Skip to main content

A Proposed Service Level Improvement Methodology for Public Transportation Using Interval Type-2 Fuzzy EDAS Based on Customer Satisfaction Data

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Intelligent and Fuzzy Techniques in Big Data Analytics and Decision Making (INFUS 2019)

Part of the book series: Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing ((AISC,volume 1029))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

Quality of service is one of the most important agents which encourages the use of public transportation systems. This study aims to propose a convenient methodology for the evaluation of customer satisfaction levels to show and improve service level for each bus operator in Istanbul. An interval type-2 fuzzy EDAS method is proposed for the evaluation and improvement of public transportation bus operators’ service level based on customer satisfaction surveys. The proposed approach contributes decision makers to determine future investment fields for service level improvement meanwhile it shows a general level for the operational shortcomings of the service provided.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. European Commission. Green Paper: Towards a New Culture for Urban Mobility (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Transportation Research Board, Summary of TCRP Report 88: A Guidebook for Developing a Transit Performance–Measurement System. TRB, National Research Council (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Pérez, J.C., Carrillo, M.H., Montoya-Torres, J.R: Multi-criteria approaches for urban passenger transport systems: a literature review. Ann. OR 1–19 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Yeh, C.H., Deng, H., Chang, Y.H.: Perspectives for practice fuzzy multi criteria analysis for performance evaluation of bus companies. Eur. J. OR 126, 459–473 (2000)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  5. Awasthi, A., Chauhan, S.S., Omrani, H., Panahi, A.: A hybrid approach based on SERVQUAL and fuzzy TOPSIS for evaluating transportation service quality. Comput. Ind. Eng. 61, 637–646 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Celik, E., Bilisik, O.N., Erdogan, M., Gumus, A.T., Baracli, H.: An integrated novel interval type-2 fuzzy MCDM method to improve customer satisfaction in public transportation for Istanbul. Transp. Res. Part E 58, 28–51 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Celik, E., Aydin, N., Gumus, A.T.: A multi attribute customer satisfaction evaluation approach for rail transit network: a real case study for Istanbul, Turkey. Transp. Policy 36, 283–293 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Liou, J.J.H., Hsu, C.C., Chen, Y.S.: Improving transportation SQ based on information fusion. Transp. Res. Part A Pol. Pract. 67, 225–239 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Aydin, N., Celik, E., Gumus, A.T.: A hierarchical customer satisfaction framework for evaluating rail transit systems of Istanbul. Transp. Res. Part A Pol. Pract. 77, 61–81 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Chen, S.M., Lee, L.-W.: Fuzzy MAGDM based on the ranking values and the arithmetic operations of interval type-2 fuzzy sets. Exp. Syst. App. 37(1), 824–833 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Li, W., Yu, S., Pei, H., Zhao, C., Tian, B.: A hybrid approach based on fuzzy AHP and 2-type fuzzy linguistic method for evaluation in-flight service quality. J. Air Transp. Manage. 60, 49–64 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Guner, S.: Measuring the quality of public transportation systems and ranking the bus transit routes using multi-criteria decision making techniques. Case Stud. Transp. Pol. 6, 214–224 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Mardani, A., Khalifah, Z., Zavadskas, E.K., Jusoh, A.: Multiple criteria decision-making techniques in transportation systems: a systematic review of the state of the art literature. Transport 31, 1034–1068 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Keshavarz Ghorabaee, M., Zavadskas, E.K., Olfat, L., Turskis, Z.: Multi-criteria inventory classification using a new method of evaluation based on distance from average solution (EDAS). Informatica 26(3), 435–451 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Keshavarz Ghorabaee, M., Zavadskas, E.K., Amiri, M., Turskis, Z.: Extended EDAS method for fuzzy multi-criteria decision-making: an application to supplier selection. Int. J. Comput. Commun. Control 11(3), 358–371 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Stevic, Z., Tanackov, I., Vasiljevıc, M., Veskovic, S.: Evaluation in logistics using combined AHP and EDAS method. In: International Symposium on Operational Research SYM-OP-IS, vol. 43, pp. 309–313 (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Peng, X., Liu, C.: Algorithms for neutrosophic soft decision making based on EDAS and new similarity measure. J. Intell. Fuzzy Syst. 32, 955–968 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Kahraman, C., Keshavarz Ghorabaee, M., Zavadskas, E.K., Cevik Onar, S., Yazdani, M., ve Oztaysi, B.: Intuitionistic fuzzy EDAS method: an application to solid waste disposal site selection. J. Environ. Eng. Landscape Manage. 25(1), 1–12 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Keshavarz Ghorabaee, M., Amiri, M., Zavadskas, E.K., Turskis, Z.: MCGDM using an extended EDAS method with IT2FS. Ekon. Manage. 1, 48–68 (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Keshavarz Ghorabaee, M., Amiri, M., Sadaghiani, J.S., Zavadskas, E.K.: Multi-criteria project selection using an extended VIKOR method with interval type-2 fuzzy sets. Int. J. IT DM 14(5), 993–1016 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Keshavarz Ghorabaee, M., Amiri, M., Salehi Sadaghiani, J., Hassani Goodarzi, G.: Multiple criteria group decision-making for supplier selection based on COPRAS method with interval type-2 fuzzy sets. Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol. 75(5–8), 1115–1130 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. TSI. http://www.turkstat.gov.tr/HbGetirHTML.do?id=30709. Accessed 28 Jan 2019

  23. IETT MMA: IETT General Directorate, Customer Satisfaction Survey Report (2017)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Murat Levent Demircan .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Demircan, M.L., Tunc, S. (2020). A Proposed Service Level Improvement Methodology for Public Transportation Using Interval Type-2 Fuzzy EDAS Based on Customer Satisfaction Data. In: Kahraman, C., Cebi, S., Cevik Onar, S., Oztaysi, B., Tolga, A., Sari, I. (eds) Intelligent and Fuzzy Techniques in Big Data Analytics and Decision Making. INFUS 2019. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, vol 1029. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-23756-1_158

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics