Abstract
This chapter considers the complexities of gender in South African education. Using recent nationally representative data we find that girls achieve better average results than boys across subject areas, grade levels and time. Gender differences based on school type reveal that the widest gaps are in government schools and rural settings, with girls outperforming boys. In independent schools, Grade 9 boys perform slightly better than girls. Attainment was lower for boys than for girls in every racial group. Boys tended to be older than girls and to have higher dropout rates in secondary schools. School climate results reveal that boys are more likely to be bullied in every type of school but that boys and girls in public schools are at a greater risk of being bullied than boys and girls in independent schools. Girls are less confident about their mathematics ability despite the achievement differences that favour girls. This seems to suggest that other factors either at school or in the external environment are undermining how girls view their potential in technical subjects. We conclude that there are a number of boys and girls who are at serious risk of disappearing from the education system if gender targeted interventions are not carefully considered.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
- 1.
A very useful, though dated, example is Chisholm and September’s review of gender equity in South African education between 1994 and 2004 (Chisholm and September 2005).
- 2.
See Van Broekhuizen and Spaull (2017) for a contemporary discussion of gender differences in higher education.
- 3.
Southern and Eastern Africa Consortium for Monitoring Educational Quality.
- 4.
Trends in Mathematics and Science Study.
- 5.
Progress in International Reading Literacy Study.
- 6.
The difference in average score for male and female learners is presented (male minus female) so that values to the left shows instances where girls achieved better results than boys and values to the right are where boys performed better.
- 7.
Learners were asked nine questions on the frequency and type of bullying that they experienced. These questions covered direct and indirect forms of bullying. Direct forms of bullying include both physical and verbal forms.
- 8.
The IEA studies ask learners whether they were forced to do something they did not want to do but do not explicitly address the question of sexual violence.
References
Aikman, S., & Unterhalter, E. (2006). Introduction. In S. Aikman & E. Unterhalter (Eds.), Beyond access: Transforming policy and practice for gender equality in education. Oxford: Oxfam.
Aikman, S., & Unterhalter, E. (2007). Practising gender equality in education. Oxford: Oxfam GB.
Anton-Erxleben, K., Kibriya, S., & Zhang, Y. (2016). Bullying as the main driver of low performance in schools: Evidence from Botswana, Ghana, and South Africa. MPRA Paper, No 75555.
Branson, N., & Zuze, T. L. (2012). Education, the great equaliser: Improving access to quality education. South African Child Gauge, 2012, 69–74.
Branson, N., Hofmeyr, C., & Lam, D. (2014). Progress through school and the determinants of school dropout in South Africa. Development Southern Africa, 31(1), 106–126.
Bray, R., Gardner, C., & Parsons, N. (1997). Can boys do better? Secondary Heads Association, Leicester
Chisholm, L., & September, J. (2005). Gender equity in South African education 1994–2004: Perspectives from research, government and unions: Conference proceedings. Pretoria: HSRC Press.
Commission for Gender Equality. (2007). Gender in the curriculum. The Commission for Gender Equality, Johannesburg.
DBE. (2016a). Education Statistics in South Africa 2014. Department of Basic Education, Pretoria.
DBE. (2016b). National Senior Certificate Examination Report 2016. Department of Basic Education, Pretoria.
DBE. (2017). Summary Report. Results of Year 2 Impact Evaluation. The Early Grade Reading Study, Department of Basic Education, Pretoria.
Else-Quest, N. M., Hyde, J. S., & Linn, M. C. (2010). Cross-national patterns of gender differences in mathematics: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 136(1), 103.
Fleisch, B., & Shindler, J. (2009). Gender repetition: School access, transitions and equity in the ‘Birth-to-Twenty’ cohort panel study in urban South Africa. Comparative Education, 45(2), 265–279.
Francis, B., & Skelton, C. (2005). Reassessing gender and achievement: Questioning contemporary key debates. London: Routledge.
Frenzel, A. C., Pekrun, R., & Goetz, T. (2007). Girls and mathematics-A “hopeless” issue? A control-value approach to gender differences in emotions towards mathematics. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 22(4), 497.
Gurian, M., Stevens, K., & Daniels, P. (2009). Single-sex classrooms are succeeding. Educational Horizons, 87(4), 234–245.
Gustafsson, M. (2011). The when and how of leaving school: The policy implications of new evidence on secondary schooling in South Africa. Stellenbosch Economic Working Papers, 09/11.
Gustafsson, M. (2015). The relative under-performance of males in the schooling system. Department of Basic Education, Pretoria.
Hanushek, E. (2008). Schooling, gender equity, and economic outcomes. In M. Embon & L. Fort (Eds.), Girls’ education in the 21st century, gender equality, empowerment, and economic growth. Washington, DC: World Bank.
Hart, L. C. (2016). When “separate” may be better: Exploring single-sex learning as a remedy for social anxieties in female middle school students. Middle School Journal, 47(2), 32–40.
Howie, S., Combrinck, C., Roux, K., Tshele, M., Mokoena, G., & McLeod Palane, N. (2017). PIRLS Literacy 2016: South African Highlights Report. Centre for Evaluation and Assessment, Faculty of Education, University of Pretoria, Pretoria.
Isdale, K., Reddy, V., Winnaar, L., & Zuze, T. L. (2016). Smooth, staggered or stopped? Educational transitions in the South African Youth Panel Study. Pretoria: HSRC Press.
Jacobsen, J. (2007). The economics of gender. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing.
Kane, J. M., & Mertz, J. E. (2012). Debunking myths about gender and mathematics performance. Notices of the AMS, 59(1), 10–21.
Lefoka, P. J. (2007). Out of school missing boys–a study from Lesotho. Commonwealth Education Partnerships Available at: http://www.ungei.org/resources/6031.htm
Mallow, J. V. (1994). Gender-related science anxiety: A first binational study. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 3(4), 227–238.
Marks, G. N. (2008). Accounting for the gender gaps in student performance in reading and mathematics: Evidence from 31 countries. Oxford Review of Education, 34(1), 89–109.
Mason, M. A., Wolfinger, N. H., & Goulden, M. (2013). Do babies matter?: Gender and family in the Ivory Tower. London/New Brunswick: Rutgers University Press.
Mullis, I. V., Martin, M. O., Foy, P., & Hooper, M. (2016). TIMSS 2015 international results in mathematics. Retrieved from Boston College, TIMSS & PIRLS International Study Center. http://timssandpirlsbcedu/timss2015/international-results
Mullis, I. V., Martin, M. O., Foy, P., & Hooper, M. (2017). PIRLS 2016 international results in reading. Chestnut Hill, MA: TIMSS & PIRLS International Study Center, Boston College.
OECD (2013) PISA 2012 results: Ready to learn: Students’ engagement, drive and self-beliefs (volume III): Preliminary version. Paris: OECD.
Pandor, N. (2005). Keynote address: The hidden face of gender inequality in South African education. Gender Equity in South African Education 1994–2004: Perspectives from Research, Government and Unions.
Paterson, K. (2017). Chapter 18: Sexual violence in schools. In F. Veriava (Ed.), Basic education rights handbook, Section 27, Johannesburg.
Patrinos, H. (2008). Returns to education: The gender perspective. Girls’ Education in the 21st Century: Gender Equality, Empowerment and Economic Growth (pp. 53–661). Washington, DC: The World Bank.
Perry, H. (2003). Female performance in the senior certificate examination: Excellence hiding behind the averages. Edusource Data News, 39, 14–25.
Prinsloo, S. (2006). Sexual harassment and violence in South African schools. South African Journal of Education, 26(2), 305–318.
Ready, D. D., LoGerfo, L. F., Burkam, D. T., & Lee, V. E. (2005). Explaining girls’ advantage in kindergarten literacy learning: Do classroom behaviors make a difference? The Elementary School Journal, 106(1), 21–38.
Ross, K., Saito, M., Dolata, S., Ikeda, M., & Zuze, L. (2004). Data archive for the SACMEQ I and SACMEQ II projects. Paris: IIEP-UNESCO.
Schleicher, A. (2008). Student learning outcomes in mathematics from a gender perspective: What does the International PISA Assessment tell us? (p. 41). Girls’ Education in the 21st Century.
Smyth, E. (2007). Cross-national patterns in educational attainment and achievement. In International studies in educational inequality, theory and policy: Educational inequality: Persistence and change (Vol 1). Dordrecht: Springer.
Sommers, C. H. (2001). The war against boys: How misguided feminism is harming our young men. New York: Simon & Schuster.
Tatum, A. W. (2000). Breaking down barriers that disenfranchise African American adolescent readers in low-level tracks. Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy, 44(1), 52–64.
UNESCO. (2015). Gender and EFA 2000–2015. Achievements and challenges. Paris: UNESCO.
UNESCO. (2016). Global education monitoring report. Gender Review Creating Sustainable Futures for All, UNESCO, Paris.
UNESCO. (2017). Global education monitoring report 2017/18. Accountability in Education: Meeting our Commitments UNESCO, Paris.
United Nations. (2015). The millennium development goals report 2015. United Nations, New York.
Unterhalter, E. (2006). Fragemented frameworks? Researching women, gender, education, and development. In S. Aikman & E. Unterhalter (Eds.), Beyond access: Transforming policy and practice for gender equality in education. Oxford: Oxfam.
Van Broekhuizen, H., & Spaull, N. (2017). The ‘Martha Effect’: The compounding female advantage in South African higher education. Stellenbosch Economic Working Papers, WP14/2017.
Warrington, M., & Younger, M. (2000). The other side of the gender gap. Gender and Education, 12(4), 493–508.
Wills, G. (2015). A profile of the labour market for school principals in South Africa: Evidence to inform policy. Stellenbosch Economic Working Papers, WP12/2015.
Wolf, A. (2013). The XX factor: How working women are creating a new society. London: Profile Books.
Wolpe, A. (2005). Reflections on the gender equity task team. In L. Chisholm & J. September (Eds.), Gender Equity in South African Education 1994–2004: Perspectives from Research, Government and Unions: Conference Proceedings. Pretoria: HSRC Press.
Younger, M., & Warrington, M. (1996). Differential achievement of girls and boys at GCSE: Some observations from the perspective of one school. British Journal of Sociology of Education, 17(3), 299–313.
Zuze, T., Reddy, V., Juan, A., Hannan, S., Visser, M., & Winnaar, L. (2016). Safe and sound? Violence and South African Education. HSRC Policy Brief, 06, Pretoria.
Zuze, T. L. (2008). Equity and effectiveness in East African primary schools. Ph.D. thesis, University of Cape Town.
Zuze, T. L. (2017). A riddle explained: Gender disparities in East African education. African Review of Economics and Finance, 7(2), 29–59.
Zuze, T. L., & Reddy, V. (2014). School resources and the gender reading literacy gap in South African schools. International Journal of Educational Development, 36, 100–107.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Appendix
Appendix
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Zuze, T.L., Beku, U. (2019). Gender Inequalities in South African Schools: New Complexities. In: Spaull, N., Jansen, J. (eds) South African Schooling: The Enigma of Inequality. Policy Implications of Research in Education, vol 10. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-18811-5_12
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-18811-5_12
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-18810-8
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-18811-5
eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)