Skip to main content
Log in

Mortuary practices: Their social, philosophical-religious, circumstantial, and physical determinants

  • Published:
Journal of Archaeological Method and Theory Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Recent, mainstream, American mortuary archaeology, in its paradigmatic outlook, middle-range theory, analytic methodology, and case studies, has emphasized social organization as the primary factor that determines mortuary practices. Broader anthropological and social science traditions have recognized philosophical-religious beliefs as additional, important determinants. The historical roots of mortuary archaeology's focus on the social, and the consequence of this on theory development, is reviewed. Then, through a Human Relations Area Files (HRAF) cross-cultural survey, the kinds of philosophical-religious, social organizational, circumstantial, and physical factors that affect specific kinds of mortuary practices, and the relative importance of these factors, are documented. The data are also used to test basic premises that mortuary archaeologists routinely use today to reconstruct social organization. A balanced, more holistic, and multidisciplinary approach, which considers many kinds of causes beyond social ones, is found necessary to interpret mortuary remains and to reconstruct the past from them.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References cited

  • Abbott, D. R., and Howard, J. (1991).Paleohydraulics and ceramic exchange: Structure and interaction in Hohokam irrigation communities. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Society for American Archaeology, New Orleans, April.

  • Ariès, P. (1977).L'Homme devant la Mort, Éditions du Seuil, Paris.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bartel, B. (1982). A historical review of ethnological and archaeological analyses of mortuary practice.Journal of Anthropological Archaeology 1(1):32–58.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Benedict, R. (1934).Patterns of Culture, Houghton Mifflin, Boston.

    Google Scholar 

  • Binford, L. R. (1964).Archaeological Investigations on Wassam Ridge, Archaeological Salvage Report 17, Southern Illinois University Museum, Carbondale.

    Google Scholar 

  • Binford, L. R. (1971). Mortuary practices: Their study and their potential. In Brown, J. A. (ed.), Approaches to the social dimensions of mortuary practices,Society for American Archaeology, Memoris 25:6–29.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blakely, R. L. (1977) Sociocultural adaptations in prehistoric America.Southern Anthropological Society, Proceedings 11.

  • Blau, P. (1970). A formal theory of differentiation in organizations.American Sociological Review 35(2): 201–218.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bloch, M. (1971).Placing the Dead, Seminar Press, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bloch, M. and Parry, J. (eds.). (1982).Death and the Regeneration of Life, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, England.

    Google Scholar 

  • Braun, D. P. (1977).Middle Woodland-Early Late Woodland Social Change in the Prehistoric Central Midwestern U.S., Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, Department of Anthropology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor.

    Google Scholar 

  • Braun, D. P. (1979). Illinois Hopewell burial practices and social organization: A reexamination of the Klunk-Gibson mound group. In Brose, D. S., and Greber, N. (eds.)Hopewell Archaeology: The Chillicothe Conference, Kent State University Press, Kent, OH, pp. 66–79.

    Google Scholar 

  • Braun, D. P. (1981). A critique of some recent North American mortuary studies.American Antiquity 46(2): 398–416.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, J. A. (ed.) (1971a). Approaches to the social dimensions of mortuary practices,Society for American Archaeology, Memoirs 25.

  • Brown, J. A. (1971b). The dimensions of status in the burials at Spiro. In Brown, J. A. (ed.), Approaches to the social dimensions of mortuary practices,Society for American Archaeology, Memoirs 25: 92–112.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, J. A. (1981). The search for rank in prehistoric burials. In Chapman, R., Kinnes, I., and Randsborg, K. (eds.),The Archaeology of Death, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, England, pp. 25–39.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, J. A. (1987). Quantitative burial analyses as interassemblage comparison. In Aldenderfer, M. S. (ed.),Quantitative Research in Archaeology, Sage Publications, Newbury Park, CA, pp.294–308.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brunson, J. L. (1989).The Social Organization of the Los Muertos Hohokam: A Reanalysis of Cushing's Hemenway Expedition Data. Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, Department of Anthropology, Arizona State University, Tempe.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buikstra, J. E. (1977). Biocultural dimensions of archaeological study: A regional perspective.Southern Anthropological Society, Proceedings 11.

  • Cannon, A. (1989). The historical dimension in mortuary expressions of status and sentiment.Current Anthropology 30: 437–458.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carr, C. (1992). Modeling the evolution of alliance strategies as systems regulators in egalitarian societies. InReports for 1990 and 1991: Fiftieth Anniversary Issue, Wenner-Gren Foundation for Anthropological Research, Inc., Wenner-Gren Foundation for Anthropological Research, New York, p. 147.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carr, C., and Maslowski, R. (1995). Cordage and fabrics: Relating form, technology, and social processes. In Carr, C., and Neitzel, J. E. (eds.),Style, Society, and Person, Plenum Press, New York, pp. 297–343.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carr, C., and Neitzel, J. E. (1995). Future directions for material style studies. In Carr, C., and Neitzel, J. E. (eds.),Style, Society, and Person, Plenum Press, New York, pp. 437–459.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chapman, R. (1981). The emergence of formal disposal areas and the ‘problem’ of megalithic tombs in Europe. In Chapman, R., Kinnes, I., and Randsborg, K. (eds.),The Archaeology of Death, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, England, pp.1–25.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chapman, R. Kinnes, I., and Randsborg, K. (eds.) (1981)The Archaeology of Death, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, England.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chapman, R. and Randsborg, K. (1981) Approaches to the archaeology of death. In Chapman, R., Kinnes, I., and Randsborg, K. (eds.),The Archaeology of Death, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, England, pp.1–25.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cuevas, B. J. (1993).Death and Transition: The Dynamics of Liminal Space in Tibetan Ceremonies of the Dead. Unpublished Masters' thesis, Department of Religious Studies, University of Virginia, Charlottesville.

    Google Scholar 

  • David, N. (1992). The archaeology of ideology: Mortuary practices in the central Mandara highlands, northern Cameroon. In Sterner, J., and David, N. (eds.),An African Commitment: Papers in Honour of Peter Lewis Shinnie, University of Calgary Press, Calgary, pp. 181–210.

    Google Scholar 

  • Douglas, M. (1970).Natural Symbols, Pantheon Books, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Durkheim, E. (1915, orig. 1912).The Elementary Forms of the Religious Life, J. L. W. Swain, trans., George Allen and Unwin, Ltd., London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Durkheim, E. (1938, orig. 1893).The Rules of Sociological Method. S. Solovay and J. Mueller, trans., Free Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Durkheim, E. (1951, orig. 1897).Suicide, J. Spaulding and G. Simpson, trans., Free Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Earle, T. K. (1990). Style and iconography as legitimation in complex chiefdoms. In Conkey, M., and Hastorf, C. (eds.),The Uses of Style in Archaeology, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, England, pp. 73–81.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eliade, M. (1964).Shamanism, Princeton University Press, Princeton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Emerson, T. E. (1989). Water, serpents, and the underworld: An exploration into Cahokian symbolism. In Galloway, P. (ed.),Southern Ceremonial Complex: Artifacts and Analysis: The Cottonlandia Conference, University of Nebraska Press, Lincoln, pp. 45–92.

    Google Scholar 

  • Flannery, K. V. (1972). The cultural evolution of civilizations.Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 3: 399–426.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frazier, Sir J. (1929).The Golden Bough, Vol. 1, Book League of America, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gardner, R. Rockerfeller, M. G., Lincoln, J., and Chopra, J. (1963).Dead Birds (the film), McGraw-Hill, New York, in cooperation with the Film Study Center Library, Peabody Museum, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldstein, L. G. (1976).Spatial Structure and Social Organization: Regional Manifestations of Mississippian Society, Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, Department of Anthropology, Northwestern University, Evanston.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldstein, L. G. (1981). One-dimensional archaeology and multi-dimensional people: Spatial organization and mortuary analysis. In Chapman, R., Kinnes, I., and Randsborg, K. (eds.),The Archaeology of Death, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, England, pp. 53–70.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goodenough, W. (1965). Rethinking ‘status’ and ‘role’: Toward a general model of the cultural organization of social relationships. In Gluckman, M., and Eggan, F. (eds.), The relevance of models for social anthropology,Association of Social Anthropologists of the Commonwealth, Monograph,1: 1–24.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goodman, F. (1990).Where the Spirits Ride the Wind, Indiana University Press, Bloomington.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goodman, F. (1991).Ecstacy, Ritual, and Alternate Reality: Religion in a Pluralistic World, Indiana University Press, Bloomington.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greber, N. (1979). Variations in structure of Ohio Hopewell peoples.Mid-Continental Journal of Archaeology 4: 35–76.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grof, S., and Grof, C. (1980).Beyond Death: The Gates of Consciousness. Thames and Hudson, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gruber, J. W. (1971). Patterning in death in a late prehistoric village in Pennsylvania.American Antiquity 36: 64–76.

    Google Scholar 

  • Habenstein, R. W., and Lamers, W. M. (1960).Funeral Customs the World Over, National Funeral Directors Association and Bulfin Printers, Milwaukee.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hall, R. L. (1976). Ghosts, water barriers, corn and sacred enclosures in the Eastern Woodlands.American Antiquity 41: 360–364.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hall, R. L. (1979). In search of the ideology of the Adena-Hopewell Climax. In Brose, D. S., and Greber, N. (eds.),Hopewell Archaeology: The Chillicothe Conference, Kent State University Press, Kent, OH, pp. 258–265.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hall, R. L. (1983). A pan-continental perspective on Red Ochre and Glacial Kame ceremonialism. In Dunnell, R. C., and Grayson, D. K. (eds.),Lulu Linear Punctated: Essays in Honor of George Irving Quimby, University of Michigan, Museum of Anthropology, Anthropological Papers72: 74–107.

    Google Scholar 

  • Henry, M. M. (1994)An Inventory of Hopewell Imagery, Their Spatial Relationships, and Possible Explanations from Native American Mythologies. Unpublished Masters thesis, Department of Anthropology, Arizona State University, Tempe.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hertz, R. (1907). Contribution a une étude sur la representation collective de la mort. Année Sociologique10: 48–137.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hodder, I. (1982a).Symbols in Action, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, England.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hodder, I. (1982b). Theoretical archaeology: A reactionary view. In Hodder, I. (ed.),Symbolic and Structural Archaeology, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, England, pp. 1–16.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hodder, I. (1982c).The Present Past, B. T. Batsford, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hodder, I. (1984). Burials, houses, women and men in the European Neolithic. In Miller, D., and Tilley, C. (eds.),Ideology, Power, and Prehistory, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, England, pp. 51–68.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huntington, R., and Metcalf, P. (1979).Celebrations of Death, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, England.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huss-Ashmore, R. Goodman, A., H., and Armelagos, G. (1982). Nutritional inference from paleopathology.Advances in Archaeological Method and Theory 5: 395–473.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jung, Carl G. (ed.) (1964).Man and His Symbols, Doubleday, Garden City.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kearney, M. (1975). World view theory and study.Annual Review of Anthropology 4: 247–270.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kearney, M. (1984).World View, Chandler and Sharp, Novato, CA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kroeber, A. L. (1927). Disposal of the dead.American Anthropologist 29: 308–315.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kroeber, A. L. (1963).Anthropology: Cultural Patterns and Processes, Harcourt Brace, & World, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kubler-Ross, E. (1969).On Death and Dying, MacMillan, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuhn, T. S. (1962).The Structure of Scientific Revolutions, University of Chicago Press, Chicago.

    Google Scholar 

  • Little, B. J., Lanphear, K. M., and Owsley, D. W. (1992). Mortuary display and status in a Nineteenth Century Anglo-American cemetery in Manassas, Virginia.American Antiquity 57: 397–418.

    Google Scholar 

  • Malinowski, B. (1954).Magic, Science, and Religion and Other Essays, Doubleday, Garden City.

    Google Scholar 

  • Matlock, J. G. (1990).An animistic interpretation of the mortuary remains at Carter Ranch pueblo. Unpublished manuscript on file with the author, Department of Anthropology, Southern Illinois University, Carbondale.

    Google Scholar 

  • McGregor, J. C. (1941). Burial of an early American magician.American Philosophical Society, Proceedings 86(2): 270–301.

    Google Scholar 

  • McGuire, R. H. (1992).Death, Society, and Ideology in a Hohokam Community, Westview Press, Boulder, CO.

    Google Scholar 

  • Merbs, C. F. (1989).Orientation of Canadian Thule and early historic burials: seasonality and choice of heaven. Paper presented at the annual meetings of the Society for Historical Archaeology, Baltimore, January.

  • Miller, D. and Tilley, C. (1984).Ideology, Power, and Prehistory, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, England.

    Google Scholar 

  • Murdock, G. P. (1967). Ethnographic atlas: A summary.Ethnology 6(2): 109–236.

    Google Scholar 

  • Murdock, G. P. (1969). World sampling provinces.Ethnology 7(3): 305–329.

    Google Scholar 

  • Murdock, G. P. (1983).Outline of World Cultures, 6th ed. Human Relations Area Files, Inc., New Haven.

    Google Scholar 

  • Murdock, G. P., and White, D. R. (1980) Standard cross-cultural sample. In Barry III, H., and Schlegel, A. (eds.),Cross-Cultural Samples and Codes, University of Pittsburgh Press, Pittsburgh, pp. 3–27.

    Google Scholar 

  • Murdock, G. P., Ford, C. S., Hudson, A. E., Kennedy, R., Simmons, L. W., and Whiting, J. W. M. (1982).Outline of Cultural Materials, 5th ed., Human Relations Area Files, Inc., New Haven.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ortner, D. J., and Putschar, W. G. J. (1981). Identification of pathological conditions in human skeletal remains.Smithsonian Contributions to Anthropology 28: 1–54.

    Google Scholar 

  • O'Shea, J. (1981). Social configurations and the archaeological study of mortuary practices: A case study. In Chapman, R., Kinnes, I., and Randsborg, K. (eds.),The Archaeology of Death, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, England, pp. 39–52.

    Google Scholar 

  • O'Shea, J. (1984).Mortuary Variability: An Archaeological Investigation. Academic Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Owsley, D. W., Berryman, H. E., and Bass, W. M. (1977). Demographic and osteological evidence for warfare at the Larson site, South Dakota.Plains Anthropologist, Memoir 13, 22–78, (part 1), 119–132 (part 2).

    Google Scholar 

  • Pearson, M. P. (1982). Mortuary practices, society, and ideology: An ethnoarchaeological study. In Hodder, I. (ed.),Symbolic and Structural Archaeology, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, England, pp. 99–113.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pearson, M. P. (1984). Economic and ideological change: Cyclical growth in the pre-state societies of Jutland. In Miller, D., and Tilley, C. (eds.),Ideology, Power, and Prehistory, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, England, pp. 69–92.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pebbles, C. S. (1971). Moundville and surrounding sites: Some structural considerations of mortuary practices II. In Brown, J. (ed.), Approaches To the social dimensions of mortuary practices,Society for American Archaeology, Memoris 25: 68–91.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peebles, C. S. (1972). Monothetic-divisive analysis of the Moundville burials: An initial report.Newsletter of Computer Archaeology 8(2): 1–13.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peebles, C. S. (1974).Moundville: The Organization of a Prehistoric Community and Culture, Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, Department of Anthropology, University of California, Santa Barbara.

    Google Scholar 

  • Penney, D. (1983).Imagery of the Middle Woodland Period: The Birth of a North American Iconographic Tradition. Paper presented at the Douglas Fraser Memorial Symposium on Primitive and Precolumbian Art, Department of Anthropology, Columbia University, New York, April 15.

    Google Scholar 

  • Penney, D. (1985). Continuities of imagery and symbolism in the art of the Woodlands. In Brose, D., Brown, J. A., and D. W. Penney (eds.),Ancient Art of the American Woodland Indians, Harry Abrams, New York, pp. 147–198.

    Google Scholar 

  • Price, T. D. Schoeninger, M. J., and Armelagos, G. J. (1985). Bone chemistry and past behavior: An overview.Journal of Human Evolution 14: 419–447.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rappaport, R. A. (1968).Pigs for the Ancestors, Yale University Press, New Haven.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rappaport, R. A. (1979).Ecology, Meaning, and Religion, North Atlantic Books, Richmond, CA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ravesloot, J. C. (1988).Mortuary Practices and Social Differentiation at Casas Grandes, Chihuahua, Mexico, University of Arizona, Anthropological Papers No. 49, University of Arizona, Tempe.

    Google Scholar 

  • Renfrew, C. (1976). Megaliths, territories, and populations. In De Laet, S. J. (ed.),Acculturation and Continuity in Atlantic Europe, Tempel, Brugge, Belgium, pp. 198–220.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roe, P. (1995). Style, society, myth, and structure. In Carr, C. and Neitzel, J. E. (eds.),Style, Society, and Person, Plenum Press, New York, pp. 27–76.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rose, H. J. (1922). Celestial and terrestrial orientation of the dead.Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute of Great Britain and Northern Ireland 52: 127–140.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosenthal, B. (1995). Iroquois false face masks: The multiple causes of style. In Carr, C., and Neitzel, J. E. (eds.),Style, Society, and Person, Plenum Press, New York, pp. 345–367.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rothschild, N. (1979). Mortuary behavior and social organization at Indian Knoll and Dickson Mounds.American Antiquity 44: 658–675.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sabloff, J. A., and Willey, G. R. (1980).A History of American Archaeology, W. H. Freeman, San Francisco.

    Google Scholar 

  • Saxe, A. A. (1970).Social Dimensions of Mortuary Practices in a Mesolithic Population from Wadi Halfa, Sudan, Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, Department of Anthropology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor.

    Google Scholar 

  • Seeman, M. F. (1979). The Hopewell interaction sphere: The evidence for interregional trade and structural complexity.Indiana Historical Society, Prehistoric Research Series 5(2): 235–438.

    Google Scholar 

  • Seeman, M. F. (1988). Ohio Hopewell trophy-skull artifacts as evidence for competition in Middle Woodland societies, Circa 50 B.C.-A.D. 350.American Antiquity 53: 565–577.

    Google Scholar 

  • Service, E. R. (1962).Primitive Social Organization, Random House, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Steward, J. H. (1955).Theory of Culture Change, University of Illinois Press, Urbana.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stickel, E. G. (1968). Status differentiations at the Rincon site.University of California at Los Angeles, Archaeological Survey, Annual Report 10: 209–261.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sugiyama, S. (1992). World view materialized at Teotihuacan, Mexico.Latin American Antiquity 4: 103–129.

    Google Scholar 

  • Swanson, Guy E. (1960).Birth of the Gods, University of Michigan Press, Ann Arbor.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tainter, J. A. (1975).The Archaeological Study of Social Change: Woodland Systems in West-Central Illinois, Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, Department of Anthropology, Northwestern University, Evanston.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tainter, J. A. (1978). Mortuary practices and the study of prehistoric social systems.Advances in Archaeological Method and Theory 1: 105–141.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, W. W. (1948).A Study of Archaeology, Southern Illinois University Press, Carbondale.

    Google Scholar 

  • Toelken, B. (1979).The Dynamics of Folklore, Houghton Mifflin, Boston.

    Google Scholar 

  • Trigger, B. (1969).The Huron Farmers of the North, Holt, Rinehart, and Winston, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Turner, V. (1967).The Forest of Symbols, Cornell University Press, Ithaca, NY.

    Google Scholar 

  • Turner, V. (1969).The Ritual Process, Aldine, Chicago.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tyler, J. B. (1921).The New Stone Age of Northern Europe, Charles Scribner's Sons, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ubelaker, D. (1989).Human Skeletal Remains: Excavation, Analysis, Interpretation, Taraxacum, Washington, DC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ucko, P. J. (1969). Ethnography and archaeological interpretation of funerary remains.World Archaeology 1(2): 262–280.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Gennep, A. (1909).Les Rites de Passage, Emile Nourry, Paris.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vayda, A. P., and Rappaport, R. A. (1967). Ecology, cultural and noncultural. In Clifton, J. (ed.),Introduction to Cultural Anthropology, Houghton-Mifflin, Boston, pp. 477–497.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vehik, S. C. (1975).Sociocultural Implications of Central European Early Bronze Age Mortuary Practices. Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, Department of Anthropology, University of Missouri, Columbia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Viollier, D. (1911).Essai sur les Rites Funéraires en Suisse des Origines a la Conquête Romaine, Leroux, Paris.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walsh, R. N. (1990).The Spirit of Shamanism, Jeremy P. Tarcher, Los Angeles.

    Google Scholar 

  • Webb, W. S., and Snow, C. E. (1945).The Adena People, University of Kentucky Reports in Anthropology and Archaeology No. 6, University of Kentucky, Lexington.

    Google Scholar 

  • Webb, W. S., and Snow, C. E. (1974).The Adena People, University of Tennessee Press, Knoxville.

    Google Scholar 

  • Webster, D. (1963).Webster's Seventh New Collegiate Dictionary, Merriam, Springfield, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • White, L. (1949).The Science of Culture, Farrar, Straus, and Giroux, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Whittlesey, S. M. (1978).Status and Death at Grasshopper Pueblo: Experiments toward an Archaeological Theory of Correlates, Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, Department of Anthropology, University of Arizona, Tucson.

    Google Scholar 

  • Willey, G. R., and Sabloff, J. A. (1980).A History of American Archaeology, W. H. Freeman, San Francisco.

    Google Scholar 

  • Winters, H. D. (1968). Value systems and trade cycles of the Late Archaic in the midwest. In Binford, S. R., and Binford, L. R., (eds.),New Perspectives in Archeology, Aldine, Chicago, pp. 175–22.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Carr, C. Mortuary practices: Their social, philosophical-religious, circumstantial, and physical determinants. J Archaeol Method Theory 2, 105–200 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02228990

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02228990

Key words

Navigation