Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Sustainable Development Law in (Only) One World: Challenges and Perspectives for Governance and Governments

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Sustainability and Law

Abstract

This chapter starts from the angle of the necessity of an absolute reduction of the Global North’s use of Earth’s sink and source capacities due to the unchangeable biophysical limitations and assesses the instruments therefore available to different types of stakeholders. In terms of methodology, this subchapter applies in a hermeneutic manner the decision support framework of 3-D Sustainability, the analytical differentiation among stakeholders as the “players of the game” and institutions as the “rules of the game” and adds to these rule-focused instruments two further types of instruments, namely economic-incentive focused and information focused ones. The findings start with a distinction between substantial inter-national and intra-national finetuning when it comes to the implementation of this absolute reduction goal in the Global North and provides justifications therefore. Then, in a rough overview, the general availability of the three instrument types to three overall types of stakeholders – namely (1) governmental ones, (2) for-profit ones and (3) not-for-profit ones is presented and discussed. For the further analysis, governmental stakeholders are picked out due to their unique availability of rule-focused instruments. Then, the different extent of availability of these instruments to governmental stakeholders on three levels (national, regional and international) of the geopolitical scale is shown and analyzed. Afterwards, national stakeholders are selected for the further analysis due to their unique availability of those rule-focused instruments that allow raising taxes as own income source. In relation to all three types of instruments discussed, concrete national actions are presented that implement absolute reductions based on four of the six 3-D Sustainability criteria, namely sufficiency, eco-effectiveness, ecological equity and socio-effectiveness. Conclusions further emphasize the global relevance of the findings and point out potential future research directions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 109.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 139.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Adger, W., Eakin, H., & Winkels, A. (2008). Nested and teleconnected vulnerabilities to environmental change. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment, 7(3), 150–157.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alcott, B. (2008). The sufficiency strategy: Would rich-world frugality lower environmental impact? Ecological Economics, 64, 770–786.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anderies, J. M. (2015). Managing variance: Key policy challenges for the Anthropocene. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 112, 14402–14403.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bevir, M. (2009). Key concepts of governance (SAGE key concepts series) (p. 232).

    Google Scholar 

  • Binswanger, M. (2001). Technological progress and sustainable development: What about the rebound effect? (2001). Ecological Economics, 36, 119–132.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bruch, C. E., & Czerbiniak, R. (2002). Globalizing environmental governance: Making the leap from regional initiatives on transparency, participation and accountability in environmental matters. Environmental Law Reporter News and Analysis, 32(4), 10428–10453.

    Google Scholar 

  • Capra, F. (1997). The web of life: A new understanding of living systems. Parklands: Random House (Pty) Ltd.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carpenter, S. R., Brock, W. A., Folke, C., van Nes, E. H., & Scheffer, M. (2015). Allowing variance may enlarge the safe operating space for exploited ecosystems. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 112(46), 14384–14389.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cash, D. W., Adger, W. N., Berkes, F., Garden, P., Lebel, L., Olsson, P., Pritchard, L., & Young, O. (2006). Scale and cross-scale dynamics: Governance and information in a multilevel world. Ecology and Society, 11(2), 8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cichowski, R. A. (2006). Courts, rights, and democratic participation. Comparative Political Studies, 39, 50–75.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • CJEU. (2017). Order of the Grand Chamber delivered on 20 November 2017 in Commission v Poland. “Białowieża forest” (C-441/17 R, EU:C:2017:877). Retrieved at October 27, 2019, from http://curia.europa.eu/juris/documents.jsf?language=EN&critereEcli=ECLI:EU:C:2017:877

  • CJEU. (2019a). Annual report 2018: The year in review. Luxembourg: Court of Justice of the European Union. Retrieved at October 27, 2019, from https://curia.europa.eu/jcms/upload/docs/application/pdf/2019-04/ra_pan_2018_en.pdf.

    Google Scholar 

  • CJEU. (2019b). Annual report 2018: Judicial activity. Luxembourg: Court of Justice of the European Union. Retrieved at October 27, 2019, from https://curia.europa.eu/jcms/upload/docs/application/pdf/2019-04/_ra_2018_en.pdf.

    Google Scholar 

  • CJEU. (2019c). Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU). Retrieved at October 27, 2019 from https://europa.eu/european-union/about-eu/institutions-bodies/court-justice_en

  • Crutzen, P. J. (2002). The “anthropocene”. Journal De Physique Iv, 12(PR10), 1–5.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dromgool, T., & Ybarra Enquix, D. (2016). The fair and equitable treatment standard and the revocation of feed in tariffs—Foreign renewable energy investments in crisis-struck Spain. In V. Mauerhofer (Ed.), Legal aspects of sustainable development: Horizontal and sectorial policy issues (pp. 389–422). Cham: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Dyllick, T., & Hockerts, K. (2002). Beyond the business case for corporate sustainability. Business Strategy and the Environment, 11(2), 130–141. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.323m

  • Economic Commission for Latin America and the Caribbean (ECLAC). (2018). Escazú agreement on access to information, public participation and justice in environmental matters. Retrieved at October 27, 2019, from https://repositorio.cepal.org/bitstream/handle/11362/43583/1/S1800428_en.pdf

  • EU. (2019a). EU cohesion policy – Frequently asked questions. Retrieved at October 27, 2019, from https://ec.europa.eu/regional_policy/en/faq/

  • EU. (2019b). About the EU. Retrieved at October 27, 2019 from https://ec.europa.eu/info/strategy/eu-budget/how-it-works/fact-check_enen

  • Gu, H. (2016). NIMBYism in China: Issues and prospects of public participation in facility siting. Land Use Policy, 52(2016), 527–534.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hamilton, C., Gemenne, F., & Bonneuil, C. (2015). Thinking the anthopocene. In C. Hamilton, F. Gemenne, & C. Bonneuil (Eds.), The anthropocene and the global environmental crisis: Rethinking modernity in a new epoch (pp. 1–14). London/New York: Routledge.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Hubacek, K., & Mauerhofer, V. (2008). Future generations: Economic, legal and institutional aspects. Futures, 40, 413–423.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huesemann, M. H. (2001). Can pollution problems be effectively solved by environmental science and technology? An analysis of critical limitations. Ecological Economics, 37, 271–287.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hull, V., & Liu, J. (2018). Telecoupling: A new frontier for global sustainability. Ecology and Society, 23(4), 41. https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-10494-230441.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ICJ. (2014). International court of justice handbook (6th edn). The registrar of the international court of justice, The Hague, Netherlands. Retrieved at October 27, 2019, from https://www.icj-cij.org/files/publications/handbook-of-the-court-en.pdf

  • IRP. (2019). Global resources outlook 2019: Natural resources for the future we want. In B. Oberle, S. Bringezu, S. Hatfield-Dodds, S. Hellweg, H. Schandl, J. Clement, L. Cabernard, N. Che, D. Chen, H. Droz-Georget, P. Ekins, M. Fischer-Kowalski, M. Flörke, S. Frank, A. Froemelt, A. Geschke, M. Haupt, P. Havlik, R. Hüfner, M. Lenzen, M. Lieber, B. Liu, Y. Lu, S. Lutter, J. Mehr, A. Miatto, D. Newth, C. Oberschelp, M. Obersteiner, S. Pfister, E. Piccoli, R. Schaldach, J. Schüngel, T. Sonderegger, A. Sudheshwar, H. Tanikawa, E. van der Voet, C. Walker, J. West, Z. Wang, & B. Zhu (Eds.), A report of the international resource panel. Nairobi: United Nations Environment Programme.

    Google Scholar 

  • Janoušková, S., Hák, T., & Moldan, B. (2018). Global SDGs assessments: Helping or confusing indicators? Sustainability, 10(1540), 1–18.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jendrośka, J. (2011). Public participation in environmental decision-making. Inter-actions between the convention and EU law and other key legal issues in its implementation in the light of the opinions of the Aarhus convention compliancecommittee. In M. Pallemaerts (Ed.), The Aarhus convention at ten. Interactions and tensions between conventional international law and EU environmental law (pp. 91–148). Groningen: Europa Law Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jiborn, M., Kander, A., Kulionis, V., Nielsen, H., & Moran, D. D. (2018). Decoupling or delusion? Measuring emissions displacement in foreign trade. Global Environmental Change, 49, 27–34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kallis, G. (2018). Degrowth. Newcastle upon Tyne: Agenda Publishing. 176 pp.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Koester, V. (2007). The compliance committee of the Aarhus convention: An overview of procedures and jurisprudence. Environmental Policy and Law, 37(2–3), 83–96.

    Google Scholar 

  • Li, W. (2016). Failure by design–National mandates and agent control of local landuse in China. Land Use Policy, 52, 518–526.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lin, D., Hanscom, L., Murthy, A., Galli, A., Evans, M., Neill, E., Mancini, M. S., Martindill, J., Medouar, F., Huang, S., & Wackernagel, M. (2018). Ecological footprint accounting for countries: Updates and results of the national footprint accounts, 2012–2018. Resources, 7(3), 58.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu, J., Hull, V., Batistella, M., DeFries, R., Dietz, T., Fu, F., Hertel, T. W., Izaurralde, R. C., Lambin, E. F., Li, S., Martinelli, L. A., McConnell, W. J., Moran, E. F., Naylor, R., Ouyang, Z., Polenske, K. R., Reenberg, A., de Miranda, R. G., Simmons, C. S., Verburg, P. H., Vitousek, P. M., Zhang, F., & Zhu, C. (2013). Framing sustainability in a telecoupled world. Ecology and Society, 18(2), 26. https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-05873-180226.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mauerhofer, V. (2008). 3-D sustainability: An approach for priority setting in situation of conflicting interests towards a sustainable development. Ecological Economics, 64(3), 496–506.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mauerhofer, V. (2013a). Lose less instead of win more: The failure of decoupling and perspectives for competition in a degrowth economy. Environmental Values, 22(1), 43–57.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mauerhofer, V. (2013b). Social capital, social capacity and social carrying capacity: Perspectives for the social basics within environmental sustainability. Futures (Elsevier), 53, 63–73.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mauerhofer, V. (2013c). The ‘governance-check’: Assessing the sustainability of public spatial decision-making structures. Land Use Policy, 30, 328–336.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mauerhofer, V. (2016a). 3-D sustainability and its contribution to governance assessment in legal terms: Examples and perspectives. In V. Mauerhofer (Ed.), Legal aspects of sustainable development: Horizontal and sectorial policy issues (pp. 35–56). Cham: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Mauerhofer, V. (2016b). Public participation in environmental matters: Compendium, challenges and chances globally. Land Use Policy, 52, 481–491.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mauerhofer, V. (2018a). Identifying legal priorities for policy making: A forest-society-economy context analysed by 3-D sustainability. Ecological Economics, 152, 183–190.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mauerhofer, V. (2018b). Legal aspects of ecosystem services: An introduction and an overview. Ecosystem Services, 29, 185–189.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mauerhofer, V. (2019). Legal institutions and ecological economics: Their common contribution for achieving a sustainable development. Ecological Economics, 156, 350–359.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mauerhofer, V., & Larssen, C. (2016). Judicial perspectives from the European Union for public participation in environmental matters in East Asia. Land Use Policy, 52, 552–561.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mauerhofer, V., Ichinose, T., Blackwell, B. D., Willig, M. R., Flint, C. G., Krause, M. S., & Penker, M. (2018). Underuse of social-ecological systems: A research agenda for addressing its challenges to biocultural diversity. Land Use Policy (Elsevier), 72, 57–64. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2017.12.003.

  • McShane TO, Hirsch, P. D., Trung, T. C., Songorwa, A. N., Kinzig, A., Monteferri, B., Mutekanga, D., Thang, H. V., Dammert, J. L., Pulgar-Vidal, M., Welch-Devine, M., Brosius, J. P., Coppolillo, P., & O’Connor, S. (2011). Hard choices: Making trade-offs between biodiversity conservation and human well-being. Biological Conservation, 144, 966–972.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • North, D. C. (1990). Institutions, institutional change and economic performance (p. 152). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Norton, B. G. (1989). Intergenerational equity and environmental decisions: A model using Rawls’ veil of ignorance. Ecological Economics, 1, 137–159.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Okubo, N. (2016). The development of the Japanese legal system for public participation in land use and environmental matters. Land Use Policy, 52(2016), 492–500.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pallemaerts, M. (2006). The Aarhus convention on access to information, public participation in decision-making and access to justice in environmental matters: Engaging the disenfranchised through the instutionalization of proceduralrights? In J. C. Green & W. B. Chambers (Eds.), The politics of participation in sustainable development governance (pp. 179–203). Tokyo/New York: United Nations University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pauwelyn, J. (2005). Judicial mechanisms: Is there a need for a world environment court. In B. W. Chambers & J. Green (Eds.), Reforming international environmental governance (pp. 150–177). Tokyo: UNU Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pedersen, O. W. (2012). An international environmental court and international legalism. Journal of Environmental Law, 24(3), 547–558.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Quak, E. (2018). Tax coordination and tax harmonisation within the regional economic communities in Africa, K4D Helpdesk report, commissioned by Uk DFID – UK Government’s Department for International Development (DFID) and its partner. Retrieved at October 27, 2019 from https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/5b18f76c40f0b634cfb505ce/Tax_Coordination_within_Regional_Economic_Communities_Africa.pdf.

  • Rawls, J. (1971). A theory of justice. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Rees, W. E. (2002). Footprint: Our impact on earth is getting heavier. Nature, 420, 267–268.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ring, I., & Barton, D. (2015). Economic instruments in policy mixes for biodiversity conservation and ecosystem governance. In J. Martinez-Alier & R. Muradian (Eds.), Handbook of ecological economics (pp. 413–446). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Ring, I., & Schröter-Schlaack, C. (2011). Justifying and assessing policy mixes for biodiversity and ecosystem service governance. In I. Ring & C. Schröter-Schlaack (Eds.), Instrument mixes for biodiversity policies (POLICYMIX report no. 2/2011) (pp. 14–35). Leipzig: Helmholtz Centre for Environmental Research. Accessed on 27 Sept 2016 at http://policymix.na.no.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rockström, J., Steffen, W., Noone, K., Persson, Å., Chapin, F. S., III, Lambin, E. F., Lenton, T. M., Scheffer, M., Folke, C., Schellnhuber, H. J., Nykvist, B., de Wit, C. A., Hughes, T., van der Leeuw, S., Rodhe, H., Sörlin, S., Snyder, P. K., Costanza, R., Svedin, U., Falkenmark, M., Karlberg, L., Corell, R. W., Fabry, V. J., Hansen, J., Walker, B., Liverman, D., Richardson, K., Crutzen, P., & Foley, J. A. (2009). A safe operating space for humanity. Nature, 461, 472–475.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rodríguez-Labajos, B., Yánez, Y., Bond, P., Greyl, L., Munguti, S., Uyi Ojo, G., & Overbeek, W. (2019). Not so natural an alliance? Degrowth and environmental justice movements in the global south. Ecological Economics, 157, 175–184.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rogge, S., & Reichardt, K. (2016). Policy mixes for sustainability transitions: An extended concept and framework for analysis. Research Policy, 45(8), 1620–1635.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sachs, J., Schmidt-Traub, G., Kroll, C., Lafortune, G., & Fuller, G. (2019). Sustainable development report 2019. New York: Bertelsmann Stiftung and Sustainable Development Solutions Network (SDSN).

    Google Scholar 

  • Saey-Volckrick, J. (this volume). What does the rebound effect tell us? Reflection on its sources and its implication for the sustainability debate. In V. Mauerhofer, D. Rupo, & L. Tarquinio (Eds.), Sustainability and Law. Cham: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schneider, F., Martinez-Alier, J., & Kallis, G. (2011). Sustainable degrowth. Journal of Industrial Ecology, 15(5), 654–656.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schneidewind, U., & Zarnt, A. (2014). The politics of sufficiency: Making it easier to live the good life. Munich: Oekom Publisher. 165 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Serbruyns, I., & Luyssaert, S. (2006). Acceptance of sticks, carrots and sermons as policy instruments for directing private forest management. Forest Policy and Economics, 9(3), 285–296.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Spaiser, V., Ranganathan, S., Bali Swain, R., & Sumpter, D. J. T. (2017). The sustainable development oxymoron: Quantifying and modelling the incompatibility of sustainable development goals. International Journal of Sustainable Development & World Ecology, 24(6), 457–470.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Steffen, W., Richardson, K., Rockström, J., Cornell, S. E., Fetzer, I., Bennett, E. M., Biggs, R., Carpenter, S. R., de Vries, W., de Wit, C. A., Folke, C., Gerten, D., Heinke, J., Mace, G. M., Persson, L. M., Ramanathan, V., Reyers, B., & Sörlin, S. (2015). Planetary boundaries: Guiding human development on a changing planet. Science, 347, 1259855.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • UN. (1945). Charter of the United Nations. Retrieved at October 27, 2019 from https://www.un.org/en/sections/un-charter/un-charter-full-text/

  • UN. (1992). Rio Declaration on Environment and Development, Annex I to the Report of the United Nations Conference on Environment and Development (Rio de Janeiro, 3-14 June 1992). A/CONF.151/26 (Vol. I). https://www.un.org/esa/dsd/agenda21/Agenda%2021.pdf. Accessed 10 Apr 2020.

  • UN. (2000). United Nations Millennium Declaration, Resolution 55/2 adopted by the General Assembly [without reference to a Main Committee (A/55/L.2)] in the 8th plenary meeting on 8 September 2000. https://en.wikisource.org/wiki/United_Nations_Millennium_Declaration. Accessed 10 Apr 2020.

  • UN. (2012). Resolution adopted by the general assembly on 27 July 2012. “The future we want” A/RES/66/288. Retrieved at September 27, 2016 from http://www.un.org/ga/search/view_doc.asp?symbol=A/RES/66/288&Lang=E

  • UN. (2015). Resolution adopted by the general assembly on 25 Sept 2015. “Transforming our world: The 2030 agenda for sustainable development” A/RES/70/1. Retrieved at September 27, 2016 from https://www.un.org/en/development/desa/population/migration/generalassembly/docs/globalcompact/A_RES_70_1_E.pdf

  • UN. (2019a). Report “Composition of the secretariat: Staff demographics – Report of the Secretary-General” (A/74/82). Retrieved at October 27, 2019 from https://undocs.org/en/A/74/82

  • UN. (2019b). Report on the assessment of Member States’ contributions to the United Nations regular budget for the year 2019 (ST/ADM/SER.B/992). Retrieved at October 27, 2019 from https://undocs.org/en/ST/ADM/SER.B/992

  • UNDP. (2019). Human development reports – Income Gini coefficient. Retrieved at October 27, 2019 from http://hdr.undp.org/en/content/income-gini-coefficient

  • UNECE. (1998). United Nations Economic Commission for Europe. Convention on access to information, public participation in decision-making and access to justice in environmental matters. Done at Aarhus, Denmark, on 25 June 1998. Retrieved at October 27, 2019 from https://www.unece.org/fileadmin/DAM/env/pp/documents/cep43e.pdf

  • UNEP. (2019). Global environmental outlook 6 – GEO 6. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vatn, A., & Bromley, D. W. (1994). Choices without prices without apologies. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 26(2), 129–148.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vedung, E. (1998). Policy instruments: Typologies and theories. In M. L. Bemelmans-Videc, R. C. Rist, & E. O. Vedung (Eds.), Carrots, sticks, and sermons: Policy instruments and their evaluation (pp. 21–58). New Brunswick: Transaction Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wackernagel, M. (2009). Methodological advancements in footprint analysis. Ecological Economics, 68(7), 1925–1927.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wackernagel, M., Lin, D., Evans, M., Hanscom, L., & Raven, P. (2019). Defying the footprint Oracle: Implications of country resource trends. Sustainability, 11, 2164.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ward, J. D., Sutton, P. C., Werner, A. D., Costanza, R., Mohr, S. H., & Simmons, C. T. (2016). Is decoupling GDP growth from environmental impact possible? PLoS One, 11(10), e0164733. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0164733.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wates, J. (2005). The Aarhus convention: A driving force for environmental democracy. Journal for European Environmental and Planning Law, 1, 1–11.

    Google Scholar 

  • WCED. (1987). Report of the world commission on environment and development titled “our common future” (p. 383). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Ecotechnology and Sustainable Building Engineering, Mid Sweden University, Östersund, Sweden

    Volker Mauerhofer

Authors
  1. Volker Mauerhofer
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Volker Mauerhofer .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Ecotechnology and Sustainable Building Engineering Mid Sweden University, Östersund, Sweden

    Volker Mauerhofer

  2. Department of Economics, University of Messina (Italy), Messina, Italy

    Daniela Rupo

  3. Department of Economic Studies, University “G. d’Annunzio” of Chieti-Pescara, Pescara, Italy

    Lara Tarquinio

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Mauerhofer, V. (2020). Sustainable Development Law in (Only) One World: Challenges and Perspectives for Governance and Governments. In: Mauerhofer, V., Rupo, D., Tarquinio, L. (eds) Sustainability and Law. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-42630-9_2

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-42630-9_2

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-42629-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-42630-9

  • eBook Packages: Law and CriminologyLaw and Criminology (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation