Abstract
It has taken a whilst to get here—the best part of three books in fact—but it has been an interesting trip and one which has revealed a considerable number of issues in governance, and maritime governance in particular, that have remained either unrecognised or dormant for many years. Our journey through the earlier volumes (Roe 2013, 2016) has taken us from the initial consideration of maritime governance and policy-making beginning with the problems faced by decision-makers in the context of globalisation and the contradiction of the nation-state. From there through an appreciation of the increasingly postmodern nature of governance, we moved on to more specific considerations of the needs of a meaningful and effective approach to maritime governance taking into account issues such as form, time, process, metaphor, flow and speed before reaching these final stages where in particular the requirements of metagovernance and polycentricity have become clear.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Abbott, K. W. (2009). Strengthening international regulation through transnational new governance: Overcoming the orchestration deficit. Vanderbilt Journal of Transnational Law, 42, 501–578.
Abbott, K. W., & Snidal, D. (2010). International regulation without international government; Improving IO performance through orchestration. Review of International Organizations, 5, 315–344.
Abbott, K. W., & Snidal, D. (2013). Taking responsive regulation transnational; Strategies for international organizations. Regulation and Governance, 7, 95–113.
Abbott, K. W., Genschel, P., Snidal, D., & Zangl, B. (2015). Two logics of indirect governance; Delegation and orchestration. British Journal of Political Science, 46, 719–729.
Acharya, A. (2004). How ideas spread; whose norms matter? Norm localization and institutional change in Asian regionalism. International Organization, 58(2), 239–275.
Adelle, C., & Jordan, A. (2014). Policy coherence for development in the European Union; Do new procedures unblock or simply reproduce old disagreements. Journal of European Integration, 36(4), 375–391.
Aggarwal, V. K. (1998). Institutional designs for a complex World: Bargaining, linkages and nesting. Ithaca NY: Cornell University Press.
Alchain, A. A., & Woodward, S. (1988). The firm is dead, long live the firm: A review of Oliver E. Williamson’s the economic institutions of capitalism. Journal of Economic Literature, 26, 65–79.
Aldrich, H. E. (1979). Organizations and environment. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
Alford, J., & Head, B. W. (2017). Wicked and less wicked problems: A typology and a contingency framework. Policy and Society, 36(3), 397–413.
Allen, J. (2003). Lost geographies of power. Oxford: Blackwell.
Allen, J., & Cochrane, A. (2007). Beyond the territorial fix: Regional assemblages, politics and power. Regional Studies, 41(9), 1161–1175.
Allen, J., Massey, D., & Cochrane, A. (1998). Rethinking the region. London: Routledge.
Allen, M. D., Pettus, C., & Haider-Markel, D. P. (2004). Making the national local; Specifying the conditions for national government influence on state policy-making. State Politics and Policy Quarterly, 4(3), 318–344.
Allouche, J., Middleton, C., & Gyawali, D. (2015). Technical veil, hidden politics; Interrogating the power linkages behind the nexus. Water Alternatives, 8(1), 610–626.
Almond, G. A., & Genco, S. J. (1977). Clouds, clocks and the study of politics. World Politics, 29(4), 489–522.
Alter, K. J., & Meunier, S. (2006). Nested and competing regimes in the transatlantic banana trade dispute. Journal of European Public Policy, 13, 362–382.
Alter, K. J., & Meunier, S. (2009). The politics of international regime complexity. Perspectives on Politics, 7(1), 13–24.
Amin, A. (2004). Regions unbound: Towards a new politics of place. Geografiska Annaler, 86B, 33–44.
Amin, A., & Thrift, N. (2002). Cities; Rethinking urban theory. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Archibugi, D., & Michie, J. (1997). Technological globalization and national systems of innovation; An introduction. In D. Archibugi & J. Michie (Eds.), Technology globalisation and economic performance (pp. 1–23). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Ashforth, B. E., Kreiner, G. F., & Fugate, M. (2000). All in a day’s work; Boundaries and micro role transitions. Academy of Management Review, 25(3), 472–491.
Backstrand, K., & Kuyper, J. W. (2017). The democratic legitimacy of orchestration: The UNFCCC, non-state actors, and transnational climate governance. Environmental Politics, 26(4), 764–788.
Balla, S. J. (2001). Interstate professional associations and the diffusion of policy innovations. American Politics Research, 29(3), 221–245.
Balland, P., Boschma, R., & Frenken, K. (2015). Proximity and innovation; From statics to dynamics. Regional Studies, 49(6), 907–920.
Bang, H. P. (2003). Governance as political communication. In H. P. Bang (Ed.), Governance as social and political communication (pp. 1–6). Manchester: Manchester University Press.
Bartholomew, D. J. (1982). Stochastic models for social processes. New York: Wiley.
Barton, B., & Tobler, W. (1971). A spectral analysis of innovation diffusion. Geographical Analysis, 3, 182–186.
Bauman, Z. (2000). Liquid modernity. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Baybeck, B., Berry, W. D., & Siegel, D. A. (2011). A strategic theory of policy diffusion via intergovernmental competition. The Journal of Politics, 73(1), 232–247.
Beauregard, R. A. (1995). Theorizing the global local connection. In P. L. Knox & P. J. Taylor (Eds.), World cities in a world system (pp. 232–248). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Beck, J. (1997). Netzwerke in der transnationalen Regionalpolitik, Rahmenbedingungen Funktionsweisen. Baden-Baden: Folgen, Nomos Verlag.
Bennett, C. J. (1991). What is policy convergence and what causes it? British Journal of Political Science, 21, 215–233.
Bennett, C. J. (1997). Understanding ripple effects; The cross-national adoption of policy instruments for bureaucratic accountability. Governance, 10(3), 213–233.
Bennett, P. (2000). Environmental governance and private actors; Enrolling insurers in international maritime regulation. Political Geography, 19, 875–899.
Bennett, C., & Howlett, M. (1992). The lessons of learning; Reconciling theories of policy learning and policy change. Policy Sciences, 25, 275–294.
Berry, F. S. (1994). Sizing up state policy innovation research. Policy Studies Journal, 12(3), 442–456.
Berry, F. S., & Berry, W. D. (1990). State lottery adoptions as policy innovations: An event history analysis. The American Political Science Review, 84(2), 395–415.
Berry, F. S., & Berry, W. D. (1999). Innovation and diffusion models in policy research. In P. A. Sabatier (Ed.), Theories of the policy process (pp. 169–200). Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
Biesenbender, S., & Tosun, J. (2014). Domestic politics and the diffusion of international policy innovations; How does accommodation happen? Global Environmental Change, 29, 424–433.
Blaut, J. M. (1977). Two views of diffusion. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 67(3), 343–349.
Blouin, C. (2007). Trade policy and health; From conflicting interests to policy coherence. Bulletin of the World Health Organization, 85(3), 169–173.
Boas, I., Biermann, F., & Kanie, N. (2016). Cross-sectoral strategies in global sustainability governance; Towards a nexus approach. International Environmental Agreements, 16, 449–464.
Bolman, L. G., & Deal, T. E. (2003). Reframing organizational; Artistry, choice and leadership. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
Borchert, J. R. (1961). The twin cities urbanized area; Past, present and future. Geographical Review, 51, 47–70.
Boschma, R., & Frenken, K. (2010). The spatial evolution of innovation networks; A proximity perspective. In R. Boschma & R. Martin (Eds.), The handbook of evolutionary economic geography (pp. 120–138). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
Bouaerkt, G., Ormond, D., & Peters, B. (2007). A potential governance agenda for finland. Ministry of Finance, Government of Finland, Helsinki.
Bowers, R. V. (1937). The direction of intra-societal diffusion. American Sociological Review, 2, 826–836.
Bowman, M. J. (1969). Book review: Torsten Hägerstrand, innovation diffusion as a spatial process. Economic Development and Cultural Change, 18(1), 148–149.
Braun, D., & Gilardi, F. (2006). Taking ‘Galton’s problem’ seriously; Towards a theory of policy diffusion. Journal of Theoretical Politics, 18(3), 298–322.
Bray, D. J., Taylor, M. A. P., & Scrafton, D. (2011). Transport policy in Australia—Evolution, learning and policy transfer. Transport Policy, 18, 522–532.
Brooks, S. M. (2005). Interdependent and domestic foundations of policy change; the diffusion of pension privatization around the world. International Studies Quarterly, 49, 273–294.
Brooks, J. (2014). Policy coherence and food security; The effects of OECD countries’ agricultural policies. Food Policy, 44, 88–94.
Brown, L. (1965). Models for spatial diffusion research (Technical Report No. 3). Spatial Diffusion Study, Department of Geography, Northwestern University, Evanston IL.
Brown, L. A. (1975). The market and infrastructure context of adoption; A spatial perspective on the diffusion of innovation. Economic Geography, 51(3), 185–216.
Brown, L. A., & Cox, K. R. (1971). Empirical regularities in the diffusion of innovation. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 61(3), 551–559.
Bryson, J. M., Crosby, B. C., & Middleton Stone, M. (2006). The design and implementation of cross-sector collaborations; Propositions from the literature. Public Administration Review, 66(S1), 44–55.
Bulkeley, H., & Betshill, M. M. (2005). Rethinking sustainable cities; Multilevel governance and the ‘urban’ politics of climate change. Environmental Politics, 14(1), 42–63.
Bulmer, S., & Padgett, S. (2005). Policy transfer in the European Union; An institutionalist perspective. British Journal of Political Science, 35(1), 103–126.
Bunnell, T. G., & Coe, N. M. (2001). Spaces and scales of innovation. Progress in Human Geography, 25(4), 569–589.
Buras, P. (2005). Polish social democracy; Policy transfer and programmatic change. Journal of Communist and Transition Politics, 21(1), 84–104.
Busch, P., & Jörgens, H. (2005). The international sources of policy convergence; Explaining the spread of environmental policy innovations. Journal of European Public Policy, 12(5), 860–884.
Butler, D. M., Volden, C., & Dynes, A. M. (2017). Ideology, learning and policy diffusion. American Journal of Political Science, 61(1), 37–49.
Cairney, P. (2009). The role of ideas in policy transfer: The case of UK smoking bans since devolution. Journal of European Public Policy, 16(3), 471–488.
Callon, M. (1998). The laws of the markets. Oxford: Blackwell.
Cappelin, R., & Batey, P. W. J. (Eds.). (1993). Regional networks, border regions and european integration (European Research in Regional Science Series No. 3). London: Pion.
Carbone, M. (2008). Mission impossible: The European Union and policy coherence for development. European Integration, 30(3), 323–342.
Careja, R. (2011). Paths to policy coherence to create market economies in Central and Eastern Europe. International Political Science Review, 32(3), 345–366.
Carroll, T. F., & Bebbington, A. J. (2000). Peasant federations and rural development policies in the Andes. Policy Sciences, 33(3–4), 435–457.
Casetti, E. (1969). Why do diffusion processes conform to logistic trends? Geographical Analysis, 1, 101–105.
Casetti, E., & Semple, R. K. (1969). Concerning the testing of spatial diffusion hypotheses. Geographical Analysis, 1(4), 254–259.
Castells, M. (1996). The rise of the network society. Cambridge, MA: Blackwell.
Chandler, J. (2009). Trendy solutions: Why do states adopt sustainable energy portfolio standards? Energy Policy, 37, 3274–3281.
Chapin, F. S. (1928). Cultural change. New York: Century.
Chapman, R. (2003). A policy mix for environmentally sustainable development—learning from the Dutch experience. New Zealand Journal of Environmental Law, 7(1), 29–51.
Chapman, B., & Greenaway, D. (2006). Learning to live with loans? International policy transfer and the funding of higher education. The World Economy, 29(8), 1057–1075.
Chisholm, D. (1989). Coordination without hierarchy. Informal structures in multiorganizational systems. Berkeley CA: University of California Press.
Christopherson, S., & Clark, J. (2007). Power in firm networks; What it means for regional innovation systems. Regional Studies, 41, 1223–1236.
Christopoulos, S., Horvath, B., & Kull, M. (2012). Advancing the governance of cross-sectoral policies for sustainable development; A metagovernance perspective. Public Administration and Development, 32, 305–323.
Church, A., & Reid, P. (1996). Urban power, international networks and competition, the example of cross-border cooperation. Urban Studies, 33(8), 1297–1318.
Clark, J. (1985). Policy diffusion and program scope; Research directions. Publius, 15, 61–70.
Cliff, A. D. (1968). The neighbourhood effect in the diffusion of innovations. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, 44, 75–84.
Cohen, W. M., & Levinthal, D. A. (1990). Absorptive capacity: A new perspective on learning and innovation. Administrative Science Quarterly, 35, 128–152.
Collier, D., & Messick, R. E. (1975). Prerequisites versus diffusion; Testing alternative explanation of social security adoption. The American Political Science Review, 69(4), 1299–1315.
Collin, J. (2012). Tobacco control; Global health policy and development: Towards policy coherence in global governance. Tobacco Control, 21, 274–280.
Common, R. (2004). Public management and policy transfer in South-East Asia. In M. Evans (Ed.), Policy transfer in global perspective (pp. 143–164). Aldershot: Ashgate.
Cox, K. (1998). Spaces of dependence, spaces of engagement and the politics of scale, or looking for local politics. Political Geography, 17, 12–23.
Craft, J., & Howlett, M. (2012). Policy formulation, governance shifts and policy influence: Location and content in policy. Journal of Public Policy, 32(2), 79–98.
Crain, R. L. (1966). Fluoridation—Diffusion of an innovation among cities. Social Forces, 44(4), 467–476.
Dai, X. (2015). Orchestrating monitoring; The optimal adaptation of international organizations. In K. W. Abbott, P. Genschel, D. Snidal, & B. Zangl (Eds.), International organizations as Orchestrators. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
De Burca, G., O’Keohane, R., & Sabel, C. (2013). New modes of pluralist global governance. New York University Journal of International Law and Politics, 45(1), 723–786.
De Burca, G., O’Keohane, R., & Sabel, C. (2014). Global experimentalist governance. In Conference on Experimentalist Governance (pp. 1–19). Brown University, Providence RI.
De Coning, C., & Friis, K. (2011). Coherence and coordination: The limits of the comprehensive approach. Journal of International Peacekeeping, 15, 243–272.
De Francesco, F. (2012). Diffusion of regulatory impact analysis among OECD and EU member states. Comparative Political Studies, 45(10), 1277–1305.
De Jong, M., & Edelenbos, J. (2007). An insider’s look into policy transfer in transnational expert networks. European Planning Studies, 15(5), 687–706.
De Olivera, O. P. (2017). International policy diffusion and participatory budgeting, ambassadors of participation, international institutions and transnational networks. Berlin: Springer.
Derkx, B., & Glasbergen, P. (2014). Elaborating global private meta-governance: An inventory in the realm of voluntary sustainability standards. Global Environmental Change, 27, 41–50.
Dery, D. (1999). Policy by the way; When policy is incidental to making other policies. Journal of Public Policy, 18(2), 163–176.
Deutsch, K. W., Burrell, S. A., Kann, A., & Lee, M., Jr. (1957). Political community and the North Atlantic Area. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Diekmann, A. (1989). Diffusion and survival models for the process of entry into marriage. Journal of Mathematical Sociology, 14, 31–44.
Dobbin, F., Simmons, B., & Garrett, G. (2007). The global diffusion of public policies. Annual Review of Sociology, 33, 449–472.
Dodd, S. C. (1950). The interactive hypothesis; A gravity model fitting physical masses and human groups. American Sociological Review, 15, 245–256.
Dodd, S. C. (1953). Testing message diffusion in controlled experiments; Charting the distance and time factors in the interactance hypothesis. American Sociological Review, 18(4), 410–416.
Dolowitz, D. (1997). British employment policy in the 1980s; Learning from the American experience. Governance, 10(1), 23–42.
Dolowitz, D. (2003). A policy-maker’s guide to policy transfer. Political Quarterly, 74(1), 101–108.
Dolowitz, D., & Marsh, D. (1996). Who learns what from whom; A review of the policy transfer literature. Political Studies, 44, 343–357.
Dolowitz, D., & Marsh, D. (2000). Learning from abroad; The role of policy transfer in contemporary policy making. Governance, 13(1), 5–24.
Downs, G., & Mohr, L. (1979). Towards a theory of innovation. Administration and Society, 10(4), 379–408.
Drezner, D. W. (2009). The power and peril of international regime complexity. Perspectives on Politics, 7(1), 65–70.
Dube, L., Addy, N., Blouin, C., & Drager, N. (2014). From policy coherence to 21st century convergence; A whole-of-society paradigm of human and economic development. Annals of the New York Academy of Science, 1331, 201–215.
Dunlop, C. A., & Radaelli, C. M. (2018). Does policy learning meet the standards of an analytical framework of the policy process? Policy Studies Journal, 46(S1), S48–S68.
Duraiappah, A. K., & Bhardwaj, A. (2007). Measuring policy coherence among MEAS and MDGS. International Institute for Sustainable Development, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada.
Durkheim, E. (1964). The rules of sociological method. London: Collier MacMillan.
Dye, T. R. (1990). American federalism. Lexington, MA: Lexington Books.
Eakin, H., DeFries, R., Kerr, S., Lambin, E. F., Liu, J., Marcotullio, P. J., Messerli, P., Reenberg, A., Rueda, X., Swaffield, S. R., Wicke, B., & Zimmerer, K. (2014). Significance of telecoupling for exploration of land-use change. In K. C. Seto & A. Reenberg (Eds.), Rethinking global land use in an urban era (Vol. 14). Strüngman Forum Reports, Cambridge, MA.
Eaton, K. (2016). Policy regime juxtaposition in Latin America. Columbia Internacional, 90, 3765.
Edmonson, M. S. (1961). Neolithic diffusion rates. Current Anthropology, 2(2), 71–102.
Elkins, Z., & Simmons, B. (2005). On waves, clusters, and diffusion: A conceptual framework. Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 598, 33–51.
Elkins, Z., Guzman, A. T., & Simmons, B. A. (2006). Competing for capital: The diffusion of bilateral investment treaties, 1960–2000. International Organization, 60(4), 811–846.
Engberg, L., & Larsen, J. (2010). Context-oriented meta-governance in Danish urban regeneration. Planning Theory and Practice, 11(4), 549–571.
Ettelt, S., Mays, N., & Nolte, E. (2012). Policy learning from abroad: Why it is more difficult than it seems. Policy and Politics, 40(4), 491–504.
Etzioni, A. (1965). Political unification. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
Evans, M. (2004a). Introduction: Is policy transfer rational policy-making? In M. Evans (Ed.), Policy transfer in global perspective (pp. 1–9). Aldershot: Ashgate.
Evans, M. (2004b). Understanding policy transfer. In M. Evans (Ed.), Policy transfer in global perspective (pp. 10–44). Aldershot: Ashgate.
Evans, M. (2009). Policy transfer in critical perspective. Policy Studies, 30(3), 237–241.
Evans, M., & Davies, J. (1999). Understanding policy transfer; A multi-level, multi-disciplinary perspective. Public Administration, 77(2), 361–385.
Evans, M., & McComb, P. (2004). Policy transfer networks: An insider perspective. In M. Evans (Ed.), Policy transfer in global perspective (pp. 45–63). Aldershot: Ashgate.
Evans, P. (1996). Government action, social capital and development; Reviewing the evidence on synergy. World Development, 24(6), 1119–1132.
Evans, P. B., Jacobson, H. K., & Putnam, R. D. (1993). Double-edged diplomacy; International bargaining and domestic politics. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
Evers, A. (2005). Mixed welfare systems and hybrid organisations; Changes in the governance and provision of social services. International Journal of Public Administration, 28, 737–748.
Eyestone, R. (1977). Confusion, diffusion and innovation. The American Political Science Review, 71(2), 441–447.
Falkner, R., & Gupta, A. (2009). The limits of regulatory convergence; Globalization and GMO politics in the south. International Environmental Agreements, 9, 113–133.
Flores-Crespo, P. (2004). Transferring higher education policies in Mexico: The case of the technological universities. In M. Evans (Ed.), Policy transfer in global perspective (pp. 128–142). Aldershot: Ashgate.
Folke, C., Pritchard, L., Jr., Berkes, F., Colding, J., & Svedin, U. (2007). The problem of fit between ecosystems and institutions; Ten years later. Ecology and Society, 12, 1.
Foucault, M. (1966). The order of things. Archaeology of the human sciences. London: Routledge.
Frankel, E. (1992). Hierarchical logic in shipping policy and decision-making. Maritime Policy and Management, 19(3), 211–221.
Friedman, M. (1962). Capitalism and freedom. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
Friedmann, J. (1972). The spatial organization of power in the development of urban systems. Comparative Urban Research, 1, 5–42.
Gagatsi, E., Giannopoulos, G., & Aifandopoulou, G. (2014). Supporting policy making in maritime transport by means of multi-actors multi-criteria analysis: A methodology developed for the greek maritime transport system (pp. 1–12). Paris: Transport Research Arena.
Gailing, L., & Roaring, A. (2016). Is it all about collaborative governance? Alternative ways of understanding the success of energy regions. Utilities Policy, 41, 237–245.
Gallopin, G. C., Funtowicz, S., O’Connor, M., & Ravetz, J. (2001). Science for the twenty-first century: From social contract to the scientific core. International Journal of Social Science, 53(168), 219–229.
Ganghof, S. (2006). Tax mixes and the size of the welfare state: Causal mechanisms and policy implications. Journal of European Social Policy, 16(4), 360–373.
Garrett, G., Dobbin, F., & Simmons, B. A. (2008). Conclusion. In B. A. Simmons, F. Dobbin, & G. Garrett (Eds.), The global diffusion of markets and democracy (pp. 344–360). New York: Cambridge University Press.
Garud, R., & Gehman, J. (2012). Metatheoretical perspectives on sustainability journeys: Evolutionary, relational and durational. Research Policy, 41, 980–995.
Gassebner, M., Gaston, N., & Lamla, M. J. (2011). The inverse domino effect: Are economic reforms contagious? International Economic Review, 52(1), 183–200.
Gebhard, C. (2008). Coherence. In C. Hill & M. Smith (Eds.), International relations and the European Union (pp. 101–127). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Geels, F. W. (2002). Technological transitions as evolutionary reconfiguration processes: A multi-level perspective and a case-study. Research Policy, 31(8–9), 1257–1274.
Geels, F. W. (2007). Transformation of large technical systems. A multilevel analysis of the Dutch highway system (1950–2000). Science, Technology and Human Values, 32(2), 123–149.
Geerlings, H., & Stead, D. (2003). The integration of land use planning, transport and environment in European policy and research. Transport Policy, 10, 187–196.
Gehring, T., & Oberthür, S. (2006). Introduction. In S. Oberthür & T. Gehring (Eds.), Institutional interaction in global environmental governance. Synergy and conflict among international and EU policies (pp. 1–18). Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
Gehring, T., & Oberthür, S. (2008). Interplay; Exploring institutional interaction. In O. R. Young, L. King, & H. Schroeder (Eds.), Institutions and environmental change: Principle findings, applications and research Frontiers (pp. 187–224). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Geuijen, K., Moore, M., Cederquist, A., Ronning, R., & Van Twist, M. (2017). Creating public value in global wicked problems. Public Management Review, 19(5), 621–639.
Gilardi, F. (2010). Who learns from what in policy diffusion processes? American Journal of Political Science, 54(3), 650–666.
Glick, H. R., & Hays, S. P. (1991). Innovation and reinvention in state policymaking: Theory and evolution of state living will laws. Journal of Politics, 53, 835–850.
Godlund, S. (1956). Bus service in Sweden. Lund Studies in Geography, Series B, Human Geography, Vol. 17.
Gomar, J. O. V., Stringer, L. C., & Paavola, J. (2014). Regime complexes and national policy coherence: Experiences in the biodiversity cluster. Global Governance, 20, 119–145.
Goodwin, M. (1998). The governance of rural areas: Some emerging research issues and agendas. Rural Studies, 14(1), 5–12.
Graham, E. R., Shipan, C. R., & Volden, C. (2012). Review article: The diffusion of policy research in political science. British Journal of Political Science, 43, 673–701.
Granovetter, M. (1985). Economic action and social structure: The problem of embeddedness. American Journal of Sociology, 91, 481–510.
Grant, W., & MacNamara, A. (1995). When policy communities intersect: The case of agriculture and banking. Political Studies, 43, 509–515.
Gray, V. (1973). Innovation in the states: A diffusion study. The American Political Science Review, 67, 1174–1185.
Greener, I. (2002). Understanding NHS reform: The policy transfer, social learning and path-dependency perspective. Governance, 15(2), 161–183.
Gress, F. (1996). Interstate cooperation and territorial representation in intermestic politics. Publius, 26, 53–71.
Greve, H. R. (1995). Jumping ship: The diffusion of strategy abandonment. Administrative Science Quarterly, 40, 444–473.
Grossback, L. J., Nicholson-Crotty, S., & Peterson, D. A. M. (2004). Ideology and learning in policy diffusion. American Politics Research, 32(5), 521–545.
Grupp, F. W., & Richards, A. R. (1975). Variations in elite perceptions of American states in referents for public policy making. American Political Science Review, 69(3), 850–858.
Gunningham, N., & Sinclair, D. (1991). Regulatory pluralism: Designing policy mixes for environmental protection. Law and Policy, 21(1), 49–76.
Guston, D. H. (2000). Between politics and science. Assuring the integrity and productivity of research. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Haas, E. (1957). The uniting of Europe. Palo Alto, CA: Stanford University Press.
Haas, P. M. (1992). Introduction: Epistemic communities and international policy coordination. International Organization, 46(1), 1–35.
Hägerstrand, T. (1952). The propagation of innovation waves (Lund Studies in Human Geography, No. 4). University of Lund, Lund, Sweden.
Hägerstrand, T. (1953). On Monte Carlo simulation of diffusion. In W. L. Garrison & D. F. Marble (Eds.), Quantitative geography, part 1, economic and cultural topics (Northwestern Studies in Geography Number 13). Department of Geography, Northwestern University, Evanston, IL.
Hägerstrand, T. (1965). A Monte Carlo approach to diffusion. European Journal of Sociology, 6(1), 43–67.
Hägerstrand, T. (1966). Aspects of the spatial structure of social communication and the diffusion of information. Papers of the Regional Science Association, 16, 27–42.
Hägerstrand, T. (1967). Innovation diffusion as a spatial process. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
Hägerstrand, T. (1970). What about people in regional science? Papers of the Regional Science Association, 24, 7–21.
Hägerstrand, T. (1985). Time geography: Focus on the corporeality of man, society and the environment. In S. Aida (Ed.), The science and praxis of complexity (pp. 193–216). Tokyo: United Nations University.
Haggett, P. (1965). Locational analysis in human geography. London: Edward Arnold.
Haider-Markel, D. P. (2001). Policy diffusion as a geographical expansion of the scope of political conflict: Same-sex marriage bans in the 1990s. State Politics and Policy Quarterly, 1, 5–26.
Haining, R. (1982). Interaction models and spatial diffusion processes. Geographical Analysis, 14(2), 95–108.
Hale, T., & Roger, C. (2012, January). Domestic politics and transnational climate governance: A research agenda. Earth Systems Governance Conference, Tokyo.
Hall, P. A. (1993). Policy paradigms, social learning, and the state: The case of economic policymaking in Britain. Comparative Politics, 25(3), 275–296.
Handl, V. (2005). Choosing between China and Europe? Virtual inspiration and policy transfer in the programmatic development of the Czech Communist Party. Journal of Communist and Transition Politics, 21(1), 123–141.
Hannay, A. (1972). Freedom and plastic control. Canadian Journal of Philosophy, 11(2), 277–296.
Harvey, D. (1967). Models of the evolution of spatial patterns in human geography. In R. J. Chorley & P. Haggett (Eds.), Models in geography. London: Edward Arnold.
Harvey, D. (1969). Explanation in geography. London: Edward Arnold.
Hatani, F. (2016). Institutional plasticity in public-private interactions: Why Japan’s port reform failed. Journal of World Business, 51, 923–936.
Healey, P. (1997). Collaborative planning. Shaping places in fragmented societies. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
Heichel, S., Pape, J., & Sommerer, T. (2005). Is there convergence in convergence research? An overview of empirical studies on policy convergence. Journal of European Public Policy, 12(5), 817–840.
Heide, J., & John, G. (1990). Alliances in industrial purchasing: The determinants of joint action in buyer-supplier relationships. Journal of Marketing Research, 27, 24–36.
Heide, J., & John, G. (1992). Do norms matter in marketing relationships? Journal of Marketing, 56, 32–44.
Henisz, W. J., Zelner, B. A., & Guillén, M. F. (2005). The worldwide diffusion of market-orientated infrastructure reform, 1977–1999. American Sociological Review, 70, 871–897.
Hernes, G. (1972). The process of entry into first marriage. American Sociological Review, 37, 173–182.
Herod, A. (1991). The production of scale in United States labour relations. Area, 23, 82–88.
Herod, A. (1997a). From a geography of labor to a labor geography: Labor’s spatial fix and the geography of capitalism. Antipode, 29, 1–31.
Herod, A. (1997b). Labor as an agent of globalization and as a global agent. In K. R. Cox (Ed.), Spaces of globalization: Reasserting the power of the local (pp. 167–200). New York: Guilford Press.
Hey, C., Nijkamp, P., Rienstra, S., & Rothenberger, D. (1997). Assessing scenarios on european transport policies by means of multicriteria analysis. ECON Papers, 97-086 III, Tinbergen Institute Discussion Papers, Amsterdam.
Hoberg, G. (1991). Sleeping with an elephant. The American influence on Canadian environmental regulation. Journal of Public Policy, 11, 107–132.
Hodgen, M. T. (1942). Geographical diffusion as a criterion of age. American Anthropologist, 44(3), 345–368.
Hodson, M., & Marvin, S. (2010). Can cities shape socio-technical transitions and how would we know if they were? Research Policy, 39, 477–485.
Holden, C. (2009). Exporting public-private partnerships in healthcare: Export strategy and policy transfer. Policy Studies, 30(3), 313–332.
Holly, S., Pesaran, M. H., & Yamagata, T. (2011). The spatial and temporal diffusion of house prices in the UK. Journal of Urban Economics, 69, 2–23.
Holzinger, K., Knill, C., & Sommerer, T. (2008). Environmental policy convergence: The impact of international harmonization, transnational communication, and regulatory competition. International Organization, 62, 553–587.
Hough, D. (2005). Learning from the west: Policy transfer and programmatic change in the communist successor parties of Eastern Europe. Journal of Communist Studies and Transition Politics, 21(1), 1–15.
Howlett, M. (2000). Beyond legalism? Policy ideas, implementation styles and emulation based convergence in Canada and US environmental policy. Journal of Public Policy, 20(3), 305–329.
Howlett, M., & Rayner, J. (2007). Design principles for policy mixes; cohesion and coherence in ’New Governance Arrangements’. Policy and Society, 26(4), 1–18.
Hudson, J. C. (1969). Diffusion in a central place system. Geographical Analysis, 1(1), 45–58.
Hudson, R. (2007). Regions and regional uneven development forever? Some reflective comments upon theory and practice. Regional Studies, 41, 1149–1161.
Huttenen, S., Kivimaa, P., & Virkamaki, V. (2014). The need for policy coherence to trigger a transition to biogas production. Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions, 12, 14–30.
Ikenberry, J. G. (1990). The international spread of privatization policies: Inducements, learning and ‘policy band wagoning’. In E. Suleiman & J. Waterbury (Eds.), The political economy of public sector reform and privatization. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
IPAA. (2002). Working together—Integrated governance. Institute of Public Administration Australia, Barton, Australia.
Ivanova, V., & Evans, M. (2004). Policy transfer in a transition state: The case of local government reform in the Ukraine. In M. Evans (Ed.), Policy transfer in global perspective (pp. 95–112). Aldershot: Ashgate.
Jacob, P. E., & Teune, H. (1964). The integrative process. In P. E. Jacob & J. V. Toscano (Eds.), The integration of political communities. Philadelphia PA: J. B. Lippincott Co.
Jahn, D. (2006). Globalization as ‘Galton’s Problem’: The missing link in the analysis of diffusion patterns in welfare state development. International Organization, 60, 401–431.
James, O., & Lodge, M. (2003). The limitations of ‘policy transfer’ and ‘lesson drawing’ for public policy. Political Studies Review, 1, 179–193.
Jameson, F. (1991). Postmodernism or the cultural logic of late capitalism. London: Verso Press.
Jann, W. (1983). Regieren im Netzwerk der Regionen—Das Beispiel Ostseeregion. In C. Bohret & G. Weder (Eds.), Regieren im 21. Jahrhundert—Zwischen Globalisierung und Regionalisieren. Opladen: Lecke and Budrich.
Jenkins-Smith, H., & Sabatier, P. (Eds.). (1993). Policy change and learning: An advocacy coalition approach. Oxford: Westview Press.
Jervis, R. (1991). Domino beliefs and strategic behavior. In R. Jervis & J. Snyder (Eds.), Dominos and bandwagons. Strategic beliefs and great power competition in the Eurasian Heartland (pp. 20–50). New York: Oxford University Press.
Jessop, A. (1994a). Post-Fordism and the state. In A. Amin (Ed.), Post-Fordism. A reader (pp. 280–315). Oxford: Blackwell.
Jessop, A. (1994b). The transition to Post-Fordism and the Schumpeterian workfare state. In R. Burrows & B. Loader (Eds.), Towards a Post-Fordist Welfare State (pp. 13–37). London: Routledge.
Jessop, B. (2000). The crisis of the national spatio-temporal fix and the tendential ecological dominance of globalizing capital. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 24(2), 331–360.
Jessop, B. (2003). Governance and meta-governance: On reflexivity, requisite variety and requisite irony. In P. Bang (Ed.), Governance as social and political communication (pp. 101–116). Manchester: Manchester University Press.
Jochim, A. E., & May, P. J. (2010). Beyond subsystems: Policy regimes and governance. Policy Studies Journal, 38(2), 303–327.
Jordan, G., & Halpin, D. (2006). The political costs of policy coherence: Constructing a rural policy for Scotland. Journal of Public Policy, 26(1), 21–41.
Jordan, A., & Huitema, D. (2014). Innovations in climate policy: The politics of invention, diffusion and evaluation. Environmental Politics, 23(5), 715–734.
Jordana, J., & Levi-Faur, D. (2005). The diffusion of regulatory capitalism in Latin America: Sectoral and national channels in the making of a new order. The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 598, 102–124.
Jordana, J., Levi-Faur, D., & Marin, X. F. (2011). The global diffusion of regulatory agencies: Channels of transfer and stages of diffusion. Comparative Political Studies, 44(10), 1343–1369.
Jörgens, H. (2000, December). The diffusion of environmental policy innovations—Preliminary findings from an international workshop. Diffusion of Environmental Policy Innovations Workshop, Berlin, 8–9 December.
Kantor, P. (2008). Varieties of city regionalism and the quest for political cooperation: A comparative perspective. Urban Research and Practice, 1(2), 111–129.
Kaufmann, V., Jemelin, C., Pflieger, G., & Pattaroni, L. (2008). Socio-political analysis of French transport policies: The state of the practices. Transport Policy, 15(1), 12–22.
Kasperson, R. E., & Minghi, J. V. (1969). The structure of political geography. Chicago, IL: Aldine Publishing Company.
Katz, E., Levin, M. L., & Hamilton, H. (1963). Traditions of research in the diffusion of innovations. American Sociological Review, 28, 237–252.
Keast, R., Mandell, M., & Brown, K. (2006). Mixing state, market and network governance modes. The role of government in ‘crowded’ policy domains. International Journal of Organisation Theory and Behaviour, 9(1), 27–50.
Kelly, P. F. (1997). Globalization, power, and the politics of scale in the Philippines. Geoforum, 28, 151–171.
Kenos, P., & Raab, J. (2003, October). Wanted: A good network theory of policy making. In 7th National Public Management Conference. Washington, DC, 9–10 October.
Keohane, R. O., & Nye, J. (1998). Power and interdependence in the information age. Foreign Affairs, 77(5), 81–94.
Kern, K., Koll, C., & Schophaus, M. (2007). The diffusion of local agenda 21 in Germany: Comparing the German Federal states. Environmental Politics, 16(4), 604–624.
King, A. D. (1980). Exporting planning: The colonial and neo-colonial experience. In G. E. Cherry (Ed.), Shaping an Urban World: Planning in the twentieth century (pp. 203–226). London: Mansell.
Kivimaa, P., & Virkamaki, V. (2014). Policy mixes, policy interplay and low carbon transitions: The case of passenger transport in Finland. Environmental Policy and Governance, 24, 28–41.
Klingman, D. (1980). Temporal and spatial diffusion in the comparative analysis of social change. American Political Science Review, 74(1), 123–137.
Knill, C. (2005). Introduction: Cross-national policy convergence: Concepts, approaches and explanatory factors. Journal of European Public Policy, 12(5), 764–774.
Knoepfel, P., & Kissling-Naf, I. (1998). Social learning in policy networks. Policy and Politics, 26(3), 343–367.
Koontz, T. M. (2014). Social learning in collaborative watershed planning: The importance of process control and efficacy. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, 57(10), 1572–1593.
Kousser, T. (2005). Term limits and the dismantling of state legislative professionalism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Krasner, S. D. (Ed.). (1982). International regimes. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
Krasner, S. D. (1993). In ideas and foreign policy. In J. Goldstein & R. Keohane (Eds.), Westphalia (pp. 235–264). Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
Kubin, V. V. (1979). Opposition or juxtaposition. Soviet Studies, 31(1), 124–131.
Ladi, S. (2004). Environmental policy transfer in Germany and Greece. In M. Evans (Ed.), Policy transfer in global perspective (pp. 79–94). Aldershot: Ashgate.
Lambooij, M. S., Engelfriet, P., & Westert, G. P. (2010). Diffusion of innovations in health care: Does the structural context determine its direction? International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care, 26(4), 415–420.
Lana, X., & Evans, M. (2004). Policy transfer between developing countries: The transfer of the Bolsa-Escola Programme to Ecuador. In M. Evans (Ed.), Policy transfer in global perspective (pp. 190–210). Aldershot: Ashgate.
Larmour, P. (2002). Policy transfer and reversal: Customary land registration from Africa to Melanesia. Public Administration and Development, 22, 151–161.
Lasuen, J. R. (1973). Urbanization and development—The temporal interaction between geographical and sectoral clusters. Urban Studies, 10, 163–198.
Laumann, E. O., & Knoke, D. (1987). The organizational state: Social choice in National Policy Domains. Madison, WI: University of Wisconsin Press.
Lavenex, S. (2002). EU enlargement and the challenge of policy transfer: The case of refugee policy. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 28(4), 701–721.
Lee, C. K., & Strang, D. (2006). The international diffusion of public-sector downsizing: Network emulation and theory-driven learning. International Organization, 60, 883–909.
Leeson, P. T., & Dean, A. M. (2009). The democratic domino theory: An empirical investigation. American Journal of Political Science, 53(3), 533–551.
Legro, J. W. (2000). The transformation of policy ideas. American Journal of Political Science, 44(3), 419–432.
Le Meur, P.-Y., Horowitz, L. S., & Mennesson, T. (2013). ‘Horizontal’ and ‘vertical’ diffusion. The cumulative influence of Impact and Benefit Agreements (IBAs) on mining policy-production in New Caledonia. Resources Policy, 38, 648–656.
Lenntorp, B. (2004). Publications by Torsten Hägerstrand 1938–2004. Geografiska Annaler, 86B, 327–334.
Lenschow, A., Newig, J., & Challies, E. (2016). Globalization’s limits to the environmental state? Integrating telecoupling into global environmental governance. Environmental Politics, 25(1), 136–159.
Levi-Faur, D. (2005). The political economy of legal globalization: Juridification, adversarial legalism and responsive regulation. A comment. International Organization, 59(2), 451–462.
Levy, D. A. L. (1997). Regulating digital broadcasting in Europe: The limits of policy convergence. West European Politics, 20(4), 24–42.
Li, R. P. Y., & Thompson, W. R. (1975). The ‘coup contagion’ hypothesis. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 19, 63–88.
Linos, K. (2006). When do policy innovations spread? Lessons for advocates of lesson-drawing. Harvard Law Review, 119, 1407–1478.
Liu, J. (2013). Forest sustainability in China and implications for a telecoupled world. Asia and the Pacific Policy Studies, 1(1), 230–250.
Lodge, M. (2003). Institutional choice and policy transfer: Reforming British and German railway regulation. Governance, 16(2), 159–178.
Lok, J., & de Rond, M. (2013). On the plasticity of institutions: Containing and restoring practice breakdowns at the Cambridge University Boat Club. Academy of Management Journal, 56(1), 185–207.
Macneil, I. R. (1978). Contracts: Adjustment of long-term economic relations under classical, neo-classical and relational contract law. Northwestern University Law Review, 72, 854–905.
Macneil, I. R. (1980). The new social contract: An enquiry into modern contractual relations. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
Majone, G. (1989). Evidence, argument and persuasion in the policy process. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
Majone, G. (1991). Cross-national sources of regulatory policy making in Europe and the United States. Journal of Public Policy, 11, 79–106.
Makkonen, M., Huttunen, S., Primmer, E., Repo, A., & Hilden, M. (2015). Policy coherence in climate change mitigation: An ecosystem service approach to forests as carbon sinks and bioenergy sources. Forest Policy and Economics, 50, 153–162.
Makse, T., & Volden, C. (2011). The role of policy attributes in the diffusion of innovations. The Journal of Politics, 73(1), 108–124.
Mallory, T. G. (2016). Fisheries subsidies in China: Quantitative and qualitative assessment of policy coherence and effectiveness. Marine Policy, 68, 74–82.
Mangat, R. (2001). The death of distance? Globalism in international relations. E-Merge, 2, 1–13.
Marsden, G., & Stead, D. (2011). Policy transfer and learning in the field of transport: A review of concepts and evidence. Transport Policy, 18, 492–500.
Marsden, G., Frick, K. T., May, A. D., & Deakin, E. (2011). How do cities approach policy innovation and policy learning? A study of 30 policies in Northern Europe and North America. Transport Policy, 18, 501–512.
Marsden, T., & Jonathan, M. (1998). Editorial: The shifting nature of rural governance and community participation. Journal of Rural Studies, 14(1), 1–4.
Marsh, D., & Sharman, J. C. (2009). Policy diffusion and policy transfer. Policy Studies, 30(3), 269–288.
Martin-Nagle, R., Howard, E., Wiltse, A., & Duncan, D. (2012). Conference synopsis. In Bonn 2011 Conference The Water, Energy and Food Nexus. Solutions for the Green Economy, 16–18 November, Federal Ministry for the Environment, Nature, Conservation and Nuclear Safety (BMU), and Federal Ministry for Economic Cooperation and Development (BMZ), Berlin, Germany.
Massey, A. (2009). Policy mimesis in the context of global governance. Policy Studies, 30(3), 383–395.
Massey, D. (1991). A global sense of place. Marxism Today, 24–29 June.
Massey, D. (1994). Space, place and gender. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Massey, D. (2004). Geographies of responsibility. Geografiska Annaler, 86B, 5–18.
Matisoff, D. C., & Edwards, J. (2014). Kindred spirits or intergovernmental competition? The innovation and diffusion of energy policies in the American states (1990–2008). Environmental Politics, 23(5), 795–817.
May, A. D., Kelly, C., & Shepherd, S. (2006a). The principles of integration in urban transport strategies. Transport Policy, 13(4), 319–327.
May, P. J. (1992). Policy learning and failure. Journal of Public Policy, 12(4), 331–354.
May, P. J., Jones, B. D., Beem, B., Neff-Sharum, E. A., & Poague, M. K. (2005). Policy coherence and component-driven policymaking: Arctic policy in Canada and the United States. Policy Studies Journal, 33(1), 37–63.
May, P. J., Sapotichne, J., & Workman, S. (2006b). Policy coherence and policy domains. Policy Studies Journal, 34(3), 381–403.
Mayo, M. (2000). Cultures, communities, identities: Cultural strategies for participation and empowerment. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
McCool, D. (1989). Subgovernments and the impact of policy fragmentation and accommodation. Policy Studies Review, 8(4), 264–287.
McGrew, T. (1992). A global society? In S. Hall, D. Held, & T. McGrew (Eds.), Modernity and its futures (pp. 61–116). Cambridge: Polity Press.
McVoy, E. C. (1940). Patterns of diffusion in the United States. American Sociological Review, 5, 219–227.
Meijers, E. (2005). Polycentric Urban Regions and the quest for synergy: Is a network of cities more than the sum of the parts? Urban Studies, 42(4), 765–781.
Menzel, D. C., & Feller, I. (1977). Leadership and interaction patterns in the diffusion of innovations among the American states. The Western Political Quarterly, 30(4), 528–536.
Meseguer, C. (2004). What role for learning? The diffusion of privatisation in OECD and Latin American countries. Journal of Public Policy, 24(3), 299–325.
Meseguer, C. (2005). Policy learning, policy diffusion and the making of a new order. Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Sciences, 598, 67–82.
Meseguer, C., & Gilardi, F. (2005). What is new in the study of diffusion? Paper presented at the Annual Convention of the International Studies Association, Honolulu, 1–5 March.
Meuleman, L. (2010). The cultural dimension of metagovernance: Why governance doctrines may fail. Public Organization Review, 10, 49–79.
Mickwitz, P., & Kivimaa, P. (2007). Evaluating policy integration. The case of policies for environmentally friendlier technological innovations. Evaluation, 13(1), 68–86.
Midlarsky, M. I. (1970). Mathematical models of instability and a theory of diffusion. International Studies Quarterly, 14, 60–84.
Midlarsky, M. I. (1975). On war. New York: Free Press.
Midlarsky, M. I. (1978). Analyzing diffusion and contagion effects: The urban disorders of the 1960s. American Political Science Review, 72(3), 996–1008.
Minitrom, M. (1997). Policy entrepreneurs and the diffusion of innovation. American Journal of Political Science, 41(3), 738–770.
Mooney, C. Z. (2001). Modeling regional effects on state policy diffusion. Political Research Quarterly, 54(1), 103–124.
Mooney, C. Z., & Lee, M.-H. (1995). Legislative morality in the American states: The case of pre-Roe abortion regulation reform. American Journal of Political Science, 39(3), 599–627.
Mooney, C. Z., & Lee, M.-H. (1999). The temporal diffusion of morality policy: The case of death penalty legislation in the American states. Policy Studies Journal, 27(4), 766–780.
Morgan, K. (2007). The polycentric state: New spaces of empowerment and engagement? Regional Studies, 41(9), 1237–1251.
Morrill, R. L. (1968). Waves of spatial diffusion. Journal of Regional Science, 8(1), 1–18.
Morrill, R. L. (1970). The shape of diffusion in space and time. Economic Geography, 46, 259–268.
Morrill, R. (1985). The diffusion of the use of tractors again. Geographical Analysis, 17(1), 88–94.
Morrill, R. L. (2005). Hägerstrand and the ‘quantitative revolution’: A personal appreciation. Progress in Human Geography, 29, 333–336.
Mossberger, K., & Wolman, H. (2003). Policy transfer as a form of prospective policy evaluation: Challenges and recommendations. Public Administration Review, 63(4), 428–440.
Most, B. A. (1973). Testing for geographic contagion: A cross-national study of nine types of violent events, Latin America 1946–1965. Department of Political Science, Indiana University, Bloomington, IN.
Most, B. A., & Starr, H. (1980). Diffusion, reinforcement, geopolitics and the spread of war. American Political Science Review, 74(4), 932–946.
Moulaert, F., Swyngedouw, E., & Wilson, P. (1988). Spatial responses to Fordist and Post-Fordist accumulation and regulation. Papers of the Regional Studies Association, 64, 11–23.
Murphey, R. (1966). China and the dominoes. Asian Survey, 6(9), 510–515.
Nakano, K. (2004). Cross-national transfer of policy studies: Agencification in Britain and Japan. Governance, 17(2), 169–188.
Nasr, J., & Volait, M. (Eds.). (2003). Urbanism—Imported or exported: Native aspirations and foreign plans. Chichester: Wiley.
Nedley, A. (2004). Policy transfer and the developing country experience gap: Taking a southern perspective. In M. Evans (Ed.), Policy transfer in global perspective (pp. 165–189). Aldershot: Ashgate.
Newmark, A. J. (2002). An integrated approach to policy transfer and diffusion. The Review of Policy Research, 19(2), 152–178.
Nilsson, M., Zamparutti, T., Petersen, J. E., Nykvist, B., Rudberg, P., & McGuinn, J. (2012). Understanding policy coherence: Analytical framework and examples of sector-environment policy interactions in the EU. Environmental Policy and Governance, 22, 395–423.
Noordewier, T., John, G., & Nevin, J. (1990). Performance outcomes of purchasing arrangements in industrial buyer-vendor arrangements. Journal of Marketing, 54, 80–93.
Nooteboom, B. (1999). Inter-firm alliances: Analysis and design. London: Routledge.
Nooteboom, B. (2000). Learning and innovation in organizations and economies. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Notteboom, T., De Langen, P., & Jacobs, W. (2013). Institutional plasticity and path dependence in seaports: Interactions between institutions, port governance reforms and port authority routines. Journal of Transport Geography, 27, 26–35.
Nykvist, B., & Whitmarsh, L. (2008). A multi-level analysis of sustainable mobility transitions: Niche development in the UK and Sweden. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 75, 1373–1387.
Oberlack, C., Boillat, S., Bronnimann, S., Gerber, J., Heinemann, A., Speranza, C. I., et al. (2018). Polycentric governance in telecoupled resource systems. Ecology and Society, 23, 1.
Oberthür, S., & Stokke, O. S. (2011). Managing Institutional Complexity: Regime interplay and global environmental change. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
OECD. (2007). Instrument mixes for environmental policy. Paris: OECD.
O’Loughlin, J. O., Ward, M. D., Lofdahl, C. L., Cohen, J. S., Brown, D. S., Reilly, D., et al. (1998). The diffusion of democracy, 1946–1994. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 88(4), 545–574.
Olsen, G. R. (2000). Book review: Policy coherence in development co-operation. In J. Forster & O. Stokke (Eds.), Journal of International Development, 12, 1051–1052.
Ormrod, R. K. (1990). Local context and innovation diffusion in a well-connected world. Economic Geography, 66(2), 109–122.
Orsini, A., Morin, J.-F., & Young, O. (2013). Regime complexes: A buzz, a boom, or a boost for global governance? Global Governance, 19, 27–39.
Paquet, G. (1999). Governance through social learning. Ottawa: University of Ottawa Press.
Parola, F., Ferrari, C., Tei, A., Satta, G., & Musso, E. (2017). Dealing with multi-scalar embeddedness and institutional divergence: Evidence from the renovation of Italian port governance. Research in Transportation Business and Management, 22, 89–99.
Paterson, W. E., & Sloam, J. (2005). Learning from the west; policy transfer and political parties. Journal of Communist Studies and Transition Politics, 21(1), 33–47.
Peck, J. (2011). Geographies of policy: From transfer-diffusion to mobility-mutation. Progress in Human Geography, 35(6), 773–797.
Peck, J., & Theodore, N. (2010). Mobilizing policy: Models, methods, and mutations. Geoforum, 41, 169–174.
Peck, J., & Tickell, A. (1994). Something for a new institutional fix: The after-Fordist crisis and the global-local disorder. In A. Amin (Ed.), Post-fordism. A reader (pp. 280–315). Oxford: Blackwell.
Pedersen, P. O. (1970). Innovation diffusion within and between national urban systems. Geographical Analysis, 2(3), 203–254.
Pemberton, H. E. (1936). Culture diffusion gradients. American Journal of Sociology, 42, 226–233.
Perlmutter, H. V. (1991). On the rocky road to the first global civilization. Human Relations, 44(9), 897–1010.
Perri 6. (2004). Joined-up government in the western world in comparative perspective; a preliminary literature review and exploration. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 14(1), 103–138.
Persson, O., & Ellegård, K. (2012). Torsten Hägerstrand in the citation time web. The Professional Geographer, 64(2), 250–261.
Peters, G. (1998). Managing horizontal government; the politics of co-ordination. Public Administration, 76, 295–311.
Peters, G. (2007) The Meta-Governance of Policy Networks; Steering at a Distance but Still Steering, Working Paper 78/2007, Universidad de Pittsburgh, Madrid.
Picciotto, R. (2005). The evaluation of policy coherence for development. Evaluation, 11(3), 311–330.
Pierce, P. A., & Miller, D. E. (1999). Variations in the diffusion of state lottery adoptions; how revenue dedication changes morality politics. Policy Studies Journal, 27(4), 696–706.
Pierson, P. (2000a). Increasing returns, path dependence and the study of politics. American Political Science Review, 94, 251–267.
Pierson, P. (2000b). The limits of design: Explaining institutional origins and change. Governance, 13, 475–499.
Pike, A. (2007). Editorial: Whither regional studies? Regional Studies, 41(9), 1143–1148.
Platteau, J. P., & Abraham, A. (2002). Participatory development in the presence of endogenous community imperfections. Journal of Development Studies, 39(2), 104–136.
Polsby, N. (1984). Political innovation in America. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
Popper, K. (1972). Objective Knowledge. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Poppo, L., & Zenger, T. (2002). Do formal contracts and relational governance function as substitutes or complements? Strategic Management Journal, 23, 707–725.
Pred, A. B. (1975). Diffusion, organizational spatial structure, and city-system development. Economic Geography, 51(3), 252–268.
Prince, R. (2010). Policy transfer as policy assemblage: Making policy for the creative industries in New Zealand. Environment and Planning A, 42, 169–186.
Putnam, R. (1988). Diplomacy and domestic politics: The logic of two level games. International Organization, 42(3), 427–460.
Radaelli, C. (2000). Policy transfer in the European Union: Institutional isomorphism as a source of legitimacy. Governance, 13(1), 25–43.
Randma-Liiv, T. (2005). Demand and supply based policy transfer in Estonian public administration. Journal of Baltic Studies, 36(4), 467–487.
Rapoport, A. (1960). Fights, games and debates. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.
Ratzel, F. (1891). Anthropogeographie. Stuttgart: J. Engelhorn.
Rehák, S., Hudec, O., &Buček, M. (2013). Path dependency and path plasticity in emerging industries. Two cases from Slovakia. Zeitschrift für Wirtschaftsgeographie 57(1/2), 52–56.
Ringquist, E. J. (1993). Environmental protection at the state level: Politics and progress in controlling pollution. Armonk, NY: M. E. Sharpe.
Rist, S., Chidambaranathan, M., Escobar, C., Wiesmann, U., & Zimmermann, A. (2007). Moving from sustainable management to sustainable governance of natural resources: The role of social learning processes in rural India, Bolivia and Mali. Journal of Rural Studies, 23, 23–37.
Rodgers, D. T. (1998). Atlantic crossings: Social politics in a progressive age. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Roe, M. (2009). Maritime governance and policy-making failure in the European Union. International Journal of Shipping and Transport Logistics, 1(1), 1–19.
Roe, M. (2013). Maritime governance and policy-making. Heidelberg: Springer.
Roe, M. S. (2016). Maritime governance: Speed, flow, form, process. London: Springer.
Rogers, E. M. (1962). Diffusion of innovations. New York: Free Press.
Rose, G. (1999). Performing space. In D. Massey, J. Allen, & P. Sarre (Eds.), Human geography today (pp. 247–259). Cambridge: Polity Press.
Rose, R. (1991). What is lesson drawing? Journal of Public Policy, 11(1), 3–30.
Rose, R. (1993). Lesson drawing in public policy: A guide to learning across time and space. Chatham, NJ: Chatham House.
Rosenau, J. (Ed.). (1969). Linkage politics: Essays on the convergence of national and international systems. New York: Free Press.
Russett, B. M. (1967). International regions and the international system: A study in political ecology. Chicago, IL: Rand McNally.
Ryan, B., & Gross, N. (1943). The diffusion of hybrid seed corn in two Iowa communities. Rural Sociology, 8, 15–24.
Santos, G., Behrendt, H., & Teytelboym, A. (2010). Part II: Policy instruments for sustainable road transport. Research in Transportation Economics, 28, 46–91.
Sartori, G. (1997). Comparative constitutional engineering. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
Saunier, P.-Y. (1999). Changing the city: Urban international information and the Lyon municipality. Planning Perspectives, 14, 19–48.
Savage, R. L. (1985). Diffusion research traditions and the spread of policy innovations in a federal system. Publius, 15, 1–12.
Sayer, A. (2004). Seeking the geographies of power. Economy and Society, 33(2), 255–270.
Schechter, J. (2011). Juxtaposition: A new way to combine logics. The Review of Symbolic Logic, 4(4), 560–606.
Schleifer, P. (2013). Orchestrating sustainability: The case of European Union biofuel governance. Regulation and Governance, 7, 533–546.
Schmidt, F. (2013). Governing planetary boundaries: Limiting or enabling conditions for transitions towards sustainability? In L. Meuleman (Ed.), Transgovernance. Advancing sustainability governance (pp. 215–234). Berlin: Springer.
Schmitter, P. C. (1974). Still the century of corporatism? Review of Politics, 36(1), 85–131.
Schneider, A., & Ingram, H. (1988). Systematically pinching ideas: A comparative approach to policy design. Journal of Public Policy, 8, 61–80.
Scholte, J. A. (1996). Beyond the buzzword: Towards a critical theory of globalization. In E. Korfman & G. Youngs (Eds.), Globalization Theory and Practice. Cassel, London.
Scholte, J. A. (2000). Global civil society. In N. Woods (Ed.), The political economy of globalization. London: Macmillan.
Scobie, M. (2016). Policy coherence in climate governance in Caribbean small island developing states. Environmental Science and Policy, 58, 16–28.
Scott, W. R. (1987). Organizations: Rational, natural and open systems. Englewood, NJ: Prentice Hall.
Scrase, J. I., & Sheate, W. R. (2002). Integration and integrated approaches to assessment: What do they mean for the environment? Journal of Environmental Policy and Planning, 4, 4.
Searle, J. (1995). The construction of social reality. New York: The Free Press.
Seto, K. C., Reenberg, A., Boone, C., Fragkias, M., Haase, D., Langanke, T., et al. (2012). Urban land telecommunications and sustainability. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 109(20), 7687–7692.
Sheller, M., & Urry, J. (2006). The new mobilities paradigm. Environment and Planning A, 38, 207–226.
Shipan, C. R., & Volden, C. (2008). The mechanisms of policy diffusion. American Journal of Political Science, 52(4), 840–857.
Sidaway, J. D. (1994). Political geography in the time of cyberspaces: New agendas. Geoforum, 25(4), 487–503.
Signorino, C. (1999). Strategic interaction and the statistical analysis of international conflict. American Political Science Review, 92, 279–298.
Simmons, B. A., & Elkins, (2004). The globalization of liberalization: Policy diffusion in the international political economy. American Political Science Review, 98(1), 171–189.
Simmons, B. A., Dobbin, F., & Garrett, G. (2006). Introduction: The international diffusion of liberalism. International Organization, 60(4), 781–810.
Simmons, B. A., Dobbin, F., & Garrett, G. (2008). Introduction: The diffusion of liberalization. In B. A. Simmons, F. Dobbin, & G. Garrett (Eds.), The global diffusion of markets and democracy (pp. 1–63). New York: Cambridge University Press.
Simmons, G., Giraldo, J. E. D., Truong, Y., & Palmer, M. (2018). Uncovering the link between governance as an innovation process and socio-economic regime transition in cities. Research Policy, 47, 241–251.
Silverson, R. M., & Starr, H. (1989). World politics: The menu for choice. New York: Freeman.
Skelcher, C. (2005). Jurisdictional integrity, polycentrism, and the design of democratic governance. Governance, 18(1), 89–110.
Skillnäs, N. (1999). Modified innovation diffusion—A way to explain the diffusion of cholera in Linköping in 1866? A study in methods. Geografiska Annaler, 81B, 243–260.
Slater, J. (1987). Dominos in central America, will they fall? Does it matter? International Security, 12(2), 105–134.
Smith, N. (1992a). Contours of a spatialised politics: Homeless vehicles and the production of geographical scale. Social Text, 33, 54–81.
Smith, N. (1992b). Geography, difference and the politics of scale. In J. Doherty, E. Graham, & M. Malek (Eds.), Postmodernism and the social sciences (pp. 57–79). London: Macmillan.
Smith, N. (1993). Homeless/global: Scaling places. In J. Bird, B. Curtis, T. Putnam, G. Robertson, & L. Tickner (Eds.), Mapping the futures, local cultures, global change (pp. 87–119). London: Routledge.
Smith, N. (1996). Spaces of vulnerability: The space of flows and the politics of scale. Critique of Anthropology, 16, 63–77.
Smith, T. M., & Fischlein, M. (2010). Rival private governance networks: Competing to define the rules of sustainability performance. Global Environmental Change, 20, 511–522.
Snyder, J. (1991). Introduction. In R. Jervis & J. Snyder (Eds.), Dominos and bandwagons. Strategic beliefs and great power competition in the eurasian heartland (pp. 3–19). New York: Oxford University Press.
Snyder, J. L., & Jervis, R. (1993). Coping with complexity in the international system, pew studies in economics and security. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
Söderborg, C. (2008). Much ado about nothing? Energy forest cultivation in Sweden: How intersectoral policy coordination affects outcomes from EPI in multisectoral issues. Journal of Environmental Policy & Planning, 10(4), 381–403.
Soule, S. A., & Zylan, Y. (1997). Runaway train? The diffusion of state-level reform in ADC/AFDC eligibility requirements, 1950-1967. American Journal of Sociology, 103(3), 733–762.
Star, S. L., & Griesemer, J. R. (1989). Institutional ecology, `translations’ and boundary objects: Amateurs and professionals in Berkeley’s museum of vertebrate Zoology, 1907–39. Social Studies of Science, 19, 3.
Starr, H. (1991). Democratic dominoes. Diffusion approaches to the spread of democracy in the international system. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 35(2), 356–381.
Stead, D., de Jong, M., & Reinholde, I. (2008). Urban transport policy transfer in Central and Eastern Europe. The Planning Review, 44(172), 62–73.
Stokke, O. S. (2001). The interplay of international regimes: Putting effectiveness theory to work, FNI Report 14/2001. Lysaker, Norway: The Fridtjof Nansen Institute.
Stone, D. (1999). Learning lessons and transferring policy across time, space and disciplines. Politics, 19(1), 51–59.
Stone, D. (2000). Non-governmental policy transfer: The strategies of independent policy institutions. Governance, 13(1), 45–70.
Stone, D. (2001). Learning lessons, policy transfer and the international diffusion of policy ideas (CSGR Working Paper No. 69/01). Centre for the Study of Globalisation and Regionalisation, University of Warwick, Coventry.
Stone, D. (2004). Transfer agents and global networks in the ‘transnationalization’ of policy. Journal of European Public Policy, 11(3), 545–566.
Stone, D. (2012). Transfer and translation of policy. Policy Studies, 33(6), 483–499.
Stoutenborough, J. W., & Beverlin, M. (2008). Encouraging pollution-free energy: The diffusion of state new metering policies. Social Science Quarterly, 89(5), 1231–1251.
Strambach, S. (2008). Path dependency and path plasticity; the co-evolution of institutions and innovation—The German customized business software industry. Marburg: Philipps Universität.
Strambach, S. (2010). Path dependency and path plasticity. The co-evolution of institutions and innovation—The German customized business software industry. In R. Boschma & R. Martin (Eds.), The handbook of evolutionary economic Geography (pp. 406–429). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
Strambach, S., & Storz, C. (2008). Pfadabhängigkeit und Pfadplastizität von Innovations systemen—Die deutsche ind japanische Softwareindustrie. Vierteljahrshefte zur Wirtschaftsforschung, 77(2), 1–20.
Strang, D. (1991). Adding social structure to diffusion models. An event history framework. Sociological Methods and Research, 19(3), 324–353.
Strang, D., & Meyer, J. W. (1993). Institutional conditions for diffusion. Theory and Society, 22, 487–511.
Strang, D., & Soule, S. A. (1998). Diffusion in organizations and social movements: From hybrid corn to poison pills. Annual Review of Sociology, 24, 265–290.
Strang, D., & Tuma, N. B. (1993). Spatial and temporal heterogeneity in diffusion. American Journal of Sociology, 99(3), 614–639.
Streeck, W., & Thelen, K. A. (2005). Beyond Continuity: Institutional change in advanced political economics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Street, A. (2004). Policy transfer in Kyrgyzstan: The case of the general practice fundholding. In M. Evans (Ed.), Policy transfer in global perspective (pp. 113–127). Aldershot: Ashgate.
Stubbs, P. (2005). Stretching concepts too far? Multi-level governance, policy transfer and the politics of scale in South East Europe. Southeast European Politics, VI, 2, 66–87.
Sultan, S. E. (1987). Evolutionary implications of phenotypic plasticity in plants. Evolutionary Biology, 21, 127–178.
Sutcliffe, A. (1981). Towards the planned city. Oxford: Blackwell.
Sutherland, E. H. (1950). The diffusion of sexual psychopath laws. American Journal of Sociology, 56(2), 142–148.
Swainson, R., & de Loe, R. C. (2011). The importance of context in relation to policy transfer: A case study of environmental water allocation in Australia. Environmental Policy and Governance, 21, 58–69.
Swank, D. (2006). Tax policy in an era of internationalization: Explaining the spread of neoliberalism. International Organization, 60(4), 847–882.
Swyngedouw, E. (1997). Neither global nor local: ‘Glocalization’ and the politics of scale. In K. R. Cox (Ed.), Spaces of globalization. Reasserting the power of the local (pp. 137–166). New York: The Guilford Press.
Taafe, E. J., Morrill, R. L., & Gould, P. R. (1963). Transport expansion in undeveloped countries: A comparative analysis. Geographical Review, 53, 503–529.
Tait, M., & Campbell, H. (2000). The politics of communication between planning officers and politicians: The exercise of power through discourse. Environment and Planning A, 32(3), 489–506.
Takao, Y. (2014). Policy learning and diffusion of Tokyo’s metropolitan cap-and-trade; making a mandatory reduction of total CO2 emissions work at local scales. Policy Studies, 35(4), 319–338.
Tarde, G. (1903). The laws of imitation. New York: Holt.
Tavits, M. (2003). Policy learning and uncertainty: The case of pension reform in Estonia and Latvia. The Policy Studies Journal, 31(4), 643–657.
Teibout, C. (1956). A pure theory of local government expenditure. Journal of Political Economy, 60, 416–424.
Tews, K. (2005). The diffusion of environmental policy innovations: Cornerstones of an analytical framework. European Environment, 15, 63–79.
Tews, K., Busch, P.-O., & Jörgens, H. (2003). The diffusion of new environmental policy instruments. European Journal of Political Research, 42, 569–600.
Thede, N. (2013). Policy coherence for development and securitisation: Competing paradigms or stabilising north-south hierarchies? Third World Quarterly, 34(5), 784–799.
Thomas, E. V. (2003). Sustainable development, market paradigms and policy integration. Journal of Environmental Policy and Planning, 5(2), 201–216.
Thomas, G. M., Meyer, J. W., Ramirez, F. O., & Boli, J. (1987). Institutional structure: Constituting state, society, and the individual. Beverly, Hills, CA: Sage.
Timms, P. (2011). Urban transport policy transfer: ‘Bottom up’ and ‘top down’ perspectives. Transport Policy, 18, 513–521.
Tolbert, P. S., & Zucker, L. G. (1983). Institutional sources of change in the formal structure of organizations: The diffusion of civil service reform, 1880–1935. Administrative Science Quarterly, 28, 22–39.
Torgerson, D. (1986). Between knowledge and politics: Three faces of policy analysis. Policy Sciences, 19, 33–59.
Tribe, L. H. (1972). Policy science: Analysis or ideology? Philosophy and Public Affairs, 2(1), 66–110.
True, J., & Minitrom, M. (2001). Transnational networks and policy diffusion: The case of gender mainstreaming. International Studies Quarterly, 45, 27–57.
Truscott, D. J. (1996). Cross-cultural perspectives: Toward an integrated theory of elder abuse. Policy Studies, 17, 287–297.
Uzzi, B. (1996). The sources and consequences of embeddedness for the economic performance of organizations: The network effect. American Sociological Review, 61, 674–698.
Van Assche, K., & Djanibekov, N. (2012). Spatial planning as policy integration: The need for an evolutionary perspective. Lessons from Uzbekistan. Land Use Policy, 29, 179–186.
Van Assche, K., Beunen, R., & Duineveld, M. (2014). Evolutionary governance theory, an introduction. Heidelberg: Springer.
Van Kersbergen, K., & Van Waarden, F. (2004). ‘Governance’ as a bridge between disciplines: Cross-disciplinary inspiration regarding shifts in governance and problems of governability, accountability and legitimacy. European Journal of Political Research, 43, 143–171.
Van Waarden, F. (1992). Dimension and types of policy networks. European Journal of Political Research, 21(1–2), 29–59.
Vasseur, M. (2014). Convergence and divergence in renewable energy policy among US states from 1998 to 2011. Social Forces, 92(4), 1637–1657.
Victor, D. G. (1999). The market for international environmental services and the perils of coordination. Tokyo: United Nations University.
Viera, J., Moura, F., & Viegas, J. M. (2007). Transport policy and environmental impacts: The importance of multi-instrumentality in policy integration. Transport Policy, 14, 421–432.
Viksnins, G. J. (1979). The economic consequences of falling dominoes. Asian Survey, 15(11), 940–956.
Vonk, G., Geertman, S., & Schot, P. (2007). New technologies stuck in old hierarchies: The diffusion of geo-information technologies in Dutch public organizations. Public Administration Review, 67(4), 745–756.
Walker, J. L. (1969). The diffusion of innovations among the American states. The American Political Science Review, 63(3), 860–899.
Walker, C. (2015). From state to market; a micro analysis of factors that shape policy transfer and implementation. A case study from the Australian and South African road transport sector. In International Conference on Public Policy. Catholic State University of Sacre Cuore, Milan, Italy, 1–4 July.
Wallis, W. D. (1928). Probability and the diffusion of culture trails. American Anthropologist, New Series, 30(1), 94–106.
Waltman, J. (1980). Copying other Nation’s policies. Cambridge, MA: Schenkman.
Waltz, K. N. (1979). Theory of international politics. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley Publishing Co.
Wang, R. (2010). Shaping urban transport policies in China: Will copying foreign policies work? Transport Policy, 17, 147–152.
Ward, K. (2006). ‘Policies in motion’, urban management and state restructuring: The trans-local expansion of Business Improvement Districts. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 301, 54–75.
Ward, S. V. (2003). Learning from the US: The Americanisation of western urban planning. In J. Nasr & M. Volait (Eds.), Urbanism—Imported or exported: Native aspirations and foreign plans (pp. 83–106). Chichester: Wiley.
Ward, S. V. (2007). Cross-national learning in the formation of British planning policies 1940–99. Town Planning Review, 78(3), 369–401.
Ward, M. D., & Gleditsch, K. S. (2002). Location, location, location: An MCMC approach to modeling the spatial context of war and peace. Political Analysis, 10(3), 244–260.
Ward, K., & Jonas, A. E. G. (2004). Competitive city regionalism as a politics of space: A critical reinterpretation of the New Regionalism. Environment and Planning A, 36, 2119–2139.
Way, C. (2005). Political insecurity and the diffusion of financial market regulation. Annals of the American Association of Political and Social Science, 598, 125–144.
Weber, K. M., & Rohracher, H. (2012). Legitimizing research, technology and innovation policies for transformative change: Combining insights from innovation systems and multi-level perspective in a comprehensive ‘failures’ framework. Research Policy, 41(6), 1037–1047.
Weick, K. E. (1984). Small wins. Redefining the scale of social problems. American Psychologist, 39(1), 40–49.
Weimer, D. L. (1993). The current state of design craft: Borrowing, tinkering and problem solving. Public Administration Review, 53, 110–120.
Wejnert, B. (2002). Integrating models of diffusion of innovations: A conceptual framework. Annual Review of Sociology, 28, 297–326.
Welch, S., & Thompson, K. (1980). The impact of federal incentives on state policy innovation. American Journal of Political Science, 24(4), 715–729.
Welsh, W. A. (1984). Inter-Nation interaction and political diffusion. notes toward a conceptual framework. Annual Meeting International Studies Association, Atlanta, GA.
Wildavsky, A. (1979). The art and craft of policy analysis. London: Macmillan.
Wilson, C. A. (2000). Policy regimes and policy changes. Journal of Public Policy, 20(3), 247–271.
Wolman, H. (1992). Understanding cross-national policy transfers: The case of Britain and the US. Governance, 5(1), 27–45.
Wolman, H., & Page, E. (2002). Policy transfer among local governments: An information theory approach. Governance, 15(4), 477–501.
Young, O. R. (1996). Institutional linkages in international society: Polar perspectives. Global Governance, 2(1), 1–24.
Young, O. R. (2002). The institutional dimensions of environmental change, fit, interplay and scale. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Zahariadis, N. (2003). Complexity, coupling and the future of European integration. Review of Policy Research, 20, 285–310.
Zysman, J. (1994). How institutions create historically rooted trajectories of growth. Industrial and Corporate Change, 3(1), 243–283.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Roe, M. (2020). Positive Juxtaposition. In: Governance, Policy and Juxtaposition. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-31848-2_7
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-31848-2_7
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-31847-5
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-31848-2
eBook Packages: Political Science and International StudiesPolitical Science and International Studies (R0)