Skip to main content

Design Considerations for Haptic-Enabled Virtual Reality Simulation for Interactive Learning of Nanoscale Science in Schools

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Immersive Learning Research Network (iLRN 2019)

Part of the book series: Communications in Computer and Information Science ((CCIS,volume 1044))

Included in the following conference series:

  • 1041 Accesses

Abstract

This paper reports on a study which investigated whether the addition of haptics (virtual touch) to a 3D virtual reality (VR) simulation promotes understanding of key nanoscale concepts in membrane systems for students aged 12 to 13. We developed a virtual model of a section of the cell membrane and a haptic enabled interface that enables students to interact with the model and to manipulate objects in the model. Students, in two schools in England, worked collaboratively in pairs on activities designed to develop their understanding of key concepts of cell membrane function. Results of pre-and post-tests of conceptual knowledge and understanding showed significant knowledge gains but there were no significant differences between the haptic and non-haptic condition. However, findings from observation of the activities and student interviews revealed that students were very positive about using the system and believed that being able to feel structures and manipulate objects within the model assisted their learning. We examine some of the design challenges and issues affecting the perception of haptic feedback.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Tokatli, O., et al.: Haptic interactions to support biology education: navigating the cell. Euro haptics, Imperial College, London (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Webb, M., et al.: The potential for haptic-enabled interaction to support collaborative learning in school biology. In: Resta, P., Smith, S. (eds.) Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference 2017, pp. 927–935. Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE), Austin (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Tuckey, H., Selvaratnam, M.: Studies involving three-dimensional visualisation skills in chemistry: a review. Stud. Sci. Educ. 21, 99–121 (1993)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Gilbert, J.K.: Visualization: a metacognitive skill in science and science education. In: Gilbert, J.K. (ed.) Visualization in Science Education. MMSE, vol. 1, pp. 9–27. Springer, Dordrecht (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/1-4020-3613-2_2

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  5. Webb, M.: Impact of IT on science education. In: Voogt, J., Knezek, G. (eds.) International Handbook of Information Technology in Primary and Secondary Education. SIHE, vol. 20, pp. 133–148. Springer, Boston (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-73315-9_8

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  6. Shams, L., Seitz, A.R.: Benefits of multisensory learning. Trends Cogn. Sci. 12, 411–417 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Paivio, A.: Mental imagery in associative learning and memory. Psychol. Rev. 76, 241 (1969)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Paivio, A.: Intelligence, dual coding theory, and the brain. Intelligence 47, 141–158 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Wong, A., Leahy, W., Marcus, N., Sweller, J.: Cognitive load theory, the transient information effect and e-learning. Learn. Instr. 22, 449–457 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Kirschner, P.A., Sweller, J., Kirschner, F., Zambrano, R.J.: From cognitive load theory to collaborative cognitive load theory. Int. J. Comput.-Support. Collaborative Learn. 13, 213–233 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Sweller, J.: Cognitive load theory, learning difficulty, and instructional design. Learn. Instr. 4, 295–312 (1994)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Flores, F., Tovar, M.E., Gallegos, L.: Representation of the cell and its processes in high school students: an integrated view. Int. J. Sci. Educ. 25, 269–286 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Malińska, L., Rybska, E., Sobieszczuk-Nowicka, E., Adamiec, M.: Teaching about water relations in plant cells: an uneasy struggle. CBE-Life Sci. Educ., 15, ar78 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Hellenkamp, B., et al.: Precision and accuracy of single-molecule FRET measurements—a multi-laboratory benchmark study. Nat. Methods 15, 669–676 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Deng, D., et al.: Crystal structure of the human glucose transporter GLUT1. Nature 510, 121 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Campbell, J.L., Quincy, C., Osserman, J., Pedersen, O.K.: Coding in-depth semistructured interviews: problems of unitization and intercoder reliability and agreement. Sociol. Methods Res. 42, 294–320 (2013)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  17. Culbertson, H., Schorr, S.B., Okamura, A.M.: Haptics: the present and future of artificial touch sensation. Ann. Rev. Control Robot. Auton. Syst. 1, 385–409 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Lukas, S., Philipp, A.M., Koch, I.: Switching attention between modalities: further evidence for visual dominance. Psychol. Res. PRPF 74, 255–267 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors are pleased to acknowledge support for this work from the Leverhulme Foundation project ‘3D Learning in a Rich, Cooperative Haptic Environment’. We are also pleased to thank our colleagues on this project Jon Rashid, Carleen Houbart, Phil James, Richard Fisher, and Simon Bliss as well as all the students who participated.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mary Webb .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Webb, M. et al. (2019). Design Considerations for Haptic-Enabled Virtual Reality Simulation for Interactive Learning of Nanoscale Science in Schools. In: Beck, D., et al. Immersive Learning Research Network. iLRN 2019. Communications in Computer and Information Science, vol 1044. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-23089-0_5

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-23089-0_5

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-23088-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-23089-0

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics