Skip to main content

Enacting Solidarity

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Shifting Solidarities

Abstract

With the macro-, meso- and micro-level of social reality correspond different modes of solidarity, which partly explains the concept’s multidimensionality. This is illustrated though an analysis of three empirical studies.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 89.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Alexander, J. C. (2014 [1983]). The modern reconstruction of classical thought: Talcott Parsons. London and New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bayertz, K. (1999). Four uses of “solidarity”. In K. Bayertz (Ed.), Solidarity (pp. 3–28). Dordrecht: Kluwer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Bellah, R. (1973). Emile Durkheim on morality and society. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brunkhorst, H. (2005 [2002]). Solidarity: From civic friendship to a global legal community. Cambridge: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Giddens, A. (1993). New rules of sociological method: A positive critique of interpretative sociologies (2nd ed.). Cambridge: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gofman, A. (2014). Durkheim’s theory of social solidarity and social rules. In V. Jeffries (Ed.), The Palgrave handbook of altruism, morality, and social solidarity: Formulating a field of study (pp. 45–70). New York: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Heelas, P., Lash, S., & Morris, P. (Eds.). (1996). Detraditionalization. Oxford: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Luhmann, N. (2012 [1997]). Theory of society (2 vols.). Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, C., & Sorrell, K. (2014). On social solidarity. In V. Jeffries (Ed.), The Palgrave handbook of altruism, morality, and social solidarity: Formulating a field of study (pp. 219–248). New York: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Rudi Laermans .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Laermans, R. (2020). Enacting Solidarity. In: Van Hoyweghen, I., Pulignano, V., Meyers, G. (eds) Shifting Solidarities . Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-44062-6_10

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-44062-6_10

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-44061-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-44062-6

  • eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics