Abstract
For the past decade, water policies have been strongly influenced by the concept of integrated water resource management (IWRM), and the river basin has been regarded as the most relevant scale for water governance. This article is based on the case of the Rhone River. Through historical analysis (from 1870 to the present), we study how the river’s functions evolve, how water users compete to secure their needs, and the effects on the governance structure and on its spatiality. While this governance structure has remained stable for decades, we show how the evolution of water policies (and the emergence of IWRM) and of environmental concerns strongly modified the strategies of actors. We also demonstrate how the governance structure as well as its space and scale of regulation tends to change with the attempt of central States to get back to the centre of the configuration of actors.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Barraqué B (2001) Les enjeux de la directive cadre sur l’eau de l’Union européenne. Flux 46:70–75
Barraqué B (2009) The development of water services in Europe: from diversity to convergence? In: Castro JE, Heller L (eds) Water and sanitation services: public policy and management. Earthscan, Londres
Brenner N (2004) New state spaces: urban governance and the rescaling of statehood. Oxford University Press, Oxford
Carter C, Smith A (2008) Revitalizing public policy approaches to the EU: ‘territorial institutionalism’, fisheries and wine. J Eur Public Policy 15(2):263–281
Delahay E (2009) Les espaces fluvio-urbains rhodaniens à l’aval de Lyon, Vienne, Valence, Avignon, Tarascon, Beaucaire et Arles: des territoires à la dérive? Phd Thesis, Université Lumière Lyon 2
Frey BS, Eichenberger R (1999) The new democratic federalism for Europe: functional, overlapping, and competing jurisdictions. Edward Elgar
Gerber J-D, Knoepfel P, Nahrath S, Varone F (2009) Institutional resource regimes: towards sustainability through the combination of property-rights theory and policy analysis. Ecol Econ 68(3):798–809
Ghiotti S (2006) Les Territoires de l’eau et la décentralisation. La gouvernance de bassin versant ou les limites d’une évidence, Développement durable et territoires (On line), Dossier 6|2006, on line the 10 February 2006, consulted the 04 June 2013. http://developpementdurable.revues.org/1742; doi:10.4000/developpementdurable.1742
Graefe O (2011) River basins as new environmental regions? The depolitization of water management. Procedia Soc Behav Sci 14:24–27
Hering JG, Ingold MK (2012) Water resources management: what should be integrated? Science 336(6086):1234–1235
Hooghe L, Marks G (2003) Unraveling the central state, but how? Types of multi-level governance. Am Political Sci Rev 97(2):233–243
Keohane R, Ostrom E (eds) (1995) Local commons and global interdependence. Sage, London
Kissling-Näf I, Kuks S (eds) (2004) The evolution of national water regimes in Europe. Kluwer, Dodrecht
Lebel L, Garden P, Imamura M (2005) The politics of scale, position, and place in the governance of water resources in the Mekong Region. Ecol Soc 10(2):18. http://digitalcommons.usu.edu/unf_research/32/
Moss T (2003) Solving problems of ‘fit’ at the expense of problems of ‘interplay’? The spatial reorganisation of water management following the EU water framework directive. In: Engels A, Breit H, Moss T, Troja M (eds) How institutions change. Perspectives on social learning in global and local environmental contexts. Leske + Budrich, Opladen
Moss T, Jens N (2010) Multilevel water governance and problems of scale: setting the stage for a broader debate. Environ Manag 46(1):1–6
Nahrath S, Varone F, Gerber J-D (2009) Les espaces fonctionnels : nouveau référentiel de la gestion durable des ressources ? VertigO 9(1):1–14
Nahrath S, Gerber J-D, Knoepfel P, Bréthaut C (2012) Le rôle des institutions de gestion communautaire de ressources dans les politiques environnementales et d’ames institu du territoire en Suisse. Nat Sci Société (NSS) 20:39–51
Ostrom E (1990) Governing the commons, the evolution of institutions for collective action. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
Ostrom E (1999) Revisiting the commons: local lessons, global challenges. Science 284(5412):278–282
Ostrom E (2010) Polycentric systems for coping with collective action and global environmental change. Glob Environ Chang 20(4):550–557
Ostrom V, Robert LB, Ostrom E (1988) Local government in the United States. ICS Press, San Francisco
Paquier S, Pflieger G (2008) L’eau et les services industriels de Genève : aux origines du modèle suisse des services urbains. Entreprises et Histoire 50:36–51
Pritchard SB (2011) Confluence: the nature of technology and the remaking of the Rhone (No. 172). Harvard University Press, Harvard
Sack RD (1983) Human territoriality: a theory. Ann Assoc Am Geogr 73(1):55–74
Scholz J, Stiftel B (eds) (2005) Adaptive governance and water conflict. Resources for the future, Washington DC
Storck F, Pochat M, Tosello F (2004) Utilisation des outils Arcveiw 3D—Tracking Analys pour l’étude de l’aléa inondation induit par les crues du Rhône et de la Saône sur le territoire du Grand Lyon. Unpublished paper presented at SIG 2004, conférence francphone ESRI, Issy-Les-Loulineaux
Swyngedouw E (2004) Scaled geographies. Nature, place, and the politics of scale. In: McMaster R, Sheppard E (eds) Scale and geographic inquiry: nature, society and method. Blackwell, Oxford
UNEP-GRID Geneva. n.d. Rhone basin [Map], Retrieved July 24, 2013, from: http://www.grid.unep.ch/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=73&Itemid=400&lang=en&project_id=25FE9290
Varone F, Nahrath S, Aubin D, Gerber J-D (in press) Functional regulatory spaces. Policy Sciences. http://link.springer.com/article/10.1007%2Fs11077-013-9174-1, doi:10.1007/s11077-013-9174-1
Young OR (2002) The institutional dimensions of environmental change: fit, interplay, and scale (global environmental accords: strategies for sustainability). MIT Press, Cumberland
Acknowledgments
This article is the result of data collected for the research project “GOUVRHONE, hydropower and the regulation of the Rhone River in a context of climate change and electricity liberalisation” led by the University of Geneva within the Institute of Environmental Sciences (Group Politics, Environment and Territories). The project started in May 2012 for a period of 36 months and is funded by the French ministry of ecology, the French water Agency Rhône Méditerranée and Corse, the Swiss federal office for the environment, the cantons of Geneva and Vaud, Services Industriels de Genève (SIG) and Electricité de France (EDF).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Bréthaut, C., Pflieger, G. The shifting territorialities of the Rhone River’s transboundary governance: a historical analysis of the evolution of the functions, uses and spatiality of river basin governance. Reg Environ Change 15, 549–558 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10113-013-0541-4
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10113-013-0541-4