Skip to main content

Forecast Correction Using Organizational Debiasing in Corporate Cash Flow Revisioning

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Exploring Service Science (IESS 2018)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing ((LNBIP,volume 331))

Included in the following conference series:

  • 1495 Accesses

Abstract

Corporations that employ information systems, such as decision support systems for judgmental forecasts, have business objectives that require accurate forecasts. But the accuracy of these forecasts is most likely biased by organizational and individual structures within the corporation. These biases, such as revenue targets or personal objectives, may alter the forecasters’ prediction due to financial incentives in a predefined way. This paper argues that model-driven correction of forecasts – which typically utilizes only statistical methods – should incorporate organizational debiasing methods. In a case of an international corporation, local experts forecast cash flows for corporate risk management. The forecasts are later aggregated on a corporate level with subsequent debiasing techniques for decision support. Empirical results show that considering organizational objectives for debiasing techniques can strongly improve forecast accuracy. The total correctable expert error is reduced by up to 60 % for all forecasts of a month, providing better decision support for managers.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Almeida, H., Campello, M., Weisbach, M.S.: The cash flow sensitivity of cash. J. Financ. 59(4), 1777–1804 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Blanc, S.M., Setzer, T.: Improving forecast accuracy by guided manual overwrite in forecast debiasing. In: Proceedings of the European Conference on Information Systems (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Bromiley, P.: Do forecasts produced by organizations reflect anchoring and adjustment? J. Forecast. 6(3), 201–210 (1987)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Burgstahler, D., Eames, M.: Management of earnings and analysts’ forecasts to achieve zero and small positive earnings surprises. J. Bus. Financ. Account. 33(5–6), 633–652 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Daniel, N.D., Denis, D.J., Naveen, L.: Do firms manage earnings to meet dividend thresholds? J. Acc. Econ. 45(1), 2–26 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Fildes, R., Hastings, R.: The organization and improvement of market forecasting. J. Oper. Res. Soc. 45(1), 1–16 (1994)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Graham, J.R., Harvey, C.R.: The theory and practice of corporate finance: evidence from the field. J. Financ. Econ. 60(2), 187–243 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Hogarth, R.M., Makridakis, S.: Forecasting and planning: an evaluation. Manag. Sci. 27(2), 115–138 (1981)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Kim, C., Mauer, D., Sherman, A.: The determinants of corporate liquidity: theory and evidence. J. Financ. Quant. Anal. 33(3), 335–359 (1998)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Knöll, F.: The goal of forecasting – Predictability of cash flow revisions in corporate finance. In: Proceedings of the 26th European Conference on Information Systems: Beyond Digitization - Facets of Socio-Technical Change (ECIS), (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Knöll, F., Setzer, T., Laubis, K.: On predictability of revisioning in corporate cash flow forecasting. In: Proceedings of the 51st Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS), pp. 1583–1589 (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Knöll, F., Simko, V.: Organizational information improves forecast efficiency of correction techniques. In: Proceedings of the 17th Conference on Information Technologies – Applications and Theory (ITAT), Computational Intelligence and Data Mining (WCIDM), vol. 1885, pp. 86–92 (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Lawrence, M., Goodwin, P., O’Connor, M., Önkal, D.: Judgmental forecasting: a review of progress over the last 25 years. Int. J. Forecast. 22, 493–618 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Leitner, J., Leopold-Wildburger, U.: Experiments on forecasting behavior with several sources of information – A review of the literature. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 213(3), 459–469 (2011)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  15. Lim, S.S., Wang, H.: The effect of financial hedging on the incentives for corporate diversification: the role of stakeholder firm-specific investments. J. Econ. Behav. Organ. 62(4), 640–656 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Marr, B.: Key Performance Indicators (KPI): The 75 Measures Every Manager Needs to Know. Pearson, London (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Martin, J.D., Morgan, G.E.: Financial planning where the firm’s demand for funds is nonstationary and stochastic. Manag. Sci. 34(9), 1054–1066 (1988)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. McCarthy, T.M., Davis, D.F., Golicic, S.L., Mentzer, J.T.: The evolution of sales forecasting management: A 20-year longitudinal study of forecasting practices. J. Forecast. 25(5), 303 (2006)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  19. McNees, S.K.: The role of judgment in macroeconomic forecasting accuracy. Int. J. Forecast. 6(3), 287–299 (1990)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. R Core Team: R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing (2013). http://www.R-project.org

  21. Sanders, N.R., Manrodt, K.B.: The efficacy of using judgmental versus quantitative forecasting methods in practice. Omega 31(6), 511–522 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Schweitzer, M.E., Ordóñez, L., Douma, B.: Goal setting as a motivator of unethical behavior. Acad. Manag. J. 47(3), 422–432 (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  23. Stulz, R.M.: Managerial discretion and optimal financing policies. J. Financ. Econ. 26(1), 3–27 (1990)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Florian Knöll .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Knöll, F., Shapoval, K. (2018). Forecast Correction Using Organizational Debiasing in Corporate Cash Flow Revisioning. In: Satzger, G., Patrício, L., Zaki, M., Kühl, N., Hottum, P. (eds) Exploring Service Science. IESS 2018. Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing, vol 331. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-00713-3_18

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-00713-3_18

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-00712-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-00713-3

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics