Skip to main content

How Democratic Elections Differ

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
How Referendums Challenge European Democracy

Part of the book series: Palgrave Studies in European Union Politics ((PSEUP))

  • 526 Accesses

Abstract

When democracy is defined as government by the people, for the people and of the people, a great deal of ambiguity is packed into eleven words. Government by the people is literally impossible in any political system larger than a village. A representative democracy can be described as government for the people because members of the parliament are accountable to citizens in a free and fair election. In contemporary Europe, the most common form of democracy is representative democracy. However, if representatives are very disproportionately male and middle-class and belong to one race in a multiracial society, their claim to be of the people is incorrect in the sociological sense. A referendum is of the people and by the people because all citizens can participate in directly deciding whether a policy should be adopted or rejected.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 79.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 99.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 99.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Aachen, C., and L. Bartels. 2016. Democracy for Realists: Why Elections Do Not Produce Responsive Government. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Barber, B. 2004. Strong Democracy: Participatory Politics for a New Age, 2nd ed. Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Collier, D., and S. Levitsky. 1997. Democracy with Adjectives. World Politics 49 (3): 430–451.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Colombo, C. 2018. Justifications and Citizen Competence in Direct Democracy: A Multilevel Analysis. British Journal of Political Science 48 (3): 787–806.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dahl, R. 1989. Democracy and Its Critics. New Haven: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Farrell, Jason, and Paul Goldsmith. 2017. How to Lose a Referendum: The Definitive Story of Why the UK Voted for Brexit. London: Biteback.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fisher, J., E. Fieldhouse, M.N. Franklin, R. Gibson, M. Cantijoch, and C. Wlezien (eds.). 2018. The Routledge Handbook of Elections, Voting Behavior and Public Opinion. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freedom House. 2019. https://freedomhouse.org/report/.

  • Habermas, J. 1996. Between Fact and Norms: Contributions to a Discourse Theory of Law and Democracy. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Hibbing, J., and E. Theiss-Morse. 2002. Stealth Democracy: Americans’ Beliefs About How Democracy Should Work. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • ICE: Independent Commission on Referendums. 2018. Report of the Independent Commission on Referendums. London: University College London Constitution Unit.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lijphart, A. 2012. Patterns of Democracy: Government Forms and Performance in Thirty-Six Countries, 2nd ed. New Haven: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marsh, M. 2018. Voting Behaviour in Referendums. In Fisher et al. 2018, 256–266.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mendez, F., and M. Germann. 2018. Contested Sovereignty: Mapping Referendums on Sovereignty over Time and Space. British Journal of Political Science 48 (1): 141–165.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mudde, C., and C. Kaltwasser. 2017. Populism: A Very Short Introduction. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Müller, J.-W. 2016. What Is Populism? London: Penguin Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nagel, J., and R. Smith (eds.). 2013. Representation, Elections and Beyond. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pateman, C. 1970. Participation and Democratic Theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Przeworski, Adam. 1995. Sustainable Democracy. New York: Cambridge University Press Przeworski.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Qvortrup, M. (ed.). 2018a. Referendums Around the World. London: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Qvortrup, M. 2018b. The History of Referendums and Direct Democracy. In The Routledge Handbook to Referendums and Direct Democracy, ed. L. Morel and M. Qvortrup, 11–26. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rose, R. 2015. Representing Europeans: A Pragmatic Approach, 2nd ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rose, R., and B. Wessels. 2020. Do Populist or Civic Values Drive Support for Referendums in Europe? European Journal of Political Research, in press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosenbluth, F., and I. Shapiro. 2018. Responsible Parties: Saving Democracy from Itself. New Haven: Yale University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Ruth, S.P., Y. Welp, and L. Whitehead (eds.). 2017. Let the People Rule. Colchester: ECPR Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sartori, G. 1987. The Theory of Democracy Revisited. Chatham, NJ: Chatham House.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schumpeter, J. 1952. Capitalism, Socialism and Democracy, 4th ed. London: George Allen & Unwin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Serdült, U. 2018. Switzerland. In Referendums Around the World, ed. M. Qvortrup, 47–112. London: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Talpin, J. 2018. Do Referendums Make Better Citizens? In The Routledge Handbook to Referendums and Direct Democracy, ed. L. Morel and M. Qvortrup, 405–418. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ulieri, P. 2000. Plebiscites and Plebiscitary Politics. In International Encyclopedia of Elections, ed. R. Rose, 199–202. Washington, DC: CQ Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weale, A. 2018. The Will of the People: A Modern Myth. Oxford: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wheatley, J. 2017. A Problem or a Solution? In Ruth et al. 2017, 41–61.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zmerli, S., and T. van der Meer (eds.). 2017. Handbook on Political Trust. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Rose, R. (2020). How Democratic Elections Differ. In: How Referendums Challenge European Democracy . Palgrave Studies in European Union Politics. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-44117-3_1

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics