Skip to main content

Embedding CSR in Corporate Strategies

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Rethinking Business Responsibility in a Global Context

Part of the book series: CSR, Sustainability, Ethics & Governance ((CSEG))

Abstract

As the number of companies aiming for a positive impact on their surroundings rises, this chapter argues that CSR has to be part of corporate strategy. It offers specific steps to draft and embed CSR strategies into corporate strategy development. In conclusion, the chapter looks at measuring and reporting the impact of CSR.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Becker-Olsen, K. L., Cudmore, B. A., & Hill, R. P. (2006). The impact of perceived corporate social responsibility on consumer behavior. Journal of Business Research, 59(1), 46–53.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beschorner, T., Hajduk, T., & Simeonov, S. (2013). Sector-specific corporate responsibility in Europe: Introduction. In T. Beschorner, T. Hajduk, & S. Simeonov (Eds.), Corporate responsibility in Europe: Government involvement in sector-specific initiatives (pp. 23–39). Gütersloh, Germany: Verlag Bertelsmann Stiftung.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blasco, J. L., King, A., McKenzie, M., & Karn, M. (2017). The road ahead. The KPMG Survey of Corporate Responsibility Reporting 2017. Accessed May 17, 2019, from https://integratedreporting.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/10/kpmg-survey-of-corporate-responsibility-reporting-2017.pdf

  • Bugg-Levine, A., & Emerson, J. (2011). Impact investing: Transforming how we make money while making a difference. Innovations: Technology, Governance, Globalization, 6(3), 9–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • CBSR. (2015). A guide to the “qualities of a transformational company”. Canadian Business for Social Responsibility. Accessed May 30, 2019, from https://provisioncoalition.com/Assets/ProvisionCoalition/Documents/Library%20Content//SustainabilityFrameworks/the-transformational-company-guide-full.pdf

  • Commission of the European Communities. (2001). Green paper. Promoting a European framework for corporate social responsibility. Accessed May 17, 2019, from https://europa.eu/rapid/press-release_DOC-01-9_en.pdf

  • Corcoran, S. (2009, December 16). Defining earned, owned, and paid media. Accessed April 22, 2019, from https://go.forrester.com/blogs/09-12-16-defining_earned_owned_and_paid_media/

  • Dawkins, J. (2005). Corporate responsibility: The communication challenge. Journal of Communication Management, 9(2), 108–119.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Delmas, M. A., & Burbano, V. C. (2011). The drivers of greenwashing. California Management Review, 54(1), 64–87.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Du, S., Bhattacharya, C. B., & Sen, S. (2010). Maximizing business returns to corporate social responsibility (CSR): The role of CSR communication. International Journal of Management Reviews, 12(1), 8–19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ellen, P. S., Mohr, L. A., & Webb, D. J. (2000). Charitable programs and the retailer: Do they mix? Journal of Retailing, 76(3), 393–406.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ellen, P. S., Webb, D. J., & Mohr, L. A. (2006). Building corporate associations: Consumer attributions for corporate socially responsible programs. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 34(2), 147–157.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • European Commission. (2011). A renewed EU strategy 2011–14 for corporate social responsibility. Accessed May 17, 2019, from http://www.europarl.europa.eu/meetdocs/2009_2014/documents/com/com_com(2011)0681_/com_com(2011)0681_en.pdf

  • EY. (2015). The business case for purpose. Harvard Business Review Analytical Services Report. Accessed May 30, 2019, from https://assets.ey.com/content/dam/ey-sites/ey-com/en_gl/topics/digital/ey-the-business-case-for-purpose.pdf

  • EY. (2017). Is your nonfinancial performance revealing the true value of your business to investors? Accessed May 30, 2019, from https://www.ey.com/Publication/vwLUAssets/EY_-_Nonfinancial_performance_may_influence_investors/$FILE/ey-nonfinancial-performance-may-influence-investors.pdf

  • Fernandez-Feijoo, B., Romero, S., & Ruiz, S. (2014). Effect of stakeholders’ pressure on transparency of sustainability reports within the GRI framework. Journal of Business Ethics, 122(1), 53–63.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Flammer, C. (2013). Corporate social responsibility and shareholder reaction: The environmental awareness of investors. The Academy of Management Journal, 56(3), 758–781.

    Google Scholar 

  • Forehand, M. R., & Grier, S. (2003). When is honesty the best policy? The effect of stated company intent on consumer skepticism. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 13(3), 349–356.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Galbreath, J., & Benjamin, K. (2010). Action-based approach for linking CSR with strategy: Framework and cases. In C. Louche, S. Idowu, & W. Filho (Eds.), Innovative CSR: From risk management to value creation (pp. 12–36). Sheffield: Greenleaf Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goodall, D. (2009, March 2). Owned, bought and earned media. Accessed April 22, 2019, from https://danielgoodall.wordpress.com/2009/03/02/owned-bought-and-earned-media/

  • Graafland, J., & Smid, H. (2019). Decoupling among CSR policies, programs, and impacts: An empirical study. Business & Society, 58(2), 231–267.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gruber, V., Kaliauer, M., & Schlegelmilch, B. B. (2015). Improving the effectiveness and credibility of corporate social responsibility messaging: An Austrian model identifies influential CSR content and communication channels. Journal of Advertising Research, 57(4), 397–409.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gupta, S., & Pirsch, J. (2006). The company-cause-customer fit decision in cause-related marketing. Journal of Consumer Marketing, 23(6), 314–326.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Izzo, J., & Vanderwielen, J. (2018). The purpose revolution: How leaders create engagement and competitive advantage in an age of social good. Oakland: Berrett-Koehler Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jackson, G., & Apostolakou, A. (2010). Corporate social responsibility in Western Europe: An institutional mirror or substitute? Journal of Business Ethics, 94(3), 371–394.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jamali, D. (2010). MNCs and international accountability standards through an institutional lens: Evidence of symbolic conformity or decoupling. Journal of Business Ethics, 95(4), 617–640.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kudłak, R., Szőcs, I., Krumay, B., & Martinuzzi, A. (2018). The future of CSR-selected findings from a Europe-wide Delphi study. Journal of Cleaner Production, 183, 282–291.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lafferty, B. A., Goldsmith, R. E., & Hult, G. T. M. (2004). The impact of the alliance on the partners: A look at cause–brand alliances. Psychology and Marketing, 21(7), 509–531.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lafley, A. G., & Martin, R. L. (2013). Playing to win: How strategy really works. Boston: Harvard Business School Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Luo, X., & Bhattacharya, C. B. (2006). Corporate social responsibility, customer satisfaction, and market value. Journal of Marketing, 70(4), 1–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Luo, X. R., Wang, D., & Zhang, J. (2017). Whose call to answer: Institutional complexity and firms’ CSR reporting. The Academy of Management Journal, 60(1), 321–344.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marano, V., Tashman, P., & Kostova, T. (2017). Escaping the iron cage: Liabilities of origin and CSR reporting of emerging market multinational enterprises. Journal of International Business Studies, 48(3), 386–408.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marquis, C., Toffel, M. W., & Zhou, Y. (2016). Scrutiny, norms, and selective disclosure: A global study of greenwashing. Organization Science, 27(2), 483–504.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morsing, M., Schultz, M., & Nielsen, K. U. (2008). The ‘Catch 22’ of communicating CSR: Findings from a Danish study. Journal of Marketing Communications, 14(2), 97–111.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Murphy, P. E., & Schlegelmilch, B. B. (2013). Corporate social responsibility and corporate social irresponsibility: Introduction to a special topic section. Journal of Business Research, 66(10), 1807–1813.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Odriozola, M. D., & Baraibar-Diez, E. (2017). Is corporate reputation associated with quality of CSR reporting? Evidence from Spain. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 24(2), 121–132.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Okhmatovskiy, I., & David, R. J. (2012). Setting your own standards: Internal corporate governance codes as a response to institutional pressure. Organization Science, 23(1), 155–176.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Porter, M. E., & Kramer, M. R. (2006). Strategy and society. The links between competitive advantage and corporate social responsibility. Harvard Business Review, 84(12), 78–92.

    Google Scholar 

  • Porter, M. E., & Kramer, M. R. (2011). The big idea: Creating shared value. How to reinvent capitalism – and unleash a wave of innovation and growth. Harvard Business Review, 89(1-2), 62–78.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reverte, C. (2015). The new Spanish corporate social responsibility strategy 2014–2020: A crucial step forward with new challenges ahead. Journal of Cleaner Production, 91, 327–336.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scherer, A. G., & Palazzo, G. (2011). The new political role of business in a globalized world: A review of a new perspective on CSR and its implications for the firm, governance, and democracy. Journal of Management Studies, 48(4), 899–931.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sen, S., Bhattacharya, C. B., & Korschun, D. (2006). The role of corporate social responsibility in strengthening multiple stakeholder relationships: A field experiment. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 34(2), 158–166.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sierra-García, L., Zorio-Grima, A., & García-Benau, M. A. (2015). Stakeholder engagement, corporate social responsibility and integrated reporting: An exploratory study. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 22(5), 286–304.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Simmons, C. J., & Becker-Olsen, K. L. (2006). Achieving marketing objectives through social sponsorships. Journal of Marketing, 70(4), 154–169.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Simmons, J. M., Jr., Crittenden, V. L., & Schlegelmilch, B. B. (2018). The Global Reporting Initiative: Do application levels matter? Social Responsibility Journal, 14(3), 527–541.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Skarmeas, D., & Leonidou, C. N. (2013). When consumers doubt, watch out! The role of CSR skepticism. Journal of Business Research, 66(10), 1831–1838.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tashman, P., Marano, V., & Kostova, T. (2019). Walking the walk or talking the talk? Corporate social responsibility decoupling in emerging market multinationals. Journal of International Business Studies, 50(2), 153–171.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thompson, S. J. (2012). The perils of partnering in developing markets. Harvard Business Review, 90(6), 23–25.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tschopp, D., & Nastanski, M. (2014). The harmonization and convergence of corporate social responsibility reporting standards. Journal of Business Ethics, 125(1), 147–162.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Varadarajan, P. R., & Menon, A. (1988). Cause-related marketing: A coalignment of marketing strategy and corporate philanthropy. Journal of Marketing, 52(3), 58–74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang, Z., Hsieh, T. S., & Sarkis, J. (2018). CSR performance and the readability of CSR reports: Too good to be true? Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 25(1), 66–79.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Werther, W. B., Jr., & Chandler, D. (2011). Strategic corporate social responsibility: Stakeholders in a global environment. Los Angeles: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • World Business Council for Sustainable Development. (2013). Measuring socio-economic impact. A guide for business. Accessed May 17, 2019, from https://www.wbcsd.org/Programs/People/Social-Impact/Resources/WBCSD-Measuring-Impact

  • Yoon, Y., Gürhan-Canli, Z., & Schwarz, N. (2006). The effect of corporate social responsibility (CSR) activities on companies with bad reputations. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 16(4), 377–390.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ilona Szőcs .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Szőcs, I., Schlegelmilch, B.B. (2020). Embedding CSR in Corporate Strategies. In: Schlegelmilch, B.B., Szőcs, I. (eds) Rethinking Business Responsibility in a Global Context. CSR, Sustainability, Ethics & Governance. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-34261-6_4

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics