Introduction: Ukrainian Society Under Reluctant Transformation and Institutional Duality

  • Evgenii Golovakha
  • Tetiana Liubyva
  • Alberto Veira-RamosEmail author


Editors describe the post-Soviet transformation in Ukraine as “reluctant”, contrary to “natural”, “resumed natural” or “voluntary”, and analyse its stages after independence. “Reluctant transformation” implies the absence of a clear plan for achieving transformation. This led to the reproduction of outdated practices inherited from Soviet times associated with corruption and “cronyism” that undermined social trust in the newly developed democratic institutions among the majority of Ukrainians, and condemned Ukraine to stagnation in a state of “institutional duality” and the suffering of a “shock without therapy” type of transition. This theoretical framework constitutes the foundation for empirical research using data from the Ukrainian Society survey, described by the authors. Finally, the editors make a summary of the contributions made by authors of the remaining chapters of the book.


Ukraine Reluctant transformation Institutional trust Institutional duality Human potential 


  1. Becker, G. S. (1964). Human capital: A theoretical and empirical analysis, with special reference to education. New York: National Bureau of Economic Research.Google Scholar
  2. Bohle, D., & Greskovits, B. (2006). Capitalism without compromise: Strong business and weak labour in Eastern Europe’s new transnational industries. Studies in Comparative International Development, 41(1), 3–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Golovakha, E. (1996). Transformiruyushcheyesia obshchestvo. Opyt sociologicheskogo monitoringa v Ukraine [Transforming society. Experience of sociological monitoring]. Kyiv: Institute of Sociology of NAS of Ukraine.Google Scholar
  4. Golovakha, E. (2015). Human potential of the reluctant social transformations in Ukraine. Sotsiologiya: teoriya, metody, marketing [Sociology: Theory, Methods, Marketing], 3, 166–174.Google Scholar
  5. Golovakha, E., Kostenko, N., & Makieiev, S. (Eds.). (2014). Obschestvo bez doveriya [A society without trust]. Kyiv: Institute of Sociology of NAS of Ukraine.Google Scholar
  6. Golovakha, E., & Panina, N. (2003). Post-Soviet deinstitutionalization and formation of new social institutions in Ukraine. In E. Golovakha (Ed.), Ukrainian Sociological Review 2000–2001 (pp. 12–34). Kyiv: Institute of Sociology of the National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine (MISC).Google Scholar
  7. Golovakha, E., & Panina, N. (2008). Post-Soviet anomie: Specifics of leaving the state of anomie demoralization in Russia and Ukraine. Obshhestvennye nauki i sovremennost [Social Sciences and Modernity], 6, 5–10.Google Scholar
  8. Golovakha, E., & Panina, N. (2009). Main stages and tendencies in transformation of Ukrainian society: From Perestroika to orange revolution. In E. Golovakha (Ed.), Ukrainian Sociological Review 2006–2007 (pp. 3–24). Kyiv: Institute of Sociology of the National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine.Google Scholar
  9. Hawrylyshyn, B. (2014). Uspishnistʹ krayiny zalezhytʹ vid yiyi lyudsʹkoho potentsialu [The success of the country depends on its human potential]. Retrieved March 25, 2019 from
  10. Inglehart, R., & Welzel, C. (2005). Modernization, cultural change, and democracy: The human development sequence. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  11. Schultz, T. W. (1961). Investment in human capital. The American Economic Review, 51, 1–17.Google Scholar
  12. Simonchuk, E. (2011). Dynamika sotsialʹno-klasovoyi struktury u postradyansʹkiy Ukrayini [Dynamics of social-class structure in post-Soviet Ukraine]. In V. Vorona & M. Shulga (Eds.), Ukrayinsʹke suspilʹstvo. Dvadtsyatʹ rokiv nezalezhnosti. Sotsiologichnyy monitoring [Ukrainian society. Twenty years of independence. Sociological monitoring] (Vol. 1, pp. 68–83). Kyiv: Institute of Sociology.Google Scholar
  13. Zaslavskaya, T. (2005). Chelovecheskiy potentsial v sovremennom transformatsionnom protsesse [Human potential in the modern transformation process]. Obschestvennyye nauki i sovremennost’ [Social Sciences and Modernity], 3, 5–16.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  • Evgenii Golovakha
    • 1
  • Tetiana Liubyva
    • 1
  • Alberto Veira-Ramos
    • 2
    Email author
  1. 1.Institute of SociologyNational Academy of Sciences of UkraineKyivUkraine
  2. 2.Carlos III UniversityMadridSpain

Personalised recommendations