Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Book cover

Contextual Process Digitalization pp 23–68Cite as

Models

Models

  • Albert Fleischmann5,
  • Stefan Oppl6,
  • Werner Schmidt7 &
  • …
  • Christian Stary8 
  • Chapter
  • Open Access
  • First Online: 31 March 2020
  • 5353 Accesses

Abstract

In the previous chapter we outlined the various aspects of Business Process Management. Since models are often used in practice to describe these aspects, the following sections will first look in more detail at the tasks and properties of models and modeling. We then present examples of models from various areas of expertise that in our experience have proven helpful in numerous Business Process Management projects. There is no claim to completeness for this exposition, but it can serve as an orientation for the reader when needing to choose description models for individual project needs.

Download chapter PDF

References

  1. Gabriel, M. (2015). Why the world doesn’t exist, Ullstein Taschenbuch.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Alle, V. (2015). Value networks and true nature of collaboration. Tampa, FL: Meghan Kiffer Press.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Stachowiak, H. (1973). General model theory. New York: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Kieser, A., & Walgenbach, P. (2007). Organization. Stuttgart: Schäffer-Pöschl.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Crowther, D., & Green, M. (2004). Organizational theory. London: Chartered Institute of Personnel Development.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Schreyögg, G. (2008). Organization (5th ed.). Wiesbaden: Gabler.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Kieser, A., & Ebers, M. (Eds.). (2006). Organizational theories. Stuttgart: Kohlhammer.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Szyperski, N. (1980). Information needs. In E. Grochla (Ed.), Handwörterbuch der Organization (2nd ed., p. 904). Stuttgart: C.E. Poeschel.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Krcmer, H. (2017). Information, encyclopedia of business informatics. Online Lexicon. Last accessed July 31, 2017, from http://www.enzyklopaedie-der-wirtschaftsinformatik.de/lexikon/daten-wissen/Informationsmanagement/Information-/index.html

  10. Berghaus, M. (2004). Luhmann made easy (2nd ed.). Cologne: Böhlau.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Luhmann, N. (1984). Social systems. Frankfurt: Suhrkamp.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Scheer, C., Deelmann, T., & Loos, P. (2003). Business models and internet-based business models – Definition and participant model. Working Papers of the Research Group Information Systems & Management, University of Mainz

    Google Scholar 

  13. Wirtz, B. W., Schilke, O., & Ullrich, S. (2010). Strategic development of business models implications of the web 2.0 for creating value on the internet. Long Range Planning, 43, 272e290. Elsevier 2010.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  14. Osterwalder, A., & Pigneur, Y. (2010). Business model generation. Hoboken: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Siemoneit, O. (2010). A theory of science in business administration, Dissertation. University of Stuttgart.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Kieser, A., & Ebers, M. (2006). Organizational theories. Stuttgart: Kohlhammer.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Wieß, G., & Jakob, R. (2005). Agent-oriented software development. Berlin: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Brushwood, W. (2010, July 15). Petri nets: Modeling techniques, analysis methods, case studies (2010th ed.). Vieweg+Teubner Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  19. ITIL. (2018). Best practice. Last Access February 2018, from https://www.axelos.com/best-practice-solutions/itil

  20. Matthes, D. (2011). Enterprises architecture compendium. Heidelberg: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Lehner, F. (1995) Models and modeling in business informatics - Attempting to determine the current situation. In H. Wächter (Ed.), Selbstverständnis betriebswirtschaftlicher Forschung und Lehre. Wiesbaden: Gabler Publishing House.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Kaplan, R. S., & Norten, D. P. (1997). Balanced scorecard. Stuttgart: Schaeffer-Poeschl Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Robin Milner, A. (1980). Calculus of communicating systems, Lecture Notes in Computer Science. Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Milner, R. (1999). Communicating and mobile systems: The π-calculus. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  25. Hoare, C. A. R. (1978). Communicating sequential processes. Communications of the ACM, 21(8), 666–677.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  26. Hoare, C. A. R. (1985). Communicating sequential processes. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  27. Open Group. (2019). ArchiMate® 3.1 specification. https://pubs.opengroup.org/architecture/archimate3-doc/

  28. Börger, E., & Stärk, R. (2003). Abstract state machines. Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Lankhorst, M., et al. (2017). Enterprise architecture at work (4th ed.). Berlin: Springer.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  30. Wooldridge, M. (2002). An introduction to multi agent systems. Chichester: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Cossetino, M., et al. (2014). Handbook on agent-oriented design processes. Berlin: Springer.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  32. Schewe, G. (2017). Business process, Gabler business encyclopedia. Last accessed July 31, 2017 from http://wirtschaftslexikon.gabler.de/Definition/geschaeftsprozess.html#definition

  33. Becker, J. (2012, October). Business process modeling, encyclopedia of business informatics. Online encyclopedia. Last accessed July 31, 2017, from http://www.enzyklopaedie-der-wirtschaftsinformatik.de/lexikon/daten-wissen/Informationsmanagement/Information-/index.html

  34. Schewe, G. (2017). Business process, Gabler business encyclopedia. Last accessed July 31, 2017 from http://wirtschaftslexikon.gabler.de/Definition/geschaeftsprozess.html#definition

  35. Stähler, P. (2002, September). Business models as an unit of analysis for Strategizing. In P. Steels (Ed.), Business models in the digital economy: Characteristics, strategies and effects. Cologne: Josef Eul.

    Google Scholar 

  36. Habermas, J. (1981). Theory of communicative action (Vol. 1, 2014th ed.). Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp Paperback Science.

    Google Scholar 

  37. Römpp, G. (2015). Habermas made easy. Cologne: Böhlau.

    Google Scholar 

  38. Sowa, J. F., & Zachman, J. A. (1992). Extending and formalizing the framework for information systems architecture. IBM Systems Journal, 31(3), 590–616.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  39. TOGAF. (2010, October). TOGAF version 9. Van Haren Publishing, Zaltbommel.

    Google Scholar 

  40. Franklin, S., & Graesser, A. (2017). Is it an agent, or just a program? A taxonomy for autonomous agents. Institute For Intelligent Systems, University of Memphis, Memphis, TN. Last accessed September 2017, from https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/288d/7952b6648749fcbdcedabedf8f43cf7fda52.pdf

  41. COBIT 5. (2018). Last Access February 2018, from http://www.isaca.org/COBIT/Pages/COBIT-5-german.aspx

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Dr. Albert Fleischmann & Partner, InterAktiv Unternehmensberatung, Pfaffenhofen a.d.Ilm, Germany

    Albert Fleischmann

  2. Department for Continuing Education Research and Educational Technologies, Danube University Krems, Krems, Austria

    Stefan Oppl

  3. Technische Hochschule Ingolstadt, Business School, Ingolstadt, Germany

    Werner Schmidt

  4. Department of Business Informatics-Communications Engineering, Johannes Kepler University Linz, Linz, Austria

    Christian Stary

Authors
  1. Albert Fleischmann
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Stefan Oppl
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Werner Schmidt
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Christian Stary
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Albert Fleischmann .

Rights and permissions

Open Access This chapter is licensed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license and indicate if changes were made.

The images or other third party material in this chapter are included in the chapter's Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the chapter's Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder.

Reprints and Permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Fleischmann, A., Oppl, S., Schmidt, W., Stary, C. (2020). Models. In: Contextual Process Digitalization. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-38300-8_2

Download citation

  • .RIS
  • .ENW
  • .BIB
  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-38300-8_2

  • Published: 31 March 2020

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-38299-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-38300-8

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Share this chapter

Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:

Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.

Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative

Over 10 million scientific documents at your fingertips

Switch Edition
  • Academic Edition
  • Corporate Edition
  • Home
  • Impressum
  • Legal information
  • Privacy statement
  • California Privacy Statement
  • How we use cookies
  • Manage cookies/Do not sell my data
  • Accessibility
  • FAQ
  • Contact us
  • Affiliate program

Not affiliated

Springer Nature

© 2023 Springer Nature Switzerland AG. Part of Springer Nature.