Skip to main content

Transparency and Disclosure Regulations—A Valuable Component of Improving Corporate Governance Practice in Transition Economies

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Social Responsibility and Corporate Governance

Abstract

Using a sample of public joint stock companies in Slovenia, we investigated the transparency and disclosure practices in the under-investigated context of transition economies. We combined the research on transparency and disclosure with the more recent studies on corporate governance from the perspective of the institutional theory. The SEECGAN Index methodology was applied that enables exploration of the quality of transparency and disclosure practice as one of the component of corporate governance. The methodology was applied on company and national levels as well as on international level by comparing the results among participating transition countries (i.e., Croatia and Slovenia). Research results show that the transparency and disclosure practice is of first-class and good quality in more than 80% of Slovenian prime and standard market companies listed on the Ljubljana Stock Exchange. Even though the transparency and disclosure practice is of better quality in Slovenian than in Croatian companies, improvements are required in several areas. The findings of the research indicate that several regulations (i.e., legislation, regulations and recommendations of the government, the Stock Exchange, and the directors’ and managers’ associations) positively affect governance practice in Slovenian public joint stock companies. These findings support the concept of institutional complementarities that provides a useful framework for exploring the interactions among institutions that result in synergetic effects of their activities and influence the effectiveness of the firm-level governance practices. Regular monitoring of transparency and disclosure practices is proposed for enabling companies’, the stock exchange’s and policy makers’ in-depth insight into the quality of such practices and indicating areas where improvements are required.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Aguilera, R. V., & Cuervo-Cazurra, A. (2004). Codes of good governance worldwide: What’s the trigger? Organization Studies, 25(3), 415–443.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aguilera, R. V., Filatotchev, I., Gospel, H., & Jackson, G. (2008). An organizational approach to comparative corporate governance: Costs, contingencies, and complementarities. Organization Science, 19(3), 475–492.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aguilera, R. V., & Cuervo-Cazurra, A. (2009). Codes of good governance. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 17(3), 376–387.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aguilera, R. V., & Jackson, G. (2010). Comparative and international corporate governance. Academy of Management Annals, 4(1), 485–556.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aguilera, R., Florackis, C., & Kim, H. (2016). Advancing the corporate governance research agenda. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 24(3), 172–180.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bauwhede, H. V., & Willekens, M. (2008). Disclosure on corporate governance in the European Union. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 16(2), 101–115.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bekö, J., & Jagrič, T. (2011). Demand models for direct mail and periodicals delivery service: Results for a transition economy. Applied Economics, 43(9), 1125–11138.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berglöf, E., & Pajuste, A. (2005). What do firms disclose and why? Enforcing corporate governance and transparency in Central and Eastern Europe. Oxford Review of Economic Policy, 21(2), 178–197. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxrep/gri011.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Braguinsky, S., & Mityakov, S. (2015). Foreign corporations and the culture of transparency: Evidence from Russian administrative data. Journal of Financial Economics, 117(1), 139–164.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Buşega, I., & Dachin, A. (2015). Aspects of structural adjustments in CEE countries during the economic crisis. Post-Crisis Developments in Economics, 24(1), 75–84.

    Google Scholar 

  • Collier, P., & Zaman, M. (2005). Convergence in European corporate governance: The audit committee concept. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 13(6), 753–768.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cromme, G. (2005). Corporate governance in Germany and the German corporate governance code. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 13(3), 362–367.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Djokić, D., Kladnik, B., Martinčič, P., & Duh, M. (2014). The SEECGAN Research—Slovenia (Working Material). Koper: Fakulteta za management Univerze na Primorskem; Maribor: Ekonomsko-poslovna fakulteta Univerze v Mariboru.

    Google Scholar 

  • Djokić, D., & Duh, M. (2017). Measuring the corporate governance quality: The case of Slovenia. In J. Belak & M. Duh (Eds.), Ethics, social responsibility and innovation in corporate governance (pp. 99–122). Newcastle: Cambridge Scholar Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Duh, M. (2017). Corporate governance codes and their role in improving corporate governance practice. In O. L. Emeagwali (Ed.), Corporate governance and strategic decision making (pp. 53–83). Rijeka: InTech.

    Google Scholar 

  • Durisin, B., & Puzone, F. (2009). Maturation of corporate governance research, 1993–2007: An assessment. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 17(3), 266–291.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Durnev, A., & Kim, E. H. (2005). To steal or not to steal: Firm attributes, legal environment, and valuation. Journal of Finance, 60(3), 1461–1493.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fama, E. F., & Jensen, M. C. (1983). Separation of ownership and control. Journal of Law and Economics, 26(2), 301–325.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Filatotchev, I., Jackson, G., & Nakajima, C. (2013). Corporate governance and national institutions: A review and emerging research agenda. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 30(4), 965–986.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Filatotchev, I., Zhang, X., & Piesse, J. (2011). Multiple agency perspective, family control, and private information abuse in an emerging economy. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 28(1), 69–93.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grosman, A., Okhmatovskiy, I., & Wright, M. (2016). State control and corporate governance in transition economies: 25 years on from 1989. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 24(3), 200–221.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Healy, P. M., & Palepu, K. G. (2001). Information asymmetry, corporate disclosure, and the capital markets: A review of the empirical disclosure literature. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 31(1–3), 405–440.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hoskisson, R. E., Wright, M., Filatotchev, I., & Peng, M. W. (2013). Emerging multinationals from mid-range economies: The influence of institutions and factor markets. Journal of Management Studies, 50(7), 1295–1321.

    Google Scholar 

  • Judge, W. (2008). Agency and institutions. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 16(3), ii–iii.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kumar, P., & Zattoni, A. (2015). In search of a greater pluralism of theories and methods in governance research. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 23(1), 1–2.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lahovnik, M. (2004). The cornerstones of corporate strategies in Slovenia and Croatia. Journal for East European Management Studies, 9(3), 313–327.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • La Porta, R., Lopez-de-Silanes, F., Shleifer, A., & Vishny, R. W. (1998). Law and finance. Journal of Political Economy, 106(6), 1113–1155.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • La Porta, R., Lopez-de-Silanes, F., Shleifer, A., & Vishny, R. W. (2000). Investor protection and corporate governance. Journal of Financial Economics, 58(1), 3–27.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Larcker, D., & Tayan, B. (2011). Corporate governance matters: A closer look at organizational choices and their consequences. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • LJSE Analysis. (2012). Analiza razkritij odstopanj v izjavah o skladnosti s kodeksom (Analysis of disclosure of deviations in declarations on compliance with the code). Ljubljana: Ljubljana Stock Exchange. Accessed January 5, 2016 from http://www.ljse.si/media/Attachments/Izdajatelji/Analiza_razkritij_odstopanj_izjav_CG_2012_internet.pdf.

  • LJSE Analysis. (2015). Poročilo o analizi skladnosti s kodeksom upravljanja javnih delniških družb v Sloveniji za obdobje 2011–2014 (Report of analysis of compliance with the governance code of public companies in Slovenia for period 2011–2014). Ljubljana: Ljubljana Stock Exchange and Slovenian Directors’ Association. Accessed January 4, 2016 from http://seonet.ljse.si/?doc=LATEST_PUBLIC_ANNOUNCEMENTS&doc_id=58513.

  • LJSE Guidelines. (2013). Guidelines on disclosure for listed companies. Ljubljana Stock Exchange. Available at: http://www.ljse.si/cgi-bin/jve.cgi?doc=1539 [22 July 2015].

  • LJSE Markets. (2015). Markets of the Ljubljana stock exchange. Available at: http://www.ljse.si/cgi-bin/jve.cgi?doc=8371 [22 July 2015].

  • Luo, Y., & Salterio, S. E. (2014). Governance quality in a “comply or explain governance disclosure regime. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 22(6), 460–481.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mangena, M., & Pike, R. (2005). The effect of audit committee shareholding, financial expertise and size on interim financial disclosure. Accounting and Business Research, 35(4), 327–349.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Martynova, M., & Renneboog, L. (2010). A corporate governance index: convergence and diversity of national corporate governance regulations (Discussion Paper). Tilburg University. Available at: http://ssrn.com/ [7 July 2015].

  • Morck, R., Wolfenzon, D., & Yeung, B. (2005). Corporate governance, economic entrenchment and growth. Journal of Economic Literature, 43(3), 655–720.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nowland, J. (2008). The effect of national governance codes on firm disclosure practices: Evidence from analyst earnings forecasts. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 16(6), 475–491.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Patel, S. A., & Dallas, G. (2002, October 16). Transparency and disclosure: Overview of methodology and study resultsUnited States. SSRN. Available at: http://ssrn.com/abstract=422800 [29 June 2015].

  • Renders, A., & Gaeremynck, A. (2012). Corporate governance, principal-principal agency conflicts, and firm value in European listed companies. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 20(2), 125–143.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schiehll, E., Ahmadjian, C., & Filatotchev, I. (2014). National governance Bundles perspective: Understanding the diversity of corporate governance practices at the firm and country levels. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 22(3), 179–184.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sheridan, L., Jones, E., & Marston, C. (2006). Corporate governance codes and the supply of corporate information in the UK. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 14(5), 497–503.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Slovenian CG Code. (2009). Kodeks upravljanja javnih delniških družb (Corporate Governance Code for Joint Stock Companies). Accessed on March 3, 2015 from http://www.ljse.si/media/Attachments/Izdajatelji/Kodeks_veljaven_8122009_koncna_verzija.pdf.

  • Tipurić, D., Trivun, V., Hruška, D., Silajdžić, V., Mahmutćehajić, F., Mešina, M., & Mrgud, M. (2012). Some relevant corporate governance issues in Croatia and Bosnia and Herzegovina. International Journal of Management Cases, 14(3), 81–89. https://doi.org/10.5848/APBJ.2012.00073.

  • Tipurić, D., Dvorski, K., & Delić, M. (2014). Measuring the quality of corporate governance—A review of corporate governance indices. European Journal of Economics and Management, 1(1), 234–252.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tipurić, D., Mešin Žagar, M., Čeh Časni, A., Djokić, D., Duh, M., Vrboski, P., Hadzi Vasileva-Markovska, V., & Lovrinčević, M. (2016). The differences in board structure and composition in Croatia, Macedonia and Slovenia. Paper presented at OFEL 2016, Dubrovnik, Croatia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tipurić, D., et al. (2015). Korporativno upravljanje u Hrvatskoj (Corporate Governance in Croatia). CIRU: Zagreb.

    Google Scholar 

  • Waring, P., & Edwards, T. (2008). Socially responsible investment: Explaining its uneven development and human resource management consequences. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 16(3), 135–145.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weimer, J., & Pape, J. C. (1999). A taxonomy of systems of corporate governance. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 7(2), 152–166.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zattoni, A., & Cuomo, F. (2008). Why adopt codec of good governance? A comparison of institutional and efficiency perspectives. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 16(1), 1–15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zattoni, A., & Van Eees, H. (2012). How to contribute to the development of a global understanding of corporate governance? Reflections from submitted and published articles in CGIR. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 20(1), 1–2.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ZFTI. (2007). Zakon o trgu finančnih instrumentov (Market of Financial Instruments Act) (Official Gazette of the Republic of Slovenia, No. 108/10), last amended in 2012.

    Google Scholar 

  • ZGD-1. (2009). Zakon o gospodarskih družbah (Companies Act). (Official Gazette of the Republic of Slovenia, No. 65/09), last amended in 2015.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mojca Duh .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Duh, M., Djokić, D. (2021). Transparency and Disclosure Regulations—A Valuable Component of Improving Corporate Governance Practice in Transition Economies. In: Mulej, M., O’Sullivan, G., Štrukelj, T. (eds) Social Responsibility and Corporate Governance. Palgrave Studies in Governance, Leadership and Responsibility. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-46095-2_8

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics