Abstract
The authors take a snapshot of contemporary CSR practice in the USA by combining their own real-world experience with findings from the current literature and the results of a survey of current CSR US executives. Six trends emerged: (1) CSR is not PR; (2) CSR drives corporate value; (3) CEOs have a lot to say about CSR; (4) CSR performance is being measured; (5) CSR is evolving incrementally; and (6) CSR is a business imperative and a moral imperative. For major US corporations, CSR is good for business and good for the society. It contributes to harnessing the abilities of both to build the sustainable conditions both require to prosper.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
LinkedIn, the social media site for professional business people, offers many discussion groups on the topic of CSR that help practitioners network, share insights, and conduct topical discussions. Examples include Corporate Social Responsibility and CSRwire, the Corporate Social Responsibility Newswire. Also of note are blogs such as Sustainable Business Forum, Corporate Responsibility: CSR Now, the Forbes Leadership Forum, and Cause Integration. These resources are written by social responsibility experts who follow the practice, pose intriguing questions for discussion, and report latest trends.
References
Baker, M. 2012. Four emerging trends in corporate social responsibility. Retrieved from www.mallenbaker.net/csr/page.php?Story_ID=2747.
Beattie, S. 2012. CSR reporting 2.0: From stats to stories. SustainableBrands.com Retrieved from http://www.sustainablebrands.com/news_and_views/mar2012/csr-reporting-20-stats-stories.
Center for Corporate Citizenship, Boston College, Carroll School of Management. 2012. Commitment to value: The state of corporate citizenship 2012 – Executive summary. Chestnut Hill. Retrieved from http://www.bcccc.net/pdf/SOCC2012ExecSummaryPresentation.pdf.
Cochran, P.L. 2007. The evolution of corporate social responsibility. Business Horizons 50(6): 449–454. Retrieved from http://uploadkon.ir/uploads/1-s2.0-S0007681307000808-main.pdf.
Commission to the European Parliament, The Council, The European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions. 2011. A renewed EU strategy 2011–14 for Corporate Social Responsibility (COM (2011) 681 final). Brussels: The European Commission, October 25.
Craig, S. 2013. Goldman, buying redemption: The firm’s big splash of philanthropy prompts critics to ask: How much is too much? The New York Times, Sunday Business, 1, October 27.
Crane, A., and D. Matten. 2013. The top CSR trends for 2013. Sustainable Business Forum. Retrieved from http://craneandmatten.blogspot.com/2013/01/the-top-5-csr-trends-for-2013.html.
Eichler, L. 2013. Is doing good a sustainable business model? The Globe and Mail. Retrieved from http://www.theglobeandmail.com/report-on-business/careers/career-advice/life-at-work/good-vibes-for-social-responsibility/article14575293.
Frankental, P. 2001. Corporate social responsibility – A PR invention? Corporate Communication: An International Journal 6(1) in abridged version retrieved October 10, 2013 from http://first.emeraldinsight.com/articles/csr.htm.
Global Reporting Initiative. 2014. Retrieved January 17, 2014, from https://www.globalreporting.org/network/regional-networks/gri-focal-points/focal-point-usa/Pages/default.aspx.
Gould, S. 2013. Integrated reporting. PowerPoint presented at symposium conducted by Corporate Communication International and The Robert Zicklin Center for Corporate Integrity at Baruch College, City University of New York, New York, NY, November 1.
International Integrated Reporting Council (IIRC). 2013. Retrieved November 24, 2013, from http://www.theiirc.org.
Katus, S. 2013. GRI & G4: Update. PowerPoint presented at symposium conducted by Corporate Communication International and The Robert Zicklin Center for Corporate Integrity at Baruch College, City University of New York, New York, NY, November 1.
Mohin, T. 2012. The top 10 trends in CSR for 2012. Forbes.com. Retrieved from http://www.forbes.com/sites/forbesleadershipforum/2012/01/18/the-top-10-trends-in-csr-for-2012/.
Monahan, A. 2012. Four emerging trends in corporate social responsibility. Retrieved from http://www.triplepundit.com/2012/03/technology-be-driver-social-good/?doing_wp_.
Scott, R. 2012. The bottom line of corporate good. Forbes.com. Retrieved from http://www.forbes.com/sites/causeintegration/2012/09/14/the-bottom-line-of-corporate-good/.
Scott, R. 2014. The key ingredient of CSR. Forbes.com. Retrieved from http://www.forbes.com/sites/causeintegration/2014/02/26/the-key-ingredient-of-csr/.
Smith, J. 2014. The world’s most sustainable companies of 2014. Forbes.com. Retrieved from http://www.forbes.com/sites/jacquelynsmith/2013/01/23/the-worlds-most-sustainable-companies/.
UN Global Compact. 2013a. Architects of a better world: Building the post–2015 business engagement architecture. Retrieved from http://www.unglobalcompact.org/docs/about_the_gc/Architecture.pdf.
UN Global Compact. 2013b. The UN Global Compact-Accenture CEO Study on sustainability 2013: Architects of a better world. Retrieved from http://www.accenture.com/Microsites/ungc-ceo-study/Documents/pdf/13-1739_UNGC%20report_Final_FSC3.pdf.
Weissman Center for International Business, Zicklin School of Business. 2013. CSR sustainability monitor. 2012 report on the scope and quality of CSR reports from the world’s largest corporations, New York: Ferns, W. and Sethi. S. P.
Whitman, M. 2011. Benefits of corporate social responsibility. Sustainable Business Forum. Retrieved from http://sustainablebusinessforum.com/sbtoolkit/179556/benefits-corporate-social-responsibility.
Whitman, M. 2013. Benefits of corporate social responsibility. Sustainable Business Forum. Retrieved from http://sustainablebusinessforum.com/sbtoolkit/179556/benefits-corporate-social-responsibility
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2015 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Straat, Ja., Genest, C.M. (2015). Corporate Social Responsibility in a US Context. In: Ng, P., Ngai, C. (eds) Role of Language and Corporate Communication in Greater China. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-46881-4_9
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-46881-4_9
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-662-46880-7
Online ISBN: 978-3-662-46881-4
eBook Packages: Humanities, Social Sciences and LawSocial Sciences (R0)