Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

3-D Sustainability and Its Contribution to Governance Assessment in Legal Terms: Examples and Perspectives

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Legal Aspects of Sustainable Development

Abstract

Environmental, social and economic capitals, capacities and carrying capacities provide the theoretical construct of the three dimensions of a sustainable development. Based thereon, this chapter aims firstly to provide a conceptual overview on two main objectives of multilevel rule of law systems that should be addressed when adapting these systems towards a more sustainable direction. This first aim is addressed based on ‘3-D Sustainability’, a concept offering six flexibly applicable decision-making criteria for priority setting between these sustainability dimensions based on the burden of proof in the sense of the precautionary principle. The theoretical application of these criteria on several real-world examples of legislative acts indicates the concept’s usefulness in practice. The two main objectives identified within this first aim are to stay through international environmental policy within the environmentally sustainable scale and to politically define flexible legal trade-off mechanisms, which more sustainably deal with conflicts among these sustainability dimensions. Secondly, the chapter strives to identify ways to strengthen the application of the existing international environmental legislation. Thus, several innovative mechanisms are identified that overcome current implementation and enforcement deadlocks, without changing existing laws, but also increasing its direct effect. In summary, the chapter innovatively offers—based on ongoing research—several solution proposals for addressing in a sustainable manner geopolitical and organizational scales as well as trade-offs when it comes to re-writing existing environmental legal institutions (de lege ferenda). It further provides proposals for the innovative implementation of existing normative regimes without modifying legal text (de lege lata).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 109.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 139.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Adger WN, Brown K, Tompkins EL (2005) The political economy of cross-scale networks in resource co-management. Ecol Soc 10(2):9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Agardy T (2000) Effects of fisheries on marine ecosystems: a conservationist’s perspective. ICES J Mar Sci 57:761–765

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alcott B (2008) The sufficiency strategy: would rich-world frugality lower environmental impact? Ecol Econ 64:770–786

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Applegate JS (2000) The precautionary preference: an american perspective on the precautionary principle. Hum Ecol Risk Assess 6:413–443

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Asian Development Bank (2013) Asean chief-justices explore legal solutions. Retrieved 26 Mar 2014. http://www.adb.org/news/asean-chief-justices-explore-legal-solutions-environmental-threats

  • Austrian Federal Ministry for Agriculture, Forestry, Environment and Water Economy (2007) Handbook alpine convention. Retrieved 26 Mar 2014. http://www.lebensministerium.at/publikationen/umwelt/archiv/die_alpenkonvention-handbuch_fuer_ihre_umsetzung.html (in German)

  • Austrian Federal Ministry for Agriculture, Forestry, Environment and Water Economy (2014) Database alpine convention. Retrieved 26 Mar 2014. www5.umweltbundesamt.at/alpenkonvention (in German)

  • Azar C, Holmberg J, Karlsson S (2002) Decoupling—past trend and prospects for the future. A report of the Department of Physical Resource Theory of the Chalmers University of Technology and Götheburg University with contributions by Tobias Person, Robert Ayres, Thomas Sterner and Jonas Nässèn to the Environmental Advisory Council of the Swedish Ministry of the Environment. Retrieved 31 Mar 2014. http://www.mvb.gov.se

  • Binswanger M (2001) Technological progress and sustainable development: what about the rebound effect? Ecol Econ 36:119–132

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carlman I (2008) Control system for sustainable development. In: Dubois DM (ed) Proceedings of the computing anticipatory systems: CASYS = 07 C eighth international conference, 8. American Institute of Physics, vol 1051, pp 187–194

    Google Scholar 

  • Cash DW, Adger WN, Berkes F, Garden P, Lebel L, Olsson P, Pritchard L, Young O (2006) Scale and cross-scale dynamics: governance and information in a multilevel world. Ecol Soc 11(2):8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cordonier Segger M-C (2004) Significant developments in sustainable development law and governance: a proposal. Nat Resour Forum 28:61–74

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Daly HE (1992) Allocation, distribution and scale: towards an economics that is efficient, just and sustainable. Ecol Econ 6:185–193

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • de Graaf HJ, Musters CJM, ter Keurs WJ (1996) Sustainable development: looking for new strategies. Ecol Econ 16:205–216

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De Mooij RA, van Den Bergh JCJM (2002) Growth and the environment in Europe: a guide to the debate. Empirica 29:79–91

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Del Monte-Luna P, Brook BW, Zetina-Rejón MJ, Cruz-Escalona VH (2004) The carrying capacity of ecosystems. Glob Ecol Biogeogr 13:485–495

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dobson A (1996) Environment sustainabilities: an analysis and a typology. Environ Politics 5:401–428

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dovers SR (1995) A framework for scaling and framing policy problems in sustainability. Ecol Econ 12:93–106

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dyllick T, Hockerts K (2002) Beyond the business case for corporate sustainability. Bus Strategy Environ 11:130–141

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • EEA (2002) Environmental signals. Benchmarking the millennium. European environmental agency regular indicator report Luxemburg: office for official publications of the European communities

    Google Scholar 

  • Ehrlich PR (2008) Key issues for attention from ecological economists. Environ Dev Econ 13:1–20

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Essington TE (2001) The precautionary approach in fisheries management: the devil is in the details. Trends Ecol Evol 16:121–122

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • European Communities (2005) Natura 2000—conservation in partnership. Luxembourg: office for official publications of the European communities. Retrieved 31 Mar 2014. http://ec.europa.eu/environment/nature/info/pubs/docs/nat2000/conservation_in_partnership.pdf

  • European Court of Justice—ECJ (2004) Case C-127/02 Waddenvereniging and Vogelbeschermingsvereniging [2004] ECR I-7405

    Google Scholar 

  • European Parliament and Council (2000) Directive 2000/60/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 23 October 2000 establishing a framework for Community action in the field of water policy. Official Journal L 327 of 22.12.2000. Retrieved 27 July 2015. http://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=celex:32000L0060

  • European Union Council Environment (2002) 2457th meeting of the EU Council Environment at 17th December 2002 in Luxemburg

    Google Scholar 

  • European Union (2002) Decision No. 1600/2002/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 22 July 2002 laying down the Sixth Community Environment Action Programme. Official Journal L, vol 242, p 1. 10 Sept 2002. Office for Official Publications of the European Communities, Luxemburg

    Google Scholar 

  • Faber M, Proops J, Baumgärtner S (1996) The use of the entropy concept in ecological economics. In: Faber M, Proops J (eds) Ecological economics: concepts and methods. Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, pp 115–135

    Google Scholar 

  • Farley HM, Smith ZA (2014) Sustainability: if it’s everything, is it nothing? Routledge, London, 176 pp

    Google Scholar 

  • Frame B, Brown J (2008) Developing post-normal technologies for sustainability. Ecol Econ 65:225–241

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Freestone D (1998) The burden of proof in natural resources legislation. In: FAO Legislative Study, no 63, Rome

    Google Scholar 

  • Gibson CC, Ostrom E, Ahn TK (2000) The concept of scale and the human dimensions of global change: a survey. Ecol Econ 32:217–239

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grimeaud D (2004) The EC water framework directive—an instrument for integrating water policy. RECIEL 13(1):27–39

    Google Scholar 

  • Heazle M (2006) Lessons in precaution: the international Whaling commission experience with precautionary management. Mar Policy 30(5):496–509

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hein L, van Koppen K, de Groot RS, van Ierland EC (2006) Spatial scales, stakeholders and the valuation of ecosystem services. Ecol Econ 57:209–228

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Iovanna R, Newbold SC (2007) Ecological sustainability in policy assessments: a wide-angle view and a close watch. Ecol Econ 63:639–648

    Google Scholar 

  • IUCN/UNEP/WWF (1980) World conservation strategy, international union for conservation of nature and natural resources (IUCN)/united nations environment programme (UNEP)/world wide fund for nature (WWF). IUCN/UNEP/WWF, Gland

    Google Scholar 

  • IUCN WCEL (2013) Final program judicial colloquium biodiversity. Retrieved 26 Mar 2014. http://ajne2.itkeep.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/12/FINAL-PROGRAM-judicial_colloquium_biodiversity.pdf

  • Jordan GJ, Fortin M-J (2002) Scale and topology in the ecological economics sustainability paradigm. Ecol Econ 41:361–366

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kallio TJ, Nordberg P, Ahonen A (2007) Rationalizing sustainable development’—a critical treatise. Sustain Dev 15:41–51

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kazazi M (1996) Burden of proof and related issues: a study on evidence before international tribunals. Kluwer Law International, Hague

    Google Scholar 

  • Kokott J (1998) The burden of proof in comparative and international human rights law: civil and common law approaches with special reference to the American and German legal systems. Kluwer Law International, Hague

    Google Scholar 

  • Lamberton G (2005) Sustainable sufficiency—an internally consistent version of sustainability. Sustain Dev 13(1):53–68

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Malanczuk P (1995) Sustainable development: some critical thoughts in the light of the Rio Conference. In: Ginther K, Denters E, de Waart PJIM (eds) Sustainable development and good governance. Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, Dordrecht, pp 23–52

    Google Scholar 

  • Mauerhofer V (2008a) 3-D sustainability: an approach for priority setting in situation of conflicting interests towards a sustainable development. Ecol Econ 63:496–506

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mauerhofer V (2008b) Conservation of wildlife in the European union with a focus on Austria. In: Panjwani P (ed) Wildlife law: a global perspective. American Bar Association (ABA) Publishing, Cleveland, pp 1–55

    Google Scholar 

  • Mauerhofer V (2009) Legislation check based on ‘3-D sustainability’—an approach for global precautionary governance change’. In: Proceedings of the 15th ISDRC 2009, Utrecht/The Netherlands, 5th–8th July 2009. Retrieved 8 July 2009. http://globalchallenge2009.geo.uu.nl

  • Mauerhofer V (2011) A bottom-up ‘convention-check’ to improve top-down global protected area governance. Land Use Policy 28:877–886

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mauerhofer V (2012) A legislation check based on ‘3-D sustainability’—addressing global precautionary land governance change. Land Use Policy 29:652–660

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mauerhofer V (2013a) Social capital, social capacity and social carrying capacity: perspectives for the social basics within environmental sustainability. Futures 53:63–73

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mauerhofer V (2013b) The ‘governance-check’: assessing the sustainability of public spatial decision-making structures. Land Use Policy 30:328–336

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mauerhofer V (2013c) Lose less instead of win more: the failure of decoupling and perspectives for competition in a degrowth economy. Environ Values 22:43–57

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mauerhofer V, Hubacek K, Coleby A (2013) From polluter pays to provider gets: distribution of rights and costs under payments for ecosystem services. Ecol Soc 18(4):41

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mauerhofer V (2014) Challenging the labyrinth: sustainable scales, trade-offs and perspectives through environmental law. In: Sancin V, Kovič-Dine M (eds) International environmental law: contemporary concerns and challenges in 2014. Ius Software, d.o.o, GV Založba, Ljublijana, pp 25–42

    Google Scholar 

  • Mauerhofer V, Kim RE (2014) Interpretation of ecological integrity in the sense of planetary boundaries: a new way forward for implementing multilateral environmental agreements. In: ISEE (ed) Book of abstracts of the biannual International Society for Ecological Economics (ISEE) 2014 conference, Reykjavik, Iceland, 13th–15th August, p. 14. Retrieved at 13 Aug 2014. http://isee2014.yourhost.is

  • MDGs (2015) Millenium development goals. Retrieved at 26 July 2015. http://www.un.org/millenniumgoals/

  • OECD (2002) Indicators to measure decoupling of environment pressures from economic growth. SG/SD. Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development, Paris

    Google Scholar 

  • Opdam PFM, Broekmeyer MEA, Kistenkas FH (2009) Identifying uncertainties in judging the significance of human impacts on natura 2000 sites. Environ Sci Policy 12:912–921

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Opschoor H, van der Straaten J (1993) Sustainable development: an institutional approach. Ecol Econ 7:203–222

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oxfam (2006a) What happened in Hong Kong? Briefing Paper No. 85. Retrieved 27 July 2015. http://www.oxfam.de/files/20051221_whathappenedhongkong_161kb.pdf

  • Oxfam (2006b) A recipe for disaster. Will the Doha round fail to deliver for development? Briefing Paper No. 87. Retrieved 27 July 2015. http://www.oxfam.de/files/20060427_arecipefordisaster_282kb.pdf

  • Paterson J (2007) Sustainable development, sustainable decisions and the precautionary principle. Nat Hazards 42:515–528

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pinto MCW (1995) Reflections on the term sustainable development and its institutional implications. In: Ginther K, Denters E, de Waart PJIM (eds) Sustainable development and good governance. Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, Dordrecht, pp 72–99

    Google Scholar 

  • Prévost D (2004). Selected international developments regarding health and environmental regulation of relevance to the European Union. Eur Environ Law Rev 13:38–60

    Google Scholar 

  • Princen T (1997) The shading and distancing of commerce: when internalization is not enough. Ecol Econ 20:235–253

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rawls J (1971) A theory of justice. Harvard University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Rockström J, Steffen W, Noone K, Persson Å, Chapin FS III, Lambin EF, Lenton TM, Scheffer M, Folke C, Schellnhuber HJ, Nykvist B, de Wit CA, Hughes T, van der Leeuw S, Rodhe H, Sörlin S, Snyder PK, Costanza R, Svedin U, Falkenmark M, Karlberg L, Corell RW, Fabry VJ, Hansen J, Walker B, Liverman D, Richardson K, Crutzen P, Foley JA (2009) A safe operating space for humanity. Nature 461:472–475

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ross A (2009) Modern interpretations of sustainable development. J Law Soc 36:33–54

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Satake A, Rudel TK, Onuma A (2008) Scale mismatches and their ecological and economic effects on landscapes: a spatially explicit model. Glob Environ Change 18(4):768–775

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schneidewind U, Zarnt A (2014) The politics of sufficiency. Oekom Publisher, Munich

    Google Scholar 

  • Shi T (2004) Ecological economics as a policy science: rhetoric or commitment towards an improved decision-making process on sustainability. Ecol Econ 48:23–36

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Steffen W, Richardson K, Rockström J, Cornell SE, Fetzer I, Bennett EM, Biggs R, Carpenter SR, de Vries W, de Wit CA, Folke C, Gerten D, Heinke J, Mace GM, Persson LM, Ramanathan V, Reyers B, Sörlin S (2015) Planetary boundaries: guiding human development on a changing planet. Science 347:1259855

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Termeer CJAM, Dewulf A, van Lieshout M (2010) Disentangling scale approaches in governance research: comparing monocentric, multilevel, and adaptive governance. Ecol Soc 15(4):29

    Google Scholar 

  • TFWW (2012) The future we want (TFWW). Outcome document adopted at the United Nations Conference on Sustainable Development, in Rio de Janeiro, Brazil in June 2012. Retrieved from 31 Mar 2014 from http://www.uncsd2012.org/content/documents/727The%20Future%20We%20Want%2019%20June%201230pm.pdf

  • UNEP (2014). Post 2015 Note 1# ‘Integrating the three dimensions of sustainable development’. Retrieved from 31 Mar 2014 from http://unep.org/unea/docs/UNEP%20Post%202015%20Note%201%20final.pdf

  • UNEP (2015) Informea initiative. Retrieved 26 July 2015. http://www.informea.org/

  • UNFCCC (1994) United nations framework convention on climate change, 1771 UNTS 107,UN Doc.A/AC.237/18 (Part II)/Add.1

    Google Scholar 

  • Verwey DR (2004) The European Community, the European Union and the international law of treaties - a comparative legal analysis of the Community and Union’s external treaty-making practice. TMC Asser Press, The Hague

    Google Scholar 

  • Visseren-Hamakers I, Leroy P, Glasbergen P (2012) Conservation partnerships and biodiversity governance: fullfilling governance functions through interactions. Sustain Dev 20:264–275

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wackernagel M, Rees WE (1996) Our ecological footprint: reducing human impact on the earth. New Society Publications, Gabriola Island/BC

    Google Scholar 

  • World Commission on Environment and Development (1987) Our common future. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Young OR (1994) The problem of scale in human-environment relations. J Theor Politics 6:429–447

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zandvoort H (2005) Globalisation, environmental costs, and progress, the role of consensus and liability 52(6) Water Science and Technology 43–50, as cited in: J. P. van der Sluijs, Uncertainty and precaution in environmental management: Insights from the UPEM conference, Environmental Modelling and Software, In Press, 2006, Corrected Proof

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Faculty of Life Sciences, University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria

    Volker Mauerhofer

  2. UNU IAS—United Nations University Institute for the Advanced Study of Sustainability, Tokyo, Japan

    Volker Mauerhofer

  3. PRIMAFF—Policy Research Institute of the Ministry of Agriculture, Forestry and Fishery, Tokyo, Japan

    Volker Mauerhofer

Authors
  1. Volker Mauerhofer
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Volker Mauerhofer .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria

    Volker Mauerhofer

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Mauerhofer, V. (2016). 3-D Sustainability and Its Contribution to Governance Assessment in Legal Terms: Examples and Perspectives. In: Mauerhofer, V. (eds) Legal Aspects of Sustainable Development. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-26021-1_3

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation