Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

The Influence of Personality Traits and Demographic Factors on Social Entrepreneurship Start Up Intentions

  • Published:
Journal of Business Ethics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The sheer impact of the recent global financial turmoil and scandals (such as Enron and WorldCom) has demonstrated that unbridled commercial entrepreneurs who are allowed to pursue their short-term opportunities regardless of the consequences has led to a massive depreciation of the wealth of nations, social livelihood and environmental degradation. This article suggests that the time has come for entrepreneurs to adopt a more integrative view of business that blends economic, social and environmental values. Social entrepreneurs present such a proposition through their deep commitment towards the social vision, appreciation of sustainable practices, innovativeness, ability to build social networks and also generate viable financial returns. It could be expected that social entrepreneurs often possess certain distinct personality characteristics which define their behaviours/actions. Personality traits are partly developed by innate nurturing, socialization and education. These tacit traits are also formed values/beliefs held and play an important role in driving social entrepreneurial decision making. Thus, personality traits may influence the intentions and the manner in which the individual acts. We hold that if social entrepreneurship is to be effective and impactful, business and management education can facilitate the development of these critical personality traits. Thus, this study primes at determining the personality traits that influence social entrepreneurs’ start-up intentions. It also reinforces the findings that personality traits do influence entrepreneurship in general. This study examines the influence of the Big Five personality traits on social entrepreneurship dimensions. The findings reveal that agreeableness positively influences all dimensions of social entrepreneurship, whereas openness exerts a positive influence on social vision, innovation and financial returns. Methodologically, this study develops valid and reliable scales for social entrepreneurship and verifies the adopted Big Five personality measure of Schmit et al. (Pers Psychol 53:153–193, 2000) using the five-point Likert scale. The implication of this study is that element of appreciation of social responsibility, sustainability and character development needs to be integrated within the business education curriculum to support social entrepreneurs in realizing genuine value and impact to the causes and communities they serve. Future business leaders also need to be equipped with entrepreneurship skills, while exuding independent and reflective thinking in the pursuit life-long learning. The originality of this study lies in its focus on personality traits on social rather than commercial entrepreneurship. It is hoped that the findings will trigger a paradigm shift towards greater social entrepreneurship through education by nurturing sustainable development values in future business graduates.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Abd Moen, J., Abd Rahman, I., Md Salleh, M.F. and Ibrahim, R. (2004) A study on entrepreneurial attitudes among youths in Malaysia. Case study: Institute Kemahiran Belia Negara Malaysia, Journal of American Academy of Business 4(1/2): 192-197.

    Google Scholar 

  • Abu Elanain, H.M. (2008) An investigation of relationship of openness to experience and organizational citizenship behaviour, Journal of American Academy of Business, 13, 1, pp. 72-78.

    Google Scholar 

  • Andanda, P. (2005) Module two: Informed consent, Developing World Bioethics, 5, 1, pp. 14-29.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, A.R. (1998) Cultivating the Garden of Eden: Environmental entrepreneuring, Journal of Organizational Change Management, 11, 2, pp. 135-144.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arenius, P. and M. Minniti: 2005, ‘Perceptual Variables amd Nascent Entrepreneurship’, Small Business Economics 24, 233–247.

    Google Scholar 

  • Auersweld, P. (2009) Creating social value, Stanford Social Innovation Review, 7,2, pp. 51-55.

    Google Scholar 

  • Austin, J., Stevenson, H. And Wei-Skillern, J. (2006) Social and commercial Entrepreneurship: Same, different or both?, Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 30,1, pp. 1-22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barendsen, L. and H. Gardner: 2004, ‘Is the Social Entrepreneur a New Type of Leader?’, Leader to Leader 34, 43–50.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baumol, W.J. (1968) Entrepreneurship in economic theory, The American Economic Review, 58, 2, pp. 64-71.

    Google Scholar 

  • Benninga, J.S., Berkowitz, M.W., Kuehn, P. And Smith, K. (2006) Character and academics: What good schools do, Phi Delta Kappan, 87, 6, pp. 448-452.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beugelsdijk, S. and Noorderhaven, N. (2005) Personality characteristics of self-employed: An empirical study, Small Business Economics, 35, pp. 159-167.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Birch, D. (2008) Working and fighting for progress, for prosperity, for society: Brave new business worlds before and beyond corporate citizenship, Journal of Corporate Citizenship, 29, pp. 25-32.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brooks, A. C.: 2009, Social Entrepreneurship: A Modern Approach to Social Venture Creation, Person International Edition, New Jersey

  • Bryman, A. and Bell, E. (2007) Business research methods, 2nd ed., Oxford University Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bull, M.(2008) Challenging tensions: critical, theoretical and empirical perspectives on social enterprise, International Journal of Entrepreneurial Behaviour and Research, 14, 5, pp. 268-275.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Caliendo, M. And Kritikos, A.S. (2008) Is entrepreneurial success predictable? An ex-ante analysis of the character-based approach, Kyklos, 61, 2, pp. 189-214.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Campbell, I. And Dealtry, R. (2003) The new generation of corporate universities: co-creating sustainable enterprise and business development solutions, Journal of Workplace Learning 13(7/8): 368-381.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cartwright, W. And Craig, J.L. (2006) Sustainability: Aligning corporate governance, strategy and operations with the planet, Business Process Management, 12, 6, pp. 741-750.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cavana, R.Y., Delahaye, B.L. and Sekaran, U. (2000) Applied business research: Quantitative and qualitative methods. John Wiley & Sons, Australia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chaucin, B., Hermand, D. and Mullet, E. (2007) Risk perception and personality facets, Risk Analysis, 27,1, pp. 171-185.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen, M. And Wang, M. (2008) Social networks and a new venture’s innovative capability: The role of trust within entrepreneurial teams, R&D Management, 38, 3, pp. 253-263.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ciavarella, M.A., Buchholtz, A.K., Riodan, C.M., Gatewood, R.D. and Stokes, G.S. (2004) The Big Five and venture capital survival, Journal of Business Venturing, 19, pp. 465-483.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, J. (1992) Quantitative methods in psychology: A power primer, Psychological Bulletin, 112, 1, pp. 155-159.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Collins, L., Hannon, P.D. and Smith, A. (2004) Enacting entrepreneurial intent: the gaps between student needs and higher education capability. Education Training 46: 454-463.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cools, E. and Van den Broeck,H. (2008) The hunt for the Heffalump continues: Can trait and cognitive characteristics predict entrepreneurial orientation?, Journal of Small Business Strategy, 18, 2, pp. 23-41.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cope, J. (2005) Toward a dynamic learning perspective of entrepreneurship, Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 27,2, pp.93-104.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crane, F.G. and Crane, E.C. (2007) Sispositional optimism and entrepreneurial success, The Psychologist-Manager Journal, 10, 1, pp. 13-25.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crant, J.M. (1996) The proactive personality scale as a predictor of entrepreneurial intentions, Journal of Small Business Management, 34, 1, pp. 42-49.

    Google Scholar 

  • D’Intino, R.S., Goldsby, M.G., Houghton, J.D. and Neck, C.P. (2007) Self Leadership: A process for entrepreneurial success, Journal of Leadership & Organizational Studies, 13, 4, pp. 105-120.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De Carolis, D.M. and Saparito, P. (2006) Social capital, cognition and entrepreneurial opportunities: A theoretical framework, Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 30, 1, pp. 41-56.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dees, J. G.: 2001, The Meaning of Social Entrepreneurship. http://www.fuqua.duke.edu/centers/case/documents/dees_SE.pdf. Accessed 25 June 2008

  • Dees, J.G. (2007) Taking social entrepreneurship seriously, Society, 44, 3, pp. 24-31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Elkington, P.: 2006, ‘It’s About People, Not Profits’, Business Strategy Review Winter issue, 43–45

  • Elkington, J. And Hartigan, P. (2008) The power of unreasonable people. Harvard Business Press, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Field, A.: 2009, Discovering Statistics Using SPSS, 3rd Edition (Sage Publication, London).

  • Flick, U. (2009) An introduction to qualitative research 4th ed. Sage Publication, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frank, H., Lueger, M. and Korunka, C. (2007) The significance of personality in business start-up intentions, start-up realization and business success, Entrepreneurship & Regional Development, 19, pp. 227-251.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gilness, J. (2003) How to integrate character education into the curriculum, Phi Delta Kappan, 85, 3, pp. 243-245.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gliedt, T. and Parker, P. (2007) Green community entrepreneurship: Creative destruction in the social economy, International Journal of Social Economics, 34, 8, pp. 538-553.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goss, D. (2005) Schumpeter’s legacy?: Interaction and emotions in the sociology of entrepreneurship, Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 29, 2, pp.205-218.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goss, D. (2008) Enterprise ritual: A theory of entrepreneurial emotion and exchange, British Journal of Management, 19, pp. 120-137.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Greve, A. And Salaff, J.W. (2003) Social networks and entrepreneurship, Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 28, 1, pp. 1-22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gunn, R., Durkin, C., Singh, G. and Brown, J. (2008) Social entrepreneurship in the social policy curriculum, Social Enterprise Journal, 4, 1, pp. 74-80.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hair, J.F., Black, W.C., Babin, B.J., Anderson, R.E. and Tatham, R.L. (2006) Multivariate Data Analysis, 6th ed. Pearson Education International, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Handy, F., B. Ranade and M. Kassam: 2007, ‘To Profit or Not to Profit: Women Entrepreneurs in India’, Nonprofit Management and Leadership 17(4), 383–401.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hart, S.L. (2005) Innovation, creative destruction and sustainability, Research Technology Management, 45, 5, pp. 21-33.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hart, S.L. and Christensen, C.M. (1992) The great leap: Driving innovation from the base of the pyramid, MIT Sloan Management Review, 44,1, pp. 51-56.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hart, S.L. and London, T. (2005) Developing Native Capability: What multinational corporations can learn from the base of the pyramid, Stanford Social Innovation Review, 3, 2, pp. 28-33.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haughton, C. (2008) The edge of reason, Director, 61, 7, pp. 70-74.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hawken, P.: 1992, ‘The Ecology of Commerce’, Inc., Vol. 14(4), pp. 93–100

  • Henle, C.A. (2006) Bad Apples or bad barrels? A former CEO discusses the interplay of person and situation with implications for business education, Academy of Management Learning & Education, 5, 3, pp. 346-355.

    Google Scholar 

  • Homan, R. (2001) The principle of assumed consent: the ethics of gatekeeping, Journal of Philosophy of Education, 35, 3, pp. 329-343.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jayasinghe, K., Thomas, D. and Wickramasinghe, D. (2008) Bounded emotionality in entrepreneurship: an alternative framework, International Journal of Entrepreneurial Behaviour & Research, 14,4, pp.242-258.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, B. (2005) Overcoming “Doom and Gloom”: Empowering students in courses on social problems, injustice and inequality, Teaching Sociology, 33, 1, pp. 44-58.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jørgensen, C.H. (2004) Connecting work and education: should learning be useful, correct or meaningful?, The Journal of Workplace Learning, 16, 8, pp. 455-465.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Joseph, P.B. and Efron, S. (2005) Seven worlds of moral education, Phi Delta Kappan, 86, 7, pp. 525-533.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keogh, P.D. and Polonsky, M.J. (1998) Environmental commitment: A basis for environmental entrepreneurship?, Journal of Organizational Change Management, 11, 1, pp. 38-49.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • King, M.F. and Brunner, G.C. (2000) Social desirability bias: A neglected aspect of validity testing, Psychology and Marketing, 17, 2, pp. 79-103.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kirby, D.A. (2004) Entrepreneurship education: can business schools meet the challenge?, Education Training, 46(8/9): 510-519.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kor, Y.Y., Mahoney, J.T. and Micheal, S.C. (2007) Resources, capabilities and entrepreneurial perceptions, Journal of Management Studies, 44, 7, pp. 1187-1212.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Krueger Jr, N.F. (2007) What lies beneath? The experiential essence of entrepreneurial thinking, Entrepreneurship Theory & Practice, 31,3, pp. 123-137.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kurucz, E. C., B. A. Colbert and D. C. Wheeler: 2008, ‘The Business Case for Corporate Social Responsibility’, in A. Crane, A. McWilliams, D. Matten, J. Moon and D. Seigel (eds.), The Oxford Handbook on Corporate Social Responsibility (Oxford University Press, Oxford, In Press: March 2008).

  • Landy, F.J. (2005) Some historical and scientific issues related to research on emotional intelligence, Journal of Organizational Behaviour, 26, pp. 411-424.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leader, G. (2003) Lifelong learning: policy and practice in further education, Education + Training, 45, 7, pp. 361-370.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leisinger, K.M. (2007) Corporate philanthropy: The “Top of the Pyramid”, Business and Society Review, 112, 3, pp. 315-342.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lennick, D. and Kiel, F. (2005) Moral intelligence : Enhancing business performance & leadership success. Wharton School Publishing, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Littunen, H. (2000) Entrepreneurship and the characteristics of the entrepreneurial personality, International Journal of Entrepreneurial Behaviour & Research, 6,6, pp. 295-309.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Llewellyn, D.J. and Wilson, K.M. (2003) The controversial role of personality traits in entrepreneurial psychology, Education + Training, 45, 6, pp. 341-345.

    Google Scholar 

  • Loasby, B.J. (2007) A cognitive perspective on entrepreneurship and the firm, Journal of Management Studies, 44, 7, pp. 1078-1106.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • London, M. (2008) Dual roles for corporate social responsibility and social entrepreneurship, Organizational Dynamics, 37, 4, pp. 313-326.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lovins, A. B., L. H. Lovins and P. Hawken: 2007, ‘A Road to Natural Capitalism’, Harvard Business Review, Jul/Aug, 172–183

  • Machan, T.R. (1999) Entrepreneurship and ethics, International Journal of Social Economics, 26, 5, pp. 596-608.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Matlay, H. (2008) The impact of entrepreneurship education on entrepreneurial outcomes, Journal of Small Business and Entreprise Development, 15, 2, pp. 382-396.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McCarthy, B. (2003) Strategy is personality driven, strategy is crisis driven: Insights from entrepreneurial firms, Management Decisions, 41, 4, pp. 327-339.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mezirow, J.: 2008, ‘An Overview of Transformative Learning’, in P. Sutherland and J. Crowther (eds.), Lifelong Learning: Concepts and Contexts (Routledge, London), pp. 24–38

  • Miles, M.B. and Huberman, A.M. (1994) An expanded sourcebook: Qualitative data analysis, 2nd ed., Sage Publication.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mitchell, R.K., Busenitz, L., Lant, T., McDougall, P.P., Morse, E.A. and Smith, J.B. (2002) Toward a theory of entrepreneurial cognition: Rethinking the people side of entrepreneurial research, ?, Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 27,2, pp. 93-104.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Molteni, M. (2006) The social-competitive innovation pyramid, Corporate Governance, 6, 4, pp. 516-526.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mort, G.S., Weerawardena, J. and Carnegie, K. (2003) Social entrepreneurship: Towards conceptualisation, International Journal of Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Marketing, 8, 1, pp. 76-88.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mustakova-Possardt, E. (1998) Critical consciousness: An alternative pathway for positive personal and social development, Journal of Adult Development, 5, 1, pp. 13-30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Naffziger, D.W., Hornsby, J.S. and Kuratko, D.F. (1994) A proposed research model of entrepreneurial motivation, Entrepreneurship Theory & Practice, 18, 3, pp.29-42.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nahapiet, J. and Ghoshal, S. (1998) Social capital, intellectual capital and the organizational advantage, The Academy of Management Review, 23, 2, pp. 242-266.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Newport, D. Chesnes, T. and Lindner, A. (2003) The “environmental” sustainability problem: Ensuring that sustainability stands on three legs, International journal of Sustainability in Hif = gher Education, 4, 4, pp. 357-363.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nordvik, H. and Brovold, H. (1998) Personality traits in leadership tasks, Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 39, pp. 61-64.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ong, J.W. and Ismail, H. (2008) Revisiting personality traits in entrepreneurship study from a resource based perspective, Business Renaissance Quarterly, 3, 1, pp. 97- 114.

    Google Scholar 

  • Packer, A.H. and Sharrar, G.K. (2003) Linking lifelong learning, corporate social responsibility and the changing nature of work, Advances in Developing Human Resources, 5, 3, pp. 332-340.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peterson, R.A. (1994) A meta-analysis of Cronbach’s Coefficient Alpha, Journal of Consumer Research, 21,2, pp. 381-391.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Phills, J.A., Deiglmeier, K. And Miller, D.T. (2008) Rediscovering social innovation, Stanford Social Innovation Review, 6, 4, pp. 34-43.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pittaway, L. (2005) Philosophies in entrepreneurship: a focus on economic theories, International Journal of Entrepreneurial Behaviour & Research, 11, 3, pp. 201-221.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Polan, A.J. (1991) Personal and social education: Citizenship and biography, Journal of Moral Education, 20, 1, pp. 13-32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pralahad, C. K.: 2006, The Fortune at the Bottom of the Pyramid: Eradicating Poverty Through Profits (Wharton Business School Publishing, USA)

  • Rae, D. (2005) Mid-career entrepreneurial learning, Education Training, 47, 89, pp. 562-574.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rae, D. (2009) Entrepreneurship: too risky to let loose in a stormy climate?, Entrepreneurship and Innovation, 10, 2, pp. 137-147.

    Google Scholar 

  • Randall, D.M. and Fernandes, M.F. (1991) The social desirability bias in ethics research, Journal of Business Ethics, 10, pp. 805-817.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Raposo, M. do Paco, A. and Farreira, J. (2008) Entrepreneur’s profile: A taxonomy of attributes and motivations of university students, Journal of Small Business and Enterprise Development, 15, 2, pp. 405-418.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rauch, A. and Frese, M. (2007) Let’s put the person back into entrepreneurship research: A meta-analysis on the relationship between business owners’ personality traits, business creation and business success, European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 16, 4, pp. 353-385.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rhee, K.S. and White, R.J. (2007) The emotional intelligence of entrepreneurs, Journal of Small Business Entrepreneurship, 20, 4, pp. 409-426.

    Google Scholar 

  • Richardson, I. And Hynes, B. (2008) Entrepreneurship education: towards and industry sector approach, Education + Training, 50, 3, pp. 188-198.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ridley-Duff, R. (2008) Social enterprise as a socially rational business, International Journal od Entrepreneurial Behaviour & Research, 14, 5, pp. 291-312.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rivers, T.M. (2004) Ten essentials for character education, The Journal of General Education 53, 34, pp. 247-260.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Robin, F. (2006) The challenge of TBL: A responsibility to whom? Business and Society, 111, 1, pp. 1-14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sarros, J.C., Cooper, B.K. and Hartican, A.M. (2006) Leadership and character, Leadership and Organization Development Journal, 27, 8, pp. 682-699.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Savitz, A.W. and Weber, K. (2006) The triple bottom line. Jossey-Bass, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schaefer, B.P.(2008) Shareholders and social responsibility, Journal of Business Ethics, 81, pp. 297-312.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schaper, M. And Volery, T. (2004) Entrepreneurship and small business: A Pacific Rim perspective, John Wiley and Sons, Australia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmit, M.J., Kihm, J.A. and Robie, C. (2000) Development of a global measure of personality, Personnel Psychology, 53, pp. 153-193.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schmitt-Rodermund, E. (2004) Pathways to successful entrepreneurship: Parenting, personality, early entrepreneurial competence and interest, Journal of Vocational Behaviour, 65, pp. 498-518.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shane, S. and Cable, D. (2002) Network ties, reputation and financing of new ventures, Management Science, 48, 3, pp. 364-381.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shaw, E. and Carter, S. (2007) Social entrepreneurship: Theoretical antedents and empirical analysis of the entrepreneurial processes and outcomes, Journal of Small Business and Economic Development, 14, 13, pp. 418-434.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Silberman, M. (2001) Developing interpersonal intelligence in the workplace, International and Commercial Training, 7, 5, pp. 266-269.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Springett, D. and Kearins, K. (2001) Gaining legitimacy? Sustainable development in business school curricula, 9, 4, pp. 213-221.

    Google Scholar 

  • Strang, R. (1930) Measures of Social Intelligence, The American Journal of Sociology, 36, 2, pp. 263-269.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stubbs, W. And Cocklin, C. (2008) Teaching sustainability to business students: shifting mindsets, International Journal of Sustainability in Higher Education, 9, 3, pp. 206-221.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thomas, I. (2004) Sustainability in tertiary curricula: what is stopping it happening?, International Journal of Sustainability in Higher Education, 5, 1, pp. 33-47.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thompson, J.L. (1998) A strategic perspective of entrepreneurship, International Journal of Entrepreneurial Behaviour & Research, 5,6, pp. 279-296.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thompson, J.L. (2002) The world of the social entrepreneur, The International Journal of Public Sector Management, 15, 5, pp. 412-431.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thompson, J., Alvy, G. And Lees, A. (2000) Social entrepreneurship – a new look at the people and potential, Management Decision, 38, 5, pp. 328-338.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thompson, L. and Doherty, B. (2006) The diverse world of social enterprise: A collection of social enterprise stories, International Journal of Social Economics, 33, 56, pp. 361-375.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Velazquez, L. Munguia, N. And Sanchez, M. (2005) Deterring sustainability in higher education institutions: An appraisal of the factors which influence sustainability in higher education institutions, International Journal of Sustainability in Higher Education, 6, 4, pp. 383-391.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vinten, G. (1997) The threat in the questions, Credit Control, 18,1, pp. 25-31.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walker, E.A. and Webster, B.J. (2007) Gender, age and self-employment: some things change, some stay the same, Women in Management Review, 22, 2, pp. 122-135.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Warbuton, K. (2003) Deep learning and education for sustainability, International Journal of Sustainability in Higher Education, 4, 1, pp. 44-56.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weber, P. and M. Schaper: 2004, ‘Understanding the Grey Entrepreneur’, Journal of Enterprising Culture 12(2), 147–167.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wheeler, D., McKague, K, Thomson, J., Davies, R., Medalye, J. and Prada, M. (2005) Creating sustainable local enterprise networks, MIT Sloan Management Review, 47,1, pp. 38-40.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, F., Kickul, J. and Marlino, D. (2007) Gender, entrepreneurial self-efficacy and entrepreneurial career intentions: Implications for entrepreneurial education, Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 31,3, pp. 387-406.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yong, L.: 2007, Emotional Intelligence in the Workplace: Leonard Personality Inventory (LPI) Profiling (Leonard Personality Incorporated, Malaysia).

  • Yunus, M. (2007) Creating a world without poverty - Social business and the future of capitalism. BBS Public Affairs, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhao, H. and S. E. Seibert: 2006, ‘The Big Five Personality Dimensions and Entrepreneurial Status: A Meta-Analytical Review’, Journal of Applied Psychology 91(2), 259–271

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. School of Business, Sunway University College, Selangor Darul Ehsan, Malaysia

    Joyce Koe Hwee Nga

  2. Taylor’s University College, Selangor Darul Ehsan, Malaysia

    Gomathi Shamuganathan

Authors
  1. Joyce Koe Hwee Nga
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Gomathi Shamuganathan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Gomathi Shamuganathan.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Koe Hwee Nga, J., Shamuganathan, G. The Influence of Personality Traits and Demographic Factors on Social Entrepreneurship Start Up Intentions. J Bus Ethics 95, 259–282 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-009-0358-8

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-009-0358-8

Keywords

Search

Navigation