Skip to main content

Meta-materials: Threat to the Global Status Quo?

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Disruptive and Game Changing Technologies in Modern Warfare

Abstract

This chapter investigates the disruptive potential of metamaterials, synthetic nano-structured materials, which possess special physical properties that enable the user to be invisible and to evade detection. The security applications of metamaterials are to camouflage personnel, vehicles, ships, or planes from some portion of the infrared spectrum. Metamaterials have a high refractive index meaning that light ‘flows around’ the material rather than reflecting off. Successful implementation of metamaterial adaptive camouflage (MMAC) would be a paradigm shift in camouflage and anti-detection technology that could cause significant disruptions to conflict dynamics. This chapter investigates the role of metamaterials by placing it in the broader historical context of detection and anti-detection technology. By tracing the co-development of both sides of the detection arms race, a theoretical framework can be constructed. This analysis pays special attention to radar and stealth aircraft in the post WWII era. It explores concepts like deterrence, the offense defense balance, and the security dilemma. The conclusion is that anti-detection, or camouflage, technologies are generally detrimental to the international peace and detection technologies are beneficial. Metamaterials are a threat to the global status quo and are therefore a threat to the power of global and regional hegemons. Revisionist actors, primarily non-state actors, likely will benefit disproportionately from acquiring a MMAC capability but will struggle to do so due to the technical challenge of advanced R&D, particularly in the near and mid-term. The implication is that status quo powers—whom are likely to be the first to develop a viable capability—must emphasize parallel development of countermeasures and limit the negative potential of the technology’s proliferation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 109.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 139.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 139.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. McMaster HR Jr (2016) Maintaining overmatch: the future of combat vehicle modernization. Association of the United States (AUSA) Institute of Land Warfare Hot Topic: Army Ground Combat Platforms Army, 1 Nov 2016. https://www.ausa.org/events/hot-topic-army-platforms/sessions/keynote

  2. Kosal ME (2016) Future operational environment and movement and maneuver: disruptive technology for mobility, protection, and firepower. Association of the United States (AUSA) Institute of Land Warfare Hot Topic: Army Ground Combat Platforms Army, 1 Nov 2016, Arlington, VA. https://www.ausa.org/events/hot-topic-army-platforms/sessions/panel-discussion-1

  3. Kosal ME (2018) Emerging chemical and biological technologies: security & policy challenges. In: Tetris C et al (eds) Responsible conduct in chemistry research and practice: global perspectives. Oxford University Press, pp 51–68

    Google Scholar 

  4. Zheludev NI (2010) The road ahead for metamaterials. Science 328(5978):582–583

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Shang L, Zhang W, Ke X, Zhao Y (2019) Bio-inspired intelligent structural color materials. Mater Horiz 6(5):945–958

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Kosal ME (2009) Nanotechnology for chemical and biological defense. Springer Academic Publishers, New York

    Book  Google Scholar 

  7. Alitalo P, Tretyakov S (2009) Electromagnetic cloaking with metamaterials. Mater Today 12:22–29

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Chen H, Chan CT, Sheng P (2010) Transformation optics and metamaterials. Nat Mater 9:387–396

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Han T et al (2014) Full control and manipulation of heat signatures: cloaking, camouflage and thermal metamaterials. Adv Mater 26:1721–1734

    Google Scholar 

  10. Bilotti F, Tretyakov S (2013) Amorphous metamaterials and potential nanophotonics applications. In: Rockstuhl C, Scharf T (eds) Amorphous nanophotonics. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, pp 39–66

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  11. Di Falco A, Ploschner M, Krauss TF (2010) Flexible metamaterials at visible wavelengths. New J Phys 12:11306–11313

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Rogers JA, Someya T, Huang Y (2010) Materials and mechanics for stretchable electronics. Science 327:1603–1607

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Armstrong S (2012) Biophotonics: photonic crystals aid fish’s night vision. Nat Photonics 6:575

    Google Scholar 

  14. Wang N, Zhao Y, Jiang L (2010) Bioinspired synthesis and preparation of multilevel micro/nanostructured materials. Front Chem China 5:247–261

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Stuart-Fox D, Moussalli A (2009) Camouflage, communication and thermoregulation: lessons from colour changing organisms. Philos Trans R Soc B 364(1516):463–470

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Greenleaf A, Kurylev Y, Lassas M, Uhlmann G (2009) Cloaking devices, electromagnetic wormholes, and transformation optics. SIAM Rev 51(1):3–33

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Aranovich VM et al (2004) Linear and nonlinear wave propagation in negative refraction metamaterials. Phys Rev B 69:165112

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Veselago VG (1968) The electrodynamics of substances with simultaneously negative values of ε and μ. Sov Phys Usp 10:509–514. https://ufn.ru/ru/articles/1967/7/d/

  19. Pendry JB, Schurig D, Smith DR (2006) Controlling electromagnetic fields. Science 312(5781):1780–1782

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Gabrielli LH, Cardenas J, Poitras CB, Lipson M (2009) Silicon nanostructure cloak operating at optical frequencies. Nat Photonics 3(8):461–463

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Smolyaninov II, Smolyaninova VN, Kildishev AV, Shalaev VM (2009) Anisotropic metamaterials emulated by tapered waveguides: application to optical cloaking. Phys Rev Lett 102:213901

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Lee JH, Blair J, Tamma VA, Wu Q, Rhee SJ, Summers CJ, Park W (2009) Direct visualization of optical frequency invisibility cloak based on silicon nanorod array. Opt Express 17(15):12922–12928

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Valentine J, Li J, Zentgraf T, Bartal G, Zhang X (2009) An optical cloak made of dielectrics. Nat Mater 8(7):568–571

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Ergin T, Stenger N, Brenner P, Pendry JB, Wegener M (2010) Three-dimensional invisibility cloak at optical wavelengths. Science 328(5976):337–339

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Ni X, Wong ZJ, Mrejen M, Wang Y, Zhang X (2015) An ultrathin invisibility skin cloak for visible light. Science 349(6254):1310–1314

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Xu Y et al (2018) Light–matter interaction within extreme dimensions: from nanomanufacturing to applications. Adv Opt Mater 6(18):1800444

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Xu C, Stiubianu GT, Gorodetsky AA (2018) Adaptive infrared-reflecting systems inspired by cephalopod. Science 359(6383):1495–1500

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. ADAPTIV—Cloak of Invisibility (2019) BAE Systems PLC. http://www.baesystems.com/en-us/feature/adativ-cloak-of-invisibility

  29. Merritt R (2013) Do-it-yourself invisibility with 3-D printing. Center for Metamaterials and Integrated Plasmonics Newsletter, 6 May 2013. http://metamaterials.duke.edu/news/do-it-yourself-invisibility-3-d-printing

  30. Technology 2019. Metamaterials Commercialization Center. http://www.metamaterialscenter.com/applications/imaging/

  31. Schittny R, Kadic M, Bückmann T, Wegener M (2014) Invisibility cloaking in a diffusive light scattering medium. Science 345(6195):427–429

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Smith DR (2014) A cloaking coating for murky media. Science 345(6195):384–385

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Nye JS (1990) Soft power. Foreign Policy 80:153–171

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Tang Shiping (2009) The security dilemma: a conceptual analysis. Secur Stud 18(3):587–623

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Mearsheimer JJ (2001) The tragedy of great power politics. Norton, New York

    Google Scholar 

  36. Jervis R (1978) Cooperation under the security dilemma. World Polit 30(2):167–214

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. von Clausewitz C (1832) On war

    Google Scholar 

  38. Goldstein A (2000) Deterrence and security in the 21st century. Stanford University Press, Stanford, Calif

    Google Scholar 

  39. Treaty Between the United States of America and the Union of Soviet Socialist Republics on the Limitation of Anti-Ballistic Missile Systems (1972) US Department of State, Other Releases, Bureau of Arms Control, 26 May 1972. https://www.state.gov/t/isn/trty/16332.htm

  40. Defense Science Board (2007) 21st century strategic technology vectors, vol I, main report. Office of the Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition, Technology, and Logistics, Washington, D.C., Feb 2007. https://www.acq.osd.mil/dsb/reports/2000s/ADA463361.pdf

  41. Maxwell JC (1865) A dynamical theory of the electromagnetic field. Phil Trans R Soc Lond 155:459–512

    Google Scholar 

  42. Hertz H (1887) On electromagnetic effects produced by electrical disturbances in insulators

    Google Scholar 

  43. Bauer AO (no date) Christian Hülsmeyer and about the early days of radar inventions. Foundation Centre for German Communications and Related Technologies. http://aobauer.home.xs4all.nl/Huelspart1def.pdf

  44. Page RM (1962) The early history of radar. Proc IRE 50(5):1232–1236

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Skolnik MI (1985) Fifty years of radar. Proc IEEE 73(2):182–197

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Allison DK (1981) New eye for the navy: the origin of radar at the Naval Research Laboratory. NRL report S466, Sept 1981. https://apps.dtic.mil/dtic/tr/fulltext/u2/a110586.pdf (See also “Development of the Radar Principle” U.S. Naval Research Laboratory. https://www.nrl.navy.mil/accomplishments/systems/radar/)

  47. Latham C, Stobbs A (2006) The birth of British radar: the memoirs of Arnold ‘Skip’ Wilkins. Speedwell, Birmingham

    Google Scholar 

  48. Baldwin S (1932) “International Affairs” Speech in house of commons, UK Parliament, 10 Nov 1932, vol 270, pp 525–564. https://api.parliament.uk/historic-hansard/commons/1932/nov/10/international-affairs

  49. Clark GC (1997) Deflating British radar myths of world war II. Air Command and Staff College. https://fas.org/man/dod-101/ops/docs/97-0609F.pdf

  50. Stone M, Banner GP (2000) Radars for the detection and tracking of ballistic missiles, satellites, and planets. Linc Lab J 12(2). https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/477d/7311053bd57e12d74355548c83e770420ad6.pdf

  51. Pedlow GW, Welzenbach DE (1998) The CIA and the U-2 program, 1954–1974. History Staff, Center for the Study of Intelligence, Central Intelligence Agency, 1998. https://www.cia.gov/library/center-for-the-study-of-intelligence/csi-publications/books-and-monographs/the-cia-and-the-u-2-program-1954-1974/u2.pdf

  52. The U-2’s Intended Successor: Project OXCART, 1956–1968. The National Security Archive. http://nsarchive.gwu.edu/NSAEBB/NSAEBB434/docs/U2%20-%20Chapter%206.pdf

  53. OXCART vs Blackbird: do you know the difference? Central Intelligence Agency. https://www.cia.gov/news-information/featured-story-archive/2015-featured-story-archive/oxcart-vs-blackbird.html. Accessed 18 Nov 2015

  54. Roblin S (2016) The SR-71 blackbird: the super spy plane that outran missiles. Natl Interes. http://nationalinterest.org/blog/the-sr-71-blackbird-the-super-spy-plane-outran-missiles-18142

  55. Majumdar D (2015) The ultimate comeback: should the lethal F-117 stealth fighter fly again? Natl Interes. http://nationalinterest.org/blog/the-buzz/the-ultimate-comeback-should-the-lethal-f-117-stealth-14180

  56. Operation Desert Storm: Evaluation of the Air Campaign. NSIAD-97-134, United States Government Accountability Office, 12 June 1997. https://www.gao.gov/products/NSIAD-97-134

  57. The F-35 Lightning II (2017) The Joint Strike Fighter Program. http://www.jsf.mil/

  58. Billings L (2015) War in space may be closer than ever. Sci Am. https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/war-in-space-may-be-closer-than-ever/

  59. Using clever technology to keep enemies at bay. The Economist (UK). https://www.economist.com/special-report/2018/01/25/using-clever-technology-to-keep-enemies-at-bay

  60. Jeong-ho L (2019) China releases footage of ‘Guam killer’ DF-26 ballistic missile in ‘clear message to the US. South China Morning Press. https://www.scmp.com/news/china/military/article/2183972/china-releases-footage-guam-killer-df-26-ballistic-missile-clear

  61. Krepinevich AF, Watts B (2003) Meeting the anti-access and area-denial challenge. Center for Strategic and Budgetary Assessments (CSBA), Washington, D.C., 20 May 2003. https://csbaonline.org/research/publications/a2ad-anti-access-area-denial

  62. Iranian naval forces: a tale of two navies. Office of Naval Intelligence, Feb 2017. https://www.oni.navy.mil/Portals/12/Intel%20agencies/iran/Iran%20022217SP.pdf

  63. Egozi A (2019) Iranian missile misfires as other attacks hit home. Break Def. https://breakingdefense.com/2019/06/iranian-missile-misfires-as-other-attacks-hit-home/

  64. Iran’s naval forces: from Guerilla warfare to modern naval strategy. Report from the Office of Naval Intelligence, Washington DC, Feb 2009. http://www.fas.org/irp/agency/oni/iran-navy.pdf

  65. Singh A (2010) Dark chill in the Persian Gulf—Iran’s conventional and unconventional naval forces. Marit Aff J Natl Marit Found India 6:108–132

    Google Scholar 

  66. Millennium Challenge 02 (2002) United States Joint Forces Command. http://web.archive.org/web/20070928005405/. http://www.jfcom.mil/about/experiments/mc02.htm

  67. Keck Z (2015) America’s master plan to crush Iranian warships. Natl Interes. http://nationalinterest.org/blog/the-buzz/americas-master-plan-crush-iranian-warships-13602

  68. Young A, Barker D, Owens W (2012) Methods and systems for optical focusing using negative index metamaterial. US Patent 8180213 B2, May 2012

    Google Scholar 

  69. Finklea KM (2013) Organized crime: an evolving challenge for U.S. law enforcement. Congressional Research Service, Report No. R41547. https://www.everycrsreport.com/reports/R41547.html

  70. International Labor Organization (2012) New ILO global estimate of forced labour: 20.9 million victims. http://www.ilo.org/global/about-the-ilo/newsroom/news/WCMS_182109/lang--en/index.htm

  71. Drug Trafficking (2019) United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime. https://www.unodc.org/unodc/en/drug-trafficking/

  72. Nixon R (2017) Coast guard faces challenges at sea, and at the budget office. New York Times. https://www.nytimes.com/2017/07/04/us/politics/coast-guard-faces-challenges-at-sea-and-at-the-budget-office.html

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Margaret E. Kosal .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Kosal, M.E., Stayton, J.W. (2020). Meta-materials: Threat to the Global Status Quo?. In: Kosal, M. (eds) Disruptive and Game Changing Technologies in Modern Warfare. Advanced Sciences and Technologies for Security Applications. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-28342-1_8

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics