Skip to main content

Little Miami Hopewell Ritual Dramas of Death Journeys through the Lower Realm(s)

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Being Scioto Hopewell: Ritual Drama and Personhood in Cross-Cultural Perspective
  • 232 Accesses

Abstract

In southwestern Ohio, in the Little and Great Miami river basins, Middle Woodland societies that are categorized as “Hopewell” lived social and ceremonial lives that, in many ways, were quite distinct from those of their Hopewell neighbors in the Scioto drainage. Community-wide and multicommunity ceremonial life was physically and symbolically more remote from the landscape of daily life in the Miami area. Most ceremonial centers were hilltop forts rather than geometric earthworks on easily accessed middle terraces of valleys. Death and relating to the dead appear to have been far less central, by and large, to the community and multicommunity ceremonies of Hopewell peoples of the Miami drainages than those of Scioto Hopewell peoples. A very low proportion of the ceremonial centers in the Miami drainages seem to have included burial mounds. No excavated grave within a ceremonial center had large numbers of redundant artifacts that would indicate large ceremonial gatherings and gift giving focused on specifically the deceased. Likewise, only one large deposit of decommissioned ceremonial artifacts is known to have been placed on the floor of a mound that entombed human remains. No burials laid out in the form of birds in flight are known, nor are burials associated with any large stone bird effigy or bird-shaped charnel house. The anonymity or socially soft-spoken rendering of the dead seems to be a theme that runs through the mortuary records of Miami Hopewell peoples. Burials generally were accompanied by few or no artifacts, and seldom included markers of an individual’s clan. More group ossuary interments were made than in the Scioto area, where there was only one, in one of the very earliest of charnel houses.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 189.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 249.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 249.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References Cited

  • Aftandilian, Dave (2011). Toward a Native American Theology of Animals: Creek and Cherokee Perspectives. Crosscurrents 61(2):191–207. Association for Religion and Intellectual Life, New York, NY.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alexander, Hartley Burr (1916). The Mythology of All Races, Vol. 10, North American. Marshal Jones Company, Boston, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bailey, Garrick A. (1995). The Osage and the Invisible World: From the Works of Francis La Flesche. University of Oklahoma Press, Norman, OK.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barbeau, Marius (1914). Supernatural Beings of the Huron and Wyandot. American Anthropologist, n.s. 16:288–313.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barbeau, Marius (1949). The Old World Dragon in America. In Indian Tribes of Aboriginal America, edited by S. Tax, pp. 115–112. Selected Papers of the 29th International Congress of Americanists. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barbeau, Marius (1951). The Dragon Myths and Ritual Songs of the Iroquois. Journal of the International Folk Music Council 3:81–85.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barnouw, Victor (1977). Wisconsin Chippewa Myths and Tales. University of Wisconsin Press, Madison. WI.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bierhorst, John (1995). Mythology of the Lenape: Guide and Texts. University of Arizona Press, Tucson, AZ.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Binford, Lewis R. (1964). Archaeological Investigations on Wassam Ridge, with appendices by Melvin L. Fowler and James Schoenwetter. Archaeological Salvage Report, 17. Southern Illinois University Museum, Carbondale. Abstracted as Galley Pond Mound. In An Archaeological Perspective, by Lewis R. Binford, pp. 390–420. Seminar Press, New York, NY.

    Google Scholar 

  • Birmingham, Robert A. (2010). Spirits of the Earth: The Effigy Mound Landscapes of Madison and the Four Lakes. University of Wisconsin Press, Madison, WI.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blakeslee, Donald J. (2003). A Meteor, a Mirror, a Metaphor. Wisconsin Archeologist 84(1&2):99–106.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bloch, Maurice (1971). Placing the Dead. Seminar Press, New York, NY.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bourdieu, Pierre (1977). Outline of a Theory of Practice. Translated by R. Nice. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bourdieu, Pierre (1990). The Logic of Practice. Translated by R. Nice. Polity Press, Cambridge, UK.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bourgeois, Arthur P., editor. (1994). Ojibwa Narratives of Charles and Charlotte Kawbawgam and Jacques LePique, 1893–1895. Wayne State University, Detroit, MI.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bowers, Alfred W. (1950). Mandan Social and Ceremonial Organization. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bowers, Alfred W. (1965). Hidatsa Social and Ceremonial Organization. Bureau of American Ethnology, Bulletin 194. Smithsonian Institution, Washington, D.C.

    Google Scholar 

  • Braun, David P. (1986). Midwestern Hopewellian Exchange and Supralocal Interaction. In Peer Polity Interaction and Socio-Political Change, edited by C. Renfrew and J. F. Cherry, pp. 117–126. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, James A. (1981). The Search for Rank in Prehistoric Burials. In The Archaeology of Death, edited by R. Chapman, I. Kinnes, and K. Randsborg, pp. 25–37. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, James A. (2003). The Cahokia Mound 72-Sub1 Burials as Collective Representation. In A Deep-Time Perspective: Studies in Symbols, Meaning, and the Archaeological Record, Papers in Honor of Robert L. Hall, edited by J. D. Richards and M. L. Fowler. Wisconsin Archeologist 84:81–97. Wisconsin Archeological Society, Milwaukee.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, James A. (2006). Where’s the Power in Mound Building? An Eastern Woodlands Perspective. In Leadership and Polity in Mississippian Society, edited by B. M. Butler and P. D. Welch, pp. 197–213. Occasional Paper No. 33. Center for Archaeological Investigations, Southern Illinois University, Carbondale, IL.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, James A. (2010). Cosmological Layouts of Secondary Burials as Political Instruments. In Mississippian Mortuary Practices: Beyond Hierarchy and the Representationist Perspective, edited by L. P. Sullivan and R. C. Mainfort Jr., pp. 30–53. University Press of Florida, Tallahassee, FL.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Brown, Joseph Epes (1971). The Sacred Pipe: Black Elk’s Account of the Seven Rites of the Oglala Sioux. Penguin Books, New York, NY.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buikstra, Jane E., and Douglas K. Charles (1999). Centering the Ancestors: Cemeteries, Mounds, and Sacred Landscapes of the Ancient North American Midcontinent. In Archaeologies of Landscapes: Contemporary Perspectives, edited by W. Ashmore and A. B. Knapp, pp. 201–228. Blackwell, Malden, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Byers, A. Martin (1996). Social Structure and the Pragmatic Meaning of Material Culture: Ohio Hopewell as Ecclesiastic-Communal Cult. In A View from the Core: A Synthesis of Ohio Hopewell Archaeology, edited by P. J. Pacheco, pp. 174–192. The Ohio Archaeological Council, Columbus, OH.

    Google Scholar 

  • Byers, A. Martin (2004). The Ohio Hopewell Episode: Paradigm Lost, Paradigm Gained. University of Akron Press, Akron, OH.

    Google Scholar 

  • Byers, A. Martin (2010). The Turner-Hopewell Axis: Exploring Interaction through Embankment Form and Mortuary Patterning. In Hopewell Settlement Patterns, Subsistence, and Symbolic Landscapes, edited by A. M. Byers and D. Wymer, pp. 230–244. University Press of Florida, Gainesville, FL.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Caldwell, Joseph R. (1964). Interaction Spheres in Prehistory. In Hopewellian Studies, edited by J. Caldwell and R. Hall, pp. 133–156. Illinois State Museum, Scientific Papers 12. Springfield, IL.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cannon, Aubrey (1989). The Historical Dimension in Mortuary Expressions of Status and Sentiment. Current Anthropology 30:437–447.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carr, Christopher (1995). Mortuary Practices: Their Social, Philosophical-Religious, Circumstantial, and Physical Determinants. Journal of Archaeological Method and Theory 2:105–200.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carr, Christopher (2005). Rethinking Interregional Hopewellian Interaction. In Gathering Hopewell: Society, Ritual, and Ritual Interaction, edited by C. Carr and D. T. Case, pp. 575–623. Kluwer Academic/Plenum Publishers, New York, NY.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Carr, Christopher (2008a). Coming to Know Ohio Hopewell Peoples Better: Topics for Future Research, Master’s Theses, and Doctoral Dissertations. In The Scioto Hopewell and Their Neighbors, edited by D. T. Case and C. Carr, pp. 603–690. Springer, New York, NY.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Carr, Christopher (2008b). World View and the Dynamics of Change: The Beginning and the End of Scioto Hopewell Culture and Lifeways. In The Scioto Hopewell and Their Neighbors, edited by D. T. Case and C. Carr, pp. 289–328. Springer, New York, NY.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Carr, Christopher (2008c). Social and Ritual Organization. In The Scioto Hopewell and Their Neighbors, edited by D. T. Case and C. Carr, pp. 151–288. Springer, New York, NY.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Carr, Christopher (2008d). Environmental Setting, Natural Symbols, and Subsistence. In The Scioto Hopewell and Their Neighbors, edited by D. T. Case and C. Carr, pp. 41–100. Springer, New York, NY.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Carr, Christopher (2012). Regional Differences in the Eschatology and Cosmology of Ohio Hopewell Peoples. Paper presented and the 77th Annual Meeting of the Society for American Archaeology, Memphis, TN.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carr, Christopher, and Robert McCord (2013). Ohio Hopewell Depictions of Composite Creatures: Part I–Biological Identification and Ethnohistorical Insights. Midcontinental Journal of Archaeology 38:5–82.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carr, Christopher, and Robert McCord (2015). Ohio Hopewell Depictions of Composite Creatures: Part II–Archaeological Context and a Journey to an Afterlife. Midcontinental Journal of Archaeology 40(1):18–47.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carr, Christopher, and Anna Novotny (2010). Ritual Dramas in Ohio Hopewell Earthworks. Paper presented at the 75th Annual Meeting of the Society for American Archaeology, St. Louis, MO.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carr, Christopher, and Anna Novotny (2015). Arrangement of Human Remains and Artifacts in Scioto Hopewell Burials: Dramatic Rituals or Ritual Dramas? In Transforming the Dead: Culturally Modified Human Bone in the Prehistoric Midwest, edited by E. A. Hargrave, S. J. Schermer, K. M. Hedman, and R. M. Lillie, pp. 79–101. University of Alabama Press, Tuscaloosa, AL.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carr, Christopher, Dianna Repp, Andrew Seidel, and Louise Fabbri-Gratton (n.d.). Near-Death Experiences across Cultures. Book in preparation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carr, Christopher, Rex Weeks, and Mark Bahti (2008). The Functions and Meanings of Ohio Hopewell Ceremonial Artifacts. In The Scioto Hopewell and Their Neighbors, by D. T. Case and Christopher Carr, pp. 501–521. Springer, New York, NY.

    Google Scholar 

  • Case, D. Troy, and Christopher Carr (2008). Ceremonial Site Locations, Descriptions, and Bibliography. In The Scioto Hopewell and Their Neighbors, by D. T. Case and C. Carr, pp. 501–521. Springer, New York, NY.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chamberlain, V. D. (1982). When Stars Came Down to Earth: Cosmology of the Skidi Pawnee Indians of North America. Ballena, Los Altos, CA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Charles, Douglas K. (1995). Diachronic Regional Social Dynamics: Mortuary Sites in the Illinois Valley/American Bottom Region. In Regional Approaches to Mortuary Analysis, edited by L. A. Beck, pp. 77–99. Plenum Publishers, New York, NY.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Charles, Douglas K., and Jane E. Buikstra, editors. (2006). Re-creating Hopewell. University Press of Florida, Gainesville, FL.

    Google Scholar 

  • Childe, V. Gordon (1945). Directional Changes in Funerary Practices During 50,000 Years. Man 4:13–19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coleman, Sister Bernhard (1947). Decorative Designs of the Ojibwa of Northern Minnesota. Catholic University of America Press, Washington, D.C.

    Google Scholar 

  • Connelley, William Elsey (1899). Wyandot Folk-Lore. Crane & Company, Topeka, KS.

    Google Scholar 

  • Curtin, J., and J. N. B. Hewitt (1918). Seneca Fiction, Legends, and Myths. Thirty-Second Annual Report of the Bureau of American Ethnology, 1910–1911, pp. 37–813. Smithsonian Institution, U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, D.C.

    Google Scholar 

  • DeBoer, Warren R. (1997). Ceremonial Centers from the Cayapas (Esmeraldas, Ecuador) to Chillicothe (Ohio). Cambridge Archaeological Journal 7(2):225–253.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • DeBoer, Warren R. (2010). Strange Sightings on the Scioto. In Hopewell Settlement Patterns, Subsistence, and Symbolic Landscapes, edited by A. M. Byers and D. Wymer, pp. 165–198. University Press of Florida, Gainesville, FL.

    Google Scholar 

  • Densmore, Frances (1929). Chippewa Customs. Bureau of American Ethnology, Bulletin 86. Smithsonian Institution, U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, D.C.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dernbach, Katherine Boris (2005). Spirits of the Hereafter: Death, Funerary Possession, and the Afterlife in Chuuk, Micronesia. Ethnology 44(2):99–123.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dobres, Marcia-Anne, and John E. Robb (2000). Agency in Archaeology: Paradigm or Platitude? In Agency in Archaeology, edited by M.-A. Dobres and J. E. Robb, pp. 3–17. Routledge, London, UK.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dorsey, George A. (1904). Traditions of the Skidi Pawnee. Memoirs of the American Folklore Society, No. 8. Houghton and Mifflin Company, Boston, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dorsey, George A. (1906). The Pawnee: Mythology (Part 1). Collected under the Auspices of the Carnegie Institution of Washington. Carnegie Institution of Washington, Publication 59. Washington, D.C.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dorsey, J. Owen (1894). A Study of Siouan Cults. Bureau of American Ethnology, Annual Report 11, pp. 361–544. U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, D.C.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eliade, Mircea (1964). Shamanism. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ.

    Google Scholar 

  • Emerson, Thomas E., Kristin M. Hedman, Eve A. Hargrave, Dawn E. Cobb, and Andrew R. Thompson (2016). Paradigms Lost: Reconfiguring Cahokia’s Mound 72 Beaded Burial. American Antiquity 81(3):405–425.

    Google Scholar 

  • Evans-Wentz, W. Y., editor. (1960). The Tibetan Book of the Dead. (First edition 1935.) Oxford University Press, London, UK.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fagan, Brian M. (1995). Ancient North America: The Archaeology of a Continent. Thames and Hudson, New York, NY.

    Google Scholar 

  • Faulkner, Raymond O. (1990). The Ancient Egyptian Book of the Dead. University of Texas Press, Austin, TX.

    Google Scholar 

  • Field, Stephanie, Anne Goldberg, and Tina Lee (2005). Gender, Status, and Ethnicity in the Scioto, Miami, and Northeastern Ohio Hopewellian Regions, as Evidenced by Mortuary Practices. In Gathering Hopewell: Society, Ritual, and Ritual Interaction, edited by C. Carr and D. T. Case, pp. 386–404. Kluwer Academic/Plenum Publishers, New York, NY.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Firth, Raymond (1955). The Fate of the Soul: An Interpretation of Some Primitive Concepts. In Frazier Lecture 1955, pp. 3–45. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.

    Google Scholar 

  • Flannery, Regina, and Mary Elizabeth Chambers (1985). Each Man Has His Own Friends: The Role of Dream Visitors in Traditional East Cree Belief and Practice. Arctic Anthropology 22(1):1–22.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fletcher, Alice C. (1903). Pawnee Star Lore. Journal of American Folklore 16:10–15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frisbie, Charlotte Johnson (1980). Southwestern Indian Ritual Drama. University of New Mexico Press, Albuquerque, NM.

    Google Scholar 

  • Giddens, Anthony (1984). The Constitution of Society. University of California Press, Berkeley, CA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Giles, Britton (2010). Sacrificing Complexity: Renewal through Ohio Hopewell Rituals. In Ancient Complexities: New Perspectives in Precolumbian North America, pp. 73–95. University of Utah Press, Salt Lake City, UT.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gillespie, Susan D. (2001). Personhood, Agency, and Mortuary Ritual: A Case Study from the Ancient Maya. Journal of Anthropological Archaeology 20:73–112.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goodman, Felicitas D. (1990). Where Spirits Ride the Wind: Trance Journeys and Other Ecstatic Experiences. Indiana University Press, Bloomington, IN.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grant, Peter (1960). The Saulteaux Indians about 1804. In Les Bourgeois de la Compagnie du Nord-Ouest, edited by L. R. Mason, Vol 2. Antiquarian Press, New York, NY. (Original 1889, Cote et Cie, Quebec, QC, Canada.)

    Google Scholar 

  • Greenman, Emerson (1930s). Esch Mounds, Erie County, Ohio. Manuscript on file, Ohio Historical Center, Columbus, OH. (Accession #1176, Site 33 ER 1). Undated, written sometime after the 1930 excavation of the Esch mounds.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greenman, Emerson, and Robert Goslin (1930). Field Notes: Esch Mound 1. Document (Accession #1176, Site 33ER 1) on file, Ohio Historical Center, Columbus, OH.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grinnell, George Bird (1972). Blackfoot Lodge Tales: The Story of a Prairie People. Corner House, Williamstown, MA. (Original 1908, Charles Scribner’s Sons, New York, NY.)

    Google Scholar 

  • Halifax, Joan (1979). Shamanic Voices. E. P. Dutton, New York, NY.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hall, Robert L. (1976). Ghosts, Water Barriers, Corn, and Sacred Enclosures in the Eastern Woodlands. American Antiquity 41:360–364.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hall, Robert L. (1977). An Anthropocentric Perspective for Eastern United States Prehistory. American Antiquity 42:499–518.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hall, Robert L. (1979). In Search of the Ideology of the Adena-Hopewell Climax. In Hopewell Archaeology: The Chillicothe Conference, edited by D. S. Brose and N. Greber, pp. 258–265. Kent State University Press, Kent, OH.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hall, Robert L. (1997). An Archaeology of the Soul: North American Indian Beliefs and Ritual. University of Illinois Press, Urbana and Chicago, IL.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hall, Robert L. (2006). The Enigmatic Copper Cutout from Bedford Mound 8. In Re-creating Hopewell, edited by D. K. Charles and Jane E. Buikstra, pp. 464–474. University of Florida Press, Gainesville, FL.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hallowell, A. Irving (1926). Bear Ceremonialism in the Northern Hemisphere. American Anthropologist, n.s. 28:1–175.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hallowell, A. Irving (1960). Ojibwa Ontology, Behavior, and World View. In Culture in History: Essays in Honor of Paul Radin, edited by S. Diamond, pp. 19–52. Columbia University Press, New York, NY.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harner, Michael (1990). The Way of the Shaman. HarperSanFrancisco, San Francisco, CA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harrington, Mark Raymond (1921). Religion and Ceremonies of the Lenape. Museum of the American Indian, Indian Notes and Monographs 19. Heye Foundation, New York, NY.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harrod, Howard L. (2000). The Animals Came Dancing: Native American Sacred Ecology and Animal Kinship. University of Arizona Press, Tucson, AZ.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Henry, Alexander (1809). Travels and Adventures in Canada and the Indian Territories between the Years 1760 and 1776. I. Riley, New York, NY.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hertz, Robert (1907). Contribution a une Étude sur la Representation Collective de la Mort. Année Sociologique 10:48–137. English translation 1960, A Contribution to the Study of the Collective Representations of Death. In Death and the Right Hand. Translated by R. Needham and C. Needham. Free Press, New York, NY.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hilger, M. Inez (1992). Chippewa Child Life and Its Cultural Background. Minnesota Historical Society Press, St. Paul, MN.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holm, Bill (1972). Crooked Beak of Heaven: Masks and Other Ceremonial Art of the Northwest Coast. University of Washington Press, Seattle, WA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Howard, James H. (1960). When They Worship the Underwater Panther: A Prairie Potawatomi Bundle Ceremony. Southwestern Journal of Anthropology 16:217–224.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hudson, Charles (1976). The Southeastern Indians. University of Tennessee Press, Knoxville, TN.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hultkrantz, Åke (1983). The Elders of the Fish in Aboriginal North America. American Indian Quarterly 7:1–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • James, Edwin (1956). A Narrative of the Captivity and Adventures of John Tanner (U.S. Interpreter at Saut de Ste. Marie during Thirty Years’ Residence among the Indians in the Interior of North America. Ross & Haines, Inc., Minneapolis, MN. (Original 1830, G. & C. H. Carvill, New York, NY.)

    Google Scholar 

  • Jenness, Diamond (1935). The Ojibwa Indians of Parry Island: Their Social and Religious Life. National Museum of Canada, Department of Mines, Bulletin 78, Anthropological Series 17. J. O. Patenaude, Ottawa, ON, Canada.

    Google Scholar 

  • Joffe, Natalie (1940). The Fox of Iowa. In Acculturation in Seven American Indian Tribes, edited by R. Linton, pp. 259–331. Appleton-Century, New York, NY.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones, William (1919). Ojibwa Texts, Pt. 2. Edited by T. Michelson. American Ethnological Society, Publication 7. E. J. Brill, Ltd., Leyden, The Netherlands.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kehoe, Alice (1992). Clot-of-Blood. In Earth and Sky, edited by C. R. Farrer and R. A. Williamson. University of New Mexico Press, Albuquerque, NM.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keller, Cynthia, and Christopher Carr (2005). Gender, Role, Prestige, and Ritual Interaction across the Ohio, Mann, and Havana Hopewell Regions, as Evidenced by Ceramic Figurines. In Gathering Hopewell: Society, Ritual, and Ritual Interaction, edited by C. Carr and D. T. Case, pp. 428–460. Kluwer Academic/Plenum Publishers, New York, NY.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kubler-Ross, Elisabeth (1969). On Death and Dying. Macmillan, New York, NY.

    Google Scholar 

  • Landes, Ruth (1968). Ojibwa Religion and the Midéwiwin. University of Wisconsin Press, Madison, WI.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lankford, George E. (2007). The “Path of Souls”: Some Death Imagery in the Southeastern Ceremonial Complex. In Ancient Objects and Sacred Realms: Interpretations of Mississippian Iconography, edited by F. K. Reilly III and J. F. Garber, pp. 174–212. University of Texas Press, Austin, TX.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lankford, George E., F. Kent Reilly III, and James F. Garber (2011). Visualizing the Sacred: Cosmic Visions, Regionalism, and the Art of the Mississippian World. University of Texas Press, Austin, TX.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • MacNair, Peter, Robert Joseph, and Bruce Grenville (1998). Down from the Shimmering Sky: Masks of the Northwest Coast. Douglas & McIntyre, Vancouver, BC, Canada; University of Washington, Seattle, WA; and Vancouver Art Gallery, Vancouver, BC, Canada.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mahar, Cheleen, Richard Harker, and Chris Wilkes (1990). The Basic Theoretical Position. In An Introductiion to the Work of Pierre Bourdieu, edited by R. Harker, C. Mahar, and C. Wilkes, pp. 1–25. Macmillan Press, Houndsmill, UK.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mails, Thomas E. (1978). Sundancing at Rosebud and Pine Ridge. Center for Western Studies, Augustana College, Sioux Falls, SD.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mails, Thomas E. (1991). Fools Crow: Wisdom and Power. Council Oak Books, Tulsa, OK.

    Google Scholar 

  • Malinowski, Bronislaw (1954). Magic, Science, and Religion and Other Essays by Bronislaw Malinowski. Doubleday Anchor Books, Garden City, NY.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mann, Barbara Alice (2003). Native Americans, Archaeologists, and the Mounds. Peter Lang, New York, NY.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martin, Susan R. (1999). Wonderous Power: The Story of Ancient Copper Working in the Lake Superior Basin. Wayne State University Press, Detroit, MI.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maslowski, Robert F., Charles M. Niquette, and Derek M. Wingfield (1995). The Kentucky, Ohio, and West Virginia Database. West Virginia Archaeologist 47(1&2):1–75.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mason, Leonard (1967). The Swampy Cree: A Study in Acculturation. National Museum of Canada, Anthropological Papers, 13. Department of the Secretary of State, Ottawa, ON, Canada.

    Google Scholar 

  • Metcalf, Peter, and Richard Huntington (1991). Celebrations of Death: The Anthropology of Mortuary Ritual, 2nd. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Mickelson, Truman (1925). Notes on Fox Mortuary Customs and Beliefs. Bureau of American Ethnology, Report 40:351–496. U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, D.C.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, Jay (1991). Delaware Personhood. Man in the Northeast 42(Fall):17–27.

    Google Scholar 

  • Milner, George R. (2004). The Moundbuilders: Ancient Peoples of Eastern North America. Thames and Hudson, London, UK.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mooney, James (1900). Myths of the Cherokee. Nineteenth Annual Report of the Bureau of American Ethnology. U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, D.C.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moore, John Hartwell (1974). A Study of Religious Symbolism among the Cheyenne Indians. Ph.D. dissertation, Department of Anthropology, New York University, New York, NY.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moorehead, Warren K. (1892). Document on file (File A17, Folder 3), Field Museum of Natural History, Chicago, Illinois.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moorehead, Warren K. (1922). The Hopewell Mound Group of Ohio. Field Museum of Natural History, Publication 211; Anthropological Series 6(5):73–184, plates 51–83. Chicago, IL.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nerburn, Kent (1994). The Wisdom of the Great Chiefs: The Classic Speeches of Chief Red Jacket, Chief Joseph, and Chief Seattle. New World Library, San Rafael, CA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nicholson, Edward W. B. (1891). Ars Moriendi: That Is to Saye the Craft for to Deye for the Helthe of Mannes Sowle. Bernard Quartich, London, England. (Original 1491. William Caxton or Wynken de Worde, Bodleian Library, Oxford, England.)

    Google Scholar 

  • Ortiz, Alfonzo (1972). Ritual Drama and Pueblo World View. In New Perspectives on the Pueblos, edited by A. Ortiz, pp. 135–161. University of New Mexico Press, Albuquerque, NM.

    Google Scholar 

  • Overholt, Thomas W., and J. Baird Callicott (1982). Clothed-in-Fur and Other Tales: An Introduction to an Ojibwa World View. University Press of America, Washington, D.C.

    Google Scholar 

  • Paper, Jordan (1987). Cosmological Implications of Pan-Indian Sacred Pipe Ritual. Canadian Journal of Native Studies 7(2):297–306.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pauketat, Timothy R. (2001). A New Tradition in Archaeology. In The Archaeology of Traditions: Agency and History before and after Columbus, edited by T. R. Pauketat, pp. 1–16. University Press of Florida, Gainesville, FL.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pearson, Mike Parker (1982). Mortuary Practices, Society, and Ideology: An Ethnoarchaeological Study. In Symbolic and Structural Archaeology, edited by I. Hodder, pp. 99–113. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Pearson, Mike Parker (2000). The Archaeology of Burial and Death. Texas A&M University Press, College Station, TX.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peers, Laura, and Jennifer S. H. Brown (2000). “There Is No End to Relationship among the Indians”: Ojibwa Families and Kinship in Historical Perspective. History of the Family 4(4):529–555.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Penney, David W. (1985). Continuities of Imagery and Symbolism in the Art of the Woodlands. In Ancient Art of the American Woodland Indians, edited by D. S. Brose, J. A., Brown, and D. W. Penney, pp. 147–198. Harry N. Abrams, New York, NY, in association with the Detroit Institute of Arts, Detroit, MI.

    Google Scholar 

  • Prufer, Olaf (1964a). The Hopewell Cult. Scientific American 211(6):90–102.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Prufer, Olaf (1964b). The Hopewell Complex of Ohio. In Hopewellian Studies, edited by J. Caldwell and R. Hall, pp. 35–83. Illinois State Museum, Scientific Papers 12. Springfield, IL.

    Google Scholar 

  • Radin, Paul (1909). Winnebago Tales. Journal of American Folklore 22(85):288–313.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Radin, Paul (1945). The Road of Life and Death: A Ritual Drama of the American Indians. Pantheon, New York, NY.

    Google Scholar 

  • Radin, Paul (1970). The Winnebago Tribe. University of Nebraska Press, Lincoln, NE. (Original 1923. Thirty-Seventh Annual Report of the Bureau of American Ethnology for the Years 1915–1916, pp. 33–550. U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, D.C.)

    Google Scholar 

  • Raglan, FitzRoy Richard Somerset (1936). The Hero: A Study in Tradition, Myth, and Drama. Methuen and Company, Ltd., London, UK. (Reprinted 2003, Courier Dover Publications, New York, NY.)

    Google Scholar 

  • Rappaport, Roy A. (1968). Pigs for the Ancestors. Yale University Press, New Haven, CT.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rappaport, Roy A. (1971). Nature, Culture, and Ecological Anthropology. In Man, Culture, and Society, edited by H. L. Shapiro, pp. 237–266. Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reilly, Kent F., III, and James F. Garber (2007). Ancient Objects and Sacred Realms: Interpretations of Mississippian Iconography. University of Texas Press, Austin, TX.

    Google Scholar 

  • Riordan, Robert V. (2004). Fort Ancient and Southwest Ohio. In Fort Ancient Earthworks: Prehistoric Lifeways of the Hopewell Culture in Southwestern Ohio, edited by R. P. Connolly and B. T. Lepper, pp. 223–239. Ohio Historical Society, Columbus, OH.

    Google Scholar 

  • Riordan, Robert V. (2010). Enclosed by Stone. In Hopewell Settlement Patterns, Subsistence, and Symbolic Landscapes, edited by A. M. Byers and D. Wymer, pp. 215–229. University Press of Florida, Gainesville, FL.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ritzenthaler, Robert E. (1953). The Potawatomi Indians of Wisconsin. Public Museum of the City of Milwaukee, Bulletin 19(3). Milwaukee, Wisconsin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rodrigues, Teresa (2005). Gender and Social Differentiation within the Turner Population, Ohio, as Evidenced by Activity-Induced Musculoskeletal Stress Markers. In Gathering Hopewell: Society, Ritual, and Ritual Interaction, edited by C. Carr and D. T. Case, pp. 405–427. Kluwer Academic/Plenum Publishers, New York, NY.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Romain, William F. (1992). Hopewellian Concepts in Geometry. Ohio Archaeologist 42(2):35–50.

    Google Scholar 

  • Romain, William F. (1994). Hopewell Geometric Enclosures: Symbols of an Ancient World View. Ohio Archaeologist 44(2):37–43.

    Google Scholar 

  • Romain, William F. (1996). Hopewell Geometry: Forms at the Interface of Time and Eternity. In A View from the Core: A Synthesis of Ohio Hopewell Archaeology, edited by P. J. Pacheco, pp. 194–209. Ohio Archaeological Council, Columbus, OH.

    Google Scholar 

  • Romain, William F. (2000). Mysteries of the Hopewell: Astronomers, Geometers, and Magicians of the Eastern Woodlands. University of Akron Press, Akron, OH.

    Google Scholar 

  • Romain, William F. (2009). Shamans of the Lost World: A Cognitive Approach to the Prehistoric Religion of the Ohio Hopewell. AltaMira Press, Lanham, MD.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ruby, Bret J., Christopher Carr, and Douglas K. Charles (2005). Community Organizations in the Scioto, Mann, and Havana Hopewellian Regions: A Comparative Perspective. In Gathering Hopewell: Society, Ritual, and Ritual Interaction, edited by C. Carr and D. T. Case, pp. 119–176. Kluwer Academic/Plenum Publishers, New York, NY.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Ruhl, Katharine C. (1996). Copper Earspools in the Hopewell Interaction Sphere: The Temporal and Social Implications. Master’s thesis, Department of Anthropology, Kent State University, Kent, OH.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schoolcraft, Henry R. (1860). Archives of Aboriginal Knowledge, containing all the original Paper laid before Congress respecting the History, Antiquities, Language, Ethnology, Pictography, Rites, Superstitions, and Mythology of the Indian Tribes of the United States. 6 vols. J. B. Lippincott, Philadelphia, PA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Seeman, Mark F. (1995). When Words Are Not Enough: Hopewell Interregionalism and the Use of Material Symbols at the GE Mound. In Native American Interactions: Multiscalar Analyses and Interpretation in the Eastern Woodlands, edited by M. S. Nassaney and K. E. Sassaman, pp. 122–143. University of Tennessee Press, Knoxville, TN.

    Google Scholar 

  • Service, Elman (1962). Primitive Social Organization: An Evolutionary Perspective. Random House, New York, NY.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shkilnyk, Anastasia M. (1985). A Poison Stronger than Love: The Destruction of an Ojibwa Community. Yale University Press, New Haven, CT.

    Google Scholar 

  • Skinner, Alanson Buck (1910). A Visit to the Ojibwa and Cree of Central Canada. American Museum Journal 10 (1):9–17.

    Google Scholar 

  • Skinner, Alanson Buck (1913a). Social and Ceremonial Bundles of the Menomini Indians. American Museum of Natural History, Anthropological Papers 13. New York, NY.

    Google Scholar 

  • Skinner, Alanson Buck (1913b). Notes on the Florida Seminole. American Anthropologist, n.s. 15:63–77.

    Google Scholar 

  • Skinner, Alanson Buck (1915). Associations and Ceremonies of the Menomini Indians. American Museum of Natural History, Anthropological Papers 8, Pt. 2, pp. 167–215. Order of Trustees, American Museum of Natural History, New York, NY.

    Google Scholar 

  • Skinner, Alanson Buck (1920). Medicine Ceremony of the Menomini, Iowa, and Wahpeton Dakota, with Notes on the Ceremony among the Ponca, Bungi Ojibwa, and Potawatomi. Museum of the American Indian, Indian Notes and Monographs, 4. Heye Foundation, New York, NY.

    Google Scholar 

  • Skinner, Alanson Buck (1923). Observations on the Ethnology of the Sauk Indians. Public Museum of the City of Milwaukee, Bulletin 5(3). Milwaukee, WI.

    Google Scholar 

  • Skinner, Alanson, and John V. Satterlee (1915). Folklore of the Menomini Indians. American Museum of Natural History, Anthropological Papers 13 (Part 3):217–546.

    Google Scholar 

  • Skinner, Charles M. (1896). Myths and Legends of Our Own Land, Vol. 2. J. B. Lippincott Company, Philadelphia, PA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Speck, Frank G. (1909). Ethnology of the Yuchi Indians. Anthropological Publication No. 1, University of Pennsylvania Museum, Philadelphia, PA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Squier, Ephraim G., and Edwin H. Davis (1848). Ancient Monuments of the Mississippi Valley Comprising the Results of Extensive Original Surveys and Explorations. Smithsonian Contributions to Knowledge, 1. Smithsonian Institution, Washington, D.C.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stevens, E. T. (1870). Flint Chips. Bell and Daldy, London, UK.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sturtevant, William C. (1955). The Mikasuki Seminole: Medical Beliefs and Practices. Ph.D. dissertation, Department of Anthropology, Yale University, New Haven, CT. (Reprinted 1989, 1997, University Microfilms International, Ann Arbor, MI.)

    Google Scholar 

  • Sunderhaus, Ted S., and Jack K. Blosser (2006). Water and Mud and the Re-creation of the World. In Re-creating Hopewell, edited by D. K. Charles and J. E. Buikstra, pp. 134–145. University Press of Florida, Gainesville, FL.

    Google Scholar 

  • Swanton, John R. (1928). Religious Beliefs and Medicinal Practices of the Creek Indians. Forty-Second Annual Report of the Bureau of American Ethnology. Smithsonian Institution, U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, D.C.

    Google Scholar 

  • Swanton, John R. (1931). Source Material for the Social and Ceremonial Life of the Choctaw Indians. Bureau of American Ethnology, Bulletin 103. Smithsonian Institution, U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, D.C.

    Google Scholar 

  • Swanton, John R. (1942). Source Material on the History and Ethnology of the Caddo Indians. Bureau of American Ethnology, Bulletin 103. Smithsonian Institution, Washington, D.C.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thomas, Chad R., Christopher Carr, and Cynthia Keller (2005). Animal-Totemic Clans of Ohio Hopewellian Peoples. In Gathering Hopewell: Society, Ritual, and Ritual Interaction, edited by C. Carr and D. T. Case, pp. 339–385. Kluwer Academic/Plenum Publishers, New York, NY.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Thwaites, R. G., editor and translator. (1896–1901). The Jesuit Relations and Allied Documents, Vols. 1–73. Burrows Brothers Company, Cleveland, OH.

    Google Scholar 

  • Townsend, Richard F., and Robert V. Sharp, editors. (2004). Hero, Hawk, and Open Hand: American Indian Art of the Ancient Midwest and South. The Art Institute of Chicago, Chicago, IL, and Yale University Press, New Haven, CT.

    Google Scholar 

  • Trigger, Bruce G. (1969). The Huron Farmers of the North. Holt, Rinehart, and Winston, New York, NY.

    Google Scholar 

  • Turff, Gina, and Christopher Carr (2005). Hopewellian Panpipes from Eastern North America: Their Social, Ritual, and Symbolic Significance. In Gathering Hopewell: Society, Ritual, and Ritual Interaction, edited by C. Carr and D. T. Case, pp. 648–695. Kluwer Academic/Plenum Publishers, New York, NY.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • van Nest, Julieann (2006). Rediscovering This Earth. In Re-creating Hopewell, edited by D. K. Charles and J. E. Buikstra, pp. 402–426. University Press of Florida, Gainesville, FL.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vitebsky, Piers (1995). Shamanism. University of Oklahoma Press, Norman, OK.

    Google Scholar 

  • Warren, William Whipple (1885). History of the Ojibwa Nation. Minnesota Historical Society, Collections 5:21–510. St. Paul, MN.

    Google Scholar 

  • Waugh, Frederick W. (1916). Iroquois Foods and Food Preparation. Canada Department of Mines, Geological Survey, Memoirs 86, Anthropological Series 12. Ottawa, ON, Canada.

    Google Scholar 

  • White, Bruce M. (1982). “Give Us a Little Milk”: The Social and Cultural Meanings of Gift Giving in the Lake Superior Fur Trade. Minnesota History 48(2):60–71.

    Google Scholar 

  • Whitley, David S., and Kelley Hays-Gilpin (2008). Religion beyond Icon, Burial, and Monument: An Introduction. In Belief in the Past: Theoretical Approaches to the Archaeology of Religion, edited by D. S. Whitley and K. Hays-Gilpin, pp. 11–22. Left Coast Press, Walnut Creek, CA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Willoughby, Charles C. (1922). The Turner Group of Earthworks, Hamilton County, Ohio. Peabody Museum of American Archaeology and Ethnology, Papers 8(3). Harvard University, Cambridge, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wissler, Clark, and D. C. Duvall (1908). Mythology of the Blackfoot Indians. Anthropological Papers 2(1). American Museum of Natural History, New York, NY.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yarrow, H. C. (1881). A Further Contribution to the Study of Mortuary Customs of the North American Indians. Bureau of Ethnography, Report 1:87–203. U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, D.C.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

I am very thankful to Dr. Robert McCord, Curator of Paleontology, the Arizona Museum of Natural History, for the generous time and care he took in identifying the parts of ordinary animals that constitute composite Creatures 1, 2, 3, and 4. I am grateful to Dr. David Penney, the late Dr. N’omi Greber, Dr. Tom Emerson, and two other anonymous colleagues for their helpful comments on earlier articles that led to this chapter. I especially give my heartfelt thanks to Rex Weeks for his teachings about cultural sensitivity to Woodland Native Americans past and present and his instruction in ethnohistorical and critical analytical tools for sharpening sensitivity. I am indebted to Rebekah Zinser for drafting Figure 14.7 from field drawings.

Notes

  1. 1.

    Parts of this chapter are extensions, revisions, and compilations of parts of two previously published articles (Carr and McCord 2013; 2015).

  2. 2.

    By a “composite creature” I mean a single being that combines the parts of two or more distinct kinds of ordinary, nonhuman animals. The term does not include human-animal composites. This distinction follows from one made in historic Woodland and Plains Indians narratives, between animal-animal composites that are stable animal forms of the cosmos and human-animal combinations that are phenomenologically different, temporary shaman-like or misfortunate transitions of humans into animals.

  3. 3.

    This summary is a composite of information from Willoughby (1922:63–74) and the following records in the Peabody Museum of Archaeology and Ethnology, Harvard University: six field Diagrams 2–7 in Glassine Envelope for Turner Group 1882-35, Mound 4; two field Diagrams labeled “Section of Mound 4, September 11, 1882” and “Mound 4” in Glassine Envelope for Turner 1883-44A; correspondences from C. L. Metz to F. W. Putnam on September 9 and October 6, 1882, in the X-file for accession no. 82-35A(2) Turner Mounds and Other Ohio Sites; and 6 pages of field notes “Exploration of Mound 4 of Turner Group” in Glassine Envelope.

  4. 4.

    Below the Central Altar, on top of the natural gravel subsoil, were sequentially placed 20 inches of puddled clay; 7 inches of irregularly stratified ashes, sand, gravel, clay, and loam; 1.5 inches of black ash; burned clay 4 inches deep; unburned clay 2 inches deep; and the burned clay forming the base of the Central Altar. The first two clay layers mentioned were associated with another altar built prior to, below, and adjacent to the one of interest here. Above the Central Altar and its fill and cap of flat stones were a 0.5 inch deep layer of black ashes; 8 inches of stratified ashes, sand, loam, and gravel; 8 inches of gray ashes with many animal bones and occasional pottery and mica fragments; 20 inches of darker clay with traces of ashes and charcoal and occasional animal bone fragments; and 21 inches of clay with numerous charcoal flecks.

  5. 5.

    Feature 10 cremation chamber-tomb in Mound 3, like most of the other features of the mound, was oriented about 25o east of north.

  6. 6.

    The setting of the ritual drama in the Below realm(s) could imply that the social group that orchestrated the ceremony was a clan, phratry, dual division, or sodality with a water-related eponym, like those that existed in historic Woodland Indian tribes (e.g., fish or alligator clan, fish or water phratry, lower dual division; Thomas et al. 2005:344–351, tables 8.1–8.3). However, the sizes of the ceremonial gatherings around the Central Altar of Mound 4 and the Feature 10 cremation chamber-tomb were probably much larger and involved multiple local symbolic communities (sensu Ruby et al. 2005), given the easy access to river travel afforded by the Turner site’s location and the large labor force required to build Mounds 3 and 4 and the conjoined mound complex.

  7. 7.

    Also, the creature’s mouth is not wide open to bite, and in no historic narrative of the death journey of which we are aware does the snake harm the deceased journeyer by biting.

  8. 8.

    A third provenience that probably indicates a journey to an afterlife that passed through the Below realms and that was similar to the journeys represented in the Central Altar of Mound 4 and the Feature 10 cremation chamber-tomb in Mound 3 is the Central Altar of Mound 3. Among the artifacts it contained were those pertaining to three kinds of creatures analogous to the three found in the Central Altar of Mound 3: four copper, G clef–shaped cutouts (Willoughby 1922:plate 11-a) that mimic, to us and Willoughby (1922:48), the shape of the four horns of Creature 1, the rattlesnake-carnivore; twelve alligator teeth that recall Creature 2, the primitive fish and alligator/caiman composite; and five mica cutouts of the upper halves of bears, apparently swimming, partially submerged in water (Willoughby 1922:56, plate 15), which replace the horned rattlesnake and recall the underwater-underground bears know by historic Woodland and Plains Indians (Chapter 8: Bears, Table 8.2). Like the Central Altar of Mound 4, that of Mound 3 and its contents were covered by strata having water associations, implying the location of the creatures in an underwater-underground realm. From bottom to top, the strata in the altar were three large sheets of mica, 4 inches of clean sand, and flat waterworn stones. However, the altar in Mound 3, in contrast to the Central Altar of Mound 4, appears to have been the place of decommissioning of paraphernalia from multiple ceremonies of varied purposes, only one of which might have dealt with the death journey through the Below realm(s) and encounters with powerful creatures. The multiple ceremonies are suggested by the great diversity and number of artifacts within the Central Altar of Mound 3. Also, the altar contained artifacts associated with the Above realm(s)—two mica cutouts of human faces with bird noses, that is, bird-persons, and one copper cutout with bird talons (Willoughby 1922:56, plates 10e, 15c)—in addition to the G clefs, alligator teeth, bear effigies, and other artifacts associated with the Below realm(s). Finally, the altar included three artifacts, at least one of which represents the cosmos at large rather than only the Below realms. One (Willoughby 1922:plate 10e) is a copper cutout comprised of a circle—at once the whole cosmos and the axis mundi in cross section (Carr 2008b:295–297, figure 5.2B)—with points in the eight cardinal and semicardinal directions, and two bird talons suggesting the spin of the cosmos. The other two artifacts are human parietals, each again circular and possibly referencing the entire cosmos, and carved with a turtle (elements of a map/sawback turtle and/or snapping turtle) indicating the earth-turtle island. The carina on the turtle’s back may double for bird feathers, indicating an Above realm, while the turtle’s legs may double for those of a feline, indicating an underwater panther and a Below realm (Carr 2008d:55, 59, figures 2.9a, 2.9b).

  9. 9.

    Mound 1 of the Esch mound group is Hopewellian, in the sense that it contained classic Hopewellian artifacts, including a copper and iron panpipe, a copper celt, silver-covered copper earspools, platform pipes, a conch, a mica sheet, cut mica, and an effigy bear canine. Two uncalibrated radiocarbon dates from Mound 1 are: A.D.1 ± 120 and A.D. 270 ± 90 (Maslowski et al. 1995:30, 34). Prufer (1964b:49) seriated the Esch mound group as a totality (Mounds 1 and 2) to the middle of the Ohio Middle Woodland period. Ruhl’s (1996:78, 89–90, figure 9, table 6; 2005:702–703) seriation of earspools does not include any from Mound 1, only those from Mound 2, which apparently was constructed much later in time, per the seriation and a radiocarbon date (Maslowski et al. 1995:37, 38; A.D. 590 ± 70; A.D. 720 ± 70).

  10. 10.

    Mound 1 at the Hopewell site was not the scene of a ritual drama about the journey of souls of deceased individuals to an afterlife, although it did contain a sculpture that possibly depicted an underwater-underground composite creature. Mound 1 contained four sandstone tablets, each carved with a massasauga or possibly an eastern diamondback rattlesnake. One specimen may have depicted protrusions of some kind surrounding or surmounting the snake’s head, according to the local resident who found it, but the head portion has been lost and the protrusions cannot be verified (Carr and McCord 2013:24–25). Thus, the carving might or might not have depicted a horned serpent. The carving had been wrapped in sheets of copper, possibly suggesting an underwater association (Squier and Davis 1848:277). Significantly, the mound did not contain any human remains, thus offering no evidence that the possible snake with head protrusions was a creature encountered on the journey of a deceased person to an afterlife. Fragments of carved bone tubes were found in the mound (Moorehead 1922:89), indicating that bone preservation was not a factor in researchers not finding human burials there.

    Thirty to forty chlorite disks, which create a green powder similar in color to copper corrosion when scratched, were also found in the mound (Stevens 1870:278). The spatial layout of the tablets and disks is unknown. Mound 1 is one of several mounds located in the northeastern corner of the Hopewell earthwork within a few hundred feet of a spring, which could have been envisioned as an entrance to the Below realms, as were springs, rivers, plunge pools, and other water features generally by historic Woodland and Plains Native Americans.

  11. 11.

    A much broader understanding of the possible functions of Ohio Hopewell earthworks than Byers and Romain offered is given by DeBoer (1997). He envisioned the earthworks as analogous to those of the Chachi in Ecuador, which were “multifunctional installations that served as church, capitol, court, cemetery, as well as territorial marker” for holiday celebrations, weddings, funerals, feasts, and games (DeBoer 1997:225, 232).

  12. 12.

    Sound, continued application of Hall’s (1979) interpretation of mound construction using water-logged soils as a reenactment of the Woodland earth-diver myth and as world re-creation is found in geological studies by Van Nest (2006) and Sunderhaus and Blosser (2006:143–145). Sunderhaus and Blosser (2006:141) also tied earthwork construction at Fort Ancient to Woodland Native American notions beyond world renewal, including perhaps migration mythology, ritual purification, representation of the multitiered universe, and the axis mundi as a means of communication between tiers. Likewise, Birmingham, who credits Hall with the inspiration of his interpretation of the effigy mounds of Wisconsin as places where world renewal rites were enacted (Birmingham 2010:xxi), attributed effigy mound construction to a much wider range of religious-ideological and other causes: the expression of clan totems and membership; burial of the dead; tying the group to the land and marking the group’s territory by their burying their ancestors in that place; expressing a dual kinship system and a dual cosmic organization that mirrored each other; expressing the creation of the cosmos; and re-creating the world periodically by duplicating in earthen form both its cosmological and social structure; social feasting; and creating a shared regional ethnic identity (Birmingham 2010:11, 17, 21, 31, 34–35, 201, 202).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Christopher Carr .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Carr, C. (2021). Little Miami Hopewell Ritual Dramas of Death Journeys through the Lower Realm(s). In: Being Scioto Hopewell: Ritual Drama and Personhood in Cross-Cultural Perspective. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-44917-9_14

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-44917-9_14

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-44916-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-44917-9

  • eBook Packages: HistoryHistory (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics