Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Contact Dermatitis in Children

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Clinical Contact Dermatitis

Abstract

From the birth, children’s skin is exposed to numerous environmental stimuli and can therefore be affected by various pictures of contact dermatitis. Irritant contact dermatitis of the napkin area is linked to various factors (friction between skin and diaper, maceration of skin, occlusion, urinary pH, urine, and feces). The eruption does not generally manifest before the third week of life, with a peak between the seventh and twelfth week. The dermatitis is evident on convex surfaces in direct contact with the diaper. It nearly always responds to treatment and resolves when diapers are no longer used. Contact cheilitis and perioral dermatitis, linked to irritant contact with food, can develop above all in the first 2–3 years of life. The irritation can also be induced by saliva, especially if the child continually licks the lips and surrounding skin. Contact sensitization and allergic contact dermatitis are common in children and more frequent than believed. The frequence of contact allergy increases with the age, related to increased exposure to environmental allergens (metals, pharmaceutical products, skin care products and cosmetics, toys, shoes and sport equipment, tattoos). Patch testing in pediatric patients is considered safe; the general view is that children can tolerate the same patch test concentration as adults.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Meneghini CL, Angelini G. Le dermatiti da contatto. Roma: Lombardo Ed.;1982. p. 131.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Meneghini CL. Contact dermatitis in children. In: Rycroft RJG, Menné T, Frosch PJ, editors. Textbook of contact dermatitis. Berlin: Springer; 1995. p. 403.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Angelini G, Vena GA. Dermatite da contatto nei bambini. In: Angelini G, Vena GA, editors. Dermatologia professionale e ambientale, vol III. Brescia: ISED;1999. p. 635.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Goossens A, Neyens K, Vigan M. Contact allergy in children. In: Rycroft RJG, Menné T, Frosch PJ, et al., editors. Textbook of contact dermatitis. Berlin: Springer; 2001. p. 581.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  5. Simonsen AB, Sommerlund M. Contact dermatitis in children. In: Johansen JD, Lepoittevin J-P, Thyssen JP, editors. Quick guide to contact dermatitis. Berlin: Springer; 2016. p. 115.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  6. Schulsinger C, Mollgaard K. Polyvinyl chloride dermatitis not caused by phthalates. Contact Dermatitis. 1980;6:477.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Hidano A, Purwoko R, Jitskawak K. Statistical survey of skin changes in Japanese neonates. Pediatr Dermatol. 1986;3:140.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Pratt AG, Reed WT. Influence of type of feeding on pH of stool, pH of skin and the incidence of perianal dermatitis in the newborn infant. J Pediatr. 1955;46:539.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Tanino J, Steiner M, Benjamin B. The relationship of perianal dermatitis to fecal pH. J Pediatr. 1959;54:793.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Boisits EK, McCormack JJ. Diaper dermatitis and the role of predisposition. In: Maibach HI, Boisits EK, editors. Neonatal skin. New York: Marcel Dekker; 1982. p. 191.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Jordan WE, Lawson KD, Berg RW, et al. Diaper dermatitis: frequency and severity among a general infant population. Pediatr Dermatol. 1986;3:198.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Leyden JJ, Katz S, Stewart R, et al. Urinary ammonia and ammonia-producing microorganisms in infants with and without diaper dermatitis. Arch Dermatol. 1977;113:1678.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Leyden JJ, Kligman AM. The role of microorganisms in diaper dermatitis. Arch Dermatol. 1978;114:56.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Zimmerer RE, Lawson KD, Calvert CJ. The effects of wearing diapers on the skin. Pediatr Dermatol. 1986;3:95.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Berg RW, Buckingham KW, Stewart RL. Etiologic factors in diaper dermatitis: the role of urine. Pediatr Dermatol. 1986;3:102.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Willis J. The effects of prolonged water exposure on human skin. J Invest Dermatol. 1973;60:166.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Yoshioka H, Iseki K, Fujita K. Development and differences of intestinal flora in the neonatal period of in breast-fed and bottle-fed infants. Pediatrics. 1983;72:317.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Bidmead MC, Rodger MN. The effect of enzymes on stratum corneum. J Soc Cosmet Chem. 1973;24:493.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Buckingham KW, Berg RW. Etiologic factors in diaper dermatitis: the role of feces. Pediatr Dermatol. 1986;3:107.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Patrizi A, Neri I, Marzaduri S, et al. Pigmented and hyperkeratotic napkin dermatitis: a liquid detergent irritant dermatitis. Dermatology. 1996;193:36.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Montes LF, Pittillo RF, Hunt D, et al. Microbial flora of infant’s skin: comparison of types of microrganisms between normal skin and diaper dermatitis. Arch Dermatol. 1971;103:640.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Keswick BH, Seymour JL, Milligan MC. Diaper area skin microflora of normal children and children with atopic dermatitis. J Clin Microbiol. 1987;25:216.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  23. Dixon PN, Warin RP, English MP. Role of Candida albicans infection in napkin rashes. Br Med J. 1969; ii:23.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Rebora A, Marples RR, Kligman AN. Experimental infection with Candida albicans. Arch Dermatol. 1973;108:69.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Honig PJ, Gribetz B, Leyden JL, et al. Amoxicillin and diaper dermatitis. J Am Acad Dermatol. 1988;19:275.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Roul S, Ducombs G, Leaute-Labreze C, et al. “Lucky Luke” contact dermatitis due to rabber components of diapers. Contact Dermatitis. 1998;38:363.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Larralde M, Raspa ML, Silvia H, et al. Diaper dermatitis: a new clinical feature. Pediatr Dermatol. 2001;18:167.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Belhadjali H, Giordano-Labadie F, Rance F, et al. “Lucky Luke” contact dermatitis from diapers: a new allergen? Contact Dermatitis. 2001;44:248.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Ferguson AG, Fraser NG, Grant PW. Napkin dermatitis with psoriasiform “ide”. A review of fifty cases. Br J Dermatol. 1966; 78:289.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Andersen SLC, Thomsen K. Psoriasiform napkin dermatitis. Br J Dermatol. 1971;84:316.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Neville EA, Finn OA. Psoriasiform napkin dermatitis: a follow-up study. Br J Dermatol. 1975;92:279.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Rasmussen HB, Hagdrup H, Schimdt H. Psoriasiform napkin dermatitis. Acta Derm Venereol. 1986;66:534.

    Google Scholar 

  33. Skoven JG, Hjortshoj A. HLA-antigens and psoriasiform napkin dermatitis. Dermatologica. 1978;157:225.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Graham-Brown RA, Lister DM, Burns DA. Herpetiform napkin dermatitis: napkin dermatitis simulating an acute herpes simplex infection. Br J Dermatol. 1986;114:746.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Campbell RL, Seymour JL, Stone LC, et al. Clinical studies with disposable diapers containing absorbent gelling materials: evaluation of effects on infant skin condition. J Am Acad Dermatol. 1987;17:978.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Campbell RL, Bartlett AV, Sarbaugh FC, et al. Effects of diaper types on diaper dermatitis associated with diarrhea and antibiotic use in children in day-care centers. Pediatr Dermatol. 1988;5:83.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Lane AT, Rehder PA, Helm K. Evaluations of diapers containing absorbent gelling material with conventional disposable diapers in newborn infants. Am J Dis Chil. 1990;144:315.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. Wilson PA, Dallas MJ. Diaper performance: maintenance of healthy skin. Pediatr Dermatol. 1990;7:179.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Akin F, Spraker M, Aly R, et al. Effects of breathable disposable diapers: reduced prevalence of Candida and common diaper dermatitis. Pediatr Dermatol. 2001;18:282.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. John Radcliffe Hospital Cryptorchidism Study Group. Effect of corticosteroid creams on descent of testes in infants. Br Med J. 1990;301:214.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Simonsen AB, Deleuran M, Johansen JD, et al. Contact allergy and allergic contact dermatitis in children. A review of current data. Contact Dermatitis. 2011; 65:254.

    Google Scholar 

  42. Simonsen AB, Deleuran M, Mortz CG, et al. Allergic contact dermatitis in Danish children referred for patch testing—a national-wide multicentre study. Contact Dermatitis. 2014;70:104.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Admani S, Jacobs SE. Allergic contact dermatitis in children: review of the past decade. Curr Allergy Asthma Rep. 2014;14:421.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  44. Ayala F, Balato N, Lembo G, et al. A multicentre study of contact sensitization in children. Contact Dermatitis. 1992;26:307.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Bonamonte D, Foti C, Angelini G. Contact dermatitis in pediatric age. G Ital Dermatol Venereol. 2004;139:15.

    Google Scholar 

  46. Bonamonte D, Foti C, Carpentieri A, et al. Dermatite allergica da contatto in età pediatrica. Ann Ital Dermatol Allergol. 2010;64:1.

    Google Scholar 

  47. Angelini G, Meneghini CL. Contact allergy in children. Pediatr Dermatol News. 1987;6:1995.

    Google Scholar 

  48. Gonçalo S, Gonçalo M, Azenha A, et al. Allergic contact dermatitis in children. Contact Dermatitis. 1992;26:112.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. Sevila A, Romaguera C, Vilaplana J, et al. Contact dermatitis in children. Contact Dermatitis. 1994;30:292.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. Rudzki E, Rebandel P. Contact dermatitis in children. Contact Dermatitis. 1996;34:66.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. Stables GI, Forsyth A, Lever RS. Patch testing in children. Contact Dermatitis. 1996;34:341.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  52. Wilkowska A, Grubska-Suchanek E, Karwacka I, et al. Contact allergy in children. Cutis. 1996;58:176.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  53. Katsaro IA, Koupu V, Armenaka M, et al. Patch tests in children: a review of 14 years’ experience. Contact Dermatitis. 1996;34:70.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  54. Brasch J, Geier J. Patch test results in schoolchildren. Contact Dermatitis. 1997;37:286.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  55. Shah M, Lewis FM, Gawkrodger DJ. Patch testing in children and adolescents: five years’ experience and follow-up. J Am Acad Dermatol. 1997;37:964.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  56. Pambor M, Krüger G, Winkler S. Results of patch testing in children. Contact Dermatitis. 1992;27:326.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  57. Björkstén B. The environment and sensitization to allergens in early childhood. Pediatr Allergy Immunol. 1997;8(Suppl. 10):32.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  58. Fisher AA. Allergic contact dermatitis in early infancy. Cutis. 1985;35:315.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  59. Fisher AA. Allergic contact dermatitis in early infancy. Cutis. 1994;54:300.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  60. Motolese A, Manzini BM, Donini M. Patch testing in infants. Am J Contact Dermatitis. 1995;6:153.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  61. Weston WL. Contact dermatitis in children. Curr Opin Pediatr. 1997;9:372.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  62. Seidenari S, Giusti F, Pepe P, et al. Contact sensitization in 1094 children undergoing patch testing over a 7-year period. Pediatr Dermatol. 2005;22:1.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  63. Mortz CG, Lauritsen JM, Bindslev-Jensen C, et al. Contact allergy and allergic contact dermatitis in adolescents: prevalence measures and associations. Acta Derm Venereol. 2002;82:352.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  64. Weston WL, Weston JA. Allergic contact dermatitis in children. Am J Dis Child. 1984;138:932.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  65. Weston WL, Weston JA, Kinoshita J, et al. Prevalence of positive epicutaneous tests among infants, children, and adolescents. Pediatrics. 1986;78:1070.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  66. Barros MA, Baptista A, Correia TM, et al. Patch testing in children: a study of 562 schoolchildren. Contact Dermatitis. 1991;25:156.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  67. Wantke F, Hemmer W, Jarish R, et al. Patch test reactions in children, adults and the elderly. Contact Dermatitis. 1996;34:316.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  68. Epstein WL. Contact-type delayed hypersensitivity in infants and children: induction of Rhus sensitivity. Pediatrics. 1961;27:51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  69. Lundov MD, Friis UF, Menné T, et al. Methylisothiazolinone in paint forces a patient out of her apartment. Contact Dermatitis. 2013;69:252.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  70. Lundov MD, Opstrup MS, Johansen JD. Methylisothiazolinone contact allergy—growing epidemic. Contact Dermatitis. 2013;69:271.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  71. Nijhawan RI, Jacob SE. Connubial dermatitis revisited: mother-to-child contact dermatitis. Dermatitis. 2009;20:55.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  72. Bonamonte D, Filoni A, Gullo G, et al. Nummular contact eczema: presentation of a pediatric case. The Open Dermatol J. 2019;13:3.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  73. Bonamonte D, Foti C, Mundo L, et al. La rilevanza clinica nella dermatite allergica da contatto: proposta di scoring. Ann Ital Dermatol Allergol. 2006;60:41.

    Google Scholar 

  74. Jensen CD, Paulsen E, Andersen KE. Retrospective evaluation of the consequence of alleged patch test sensitization. Contact Dermatitis. 2006;55:30.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  75. Torp Madsen J, Andersen KE. Outcome of a second patch test reading of TRUE Test® on D6/7. Contact Dermatitis. 2013;68:94.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  76. Bonitsis NG, Tatsioni A, Bassioukas K, et al. Allergens responsible for allergic contact dermatitis among children: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Contact Dermatitis. 2011;64:245.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  77. Belloni Fortina A, Fontana E, Peserico A. Contact sensitization in children: a retrospective study of 2,614 children from a single center. Pediatr Dermatol. 2016;33:399.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  78. Simonsen AB, Foss-Skiftesvik MH, Thyssen JP, et al. Contact allergy in Danish children: current trands. Contact Dermatitis. 2018;79:295.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  79. Veien NK, Borchorst E, Hattel T, et al. Stomatitis or systematically induced contact dermatitis from metal wire in orthodontic materials. Contact Dermatitis. 1994;30:210.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  80. Kerosuo H, Kanerva L. Systemic contact dermatitis caused by nickel in a stainless steel orthodontic appliance. Contact Dermatitis. 1997;36:112.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  81. Thyssen JP. Cobalt sensitization and dermatitis: considerations for the clinician. Dermatitis. 2012;23:203.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  82. Goiset A, Darrigade AS, Labrèze C, et al. Aluminium sensitization in a French paediatric patch test population. Contact Dermatitis. 2018;79:382.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  83. Gente Lidholm A, Bergfors E, Inerot A, et al. Unespected loss of contact allergy to aluminium induced by vaccine. Contact Dermatitis. 2013;68:286.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  84. Bergfors E, Trollfors B. Sixty-four children with persistent itching nodules and contact allergy to aluminium after vaccination with aluminium-adsorbed vaccines—prognosis and outcome after booster vaccination. Eur J Pediatr. 2013;172:171.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  85. Beveridge MG, Polcari IC, Burms JL, et al. Local vaccine site reactions and contact allergy to aluminium. Pediatr Dermatol. 2012;29:68.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  86. Wantke F, Hemme W, Götz M, et al. Routine patch testing with thimerosal: why it should be performed? Contact Dermatitis. 1996;35:67.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  87. Aberer W. Vaccination despite thimerosal sensitivity. Contact Dermatitis. 1991;24:6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  88. Aberer W. Thiomersal-Kontaktallergie und Impfungen mit Thiomersal-Kouservierten Seren. Dermatosen. 1997;45:137.

    Google Scholar 

  89. Tosti A, Bassi R, Peluso AM. Contact dermatitis due to a natural plasticine. Contact Dermatitis. 1990;22:301.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  90. Verhaghe I, Dooms-Goossens A. Multiple sources of allergic contact dermatitis from parabens. Contact Dermatitis. 1997;36:269.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  91. Downs AMR, Sansom JE, Simmons I. Let Ripl Fun Pot® dermatitis. Contact Dermatitis. 1998;38:234.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  92. Pevny I, Brennenstuhl M, Razinskas G. Patch testing in children. Contact Dermatitis. 1984;11:302.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  93. Vaswani SK, Collins DD, Pass CJ. Severe allergic contact eyelid dermatitis caused by swimming goggles. Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol. 2003;90:672.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  94. De Groot AC. Side-effects of henna and semipermanent “black henna” tattoos: a full review. Contact Dermatitis. 2013;69:1.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  95. Southcott RV, Haegi LAR. Plant hair dermatitis. Med J Aust. 1992;156:623.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  96. Epstein E. Contact dermatitis in children. Pediatr Clin North Am. 1971;18:839.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  97. Commens C, McGeogh A, Bartlett B, et al. Bindii (Jo Jo) dermatitis (Soliva pterosperma, Compositae). J Am Acad Dermatol. 1984;10:768.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  98. Fisher AA. Cosmetic dermatitis in childhood. Cutis. 1995;55:16.

    Google Scholar 

  99. Romaguera C, Alomar A, Camarasa JMG, et al. Contact dermatitis in children. Contact Dermatitis. 1985;12:283.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Biomedical Science and Human Oncology, University of Bari “Aldo Moro”, Bari, Italy

    Domenico Bonamonte, Caterina Foti & Giulia Gullo

  2. Professor of Dermatology, University of Bari “Aldo Moro”, Bari, Italy

    Gianni Angelini

Authors
  1. Domenico Bonamonte
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Caterina Foti
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Giulia Gullo
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Gianni Angelini
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Domenico Bonamonte .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. University of Bari “Aldo Moro”, Dermatology, Bari, Italy

    Gianni Angelini

  2. Department of Biomedical Science and Human Oncology, University of Bari “Aldo Moro”, Bari, Italy

    Domenico Bonamonte

  3. Department of Biomedical Science and Human Oncology, University of Bari “Aldo Moro”, Bari, Italy

    Caterina Foti

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Bonamonte, D., Foti, C., Gullo, G., Angelini, G. (2021). Contact Dermatitis in Children. In: Angelini, G., Bonamonte, D., Foti, C. (eds) Clinical Contact Dermatitis. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-49332-5_18

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-49332-5_18

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-49331-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-49332-5

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation