Abstract
The establishment of a limit for extraction is a fundamental requirement for the long-term sustainable development of groundwater resources. As in many countries, the context and methodology for determining these limits in Australia has evolved over time. The instigation of the National Water Initiative (NWI) in 2004 was a major milestone in Australia which enabled the development of a nationally consistent framework for water management. A key component of this major reform process has been a commitment across the States and Territories to the concept of establishing a sustainable water extraction regime for each water system. National guidelines developed over the past decade have outlined a general approach to using scientific processes and techniques to determine this regime which minimises the risks to the resource and users that depend on it.
This chapter analyses the evolution of the use of ‘sustainable yield’ in Australian groundwater management and presents how four themes have come to shape a shared conceptual framework for groundwater management. These are: appreciating how the timing and location of extraction impacts on recharge and discharge processes; accepting that setting sustainability limits necessarily requires value judgements; employing a risk-based management approach that includes socio-economic considerations and greater stakeholder engagement; and using resource condition limits together with volumetric allocations to set optimal management rules.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Anderson, T., Cauchi, T., Hamstead, M., Merrick, N. P., Mozina, M., & Phillipson, K. (2014, February). Approaches to achieve sustainable use and management of groundwater resources in the Murray–Darling Basin using rules and resource condition limits. Prepared for Murray–Darling Basin Authority.
Anderson, T., Cauchi, T., Mozina, M., & Smyth, B. (2014, February). Approaches to achieve sustainable use and management of groundwater resources in the Murray–Darling basin using rules and resource condition limits – Literature review reference report. Prepared for Murray–Darling Basin Authority.
Barnett, B., Townley, L. R., Post, V., Evans, R. E., Hunt, R. J., Peeters, L., Richardson, S., Werner, A. D., Knapton, A., & Boronkay, A. (2012). Australian groundwater modelling guidelines (Waterlines report). Canberra, Australia: National Water Commission.
Bish, S., Williams, R. M., Gates, G., & Gill, J. (2006). Assessment of sustainable limits for groundwater sources in NSW, MDBA conference Canberra pp. 107 – 115, NSW Department of Natural Resource.
Bredehoeft, J. (1997). Safe yield and the water budget myth. Editorial, Ground Water, 35(6), 929–929.
Bredehoeft, J. (2002). The water budget myth revisited: Why hydrogeologists model. Ground Water, 40, 340–345.
Clark, S. D., & Myers, A. J. (1969). Vesting and divesting: The Victorian groundwater act 1969. Melbourne University Law Review, 7, 237–257.
Cook, P. G., Herczeg, A. L., & Harrington, G. A. (2001, April 1–5). Is groundwater sustainability possible? 2001 A Water Odyssey, Australian Water Alliance 19th Federal Convention, Canberra, Australia.
CSIRO and SKM. (2010, December). Sustainable extraction limits derived from the recharge risk assessment method. Report to Murray-Darling Basin Authority.
DEWNR (Department of Environment, Water and Natural Resources, South Australia). (2012a, December). Risk management framework for water planning and management.
DEWNR (Department of Environment, Water and Natural Resources, South Australia). (2012b, December). Risk management policy and guidelines for water allocation plans.
DFW (Department for Water, Western Australia). (2011a, November). Water allocation planning in Western Australia: A guide to our process. Water resource allocation planning series.
DFW (Department for Water, Western Australia). (2011b, January). Groundwater risk-based allocation planning process. Water resource allocation and planning series. Report no. 45.
DLRM. (2016). Alice springs water allocation plan 2016–2026. Northern Territory government, Department of Land Resource Management. Report 01/2016A.
DPI (Department of Primary Industries, NSW). (2015, November). Macro water sharing plans – The approach for groundwater.
DPIE (Department of Primary Industries and Energy, Commonwealth of Australia). (1987). 1985 review of Australia’s water resources and water use. (Vol. 2). Department of Primary Industries and Energy and The Australian Water Resources Council, Canberra.
Eamus, D., Zolfaghar, S., Villalobos-Vega, R., Cleverly, J., & Huete, A. (2015). Groundwater-dependent ecosystems: Recent insights from satellite and field-based studies. Hydrology and Earth System Sciences, 19, 4229–4256.
Hatton, T., & Evans, R. (1998). Dependence of ecosystems on groundwater and its significance to Australia. Occasional Paper No. 12/98. Land and Water Resources Research and Development Corporation, CSIRO Australia.
McIntyre, N., & Wood, C. (2011). Developing adaptive groundwater management arrangements in the South East of South Australia: A pilot study. Government of South Australia, through Department for Water, Adelaide.
MDBA (Murray-Darling Basin Authority). (2012). The proposed groundwater baseline and sustainable diversion limits: Methods report, MDBA publication no: 16/12, Murray-Darling Basin Authority, Canberra.
MDBA (Murray-Darling Basin Authority). (2013, October). Handbook for practitioners: Water resource plan requirements.
MDBC (Murray–Darling Basin Commission). (2001, January). Groundwater flow modelling guideline. Report prepared by Aquaterra.
Meinzer, O. E. (1920). Quantitative methods of estimating ground-water supplies. Bulletin Geological Society of America, 31, 329–338.
Mulligan, H. K., & Pigram, J. J. (1989). Water administration in Australia: agenda for change. Centre for Water Policy Research. Occasional Paper No. 4, University of New England, Armidale.
NGC (National Groundwater Committee). (2003, March 14). Water level response management as a micro-management tool. Issue Paper 4. Australian Department of the Environment and Heritage.
Noorduijn, S., Cook, P., Simmons, C., & Richardson, S. (2019). Protecting groundwater levels and ecosystems with simple management approaches. Hydrogeology Journal, 27, 225–237.
NWC (National Water Commission). (2009). Australian water reform 2009. Second biennial assessment of progress in implementation of the National Water Initiative.
NWC (National Water Commission). (2010a, May). Sustainable levels of extraction: Position statement. Australian Government.
NWC (National Water Commission). (2010b). NWI policy guidelines for water planning and management.
Ponce, V. M. (2007). Sustainable yield of groundwater. http://groundwater.sdsu.edu
Productivity Commission. (2017). National water reform (Report no. 87). Canberra. Released on 31 May 2018.
Richardson, S., Evans, R., & Harrington, G. (2011). Connecting science and engagement: Setting groundwater extraction limits using a stakeholder-led decision-making process. In D. Connell & R. Q. Grafton (Eds.), Basin futures: Water reform in the Murray-Darling basin. Canberra, Australia: ANU Press.
Richardson, S., Irvine, E., Froend, R., Boon, P., Barber, S., & Bonneville, B. (2011). Australian groundwater-dependent ecosystems toolbox part 2: Assessment tools (Waterline report series no. 70). Canberra, Australia: National Water Commission.
Sophocleous, M. (2000). From safe yield to sustainable development of water resources – The Kansas experience. Journal of Hydrology, 235(1–2), 27–43.
Theis, C. V. (1940). The source of water derived from wells: Essential factors controlling the response of an aquifer to development. Civil Engineering, 10(5), 277–280.
Tisdell, J., Ward, J., & Grudzinksi, T. (2002, May) The development of water reform in Australia (Technical report 02/5). Melbourne, Australia: Cooperative Research Centre for Catchment Hydrology.
Turral, H., & Fullagar, I. (2007). Institutional directions in groundwater management in Australia. In M. Giordano & K. G. Villholth (Eds.), The agricultural groundwater revolution: Opportunities and threats to development (pp. 320–361). Wallingford, UK: CAB International.
Werner, A. D., Alcoe, D. W., Ordens, C. M., Hutson, J. L., Ward, J. D., & Simmons, C. T. (2011). Current practice and future challenges in coastal aquifer management: Flux-based and trigger-level approaches with application to an Australian case study. Water Resources Management. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-011-9777-2
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Pierce, D., Cook, P. (2020). Conceptual Approaches, Methods and Models Used to Assess Extraction Limits in Australia: From Sustainable to Acceptable Yield. In: Rinaudo, JD., Holley, C., Barnett, S., Montginoul, M. (eds) Sustainable Groundwater Management. Global Issues in Water Policy, vol 24. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-32766-8_14
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-32766-8_14
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-32765-1
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-32766-8
eBook Packages: Earth and Environmental ScienceEarth and Environmental Science (R0)