Skip to main content

Democratic Representation and the Nature of Political Parties

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Democratic Institutions and Practices

Abstract

The term “representation” is polysemic, meaning, among other things, reproduction, delegation or mandate. However, representation may also imply a betrayal of the reproduced or delegated reality. It seems to me that, today, political representation suggests distance and otherness, and not similarity, especially when transparency and public control of the citizens’ representatives and State institutions are constantly eroded. In this chapter, I would argue that there is a crisis of legitimacy of the means of political representation in Western democracies, resulting from the decline of parliamentarism and the political parties. These should ensure the democratic functioning of the State between elections. However, voters have now scarce control on their representatives, and candidates are more likely to be designated by the parties’ bureaucracies than by the citizens themselves. Political parties, in sum, look today like embedded in the State apparatus rather than in civil society, the latter being progressively supplanted by its institutional form, thus falling into a vicious circle of delegitimisation.

This work was carried out within the framework of the MICIU research project “Collective biography and prosographic analysis beyond Parliament” (PGC2018-095712-B-100) within the type A consolidated Basque Government Research Group, Biography & Parliament (IT-1263-19).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Some exceptions were permitted, related to the size of the delegation or to specific conditions. Hence, the last election of Representatives by general ticket (each voter holds as many votes as there are seats to elect, whether on one or multiple ballots) took place in the State of Hawaii in 1968.

  2. 2.

    For the reader’s interest, I would like to reproduce an observation made by the translators and editors of the 1994 Spanish version (pp. 170–171) of What is the Third Estate?, where they highlight one of Sieyès clearest contradictions in this work: “If the nation has been defined as a metaphysical entity prior to the election of its representations, here he identifies the deputies of the Third Estate with the nation, despite the fact that a few lines below he will once again attempt to distinguish both realities. Once more, the tension between the Rousseauian influence — popular sovereignty — and the construction of the attributes of national sovereignty is made evident by the Abbé’s text, in which the overall priority is always the political end: to argue in favour of the Third Estate so as to transform the society of estates.”

  3. 3.

    Pitkin, H. F. (1967). The concept of representation. The University of California Press.

  4. 4.

    Manin, B. (1997). The principles of representative government. Cambridge University Press.

Bibliography

  • Bagehot, W. (1867). The English constitution. Londres Chapman and Hall. https://archive.org/details/englishconstitu05bagegoog/page/n13/mode/2up

  • Burke, E. (1774). Speech to the electors of Bristol. https://press-pubs.uchicago.edu/founders/documents/v1ch13s7.html

  • Carré de Malberg, R. ([1922] 2013). Teoría general del Estado. Traducción de José Lión Depetre. Ciudad de México: Fondo de Cultura Económica.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cotta, M. ([1986] 1988). Parlamentos y representación. In G. Pasquino (Ed.), Manual de Ciencia Política (pp. 265–310). Spanish version from Pilar Chávarri, Mª Luz Morán y Miguel Ruiz de Azúa: Madrid: Alianza.

    Google Scholar 

  • Díez del Corral, L. (1989). El pensamiento político de Tocqueville. Madrid: Alianza Editorial.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fernández-Carvajal, R. (1957). Traducción y Estudio preliminar. In E. Renan (Ed.), ¿Qué es una Nación? Instituto de Estudios Políticos.

    Google Scholar 

  • García Pelayo, M. (1971). Las funciones de los modernos parlamentos bicamerales. Congreso de la República.

    Google Scholar 

  • García Pelayo, M. (1977). Las transformaciones del estado contemporáneo. Alianza.

    Google Scholar 

  • García Pelayo, M. (1986). El Estado de partidos. Alianza.

    Google Scholar 

  • García Pérez, R. D. (2018–2019). Tocqueville, religión y orden constitucional en América. Anuario de Historia del Derecho Español, LXXXVIII–LXXXIX, 351–373.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hamilton, A., Madison, J., & Jay, J. (1961). The federalist (B. F. Wright, Ed.). The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Küng, H. (2001). The Catholic Church: A short history (J. Bowden, Trans.). Weidenfeld and Nicolson.

    Google Scholar 

  • Le Bon, G. ([1895] 2002). The crowd: A study of the popular mind. Dover Publications, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Manin, B. ([1997] 1998). Los principios del gobierno representativo. Traducción de Fernando Vallespín. Alianza.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marsilius of Padua. (1956). The defender of peace (A. Gewirth, Trans.). Harper & Row.

    Google Scholar 

  • Michels, R. (2001 [1911]). Political parties: A sociological study of the oligarchical tendencies of modern democracy (Eden and Cedar Paul, Trans.). Batoche Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Montesquieu, B. de. (1794). The spirit of the laws. James Evans.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mosca, G. (1939). The ruling class (H. D. Kahn, Trans.). McGraw-Hill Book Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moscovici, S. (1988). Notes toward a description of social representations. European Journal of Social Psychology, 18, 211–250.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ostrogorski, M. ([1902] 1964). Democracy and the organization of political parties: The United States (Vol. 2, 1967, pp. 343–345). Quadrangle Books).

    Google Scholar 

  • Pitkin, H. F. (1967). The concept of representation. The University of California Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Portero Molina, J. A. (1991). Sobre la representación política. Revista Del Centro De Estudios Constitucionales, 10, 89–119.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sartori G. ([1987] 1992). Elementos de teoría política (M. Luz Morán, Trans.). Alianza.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sieyès, E. J. (2003). Political writings: Including the debate between Sieyès and Tom Paine in 1791 (M. Sonenscher, Ed. & Trans.). Hackett Publishing Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, P. (2001). Editor’s introduction. In W. Bagehot (Ed.), The English constitution (pp. VII–XXVI). Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tocqueville, A. de. (1838), Democracy in America (Vol. I, H. Reeve, Trans.). George Dearborn & Co.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tocqueville, A. de. (1863). Democracy in America (Vol. II., 3rd ed., H. Reeve & F. Bowen, Trans.). Sever and Francis.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yannuzzi, M. d. l. Á. (2010). El rol de los elementos no-racionales en la construcción democrática. Estudios Sociales, 39(1), 25–45. https://doi.org/10.14409/es.v39i1.2663

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Esteban Anchústegui Igartua .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Anchústegui Igartua, E. (2022). Democratic Representation and the Nature of Political Parties. In: Gómez Gutiérrez, J.J., Abdelnour-Nocera, J., Anchústegui Igartua, E. (eds) Democratic Institutions and Practices. Contributions to Political Science. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-10808-2_5

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics