Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Fostering Flow Experience in HCI to Enhance and Allocate Human Energy

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Engineering Psychology and Cognitive Ergonomics. Mental Workload, Human Physiology, and Human Energy (HCII 2020)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNAI,volume 12186))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

Motivation explains the direction, intensity and persistence of human behavior and thus plays a crucial role in the mobilization and allocation of available energy. An experience that occurs during motivated action is flow. Flow is perceived as highly rewarding for its own sake and, thus, in flow all attention is directed towards the task at hand, leading to an experience of absorption. At the same time, attention is shielded from irrelevant stimuli and the activity feels easy and effortless. This suggests that flow is a highly efficient state in terms of energy expenditure. Studies addressing the physiology of flow support this assumption. Accordingly, for an optimal use of energy, it is of interest to promote flow in relevant work processes. In HCI, for example, in production work, flow promotion could be enabled by a real-time measure of the operator’s flow state in combination with automated adjustments in the work system to achieve, sustain, or extend flow. Such a real-time measure should not interrupt a person, as traditional self-report measures do. A combination of physiological measures (e.g., heart rate variability, skin conductance, and blink rate) provides a promising starting point to find such a real-time measure. Automated adjustments first require the identification of design approaches that affect flow within the work system. Using the example of work in manufacturing, the concept of flow, its measurement, and potential design approaches for automated adaptation are presented, and their application in HCI processes is discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Trist, E.: The evolution of socio-technical systems. Occasional Paper, no. 2 (1981)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Steghofer, J.-P., Diaconescu, A., Marsh, S., Pitt, J.: The next generation of socio-technical systems: realizing the potential, protecting the value [introduction]. IEEE Technol. Soc. Mag. 36(3), 46–47 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Borisov, N., Weyers, B., Kluge, A.: Designing a human machine interface for quality assurance in car manufacturing: an attempt to address the “Functionality versus User Experience Contradiction” in professional production environments. In: Advances in Human-Computer Interaction (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Frank, B., Kluge, A.: Can cued recall by means of gaze guiding replace refresher training? An experimental study addressing complex cognitive skill retrieval. Int. J. Ind. Ergon. 67, 123–134 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ergon.2018.05.007

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Kluge, A., Termer, A.: Human-centered design (HCD) of a fault-finding application for mobile devices and its impact on the reduction of time in fault diagnosis in the manufacturing industry. Appl. Ergon. 59, 170–181 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apergo.2016.08.030

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Grant, A.M., Fried, Y., Juillerat, T.: Work matters: job design in classic and contemporary perspectives. In: APA Handbook of Industrial and Organizational Psychology, Vol. 1: Building and Developing the Organization. APA Handbooks in Psychology®, pp. 417–453. American Psychological Association, Washington, DC (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Thomaschewski, L., Herrmann, T., Kluge, A. (eds.): Unterstützung von Teamwork-Prozessen durch Augmented Reality (AR): Entwurf einer arbeitspsychologisch fundierten Taxonomie. [Supporting teamwork-processes through augmented reality (AR): Proposal of a work psychological taxonomy]. Arbeit interdisziplinär analysieren – bewerten – gestalten [Interdisziplinary Analyzing, Evaluating and Designing Work] (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Weyers, B., Frank, B., Kluge, A.: A formal modeling framework for the implementation of gaze guiding as an adaptive computer-based job aid for the control of complex technical systems. Int. J. Hum.–Comput. Interact. 1–29 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1080/10447318.2019.1687234

  9. Backman, J., Helaakoski, H. (eds.): Mobile technology to support maintenance efficiency—Mobile maintenance in heavy industry. In: 2011 9th IEEE International Conference on Industrial Informatics, 26–29 July 2011 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Thomaschewski, L., Weyers, B., Kluge, A.: A user-centered design approach to develop an augmented reality-based assistance system to support the temporal coordination of spatially dispersed teams with ambient awareness. In: 1st IEEE International Conference on Human-Machine Systems, ICHMS 2020 - Companion Technology Regular Track, Rome, Italy (2020)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Kreggenfeld, N., Kuhlenkötter, B.: Situational enabling for employees in “Industrie 4.0”. ZWF Zeitschrift für wirtschaftlichen Fabrikbetrieb 111(10), 658–661 (2016). https://doi.org/10.3139/104.111607

  12. Prinz, C., Kreimeier, D., Kuhlenkötter, B.: Implementation of a learning environment for an Industrie 4.0 assistance system to improve the overall equipment effectiveness. Proc. Manuf. 9, 159–166 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.promfg.2017.04.004

  13. Kanfer, R., Frese, M., Johnson, R.E.: Motivation related to work: a century of progress. J. Appl. Psychol. 102(3), 338 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1037/apl0000133

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Csikszentmihalyi, M.: Beyond Boredom and Anxiety. Jossey-Bass Publishers, San Francisco (1975)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Bruya, B.: Introduction: toward a theory of attention that includes effortless attention and action. In: Bruya, B. (ed.) Effortless Attention: A New Perspective in the Cognitive Science of Attention and Action, pp. 1–28. MIT Press, Cambridge (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Csikszentmihalyi, M.: Flow: The Psychology of Optimal Experience. Harper & Row, New York (1990)

    Google Scholar 

  17. de Manzano, Ö., Theorell, T., Harmat, L., Ullén, F.: The psychophysiology of flow during piano playing. Emotion 10, 301–311 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1037/a0018432

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Harris, D.J., Vine, S.J., Wilson, M.R.: Is flow really effortless? The complex role of effortful attention. Sport Exerc. Perform. Psychol. 6, 103–114 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1037/spy0000083

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Peifer, C., Schulz, A., Schächinger, H., Baumann, N., Antoni, C.H.: The relation of flow-experience and physiological arousal under stress - can u shape it? J. Exp. Soc. Psychol. 53, 62–69 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2014.01.009

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Oitzl, M.S., Champagne, D.L., van der Veen, R., de Kloet, E.R.: Brain development under stress: hypotheses of glucocorticoid actions revisited. Neurosci. Biobehav. Rev. 34(6), 853–866 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neubiorev.2009.07.006

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Peifer, C., Tan, J.: Psychophysiology of flow experience. In: Peifer, C., Engeser S., (eds.) Advances in Flow Research, 2nd edn. Springer, New York (in press)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Ulrich, M., Keller, J., Hoenig, K., Waller, C., Grön, G.: Neural correlates of experimentally induced flow experiences. NeuroImage 86, 194–202 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2013.08.019

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Ulrich, M., Keller, J., Grön, G.: Neural signatures of experimentally induced flow experiences identified in a typical fMRI block design with BOLD imaging. Soc. Cogn. Affect. Neurosci. 11, 496–507 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1093/scan/nsv133

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Zhou, H.-X., et al.: Rumination and the default mode network: meta-analysis of brain imaging studies and implications for depression. NeuroImage 206, 116287 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2019.116287

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Huskey, R., Wilcox, S., Weber, R.: Network neuroscience reveals distinct neuromarkers of flow during media use. J. Commun. 68, 872–895 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1093/joc/jqy043

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Huskey, R., Craighead, B., Miller, M.B., Weber, R.: Does intrinsic reward motivate cognitive control? A naturalistic-fMRI study based on the synchronization theory of flow. Cogn. Affect. Behav. Neurosci. 18, 902–924 (2018). https://doi.org/10.3758/s13415-018-0612-6

  27. Christandl, F., Mierke, K., Peifer, C.: Time flows: manipulations of subjective time progression affect recalled flow and performance in a subsequent task. J. Exp. Soc. Psychol. 74, 246–256 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2017.09.015

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Engeser, S., Rheinberg, F.: Flow, performance and moderators of challenge-skill balance. Motiv. Emot. 32(3), 158–172 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11031-008-9102-4

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Peifer, C., Zipp, G.: All at once? The effects of multitasking behavior on flow and subjective performance. Eur. J. Work Organiz. Psychol. 28(5), 682–690 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1080/1359432X.2019.1647168

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Ryan, R.M., Deci, E.L.: Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being. Am. Psychol. 55(1), 68 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.55.1.68

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Fullagar, C.J., Kelloway, E.K.: Flow at work: an experience sampling approach. J. Occup. Organiz. Psychol. 82(3), 595–615 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1348/096317908X357903

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Peifer, C., Syrek, C., Ostwald, V., Schuh, E., Antoni, C.H.: Thieves of flow: how unfinished tasks at work are related to flow experience and wellbeing. J. Happiness Stud. (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10902-019-00149-z

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Demerouti, E., Bakker, A.B., Sonnentag, S., Fullagar, C.J.: Work-related flow and energy at work and at home: a study on the role of daily recovery. J. Organiz. Behav. 33(2), 276–295 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1002/job.760

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Bassi, M., Steca, P., Monzani, D., Greco, A., Fave, A.D.: Personality and optimal experience in adolescence: implications for well-being and development. J. Happiness Stud. 15(4), 829–843 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10902-013-9451-x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Keller, J., Bless, H., Blomann, F., Kleinbohl, D.: Physiological aspects of flow experiences: skills-demand-compatibility effects on heart rate variability and salivary cortisol. J. Exp. Soc. Psychol. (2011). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2011.02.004

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Peifer, C., Schächinger, H., Engeser, S., Antoni, C.H.: Cortisol effects on flow-experience. Psychopharmacology 232, 1165–1173 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00213-014-3753-5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Debus, M.E., Sonnentag, S., Deutsch, W., Nussbeck, F.W.: Making flow happen: the effects of being recovered on work-related flow between and within days. J. Appl. Psychol. 99(4), 713 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1037/a0035881

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Peifer, C.: Psychophysiological correlates of flow-experience. In: Engeser, S. (ed.) Advances in Flow Research, pp. 139–165. Springer, New York (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-2359-1_8

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  39. De Manzano, O., Theorell, T., Harmat, L., Ullén, F.: The psychophysiology of flow during piano playing. Emotion 10(3), 301–311 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1037/a0018432

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Peifer, C., Butalova, N., Antoni, C.H.: Dopaminergic activity or visual attention? Spontaneous eye blink rate as an indirect measure of flow experience. In: 6th World Congress on Positive Psychology, Melbourne, Australia (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  41. Kivikangas, J.M.: Psychophysiology of flow experience: an explorative study [Master Thesis]. University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  42. Nacke, L.E., Lindley, C.A.: Affective ludology, flow and immersion in a first-person shooter: measurement of player experience. Loading 3(5) (2009). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neulet.2008.02.009

  43. Blascovich, J., Tomaka, J.: The biopsychosocial model of arousal regulation. Adv. Exp. Soc. Psychol. 28, 1–51 (1996)

    Google Scholar 

  44. Tozman, T., Peifer, C.: Experimental paradigms to investigate flow-experience and its psychophysiology: inspired from stress theory and research. In: Harmat, L., Ørsted Andersen, F., Ullén, F., Wright, J., Sadlo, G. (eds.) Flow Experience, pp. 329–350. Springer, Cham (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-28634-1_20

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  45. Bilmes, J.A., Bartels, C.: Graphical model architectures for speech recognition. IEEE Sig. Process. Mag. 22(5), 89–100 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1109/MSP.2005.1511827

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Johnson, M.J., Duvenaud, D.K., Wiltschko, A., Adams, R.P., Datta, S.R. (eds.): Composing graphical models with neural networks for structured representations and fast inference. In: 30th Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems, NIPS 2016, Barcelona, Spain (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  47. Kleingarn, D., Nabizadeh, N., Heckmann, M., Kolossa, D. (eds.): Speaker-adapted neural-network-based fusion for multimodal reference resolution. In: Proceedings of the 20th Annual SIGdial Meeting on Discourse and Dialogue (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  48. Peifer, C., Wolters, G.: Bei der Arbeit im Fluss sein. Konsequenzen und Voraussetzungen von Flow-Erleben am Arbeitsplatz. [Being in flow at work. Consequences and predictors of flow experience in the workplace]. Wirtschaftspsychologie 19(3), 6–22 (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  49. Peifer, C., Wolters, G.: Flow experience in the context of work. In: Peifer, C., Engeser, S. (eds.) Advances in Flow Research, 2nd edn. Springer, New York (in press)

    Google Scholar 

  50. Hackman, J.R., Oldham, G.R.: Development of the job diagnostic survey. J. Appl. Psychol. 60(2), 159 (1975)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  51. Tausch, A., Peifer, C.: Auswirkungen von Autonomie auf Flow, Motivation und Leistung: Eine Studie im Schaltanlagenbau. Wirtschaftspsychologie 2019(4), 83–100 (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  52. Keller, J., Bless, H.: Flow and regulatory compatibility: an experimental approach to the flow model of intrinsic motivation. Pers. Soc. Psychol. Bull. 34(2), 196–209 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167207310026

    Article  Google Scholar 

  53. Harmat, L., de Manzano, Ö., Theorell, T., Högman, L., Fischer, H., Ullén, F.: Physiological correlates of the flow experience during computer game playing. Int. J. Psychophysiol. 97, 1–7 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2015.05.001

    Article  Google Scholar 

  54. Maeran, R., Cangiano, F.: Flow experience and job characteristics: analyzing the role of flow in job satisfaction. TPM-Test. Psychometr. Methodol. Appl. Psychol. 20(1), 13–26 (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  55. Rau, R., Riedel, S.: Besteht ein Zusammenhang zwischen dem Auftreten von positivem Arbeitserleben unter Flow-Bedingungen und Merkmalen der Arbeitstätigkeit? Zeitschrift für Arbeits- und Organisations psychologie A&O 48(2), 55–66 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1026/0932-4089.48.2.55

    Article  Google Scholar 

  56. Jackson, S.A.: Factors influencing the occurrence of flow state in elite athletes. J. Appl. Sport Psychol. 7(2), 138–166 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1080/10413209508406962

    Article  Google Scholar 

  57. Peifer, C., Schönfeld, P., Wolters, G., Aust, F., Margraf, M.: Well done! effects of positive feedback on perceived self-efficacy, flow and performance. Front. Psychol. (accepted). https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.01008

  58. Swann, C., Crust, L., Keegan, R., Piggott, D., Hemmings, B.: An inductive exploration into the flow experiences of European Tour golfers. Qual. Res. Sport Exerc. Health (2015). https://doi.org/10.1080/2159676x.2014.926969

  59. Karasek, R.A.: Job demands, job decision latitude, and mental strain: implications for job redesign. Adm. Sci. Q. 24(2), 285–308 (1979)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  60. Emanuel, F., Zito, M., Colombo, L.: Flow at work in Italian journalists: differences between permanent and freelance journalists. Psicologia Della Salute (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  61. Fagerlind, A.-C., Gustavsson, M., Johansson, G., Ekberg, K.: Experience of work-related flow: does high decision latitude enhance benefits gained from job resources? J. Vocat. Behav. 83(2), 161–170 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvb.2013.03.010

    Article  Google Scholar 

  62. Schüler, J., Sheldon, K.M., Prentice, M., Halusic, M.: Do some people need autonomy more than others? Implicit dispositions toward autonomy moderate the effects of felt autonomy on well-being. J. Pers. 84(1), 5–20 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1111/jopy.12133

    Article  Google Scholar 

  63. Baumann, N., Lürig, C., Engeser, S.: Flow and enjoyment beyond skill-demand balance: the role of game pacing curves and personality. Motiv. Emot. 40(4), 507–519 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11031-016-9549-7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  64. Grawemeyer, B., Mavrikis, M., Holmes, W., Gutiérrez-Santos, S., Wiedmann, M., Rummel, N.: Affective learning: improving engagement and enhancing learning with affect-aware feedback. User Model. User-Adap. Inter. 27(1), 119–158 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11257-017-9188-z

    Article  Google Scholar 

  65. Walker, E., Rummel, N., Koedinger, K.R.: CTRL: a research framework for providing adaptive collaborative learning support. User Model. User-Adap. Inter. 19(5), 387 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11257-009-9069-1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  66. Rummel, N.: One framework to rule them all? Carrying forward the conversation started by Wise and Schwarz. Int. J. Comput.-Supp. Collab. Learn. 13(1), 123–129 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11412-018-9273-2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  67. van Leeuwen, A., Rummel, N., van Gog, T.: What information should CSCL teacher dashboards provide to help teachers interpret CSCL situations? Int. J. Comput.-Supp. Collab. Learn. 14(3), 261–289 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11412-019-09299-x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  68. Woolf, B., Burleson, W., Arroyo, I., Dragon, T., Cooper, D., Picard, R.: Affect-aware tutors: recognising and responding to student affect. Int. J. Learn. Technol. 4(3–4), 129–164 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1504/IJLT.2009.028804

    Article  Google Scholar 

  69. Grawemeyer, B., Holmes, W., Gutiérrez-Santos, S., Hansen, A., Loibl, K., Mavrikis, M. (eds.): Light-bulb moment? Towards adaptive presentation of feedback based on students’ affective state. In: Proceedings of the 20th International Conference on Intelligent User Interface. ACM, New York (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  70. Shen, L., Wang, M., Shen, R.: Affective e-learning: using “Emotional” data to improve learning in pervasive learning environment. J. Educ. Technol. Soc. 12(2), 176–189 (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  71. Stone-Romero, E.F.: Research strategies in industrial and organizational psychology: nonexperimental, quasi-experimental, and randomized experimental research in special purpose and nonspecial purpose settings. In: APA Handbook of Industrial and Organizational Psychology, Vol. 1: Building and Developing the Organization. APA Handbooks in Psychology®, pp. 37–72. American Psychological Association, Washington, DC (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  72. Lughofer, E.: Hybrid active learning for reducing the annotation effort of operators in classification systems. Pattern Recogn. 45(2), 884–896 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.patcog.2011.08.009

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Faculty of Psychology, Ruhr University Bochum, Bochum, Germany

    Corinna Peifer & Annette Kluge

  2. Faculty of Philosophy and Educational Sciences, Ruhr University Bochum, Bochum, Germany

    Nikol Rummel

  3. Faculty of Electrical Engineering and Information Technology, Ruhr University Bochum, Bochum, Germany

    Dorothea Kolossa

Authors
  1. Corinna Peifer
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Annette Kluge
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Nikol Rummel
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Dorothea Kolossa
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Corinna Peifer .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Coventry University, Coventry, UK

    Don Harris

  2. Cranfield University, Cranfield, UK

    Wen-Chin Li

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Peifer, C., Kluge, A., Rummel, N., Kolossa, D. (2020). Fostering Flow Experience in HCI to Enhance and Allocate Human Energy. In: Harris, D., Li, WC. (eds) Engineering Psychology and Cognitive Ergonomics. Mental Workload, Human Physiology, and Human Energy. HCII 2020. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 12186. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-49044-7_18

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-49044-7_18

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-49043-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-49044-7

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation