10209-019-00666-x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Fogliano, F., Fabbrini, F., Souza, A., Fidélio, G., Machado, J., Sarra, R.: Edgard, the chatbot: questioning ethics in the usage of artificial intelligence through interaction design and electronic literature. In: Duffy, V.G. (ed.) HCII 2019. LNCS, vol. 11582, pp. 325–341. Springer, Cham (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-22219-2_25

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  8. Androutsopoulos, I., Spiliotopoulos, D.: Symbolic authoring for multilingual natural language generation. Methods Appl. Artif. Intell. 2308, 131–142 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-46014-4_13

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  9. Bahja, M., Hammad, R., Hassouna, M.: Talk2Learn: a framework for chatbot learning. In: Scheffel, M., Broisin, J., Pammer-Schindler, V., Ioannou, A., Schneider, J. (eds.) EC-TEL 2019. LNCS, vol. 11722, pp. 582–586. Springer, Cham (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-29736-7_44

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  10. Arteaga, D., Arenas, J., Paz, F., Tupia, M., Bruzza, M.: Design of information system architecture for the recommendation of tourist sites in the city of Manta, Ecuador through a Chatbot. In: Iberian Conference on Information Systems and Technologies (CISTI) 19–22 June 2019 (2019). https://doi.org/10.23919/CISTI.2019.8760669

  11. Carisi, M., Albarelli, A., Luccio, F.L.: Design and implementation of an airport chatbot. In: ACM International Conference Proceeding Series, pp. 49–54 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1145/3342428.3342664

  12. Turunen, M., et al.: Multimodal and mobile conversational Health and Fitness Companions. Comput. Speech Lang. 25, 192–209 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.csl.2010.04.004

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Ciechanowski, L., Przegalinska, A., Magnuski, M., Gloor, P.: In the shades of the uncanny valley: an experimental study of human–chatbot interaction. Futur. Gener. Comput. Syst. 92, 539–548 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.future.2018.01.055

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Crutzen, R., Peters, G.J.Y., Portugal, S.D., Fisser, E.M., Grolleman, J.J.: An artificially intelligent chat agent that answers adolescents’ questions related to sex, drugs, and alcohol: an exploratory study. J. Adolesc. Health 48, 514–519 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jadohealth.2010.09.002

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Edwards, C., Beattie, A.J., Edwards, A., Spence, P.R.: Differences in perceptions of communication quality between a Twitterbot and human agent for information seeking and learning. Comput. Hum. Behav. 65, 666–671 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2016.07.003

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Fryer, L.K., Nakao, K., Thompson, A.: Chatbot learning partners: connecting learning experiences, interest and competence. Comput. Hum. Behav. 93, 279–289 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2018.12.023

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Demidova, E., et al.: Analysing and enriching focused semantic web archives for parliament applications. Futur. Internet 6, 433–456 (2014). https://doi.org/10.3390/fi6030433

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Antonakaki, D., Spiliotopoulos, D., Samaras, C.V., Ioannidis, S., Fragopoulou, P.: Investigating the complete corpus of referendum and elections tweets. In: Proceedings of the 2016 IEEE/ACM International Conference on Advances in Social Networks Analysis and Mining, ASONAM 2016, pp. 100–105 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1109/ASONAM.2016.7752220

  19. Antonakaki, D., Spiliotopoulos, D., Samaras, C.V., Pratikakis, P., Ioannidis, S., Fragopoulou, P.: Social media analysis during political turbulence. PLoS One 12 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0186836

  20. Spiliotopoulos, D., Xydas, G., Kouroupetroglou, G.: Diction based prosody modeling in table-to-speech synthesis. In: Matoušek, V., Mautner, P., Pavelka, T. (eds.) TSD 2005. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 3658, pp. 294–301. Springer, Heidelberg (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/11551874_38

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  21. Xydas, G., Spiliotopoulos, D., Kouroupetroglou, G.: Modeling emphatic events from non-speech aware documents in speech based user interfaces. In: Proceedings of Human Computer Interaction, pp. 806–810 (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Spiliotopoulos, D., Stavropoulou, P., Kouroupetroglou, G.: Acoustic rendering of data tables using earcons and prosody for document accessibility. In: Stephanidis, C. (ed.) UAHCI 2009. LNCS, vol. 5616, pp. 587–596. Springer, Heidelberg (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-02713-0_62

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  23. Spiliotopoulos, D., Xydas, G., Kouroupetroglou, G., Argyropoulos, V., Ikospentaki, K.: Auditory universal accessibility of data tables using naturally derived prosody specification. Univ. Access Inf. Soc. 9 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10209-009-0165-0

  24. Alexandersson, J., et al.: Metalogue: a multiperspective multimodal dialogue system with metacognitive abilities for highly adaptive and flexible dialogue management. In: Proceedings - 2014 International Conference on Intelligent Environments, IE 2014, pp. 365–368 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1109/IE.2014.67

  25. Carolus, A., Muench, R., Schmidt, C., Schneider, F.: Impertinent mobiles - effects of politeness and impoliteness in human-smartphone interaction. Comput. Hum. Behav. 93, 290–300 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2018.12.030

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Lee, S.Y., Choi, J.: Enhancing user experience with conversational agent for movie recommendation: effects of self-disclosure and reciprocity. Int. J. Hum Comput Stud. 103, 95–105 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhcs.2017.02.005

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Cuayáhuitl, H., et al.: Ensemble-based deep reinforcement learning for chatbots. Neurocomputing 366, 118–130 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neucom.2019.08.007

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Hwang, S., Kim, B., Lee, K.: A data-driven design framework for customer service chatbot. In: Marcus, A., Wang, W. (eds.) HCII 2019. LNCS, vol. 11583, pp. 222–236. Springer, Cham (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-23570-3_17

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  29. Ghandeharioun, A., McDuff, D., Czerwinski, M., Rowan, K.: EMMA: an emotion-aware wellbeing chatbot. In: 2019 8th International Conference on Affective Computing and Intelligent Interaction ACII 2019, pp. 15–21 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1109/ACII.2019.8925455

  30. Liu, R., Dong, Z.: A study of user experience in knowledge-based QA chatbot design. In: Karwowski, W., Ahram, T. (eds.) IHSI 2019. AISC, vol. 903, pp. 589–593. Springer, Cham (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-11051-2_89

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  31. Chaves, A.P., Doerry, E., Egbert, J., Gerosa, M.: It’s how you say it: identifying appropriate register for chatbot language design. In: Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Human-Agent Interaction HAI 2019, pp. 102–109 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1145/3349537.3351901

  32. Veglis, A., Maniou, T.A.: Embedding a chatbot in a news article design and implementation. In: ACM International Conference Proceeding Series (2019). https://doi.org/10.1145/3368640.3368664

  33. Cerezo, J., Kubelka, J., Robbes, R., Bergel, A.: Building an expert recommender chatbot. In: Proceedings of the 2019 IEEE/ACM 1st International Workshop on Bots Software Engineering BotSE 2019, pp. 59–63 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1109/BotSE.2019.00022

  34. Feine, J., Morana, S., Maedche, A.: Leveraging machine-executable descriptive knowledge in design science research – the case of designing socially-adaptive chatbots. In: Tulu, B., Djamasbi, S., Leroy, G. (eds.) DESRIST 2019. LNCS, vol. 11491, pp. 76–91. Springer, Cham (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-19504-5_6

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  35. Pino, A., Kouroupetroglou, G., Kacorri, H., Sarantidou, A., Spiliotopoulos, D.: An open source/freeware assistive technology software inventory. In: Miesenberger, K., Klaus, J., Zagler, W., Karshmer, A. (eds.) ICCHP 2010. LNCS, vol. 6179, pp. 178–185. Springer, Heidelberg (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-14097-6_29

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  36. Risse, T., et al.: The ARCOMEM architecture for social- and semantic-driven web archiving. Futur. Internet 6, 688–716 (2014). https://doi.org/10.3390/fi6040688

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Margaris, D., Vassilakis, C.: Exploiting rating abstention intervals for addressing concept drift in social network recommender systems. Informatics 5, 21 (2018). https://doi.org/10.3390/informatics5020021

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Aivazoglou, M., et al.: A fine-grained social network recommender system. Soc. Netw. Anal. Min. 10, 8 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13278-019-0621-7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Margaris, D., Vassilakis, C., Spiliotopoulos, D.: Handling uncertainty in social media textual information for improving venue recommendation formulation quality in social networks. Soc. Netw. Anal. Min. 9, 64 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13278-019-0610-x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Margaris, D., Vassilakis, C.: Improving collaborative filtering’s rating prediction accuracy by considering users’ rating variability. In: Proceedings of the IEEE 16th International Conference on Dependable, Autonomic and Secure Computing, IEEE 16th International Conference on Pervasive Intelligence and Computing, IEEE 4th International Conference on Big Data Intelligence and Computing and IEEE 3rd Cyber Science and Technology Congress, DASC-PICom-DataCom-CyberSciTec 2018 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1109/DASC/PiCom/DataCom/CyberSciTec.2018.00145

  41. Margaris, D., Vassilakis, C.: Improving collaborative filtering’s rating prediction quality by considering shifts in rating practices. In: Proceedings of the 2017 IEEE 19th Conference on Business Informatics, CBI 2017 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1109/CBI.2017.24

  42. Margaris, D., Georgiadis, P., Vassilakis, C.: Adapting WS-BPEL scenario execution using collaborative filtering techniques. In: Proceedings of the International Conference on Research Challenges in Information Science (2013). https://doi.org/10.1109/RCIS.2013.6577691

  43. Margaris, D., Vassilakis, C.: Enhancing rating prediction quality through improving the accuracy of detection of shifts in rating practices. In: Hameurlain, A., Wagner, R. (eds.) Transactions on Large-Scale Data- and Knowledge-Centered Systems XXXVII. LNCS, vol. 10940, pp. 151–191. Springer, Heidelberg (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-57932-9_5

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  44. Margaris, D., Vassilakis, C.: Improving collaborative filtering’s rating prediction quality in dense datasets, by pruning old ratings. In: Proceedings of the IEEE Symposium on Computers and Communications (2017). https://doi.org/10.1109/ISCC.2017.8024683

  45. Margaris, D., Vassilakis, C.: Exploiting Internet of Things information to enhance venues’ recommendation accuracy. Serv. Oriented Comput. Appl. 11, 393–409 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11761-017-0216-y

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Margaris, D., Vassilakis, C., Georgiadis, P.: Query personalization using social network information and collaborative filtering techniques. Futur. Gener. Comput. Syst. 78, 440–450 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.future.2017.03.015

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. Margaris, D., Vassilakis, C., Georgiadis, P.: Knowledge-based leisure time recommendations in social networks. In: Alor-Hernández, G., Valencia-García, R. (eds.) Current Trends on Knowledge-Based Systems. ISRL, vol. 120, pp. 23–48. Springer, Cham (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-51905-0_2

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  48. Margaris, D., Spiliotopoulos, D., Vassilakis, C.: Social relations versus near neighbours: reliable recommenders in limited information social network collaborative filtering for online advertising. In: Proceedings of the 2019 IEEE/ACM International Conference on Advances in Social Networks Analysis and Mining (ASONAM 2019), pp. 1160–1167. ACM, Vancouver (2019). https://doi.org/10.1145/3341161.3345620

  49. Margaris, D., Vassilakis, C., Georgiadis, P.: Recommendation information diffusion in social networks considering user influence and semantics. Soc. Netw. Anal. Min. 6, 108 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13278-016-0416-z

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Dimitris Spiliotopoulos .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Spiliotopoulos, D., Kotis, K., Vassilakis, C., Margaris, D. (2020). Semantics-Driven Conversational Interfaces for Museum Chatbots. In: Rauterberg, M. (eds) Culture and Computing. HCII 2020. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 12215. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-50267-6_20

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-50267-6_20

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-50266-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-50267-6

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics