Abstract
The objective of this article is to identify and characterize electricity users in terms of their attitudes towards energy saving. The analyses applied data from the proprietary survey conducted among the inhabitants of the Silesian Province. The respondents were asked, inter alia, about saving electricity through short- and long-term investment actions. Model types of users were defined, so that it was possible to assign the surveyed people to appropriate groups using distance measures dedicated to non-metric variables. Moreover, the user classes formed in this way were characterized; and for that purpose, the measures to study the dependence of qualitative variables—the chi-square test and the Cramer’s V coefficient—were used. As expected, it turned out that the respondents’ actions were significantly impacted by financial considerations, i.e. income, which determined the nature of the undertaken investments, and thus significantly influenced the result of the classification. However, as the research results have shown, also aspects related to environmental protection significantly differentiate the investors’ attitudes. People focused on long-term actions, aimed at reducing energy consumption, more often declare their interest in subsidies for environmental protection, spending higher amounts on energy-saving devices, or are even guided by ecological signs when doing shopping. The authors’ original contribution is the proposed segmentation of respondents and their characterization based on the obtained empirical data.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
Detailed information about the project is available at www.eco-bot.eu.
- 2.
As it was already mentioned, in conducted study, a non-random sample selection was applied. However, the authors used the tools of mathematical statistics, hoping to select a sample close to a random one. Considering the use of only descriptive statistics measures in the characteristics of the obtained groups would significantly reduce the value of this part of the study.
- 3.
Some respondents were reluctant to provide information concerning their financial situation (24.5% of respondents refused to share information on income). Moreover, the last position in the rating scale question on declared income was open, so the remaining group of the respondents had only quantiles determined in the distribution of income.
References
Accenture (2010) Understanding consumer preferences in energy efficiency. Accenture end-consumer observatory on electricity management 2010. Accenture. https://www.accenture.com/t20160811t002327__w__/us-en/_acnmedia/accenture/next-gen/insight-unlocking-value-of-digital-consumer/pdf/accenture-understanding-consumer-preferences-energy-efficiency-10-0229-mar-11.pdf. Accessed 30 Oct 2020
Albert A, Maasoumy M (2016) Predictive segmentation of energy consumers. Appl Energy 177:435–448
Bator A, Kukuła W (2016) Rola konsumenta w transformacji energetycznej. Fundacja ClientEarth Prawnicy dla Ziemi, Warszawa
Bylok F (2014) Prosumpcja na rynku energii elektrycznej w perspektywie teoretycznej. Biblioteka Źródłowa Energetyki Prosumenckiej. Klaster 3x20. www.klaster3x20.pl. Accessed 30 Oct 2020
Cabinet Office Behavioural Insights Team (2011) Behaviour change and energy use: behavioural insights team paper. Cabinet Office Behavioural Insights Team. https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/behaviour-change-and-energy-use-behavioural-insights-team-paper. Accessed 30 Oct 2020
Clancy D, O’Loughlin D (2002) Identifying the ‘energy champion’: a consumer behaviour approach to understanding the home energy conservation market in Ireland. Int J Nonprofit Voluntary Sector Mark 7(3):258–270
Dąbrowska A, Bylok F, Janoś-Kresło M, Kiełczewski D, Ozimek I (2015) Kompetencje konsumentów. Innowacyjne zachowania. Zrównoważona konsumpcja. PWE, Warszawa
de Almeida A, Fonseca P, Schlomann B, Feilberg N (2011) Characterization of the household electricity consumption in the EU, potential energy savings and specific policy recommendations. Energy Build 43(8):1884–1894
European Commission (2006) Communication from the commission—action plan for energy efficiency: realising the potential. European Commission Report. COM (2006), 545 Final
Frederiks E, Stenner K, Hobman E (2015) Household energy use: applying behavioural economics to understand consumer decision-making and behaviour. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 41:1385–1394
Gardner G, Stern P (1996) Environmental problems and human behavior. Allyn & Bacon, Boston
GUS (2020) Bank Danych Lokalnych. Retrieved from https://bdl.stat.gov.pl/BDL/start
Hille S (2016) The myth of the unscrupulous energy user’s dilemma: evidence from Switzerland. J Consum Policy 39:327–347
Kiełczewski D (2005) Style konsumpcji jako przejaw zróżnicowania poziomu życia. Gospodarka Narodowa 5–6:87–100
Kiełczewski D (2015) Wpływ ekologizacji konsumpcji na zmiany w zarządzaniu organizacjami. Handel Wewnętrzny 6(359):55–63
Lutzenhiser L (1993) Social and behavioral aspects of energy use. Annu Rev Energy Env 18:247–289
Matel A (2016) Przesłanki ekologizacji konsumpcji z perspektywy zachowań konsumenckich. Reasons for green consumption from the perspective of consumer behavior. Zarządzanie. Teoria i Praktyka 16(2):55–61
Matel A, Poskrobko T, Andrejuk D, Dardzińska M, Kulesza J, Piotrowska B (2018) Różnica między poznawczym a behawioralnym komponentem postaw ekologicznych młodych konsumentów. Handel Wewnętrzny 6(377):404–415
Murawska A, Mrozińska M (2016) Korzystanie z energii elektrycznej w krajach Unii Europejskiej i w Polsce w aspekcie wspierania zrównoważonej konsumpcji [The use of electricity in the European Union and in Poland in terms of promoting sustainable consumption]. Zeszyty Naukowe Szkoły Głównej Gospodarstwa Wiejskiego w Warszawie. Problemy Rolnictwa Światowego 16(XXXI)(2):223–231
Nagaj R (2018) Metody behawioralne w ocenie zachowań konsumentów na rynku energii elektrycznej. Rynek Energii 3(136):3–9
Nakamura E (2016) Electricity saving behavior of households by making efforts, replacing appliances, and renovations: em-pirical analysis using a multivariate ordered probit model. Int J Consum Stud 40:675–684
OECD (2002) Towards sustainable household consumption? Trends and policies in OECD countries. From https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264175068-en. Accessed 30 Oct 2020
Pluskwa-Dąbrowski K (2016) Konsument w energetyce – rzut oka w przyszłość. Federacja Konsumentów. https://www.documents.clientearth.org/wp-content/uploads/library/2016-12-07-konsument-w-energetyce-rzut-oka-w-przyszlosc-ext-pl.pdf. Accessed 30 Oct 2020
Polityka gospodarki niskoemisyjnej dla Województwa Śląskiego. Regionalna polityka energetyczna do roku 2030-projekt (2020) Katowice: Urząd Marszałkowski Województwa Śląskiego. https://www.slaskie.pl/content/gospodarka-niskoemisyjna. Accessed 30 Oct 2020
Popczyk J (2014) Energetyka prosumencka. O dynamice interakcji dwóch trajektorii rozwoju w energetyce: pomostowej/zstępującej i nowej/wstępującej. Europejski Kongres Finansowy. Instytut Badań nad Gospodarką Rynkową – Gdańska Akademia Bankowa & Jan Popczyk
Rogers D, Tanimoto T (1960) A computer program for classifying plants. Science 132:1115–1118
Ropuszyńska-Surma E, Węglarz M (2018a) Profiling end user of renewable energy sources among residential consumers in Poland. Sustainability 10(12):1–21
Ropuszyńska-Surma E, Węglarz M (2018b) Proekologiczne i prooszczędnościowe zachowania gospodarstw domowych jako konsumentów energii. Ekonomia Wroclaw Econ Rev 24(3). Acta Universitatis Wratislaviensis 3881:3–39
SECC (2019) Consumer pulse and market segmentation. Wave 7. Smart Energy Consumer Collaborative. https://smartenergycc.org/consumer-pulse-and-market-segmentation-wave-7-report/. Accessed 30 Oct 2020
Seidl R, Moser C, Blumer Y (2017) Navigating behavioral energy sufficiency. Results from a survey in Swiss cities on potential behavior change. PLoS ONE 12(10):e0185963. From https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0185963. Accessed 30 Oct 2020
Słupik S (2015) Świadomy konsument energii w województwie śląskim w świetle badań ankietowych. Studia ekonomiczne. Zeszyty Naukowe Uniwersytetu Ekonomicznego w Katowicach 232:215–236
Słupik S, Kos J, Trzęsiok J (2019) Report on findings from consultations and online-survey. Personalised ICT-tools for the active engagement of consumers towards sustainable energy. Eco-bot. Project. www.eco-bot.eu. Accessed 30 Oct 2020
Steg L, Dreijerink L, Abrahamse W (2005) Factors influencing the acceptability of energy policies: a test of VBN theory. J Environ Psychol 25:415–425
Walesiak M (2011) Uogólniona miara odległości GDM w statystycznej analizie wielowymiarowej z wykorzystaniem programu R. Uniwersytet Ekonomiczny we Wrocławiu, Wrocław
Zhou K, Yang S (2016) Understanding household energy consumption behavior: the contribution of energy big data analytics. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 56:810–819
Acknowledgments
This work is supported by European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation program: “Reducing energy consumption and carbon footprint by smart and sustainable use”, as a part of the currently implemented project “Personalised ICT-tools for the Active Engagement of Consumers Towards Sustainable Energy. Eco-bot” under grant agreement No. 767625.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2021 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this paper
Cite this paper
Słupik, S., Trzęsiok, J. (2021). Is Society Ready for Long-Term Investments?—Profiles of Electricity Users in Silesia. In: Jajuga, K., Najman, K., Walesiak, M. (eds) Data Analysis and Classification. SKAD 2020. Studies in Classification, Data Analysis, and Knowledge Organization. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-75190-6_11
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-75190-6_11
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-75189-0
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-75190-6
eBook Packages: Mathematics and StatisticsMathematics and Statistics (R0)