Skip to main content

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNISA,volume 12199))

Included in the following conference series:

  • 1767 Accesses

Abstract

Although there are various theories about the principle of “optical illusion”, many can be explained relatively simply by assuming laws of perspective as a basic theory. Considering the perspective as a brain function cultivated through experience of estimating distance to the target, AI can also see the illusion through learning. Therefore, it is important for safety measures to improve the social environment to eliminate risk factors that are misidentified by AI. Developing the cognitive environment to reduce misperception is not just an issue for AI. Similar problems occur in the elderly. Recognizing that there are signs, fonts, and graphics that the elderly misidentifies, it is time to need the social investment to realize a cognitive barrier-free society that is friendly to the elderly and to AI. It is an urgent issue to build a cognitive barrier-free society for the elderly, just as we realized a barrier-free society for physical ability.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Doherty, M.J., et al.: The Ebbinghaus illusion deceives adults but not young children. Dev. Sci. 13(5), 714–721 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. The Illusion Index. https://www.illusionsindex.org/ir/ebbinghaus-illusion/. Accessed 1 Jan 2020

  3. The Illusion Index. https://www.illusionsindex.org/ir/mueller-lyer/ Accessed 1 Jan 2020

  4. The Illusion Index. https://www.illusionsindex.org/ir/hering-illusion/. Accessed 1 Jan 2020

  5. The Illusion Index. https://www.illusionsindex.org/ir/zoellner-illusion/. Accessed 1 Jan 2020

  6. Drifting Spines Illusion/Drifting Embosses Illusion. http://www.psy.ritsumei.ac.jp/~akitaoka/togetogedriftillusion.html. Accessed 1 Jan 2020

  7. The Illusion Index. https://www.illusionsindex.org/i/rubin-s-vase/. Accessed 1 Jan 2020

  8. The Illusion Index. https://www.illusionsindex.org/i/impossible-cube/. Accessed 1 Jan 2020

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hiroyuki Nishimoto .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Nishimoto, H. (2020). Neural Network Risks Suggested by Optical Illusions. In: Duffy, V. (eds) Digital Human Modeling and Applications in Health, Safety, Ergonomics and Risk Management. Human Communication, Organization and Work. HCII 2020. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 12199. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-49907-5_12

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-49907-5_12

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-49906-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-49907-5

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics