Skip to main content

The Behavioural Profiles of Energy Consumers: Comparison of the Decision Tree Method and the Logit Model

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Perspectives on Consumer Behaviour

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to explore the behavioural profiles of energy consumers, i.e. households (1) which have considered installing renewable energy sources (RES) and (2) which want to become prosumers. The identification of the user profile is vital so as to gain knowledge about users of small-scale generators in order to provide them with a personalised offer. The findings from this study could be valuable for local authorities, energy utilities and producers of RES installations. The main determinants of the willingness to install RES among households were explored by means of the empirical analysis of data collected by a survey of 960 households in Lower Silesia, a south-western region of Poland, in November and December 2015. The research identified the correlation between the households’ willingness to install RES (to become prosumers) and (1) socio-economic variables, (2) pro-ecological and pro-efficient behaviour variables, and (3) attitudinal variables. The importance of the variables was verified by a logit model and by the decision tree method. The authors used both methods to determine the key features of energy consumers and to make predictions about whether they are inclined to invest in RES and to become energy prosumers. The results obtained from these two methods were compared.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 149.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 199.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 199.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. 1.

    The values in brackets show what percentage of respondents are willing to install RES in this segment, then among the RG. For each variable, the RG is highlighted in Table 2.

References

  • Act of 20 February 2015 on renewable energy sources. (2015). Journal of Laws, Item 478.

    Google Scholar 

  • Albert, A., & Maasoumy, M. (2016). Predictive segmentation of energy consumers. Applied Energy, 177, 435–448. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2016.05.128.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Deeks, J. J., & Altman, D. G. (2004). Diagnostic tests 4: Likelihood ratios. BMJ, 329(7458), 168–169. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.329.7458.168.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Diamantopoulos, A., Schlegelmilch, B. B., Sinkovics, R. R., & Bohlen, G. M. (2003). Can socio-demographics still play a role in profiling green consumers? A review of the evidence and an empirical investigation. Journal of Business Research, 56(6), 465–480. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0148-2963(01)00241-7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Diaz-Rainey, I., & Ashton, J. K. (2011). Profiling potential green electricity tariff adopters: Green consumerism as an environmental policy tool? Business Strategy and the Environment, 20, 456–470. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.699.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Federacja Konsumentów. (2016). Jak zostać prosumentem. Accessed January 26, 2017, from, http://www.federacja-konsumentow.org.pl/n,159,1307,91,1,raport-federacji-konsumentow.html

  • Gautier, A., Hoet, B., Jacqmin, J., & van Driessche, S. (2019). Self-consumption choice of residential PV owners under net-metering. Energy Policy, 128, 648–653. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2019.01.055.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Glas, A. S., Lijmer, J. G., Prins, M. H., Bonsel, G. J., & Bossuyt, P. M. M. (2003). The diagnostic odds ratio: A single indicator of test performance. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 56(11), 1129–1135. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0895-4356(03)00177-X.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Górecki, B. R. (2013). Ekonometria podstawy teorii i praktyki. Warszawa: Key Text.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gruszczyński, M. (Ed.). (2010). Mikroekonometria. Modele i metody analizy danych indywidualnych. Warszawa: Oficyna Wolters Kluwer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hutt, M. D., & Spesh, T. W. (1997). Zarządzanie marketingiem. Strategia rynku dóbr i usłg przemysłowych. Warszawa: PWN.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kotler, P. (1986). The prosumer movement: A new challenge for marketers. Advances in Consumer Research, 13, 510–513.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kubli, M., Loock, M., & Wüstenhagen, R. (2018). The flexible prosumer: Measuring the willingness to co-create distributed flexibility. Energy Policy, 114, 540–548. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2017.12.044.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kufel, T. (2013). Ekonometria. Rozwiązywanie problemów z wykorzystaniem programu GRETL. Warszawa: PWN.

    Google Scholar 

  • Łapczyński, M. (2002). Badania segmentów rynku motoryzacyjnego z zastosowaniem drzew klasyfikacyjnych (CART). Zeszyty Naukowe Akademii Ekonomicznej w Krakowie, 586, 87–102.

    Google Scholar 

  • Łapczyński, M. (2010). Drzewa klasyfikacyjne i regresyjne w badaniach marketingowych. Kraków: Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Ekonomicznego w Krakowie.

    Google Scholar 

  • Markowicz, I. (2010). Statystyczna analiza żywotności firm. Szczecin: Wydawnictwo Naukowe Uniwersytetu Szczecińskiego.

    Google Scholar 

  • McKinney, W. (2010). Data structures for statistical computing in python (pp. 51–56). Proceedings of the 9th Python in Science Conference.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oberst, C. A., Schmitz, H., & Madlener, R. (2019). Are prosumer households that much different? Evidence from stated residential energy consumption in Germany. Ecological Economics, 158, 101–115. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2018.12.014.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Osińska, M. (Ed.). (2007). Ekonometria współczesna. Toruń: Wydawnictwo „Dom Organizatora”.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pedregosa, F., Varoquaux, G., Gramfort, A., Michel, V., Thirion, B., Grisel, O., Blondel, M., Prettenhofer, P., Weiss, R., Dubourg, V., VanderPlas, J., Passos, A., Cournapeau, D., Brucher, M., Perrot, M., & Duchesnay, E. (2011). Scikit-learn: Machine learning in python. Journal of Machine Learning Research, 12, 2825–2830.

    Google Scholar 

  • Penc, J. (1997). Leksykon biznesu. Warszawa: Agencja Wydawnicza Placet.

    Google Scholar 

  • Raschka, S. (2015). Python machine learning. Packt Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ropuszyńska-Surma, E., & Weglarz, M. (2018a). Identyfikacja czynników wpływających na przyszłych prosumentów. Studia i Prace Wydziału Nauk Ekonomicznych i Zarządzania, 54(3), 331–346.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ropuszyńska-Surma, E., & Weglarz, M. (2018b). Profiling end user of renewable energy sources among residential consumers in Poland. Sustainability, 10(12). https://doi.org/10.3390/su10124452.

  • Ropuszyńska-Surma, E., Weglarz, M., & Szwabiński, J. (2018). Energy prosumers. Profiling the energy microgeneration market in lower Silesia, Poland. Operations Research and Decisions, 28(1), 75–94. https://doi.org/10.5277/ord180106.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scarpa, R., & Willis, K. (2010). Willingness-to-pay for renewable energy: Primary and discretionary choice of British households’ for micro-generation technologies. Energy Economics, 32(1), 129–136. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2009.06.004.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Song, Y. Y., & Lu, Y. (2015). Decision tree methods: Applications for classification and prediction. Shanghai Archives of Psychiatry, 27(2), 130–135. https://doi.org/10.11919/j.issn.1002-0829.215044.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sütterlin, B., Brunner, T. A., & Siegrist, M. (2011). Who puts the most energy into energy conservation? A segmentation of energy consumers based on energy-related behavioral characteristics. Energy Policy, 39(12), 8137–8152. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2011.10.008.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Toffler, A. (1980). The third wave. New York: William Morrow and Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • van Rossum, G., & Drake, F. L. (Eds.). (2001). Python reference manual. Virginia: Python Labs.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Edyta Ropuszyńska-Surma .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Appendix

Appendix

Fig. 1
A horizontal hierarchy presents a decision tree. It depicts various combinations of entropy, samples, and values originating from a particular combination of entropy, sample, and value.

Decision tree for people who considered renewable energy sources and decided not to proceed with investment (limited to four levels only). Source: Ropuszyńska-Surma et al. (2018)

Table 8 The results of estimation of the logit model for all variables
Table 9 The multicollinearity coefficients for all the independent variables

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Ropuszyńska-Surma, E., Węglarz, M. (2020). The Behavioural Profiles of Energy Consumers: Comparison of the Decision Tree Method and the Logit Model. In: Sroka, W. (eds) Perspectives on Consumer Behaviour. Contributions to Management Science. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-47380-8_10

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics