Skip to main content

Entrepreneurship for Sustainable Cities

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Building Sustainable Cities

Abstract

This study analyzes the effect of the university ecosystem, self-efficacy of the students, social entrepreneurial perception of the entrepreneur on the social entrepreneurial intention. Second-generation structural equation method (PLS-SEM) was used to analyze the results, specifically, the SmartPLS 3.2.7 software applied to data on 6425 Peruvian university students. The validity of an explanatory model of entrepreneurial intention was evaluated based on personal and situational determinants. The main contribution of this study is to show that 63% of students had an intention of social entrepreneurship; no significant differences were found in the sex of the students with respect to the intention of entrepreneurship. Only 18% were participating in a social enterprise. It was evidenced that the entrepreneurial support provided by the university ecosystem does not directly influence the social entrepreneurial intention (β = 0.038, p = 0.001), nor in the self-efficacy developed by the students (β = −0.045, p = 0.551). However, it directly influences the entrepreneurial orientation (β = −0.185, p = 0.001) and the positive perception of the social entrepreneur (β = −0.241, p = 0.001). Through these variables (which assume a mediating role), the university ecosystem exerts an indirect influence on self-efficacy and later on entrepreneurial intention. The results are useful to design models of development of social enterprises in the universities taking into account all the factors reported as important by the students.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Achieve. (2014). The 2014 Millenial impact report. Retrieved February 5, 2020, from http://casefoundation.org/wp-content/uploads/2014/11/MillennialImpactReport-2014.pdf

  • Ajzen, I. (1985). From intentions to actions: A theory of planned behavior. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-69746-3_2

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Ajzen, I. (1991). The theory of planned behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50, 179–211.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bandura, A. (1986). Social foundations of thought and action: A social cognitive theory. Retrieved February 5, 2020, fromhttp://psycnet.apa.org/record/1985-98423-000

  • Bandura, A. (2012). On the functional properties of perceived self-efficacy revisited. Journal of Management, 38(1), 9–44. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206311410606

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brinckerhoff, P. C. (2000). Social entrepreneurship: The art of mission-based venture development (Wiley Nonprofit Law, Finance and Management Series).

    Google Scholar 

  • Brockhaus Sr., R. H., & Horwitz, P. S. (1986). The psychology of the entrepreneur. In D. L. Sexton & R. W. Smilor (Eds.), The art and science of entrepreneurship (pp. 25–48). Cambridge: Ballinger.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chang, W., Liu, W., & Chiang, S. (2014). A study of the relationship between entrepreneurship courses and opportunity identification: An empirical survey. Asia Pacific Management Review, 19(1), 1–24. https://doi.org/10.6126/APMR.2014.19.1.01

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen, C., Gene, P., & Crick, A. (1998). Does entrepreneurial self-efficacy distinguish entrepreneurs form managers? Journal of Business Venturing, 13, 295–316. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0883-9026(97)00029-3

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Comisión de las Naciones Europeas. (2006). Communication from the Commission to the Council, the European Parliament, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions. Apply the Lisbon community program: Promote business mentality through education and training [Comunicación de la Comisión al Consejo, al Parlamento Europeo, al Comité Económico y Social Europeo y al Comité de la Regiones. Aplicar el programa comunitario de Lisboa: Fomentar la mentalidad empresarial mediante la educación y la formación]. (pp. 1–12). Bruselas.

    Google Scholar 

  • DaFonseca, B. (2015). Study of entrepreneurial intention in Portugal from the perspective of values and gender [Estudio de la intención emprendedora en Portugal desde la perspectiva de los valores y de género]. Doctoral Thesis, Universidad Nacional de Educación a Distancia. 250 pp. Madrid.

    Google Scholar 

  • DePablo, J., &Uribe, J. (2017). Experiences of social entrepreneurship in Latin America [Experiencias de emprendimiento social en Iberoamérica] (Vol. 67). Universidad Almería.

    Google Scholar 

  • Doherty, B., Haugh, H., & Lyon, F. (2014). Social enterprises as hybrid organizations: A review and research agenda. International Journal of Management Reviews, 16(4), 417–436.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • van Doorn, S., Heyden, M. L., & Volberda, H. W. (2017). Enhancing entrepreneurial orientation in dynamic environments: The interplay between top management team advice-seeking and absorptive capacity. Long Range Planning, 50(2), 134–144.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Drayton, W. (2002). The citizen sector: Becoming as entrepreneurial and competitive as business. California Management Review, 44(3), 120–132.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Duarte, T., & Tibana, M. R. (2009). Emprendimiento, una opción para el desarrollo. Scientia et technica, 15(43), 326–331.

    Google Scholar 

  • Easterly, W. (2008). Design and reform of institutions in LDCS and transition economies. Institutions: Top down or bottom up? American Economic Review: Papers & Proceedings, 98(2), 95–99.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fishbein, M., & Ajzen, I. (1973). Attribution of responsibility: A theoretical note. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 9(2), 148–153. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-1031(73)90006-1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Forbes. (2015). 5 Reasons why social entrepreneurship is the new business model. Retrieved February 5, 2020, fromhttps://www.forbes.com/sites/meimeifox/2016/08/08/5-reasons-why-social-entrepreneurship-is-the-new-business-model/#54af2fd144ca

  • Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error: Algebra and statistics. Journal of Marketing Research, 382–388.

    Google Scholar 

  • Franke, N., & Lüthje, C. (2004). Entrepreneurial intentions of business students—A benchmarking study. International Journal of Innovation and Technology Management, 1(03), 269–288.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gaete Quezada, R. (2015). University volunteering as a field of service learning and social entrepreneurship: A case study [El voluntariado Universitario como ámbito de aprendizaje servicio y emprendimiento social: Un estudio de caso]. Ultima década, 23(43), 235–260.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Galloway, L., & Brown, W. (2002). Entrepreneurship education at university: A driver in the creation of high growth firms? Education + Training, 44(8/9), 398–405. https://doi.org/10.1108/00400910210449231

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gestion. (2017). Economic growth in Peru and its presidents [Crecimiento económico en el Perú y sus presidentes]. Retrieved February 5, 2020, fromhttps://gestion.pe/blog/economiaparatodos/2017/09/crecimiento-economico-en-el-peru-y-sus-presidentes.html

  • GEM (2018). GEM 2018 / 2019 Global Report. Available in https://www.gemconsortium.org/report/gem-2018-2019-global-report. Accessed 10 May, 2020.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guerrero, M., Urbano, D., Cunningham, J., & Gajón, E. (2017). Determinants of Graduates’ start-ups creation across a Multi-Campus Entrepreneurial University: The case of Monterrey Institute of Technology and Higher Education. Journal of Small Business Management, 56(1). https://doi.org/10.1111/jsbm.12366

  • Haugh, H. M., & Talwar, A. (2016). Linking social entrepreneurship and social change: The mediating role of empowerment. Journal of Business Ethics, 133(4), 643–658.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hussain, A., Mohammad, S., & Ahmed, P. (2016). Impact of entrepreneurial education on entrepreneurial alertness. Journal of Social and Organizational Analysis, 1–9.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ireland, R. D., & Webb, J. W. (2009). Crossing the great divide of strategic entrepreneurship: Transitioning between exploration and exploitation. Business Horizons, 52(5), 469–479.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jin, L., Madison, K., Kraiczy, N. D., Kellermanns, F. W., Crook, T. R., & Xi, J. (2017). Entrepreneurial team composition characteristics and new venture performance: A meta-analysis. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 41(5), 743–771.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jung, D. I., Ehrlich, S. B., De Noble, A. F., & Baik, K. B. (2001). Entrepreneurial self-efficacy and its relationship to entrepreneurial action: A comparative study between the US and Korea. Management International, 6(1), 41.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kelley, D., Bosma, N., &Amorós, J. (2011). Global entrepreneurship monitor 2010 Global report. Global Entrepreneurship Research Association (GERA). Retrieved February 5, 2020, fromhttp://www.av-asesores.com/upload/479.PDF

  • Kolvereid, L., & Moen, O. (1997). Entrepreneurship among business graduates: Does a major in entrepreneurship make a difference? Journal of European Industrial Training, 21(4), 154–116.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Krueger Jr., N. F., Reilly, M. D., & Carsrud, A. L. (2000). Competing models of entrepreneurial intentions. Journal of Business Venturing, 15(5–6), 411–432.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liñán, F., &Chen, Y. (2009). Development and cross-cultural application of a specific instrument to measure entrepreneurial intentions. ET&P, 593–617. Retrieved February 5, 2020, fromhttp://institucional.us.es/vie/documentos/resultados/LinanChen2009.pdf

  • Madrigal, B.,&Santamaria, C. (2015). Entrepreneurial university, formal and informal factors: Theoretical discussion [Universidad emprendedora, factores formales e informales: discusión teórica]. En Madrigal, B. (Coord.), Cuatro ejes para conformar una cultura emprendedora. Prometeo editors.

    Google Scholar 

  • Manolova, T., Eunni, R., & Gyoshev, B. (2008). Institutional environments for entrepreneurship: Evidence from emerging economies in Eastern Europe. ET&P, 203–218. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-652.2007.00222.x

  • Miao, C., Humphrey, R. H., Qian, S., & Pollack, J. M. (2018). Emotional intelligence and entrepreneurial intentions: An exploratory meta-analysis. Career Development International.https://doi.org/10.1108/CDI-01-2018-0019

  • Moriano, J., Palací, F., & Morales, J. (2006b). The psychosocial profile of the university entrepreneur [El perfil psicosocial del emprendedor universitario]. Revista de Psicología del Trabajo y de las Organizaciones, 22(1), 75–99.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moriano, J., Palací, J., & Morales, J. (2006a). Adaptation and validation in Spain of the entrepreneurship self-efficacy scale [Adaptación y validación en España de la escala de Autoeficacia Emprendedora]. Revista de Psicología Social, 21(1), 51–64.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Navarro, M. (2014). The psychosocial profile of women entrepreneurs [El perfil psicosocial de la mujer emprendedora]. University of Valladolid. Retrieved February 5, 2020, fromhttp://uvadoc.uva.es/bitstream/10324/7059/1/TFG-G%20646.pdf

  • Nga, J. K. W., & Shamuganathan, G. (2010). The influence of personality traits and demographic factors on social entrepreneurship start up intentions. Journal of Business Ethics, 95(2), 259–282. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-009-0358-8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nicolas Martínez, C., & Rubio Bañón, A. M. (2012). Social entrepreneurship: A comparison between Spain and South American countries [El emprendimiento social: una comparativa entre España y países sudamericanos]. Faedpyme International Review, 1(1), 38–49.

    Google Scholar 

  • North, D. (1990). Institutions, institutional change and economic performance. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Ringle, C. M., Wende, S., &Becker, J. M. (2015). SmartPLS 3. Boenningstedt: SmartPLS GmbH. Retrieved February 5, 2020, fromhttp://www.smartpls.com

  • Rivera, R. G., Santos, D., Martín-Fernández, M., Requero, B., & Cancela, A. (2018). Predicting attitudes and behavioural intentions towards social entrepreneurship: The role of servant leadership in young people [Predicción de las actitudes y las intenciones conductuales hacia el emprendimiento social: el papel del liderazgo de servicio en los jóvenes]. Revista de Psicología Social, 33(3), 650–681.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rueda, I., Fernández, A., & Herreo, A. (2012). University students and entrepreneurship: Psychological determinants of the intention of creating your own business [Estudiantes universitarios y emprendimiento: determinantes psicológicos de la intención de creación de un negocio propio]. FAEDPYME International Review, 1(2), 9–15.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schwens, C., Zapkau, F. B., Bierwerth, M., Isidor, R., Knight, G., & Kabst, R. (2018). International entrepreneurship: A meta–analysis on the internationalization and performance relationship. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 42(5), 734–768.

    Google Scholar 

  • Serida, J., Guerrero, C., Alzamora, J., Borda, A., & Morales, O. (2017). Global entrepreneurship monitor: Perú 2016–2017. Lima: Biblioteca Nacional del Perú.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shapero, A., &Sokol, L. (1982). The social dimensions of entrepreneurship.

    Google Scholar 

  • Soria-Barreto, K., Zúñiga-Jara, S., & Ruiz Campo, S. (2016). Determinants of entrepreneurial intention: New evidence [Determinantes de la intención emprendedora: Nueva evidencia]. Interciencia, 41(5), 325–329.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thompson, J., Alvy, G., & Lees, A. (2000). Social entrepreneurship–a new look at the people and the potential. Management Decision, 38(5), 328–338.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yeng, O., Selvarajah, C., & Meyer, D. (2011). Inclination towards entrepreneurship among university students: An empirical study of Malaysian university students. International Journal of Business and Social Science, 2(4), 206–222. Retrieved February 5, 2020, fromhttp://www.ijbssnet.com/journals/Vol._2_No._4%3B_March_2011/24.pdf

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Aldo Alvarez-Risco .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Alvarez-Risco, A., Lopez-Odar, D., Chafloque-Cespedes, R., Sekar, M.C. (2020). Entrepreneurship for Sustainable Cities. In: Alvarez-Risco, A., Rosen, M.A., Del-Aguila-Arcentales, S., Marinova, D. (eds) Building Sustainable Cities. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-45533-0_19

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics