Abstract
As healthcare evolves in an increasingly connected world, there is a growing interest in the potential synergy between telemedicine and minimally invasive surgery. The development of digital surgery and introduction of new technologies have resulted in new and efficient ways to train and monitor the surgeon’s performance. Robotic surgery provides an ideal environment for surgical telementoring and telesurgery given its endoscopic optics and mechanized instrument movement. We review the present status, current challenges, and future promise of telemedicine in minimally invasive surgery with a focus on urological applications. The authors reviewed current published literature on PubMed®, Scopus®, and Web of Science® databases for full-text English language articles published between 1995 and 2019 using the key words “telemedicine,” “minimally invasive surgical procedure,” “robotic surgical procedure,” “education,” and “distance.” Publications were categorized into four advancing levels, i.e., verbal guidance, guidance with telestration, guidance with tele-assist, and telesurgery.
We conclude that more advanced levels of surgical telementoring provide more effective and experiential teaching but are associated with increased telecommunication network bandwidth requirements, expenses, and potential legal implications. Telementoring in robotic surgery is becoming an increasingly practical and cost-effective option in facilitating teaching of advanced surgical skills worldwide and delivery of surgical care to underserved areas. However, significant challenges remain. Realization of the potential of telementoring depends on addressing ethical issues, financial incentives, and legislation as well as collaboration with cybersecurity experts to ensure safety and cost-effectiveness.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Guljas R, Ahmed A, Chang K, et al. Impact of telemedicine in managing type 1 diabetes among school-age children and adolescents: an integrative review. J Pediatr Nurs. 2014;29(3):198–204.
Eadie L, Seifalian A, Davidson B. Telemedicine in surgery. Br J Surg. 2003;90(6):647–58.
Weinstein R, Lopez A, Joseph B, et al. Telemedicine, telehealth, and mobile health applications that work: opportunities and barriers. Am J Med. 2014;127(3):183–7.
Mars M. Telemedicine and advances in urban and rural healthcare delivery in Africa. Prog Cardiovasc Dis. 2013;56(3):326–35.
Challacombe B, Kandaswamy R, Dasgupta P, Mamode N. Telementoring facilitates independent hand-assisted laparoscopic living donor nephrectomy. Transplant Proc. 2005;37:613–6.
Pahlsson HI, Groth K, Permert J, et al. Telemedicine: an important aid to perform high-quality endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography in low-volume centers. Endoscopy. 2013;45:357–61.
Collins JW, Sooriakumaran P, Wiklund NP. Launching and evolving a robotic cystectomy service by developing your ‘FORTE’. BJU Int. 2014;113(4):520–2.
Collins J, Akre O, Challacombe B, Karim O, Wiklund P. Robotic networks: delivering empowerment through integration. BJU Int. 2015;116(2):167–8.
Corliss WR, Johnson EG. Teleoperators and human augmentation. An AEC-NASA technology survey. Washington, DC: Office of Technology Utilization, National Aeronautics and Space Administration; 1967.
Paul HA, Bargar WL, Mittlestadt B, et al. Development of a surgical robot for cementless total hip arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1992;285:57–66.
Davies BL, Ng W, Hibberd RD. Prostatic resection: an example of safe robotic surgery. Robotica. 1993;11:561–6.
Satava RM. Robotic surgery: from past to future: a personal journey. Surg Clin North Am. 2003;83:1491–500.
George EI, Brand TC, LaPorta A, Marescaux J, Satava RM. Origins of robotic surgery: from skepticism to standard of care. JSLS. 2018;22(4):e2018.00039.
Marescaux J, Leroy J, Gagner M, et al. Transatlantic robot-assisted telesurgery. Nature. 2001;413(6854):379–80.
Marescaux J, Leroy J, Rubino F, Vix M, Simone M, Mutter D. Transcontinental robot assisted remote telesurgery: feasibility and potential applications. Ann Surg. 2002;235:487–92.
Anvari M. Remote telepresence surgery: the Canadian experience. Surg Endosc. 2007;21:537–41.
Anvari M, McKinley C, Stein H. Establishment of the world’s first telerobotic remote surgical service: for provision of advanced laparoscopic surgery in a rural community. Ann Surg. 2005;241:460–4.
Anvari M. Reaching the rural world through robotic surgical programs. Eur Surg. 2005;37:284–92.
Anvari M. Telesurgery: remote knowledge translation in clinical surgery. World J Surg. 2007;31:1545–50.
Anvari M. Robot-assisted remote telepresence surgery. Semin Laparosc Surg. 2004;11:123–8.
Anvari M, Broderick T, Stein H, et al. The impact of latency on surgical precision and task completion during robotic-assisted remote telepresence surgery. Comput Aided Surg. 2005;10:93–9.
https://www.scmp.com/video/china/2181656/china-completes-worlds-first-5g-remote-surgery-test-animal.
Shin D, Dalag L, Azhar R, et al. A novel interface for the telementoring of robotic surgery. BJU Int. 2015;116(2):302–8.
Lacy AM, Bravo R, Otero-Piñeiro AM, Pena R, De Lacy FB, Menchaca R, et al. 5G-assisted telementored surgery. Br J Surg. 2019;106:1576–9. https://doi.org/10.1002/bjs.11364.
Collins JW, Verhagen H, Mottrie A, Wiklund PN. Application and integration of live streaming from leading robotic centres can enhance surgical education. Eur Urol. 2015;68(5):747–9.
Bogen EM, Schlachta CM, Ponsky T. White paper: technology for surgical telementoring-SAGES Project 6 Technology Working Group. Surg Endosc. 2019;33:684–90. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-018-06631-8.
Hassan A, Ghafoor M, Tariq SA, Zia T, Ahmad W. High efficiency video coding (HEVC)-based surgical telementoring system using shallow convolutional neural network. J Digit Imaging. 2019;32:1027–43. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10278-019-00206-2.
Gambadauro P, Magos A. NEST (network enhanced surgical training): a PC-based system for telementoring in gynecological surgery. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2008;139(2):222–5.
Sebajang H, Trudeau P, Dougall A, et al. Telementoring: an important enabling tool for the community surgeon. Surg Innov. 2005;12(4):327–31.
Treter S, Perrier N, Sosa JA, et al. Telementoring: a multi-institutional experience with the introduction of a novel surgical approach for adrenalectomy. Ann Surg Oncol. 2013;20(8):2754–8.
Clifford TG, Dajani D, Khooshabeh P, Hwang E, Desai MM, Gill IS, et al. MP23-18 inter-hospital telementoring for robotic surgery. J Urol. 2016;195(4S): e268-e269. https://www.auajournals.org/doi/pdf/10.1016/j.juro.2016.02.740.
Di Valentino M, Alerci M, Bogen M, et al. Telementoring during endovascular treatment of abdominal aortic aneurysms: a prospective study. J Endovasc Ther. 2005;12(2):200–5.
Agarwal R, Levinson A, Allaf M, et al. The RoboConsultant: telementoring and remote presence in the operating room during minimally invasive urologic surgeries using a novel mobile robotic interface. Urology. 2007;70(5):970–4.
Rothenberg S, Yoder S, Kay S, et al. Initial experience with surgical telementoring in pediatric laparoscopic surgery using remote presence technology. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2009;19(Suppl 1):S219–22.
Safir IJ, Shrewsberry AB, Issa IM, Ogan K, Ritenour CWM, Sullivan J, et al. Impact of remote monitoring and supervision on resident training using new ACGME milestone criteria. Can J Urol. 2015;22:7959–64.
Anderson SM, Kapp BB, Angell JM, Abd TT, Thompson NJ, Ritenour CWM, et al. Remote monitoring and supervision of urology residents utilizing integrated endourology suites – a prospective study of patients’ opinions. J Endourol. 2013;27:96–100. https://doi.org/10.1089/end.2012.0406.
Schlachta C, Sorsdahl A, Lefebvre K, et al. A model for longitudinal mentoring and telementoring of laparoscopic colon surgery. Surg Endosc. 2009;23(7):1634–8.
Bruns NE, Irtan S, Rothenberg SS, et al. Trans-atlantic telementoring with pediatric surgeons: technical considerations and lessons learned. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2016;26:75.
Snyderman CH, Gardner PA, Lanisnik B, et al. Surgical telementoring: a new model for surgical training. Laryngoscope. 2016;126:1334.
Forgione A, Kislov V, Guraya SY, et al. Safe introduction of laparoscopic colorectal surgery even in remote areas of the world: the value of a comprehensive telementoring training program. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2015;25:37.
Ponsky TA, Bobanga ID, Schwachter M, et al. Transcontinental telementoring with pediatric surgeons: proof of concept and technical considerations. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2014;24:892.
Bruschi M, Micali S, Porpiglia F, et al. Laparoscopic telementored adrenalectomy: the Italian experience. Surg Endosc. 2005;19(6):836–40.
Hinata N, Miyake H, Kurahashi T, et al. Novel telementoring system for robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: impact on the learning curve. Urology. 2014;83(5):1088–92.
Fuertes-Guiró F, Vitali-Erion E, Rodriguez-Franco A. A program of telementoring in laparoscopic bariatric surgery. Minim Invasive Ther Allied Technol. 2016;25:8.
Meijer HAW, Sánchez Margallo JA, Sánchez Margallo FM, et al. Wearable technology in an international telementoring setting during surgery: a feasibility study. BMJ Innov. 2017;3:189–95.
Ali M, Loggins J, Fuller W, et al. 3-D telestration: a teaching tool for robotic surgery. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2008;18(1):107–12.
Jarc A, Shah S, Adebar T, et al. Beyond 2D telestration: an evaluation of novel proctoring tools for robot-assisted minimally invasive surgery. J Robot Surg. 2016;10(2):103–9.
Jarc A, Stanley A, Clifford T, et al. Proctors exploit three-dimensional ghost tools during clinical-like training scenarios: a preliminary study. World J Urol. 2017;35(6):957–65.
Mendez I, Hill R, Clarke D, et al. Robotic long-distance telementoring in neurosurgery. Neurosurgery. 2005;56(3):434–40.
Rafiq A, Moore JA, Zhao X, et al. Digital video capture and synchronous consultation in open surgery. Ann Surg. 2004;239(4):567–73.
Rodrigues Netto N, Mitre A, Lima S, et al. Telementoring between Brazil and the United States: initial experience. J Endourol. 2003;17(4):217–20.
Bauer J, Lee B, Bishoff J, et al. International surgical telementoring using a robotic arm: our experience. Telemed J. 2000;6(1):25–31.
Micali S, Virgili G, Vannozzi E, et al. Feasibility of telementoring between Baltimore (USA) and Rome (Italy): the first five cases. J Endourol. 2000;14(6):493–6.
Bove P, Stoianovici D, Micali S, et al. Is telesurgery a new reality? Our experience with laparoscopic and percutaneous procedures. J Endourol. 2003;17(3):137–42.
Sebajang H, Trudeau P, Dougall A, et al. The role of telementoring and telerobotic assistance in the provision of laparoscopic colorectal surgery in rural areas. Surg Endosc. 2006;20(9):1389–93.
Bauer J, Lee BR, Stoianovici D, Bishoff JT, Micali S, Micali F, et al. Remote percutaneous renal access using a new automated telesurgical robotic system. Telemed J E Health. 2001;7:341–6. https://doi.org/10.1089/15305620152814746.
Andersen DS, Cabrera ME, Rojas-Muñoz EJ, et al. Augmented reality future step visualization for robust surgical telementoring. Simul Healthc. 2019;14(1):59–66. https://doi.org/10.1097/SIH.0000000000000334.
Panait L, Rafiq A, Tomulescu V, Boanca C, Popescu I, Carbonell A, et al. Telementoring versus on-site mentoring in virtual reality-based surgical training. Surg Endosc. 2006;20:113–8. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-005-0113-x.
Bilgic E, Turkdogan S, Watanabe Y, Madani A, Landry T, Lavigne D, et al. Effectiveness of telementoring in surgery compared with on-site mentoring: a systematic review. Surg Innov. 2017;24:379–85. https://doi.org/10.1177/1553350617708725.
Byrne JP, Mughal MM. Telementoring as an adjunct to training and competence-based assessment in laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Surg Endosc. 2000;14:1159–61. https://doi.org/10.1007/s004640000264.
Cubano M, Poulose BK, Talamini MA, Stewart R, Antosek LE, Lentz R, et al. Long distance telementoring. A novel tool for laparoscopy aboard the USS Abraham Lincoln. Surg Endosc. 1999;13:673–8. https://doi.org/10.1007/s004649901071.
Rogers FB, Ricci M, Caputo M, Shackford S, Sartorelli K, Callas P, et al. The use of telemedicine for real-time video consultation between trauma center and community hospital in a rural setting improves early trauma care: preliminary results. J Trauma. 2001;51:1037–41. https://doi.org/10.1097/00005373-200112000-00002.
St Julien J, Perrier ND. Video telementoring to accelerate learning of new surgical techniques. JAMA Surg. 2016;151:671–2. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamasurg.2016.0054.
McBain RK, Sousa JL, Rose AJ, Baxi SM, Faherty LJ, Taplin C, et al. Impact of project ECHO models of medical tele-education: a systematic review. J Gen Intern Med. 2019;34:2842–57. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11606-019-05291-1.
Schlachta CM, Nguyen NT, Ponsky T, Dunkin B. Project 6 Summit: SAGES telementoring initiative. Surg Endosc, vol. 30, Springer US; 2016, pp. 3665–72. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-016-4988-5.
Xu S, Perez M, Yang K, et al. Determination of the latency effects on surgical performance and the acceptable latency levels in telesurgery using the dV-Trainer_ simulator. Surg Endosc. 2014;28:2569.
Bonaci T, Herron J, Yusuf T et al. To make a robot secure: an experimental analysis of cyber security threats against teleoperated surgical robots. 12 May 2015; arXiv: 1504:04339v2 [cs.RO].
Silva E III. The interstate medical licensure compact. J Am Coll Radiol. 2015;12:511.
Federation of State Medical Boards. Interstate medical licensure compact prepares launch of new pathway for multi-state physician licensing. 17 Oct 2016. Available at http://www.fsmb.org/Media/Default/PDF/Publications/IMLCC_Oct2016_meeting.pdf. Accessed 12 June 2014.
Kempen P. The interstate telemedicine compact and the agenda of the Federation of State Medical Boards. J Am Phys Surg. 2015;20:57.
Virginia’s Legislative Information System. 2010 Session: SB 675 Health insurance; mandated coverage for telemedicine services. Available at https://lis.virginia.gov/cgi-bin/legp604.exe?101+sum+SB675.
Collins JW, Levy J, Stefanidis D et al. Utilising the Delphi process to develop a proficiency-based progression train-the-trainer course for robotic surgery training. Eur Urol. 2019. pii: S0302-2838(19)30001-6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eururo.2018.12.044. [Epub ahead of print] Review.
Collins J, Dasgupta P, Kirby R, Gill I. Globalization of surgical expertise without losing the human touch: utilising the network, old and new. BJU Int. 2012;109(8):1129–31.
Brunckhorst O, Volpe A, van der Poel H, Mottrie A, Ahmed K. Training, simulation, the learning curve, and how to reduce complications in urology. Eur Urol Focus. 2016;2(1):10–8.
Saied N. Virtual reality and medicine--from the cockpit to the operating room: are we there yet? Mo Med. 2005;102(5):450–5.
Collins JW, Akre O, Wiklund PN. Re: Walter Artibani, Vincenzo Ficarra, Ben J. Challacombe et al. EAU policy on live surgery events. Eur Urol 2014; 66: 87–97. Eur Urol. 2014;66:e121–2.
Collins JW, Tyritzis S, Nyberg T, et al. Robot-assisted radical cystectomy – description of an evolved approach to radical cystectomy. Eur Urol. 2013;64:654–63.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2021 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Collins, J.W., Ma, R., Beaulieu, Y., Hung, A.J. (2021). Telementoring for Minimally Invasive Surgery. In: Atallah, S. (eds) Digital Surgery. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-49100-0_27
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-49100-0_27
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-49099-7
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-49100-0
eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)