Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Types of Transboundary Water Governance Regimes: Theoretical Discussion and Empirical Illustrations

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Governance of a Transboundary River

Abstract

This chapter offers an analytical tool for exploring the governance of transboundary rivers by presenting three governance regimes: integrated, monofunctional and polycentric. First, the theory underpinning each model is introduced and discussed, then each is illustrated by a specific case study—the Rhine for the integrated regime, the Danube for the monofunctional regime and the Columbia River for the polycentric regime.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Target 6.5: ‘By 2030, implement integrated water resources management at all levels, including through transboundary cooperation as appropriate’.

  2. 2.

    http://www.danubecommission.org/dc/en/.

Bibliography

  • Bernauer, T. (2002). Explaining success and failure in international river management. Aquatic Sciences, 64(1), 1–19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Birkland, T. A. (2004). “The world changed today”: Agenda-setting and policy change in the wake of the September 11 terrorist attacks. Review of Policy Research, 21(2), 179–200.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bokor-Szegö, H. (1962). La Convention de Belgrade et le régime du Danube. Annuaire Français de Droit International, 8(1), 192–205.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bouché, H. (1981). L’action de la Commission Internationale pour la Protection du Rhin Contre la Pollution. International Business Law, 9, 65.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bressers, H., & de Boer, C. (2013). Contextual interaction theory for assessing water governance, policy and knowledge transfer. In Water governance, policy and knowledge transfer (pp. 56–74). London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bréthaut, C. (2018). Transboundary water management: From geopolitics to a non-state analytical perspective: The case of the Rhône River. In A critical approach to international water management trends (pp. 71–95). London: Palgrave.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bréthaut, C., & Pflieger, G. (2015). The shifting territorialities of the Rhone River’s transboundary governance: A historical analysis of the evolution of the functions, uses and spatiality of river basin governance. Regional Environmental Change, 15(3), 549–558.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carter, C., & Smith, A. (2008). Revitalizing public policy approaches to the EU: ‘Territorial institutionalism’, fisheries and wine. Journal of European Public Policy, 15(2), 263–281.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cattell, D. T. (1960). The politics of the Danube Commission under Soviet control. American Slavic and East European Review, 19(3), 380–394.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Conca, K., Wu, F., & Mei, C. (2006). Global regime formation or complex institution building? The principled content of international river agreements. International Studies Quarterly, 50(2), 263–285.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cosens, B., & Fremier, A. (2014). Assessing system resilience and ecosystem services in large river basins: A case study of the Columbia River Basin. Idaho Law Review, 51, 91.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cosens, B. A., & Williams, M. K. (2012). Resilience and water governance: Adaptive governance in the Columbia River Basin. Ecology and Society, 17(4), 3.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dieperink, C. (1999). Tussen zout en zalm: Lessen uit de ontwikkeling van het regime inzake de Rijnvervuiling.

    Google Scholar 

  • Enjolras, B. (2008). Régimes de gouvernance et services d’intérêt général, une perspective internationale. Brussels: PIE Peter Lang.

    Google Scholar 

  • Garrick, D. E. (2015). Water allocation in rivers under pressure: Water trading, transaction costs and transboundary governance in the Western US and Australia. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.

    Google Scholar 

  • Global Water Partnership. (2000). Integrated water resources management (No. TAC Background Papers No. 4). Retrieved from https://www.gwp.org/globalassets/global/toolbox/publications/background-papers/04-integrated-water-resources-management-2000-english.pdf.

  • Hand, B. K., Flint, C. G., Frissell, C. A., Muhlfeld, C. C., Devlin, S. P., Kennedy, B. P., … Stanford, J. A. (2018). A social-ecological perspective for riverscape management in the Columbia River Basin. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment, 16(S1), s23–s33.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hirt, P. W., & Sowards, A. M. (2012). The past and future of the Columbia River. In The Columbia River Treaty revisited: Transboundary river governance in the face of uncertainty. Corvallis: Oregon State University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huisman, P., De Jong, J., & Wieriks, K. (2000). Transboundary cooperation in shared river basins: Experiences from the Rhine. Meuse and North Sea. Water Policy, 1(2), 83–97.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jenkins-Smith, H. C., & Sabatier, P. A. (1999). The advocacy coalition framework: An assessment. In Theories of the policy process (pp. 117–166). Boulder: Westview Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jochim, A. E., & May, P. J. (2010). Beyond subsystems: Policy regimes and governance. Policy Studies Journal, 38(2), 303–327.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kliot, N., Shmueli, D., & Shamir, U. (2001). Institutions for management of transboundary water resources: Their nature, characteristics and shortcomings. Water Policy, 3(3), 229–255.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lagendijk, V. (2015). Divided development: Post-war ideas on river utilisation and their influence on the development of the Danube. The International History Review, 37(1), 80–98.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lankford, B., & Hepworth, N. (2010). The cathedral and the bazaar: Monocentric and polycentric river basin management. Water Alternatives, 3(1), 82.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marty, F. (2001). Managing international rivers: Problems, politics and institutions. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (p. 409). Bern: Peter Lang Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • McGinnis, M. D. (1999). Polycentric governance and development: Readings from the workshop in political theory and policy analysis. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • McKinney, M., Baker, L., Buvel, A. M., & Fischer, A. (2010). Managing transboundary natural resources: An assessment of the need to revise and update the Columbia River Treaty. Hastings West-Northwest Journal of Environmental Law and Policy, 16, 307.

    Google Scholar 

  • Milman, A., Bunclark, L., Conway, D., & Adger, W. N. (2013). Assessment of institutional capacity to adapt to climate change in transboundary river basins. Climatic Change, 121(4), 755–770.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mostert, E. (2009). International co-operation on Rhine water quality 1945–2008: An example to follow? Physics and Chemistry of the Earth, Parts A/B/C, 34(3), 142–149.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ostrom, E. (1990). Governing the commons: The evolution of institutions for collective action. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Retrieved from http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511807763.

  • Ostrom, E. (2008). Institutions and the environment. Economic Affairs, 28(3), 24–31. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0270.2008.00840.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ostrom, E. (2010). Beyond markets and states: Polycentric governance of complex economic systems. Transnational Corporations Review, 2(2), 1–12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ostrom, V., Tiebout, C. M., & Warren, R. (1961). The organization of government in metropolitan areas: A theoretical inquiry. American Political Science Review, 55(4), 831–842.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pahl-Wostl, C. (2009). A conceptual framework for analysing adaptive capacity and multi-level learning processes in resource governance regimes. Global Environmental Change, 19(3), 354–365. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2009.06.001.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pritchard, S. B. (2011). Confluence: The nature of technology and the remaking of the Rhône (Vol. 172). Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rangeley, R., Thiam, B. M., Andersen, R. A., & Lyle, C. A. (1994). International river basin organizations in Sub-Saharan Africa. Washington, DC: The World Bank.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rieman, B. E., Smith, C. L., Naiman, R. J., Ruggerone, G. T., Wood, C. C., Huntly, N., … Congleton, J. (2015). A comprehensive approach for habitat restoration in the Columbia Basin. Fisheries, 40(3), 124–135.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sadoff, C. W., & Grey, D. (2002). Beyond the river: The benefits of cooperation on international rivers. Water Policy, 4(5), 389–403.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schiff, J. S. (2017). The evolution of Rhine River governance: Historical lessons for modern transboundary water management. Water History, 9(3), 279–294.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schlager, E., & Blomquist, W. (2000, May). Local communities, policy prescriptions, and watershed management in Arizona, California, and Colorado. Eighth Conference of the International Association for the Study of Common Property, Bloomington, IN, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Varone, F., Nahrath, S., Aubin, D., & Gerber, J.-D. (2013). Functional regulatory spaces. Policy Sciences, 46(4), 311–333.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weber, M. (1997). The methodology of the social sciences. New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wieriks, K., & Schulte‐Wülwer‐Leidig, A. (1997). Integrated water management for the Rhine River Basin, from pollution prevention to ecosystem improvement. In Natural resources forum (Vol. 21, pp. 147–156). Oxford: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wolfrom, M. (1964). La pollution des eaux du Rhin. Annuaire Français de Droit International, 10(1), 737–763.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Young, O. R. (2002). The institutional dimensions of environmental change: Fit, interplay, and scale. Cambridge: MIT press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Young, O. R. (2008). The architecture of global environmental governance: Bringing science to bear on policy. Global Environmental Politics, 8(1), 14–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. UNESCO Chair on hydropolitics, Institute for Environmental Sciences, University of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland

    Christian Bréthaut

  2. UNESCO Chair on hydropolitics, Institute for Environmental Sciences, University of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland

    Géraldine Pflieger

Authors
  1. Christian Bréthaut
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Géraldine Pflieger
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Christian Bréthaut .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Bréthaut, C., Pflieger, G. (2020). Types of Transboundary Water Governance Regimes: Theoretical Discussion and Empirical Illustrations. In: Governance of a Transboundary River. Palgrave Studies in Water Governance: Policy and Practice. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-19554-0_2

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-19554-0_2

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-19553-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-19554-0

  • eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation