Skip to main content

Endoscopic Management of Complications in Acute Pancreatitis

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
ERCP and EUS

Abstract

Common complications of acute pancreatitis include pancreatic duct leaks and pancreatic collections, which were recently reclassified into acute peripancreatic fluid collection, pseudocyst, acute necrotic collection, and walled-off pancreatic necrosis. Various endoscopic techniques can definitively treat many of these complications. Pancreatic leaks and fistulae are addressed with ERCP and placement of a transpapillary stent that bridges the site of a pancreatic duct disruption. Pseudocysts can be drained via cystgastrostomy with efficacy approaching 80 %. Furthermore, walled-off pancreatic necrosis can be managed via endoscopic necrosectomy with drainage and debridement resulting in a high degree of success and significant reduction in complications compared to surgery or radiologic drainage. The current chapter reviews the workup of these complications in acute pancreatitis and discusses the indications, timing, technique, outcomes, and complications of the endoscopic procedures employed to address these complications.

Electronic supplementary material

The online version of this chapter (doi: 10.1007/978-1-4939-2320-5_12) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. Videos can also be accessed at http://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-1-4939-2320-5_12.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 249.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Peery AF, Dellon ES, Lund J, Crockett SD, McGowan CE, Bulsiewicz WJ, Gangarosa LM, Thiny MT, Stizenberg K, Morgan DR, Ringel Y, Kim HP, Dibonaventura MD, Carroll CF, Allen JK, Cook SF, Sandler RS, Kappelman MD, Shaheen NJ. Burden of gastrointestinal disease in the United States: 2012 update. Gastroenterology.2012;143(5):1179–87.e1–3. doi:10.1053/j.gastro.2012.08.002.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Banks PA, Bollen TL, Dervenis C, Gooszen HG, Johnson CD, Sarr MG, Tsiotos GG, Vege SS, Acute Pancreatitis Classification Working Group. Classification of acute pancreatitis–2012: revision of the Atlanta classification and definitions by international consensus. Gut. 2013;62(1):102–11. doi:10.1136/gutjnl-2012-302779.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Telford JJ, Farrell JJ, Saltzman JR, Shields SJ, Banks PA, Lichtenstein DR, Johannes RS, Kelsey PB, Carr- Locke DL. Pancreatic stent placement for duct disruption. Gastrointest Endosc. 2002;56(1):18–24

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Nealon WH, Walser E. Main pancreatic ductal anatomy can direct choice of modality for treating pancreatic pseudocysts (surgery versus percutaneous drainage). Ann Surg. 2002;235(6):751–8.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Larsen M, Kozarek RA. Management of pancreatic ductal leaks and fistulae. J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2014;29:1360–70. doi:10.1111/jgh.12574.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Tay CM, Chang SK. Diagnosis and management of pancreaticopleural fistula. Singapore Med J. 2013;54(4):190–4.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. van Brunschot S, Schut AJ, Bouwense SA, Besselink MG, Bakker OJ, van Goor H, Hofker S, Gooszen HG, Boermeester MA, van Santvoort HC, Dutch Pancreatitis Study Group. Abdominal compartment syndrome in acute pancreatitis: a systematic review. Pancreas. 2014;43(5):665–74. doi:10.1097/MPA.0000000000000108.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Kirkpatrick AW, Roberts DJ, De Waele J, Jaeschke R, Malbrain ML, De Keulenaer B, Duchesne J, Bjorck M, Leppaniemi A, Ejike JC, Sugrue M, Cheatham M, Ivatury R, Ball CG, Reintam Blaser A, Regli A, Balogh ZJ, D'Amours S, Debergh D, Kaplan M, Kimball E, Olvera C, Pediatric Guidelines Sub-Committee for the World Society of the Abdominal Compartment Syndrome. Intra-abdominal hypertension and the abdominal compartment syndrome: updated consensus definitions and clinical practice guidelines from the World Society of the Abdominal Compartment Syndrome. Intensive Care Med. 2013;39(7):1190–206. doi:10.1007/s00134-013-2906-z.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Pang TC, Maher R, Gananadha S, Hugh TJ, Samra JS. Peripancreatic pseudoaneurysms: a management-based classification system. Surg Endosc. 2014;28(7):2027–38. doi:10.1007/s00464-014-3434-9.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Easler J, Muddana V, Furlan A, Dasyam A, Vipperla K, Slivka A, Whitcomb DC, Papachristou GI, Yadav D. Portosplenomesenteric venous thrombosis in patients with acute pancreatitis is associated with pancreatic necrosis and usually has a benign course. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2014;12(5):854–62. doi:10.1016/j.cgh.2013.09.068.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Kumar N, Sahni VA, Thompson CC. Differentiation of walled-off pancreatic necrosis from other peripancreatic fluid collections: a comparison of CT and EUS. Gastroenterology. 2012;142(5, Supplement 1):S-23. (Digestive Diseases Week; 2012; San Diego, California).

    Google Scholar 

  12. Sheu Y, Furlan A, Almusa O, Papachristou G, Bae KT. The revised Atlanta classification for acute pancreatitis: a CT imaging guide for radiologists. Emerg Radiol. 2012;19(3):237–43. doi:10.1007/s10140-011-1001-4 (Epub 2011 Dec 13).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Morgan DE, Baron TH, Smith JK, Robbin ML, Kenney PJ. Pancreatic fluid collections prior to intervention: evaluation with MR imaging compared with CT and US. Radiology. 1997;203(3):773–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Thai TC, Riherd DM, Rust KR. MRI manifestations of pancreatic disease, especially pancreatitis, in the pediatric population. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2013;201(6):W877–92. doi:10.2214/AJR.13.10834.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Sherman S, Freeman ML, Tarnasky PR, Wilcox CM, Kulkarni A, Aisen AM, Jacoby D, Kozarek RA. Secretin (RG1068) administration increases sensitivity of detection of duct abnormalities by magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography in patients with pancreatitis. Gastroenterology. 2014;147(3):646–54. doi:10.1053/j.gastro.2014.05.035 (2014 Jun 3. pii: S0016-5085(14)00724–0).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Cappeliez O, Delhaye M, Devière J, Le Moine O, Metens T, Nicaise N, Cremer M, Stryuven J, Matos C. Chronic pancreatitis: evaluation of pancreatic exocrine function with MR pancreatography after secretin stimulation. Radiology. 2000;215(2):358–64.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Rana SS, Bhasin DK, Reddy YR, Sharma V, Rao C, Sharma RK, Gupta R. Morphological features of fluid collections on endoscopic ultrasound in acute necrotizing pancreatitis: do they change over time? Ann Gastroenterol. 2014;27(3):258–61.

    PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Vitas GJ, Sarr MG. Selected management of pancreatic pseudocysts: operative versus expectant management. Surgery. 1992;111(2):123–30.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Yeo CJ, Bastidas JA, Lynch-Nyhan A, Fishman EK, Zinner MJ, Cameron JL. The natural history of pancreatic pseudocysts documented by computed tomography. Surg Gynecol Obstet. 1990;170(5):411–7.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Lenhart DK, Balthazar EJ. MDCT of acute mild (nonnecrotizing) pancreatitis: abdominal complications and fate of fluid collections. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2008;190(3):643–9. doi:10.2214/AJR.07.2761.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Klek S, Sierzega M, Turczynowski L, Szybinski P, Szczepanek K, Kulig J. Enteral and parenteral nutrition in the conservative treatment of pancreatic fistula: a randomized clinical trial. Gastroenterology. 2011;141(1):157–63, 163.e1. doi:10.1053/j.gastro.2011.03.040.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Allen PJ, Gönen M, Brennan MF, Bucknor AA, Robinson LM, Pappas MM, Carlucci KE, D'Angelica MI, DeMatteo RP, Kingham TP, Fong Y, Jarnagin WR. Pasireotide for postoperative pancreatic fistula. N Engl J Med. 2014;370(21):2014–22. doi:10.1056/NEJMoa1313688.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Gurusamy KS, Koti R, Fusai G, Davidson BR. Somatostatin analogues for pancreatic surgery. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013;4:CD008370. doi:10.1002/14651858.CD008370.pub3.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Wensil AM, Balasubramanian SA, Bell TL. Resolution of a posttraumatic pancreatic pseudocyst with octreotide acetate in a pediatric patient. Pharmacotherapy. 2011;31(9):924. doi:10.1592/phco.31.9.924.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Tanaka T, Kuroki T, Kitasato A, Adachi T, Ono S, Hirabaru M, Matsushima H, Takatsuki M, Eguchi S. Endoscopic transpapillary pancreatic stenting for internal pancreatic fistula with the disruption of the pancreatic ductal system. Pancreatology. 2013;13(6):621–4. doi:10.1016/j.pan.2013.08.006.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Bakker OJ, van Baal MC, van Santvoort HC, Besselink MG, Poley JW, Heisterkamp J, Bollen TL, Gooszen HG, van Eijck CH, Dutch Pancreatitis Study Group. Endoscopic transpapillary stenting or conservative treatment for pancreatic fistulas in necrotizing pancreatitis: multicenter series and literature review. Ann Surg. 2011;253(5):961–7. doi:10.1097/SLA.0b013e318212e901.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Irani S, Gluck M, Ross A, Gan SI, Crane R, Brandabur JJ, Hauptmann E, Fotoohi M, Kozarek RA. Resolving external pancreatic fistulas in patients with disconnected pancreatic duct syndrome: using rendezvous techniques to avoid surgery (with video). Gastrointest Endosc. 2012;76(3):586–93.e1–3. doi:10.1016/j.gie.2012.05.006.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Hookey LC, Debroux S, Delhaye M, Arvanitakis M, Le Moine O, Devière J. Endoscopic drainage of pancreatic-fluid collections in 116 patients: a comparison of etiologies, drainage techniques, and outcomes. Gastrointest Endosc. 2006;63(4):635–43.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Bhasin DK, Rana SS, Nanda M, Chandail VS, Gupta R, Kang M, Nagi B, Sinha SK, Singh K. Comparative evaluation of transpapillary drainage with nasopancreatic drain and stent in patients with large pseudocysts located near tail of pancreas. J Gastrointest Surg. 2011;15(5):772–6. doi:10.1007/s11605-011-1466-1.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Varadarajulu S, Noone TC, Tutuian R, Hawes RH, Cotton PB. Predictors of outcome in pancreatic duct disruption managed by endoscopic transpapillary stent placement. Gastrointest Endosc. 2005;61(4):568–75

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Alexakis N, Sutton R, Neoptolemos JP. Surgical treatment of pancreatic fistula. Dig Surg. 2004;21(4):262–74. (Epub 2004 Aug 11).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Rogers BH, Cicurel NJ, Seed RW. Transgastric needle aspiration of pancreaticpseudocyst through an endoscope. Gastrointest Endosc. 1975;21(3):133–4.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Kozarek RA, Brayko CM, Harlan J, Sanowski RA, Cintora I, Kovac A. Endoscopic drainage of pancreatic pseudocysts. Gastrointest Endosc. 1985;31(5):322–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Aghdassi AA, Mayerle J, Kraft M, Sielenkämper AW, Heidecke CD, Lerch MM. Pancreatic pseudocysts—when and how to treat? HPB (Oxford). 2006;8(6):432–41.doi:10.1080/13651820600748012.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Varadarajulu S, Christein JD, Tamhane A, Drelichman ER, Wilcox CM. Prospective randomized trial comparing EUS and EGD for transmural drainage of pancreatic pseudocysts (with videos). Gastrointest Endosc. 2008;68(6):1102–11. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2008.04.028

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Lee LS, Conwell DL. Update on advanced endoscopic techniques for the pancreas: endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography, drainage and biopsy, and endoscopic ultrasound. Radiol Clin North Am. 2012;50(3):547–61. doi:10.1016/j.rcl.2012.03.002.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Chahal P. EUS-guided double cystgastrostomy of 2 infected pseudocysts in series: a novel case of endoscopic cystocystgastrostomy. Gastrointest Endosc. 2011;74(2):448. doi:10.1016/j.gie.2011.01.048.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Giovannini M, Pesenti C, Rolland AL, Moutardier V, Delpero JR. Endoscopic ultrasound-guided drainage of pancreatic pseudocysts or pancreatic abscesses using a therapeutic echo endoscope. Endoscopy. 2001;33(6):473–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Binmoeller KF, Seifert H, Soehendra N. Endoscopic pseudocyst drainage: a new instrument for simplified cystoenterostomy. Gastrointest Endosc. 1994;40(1):112.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Arvanitakis M, Delhaye M, Bali MA, Matos C, De Maertelaer V, Le Moine O, Devière J. Pancreatic-fluid collections: a randomized controlled trial regarding stent removal after endoscopic transmural drainage. Gastrointest Endosc. 2007;65(4):609–19. (Epub 2007 Feb 26).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Varadarajulu S, Bang JY, Sutton BS, Trevino JM, Christein JD, Wilcox CM. Equal efficacy of endoscopic and surgical cystogastrostomy for pancreatic pseudocyst drainage in a randomized trial. Gastroenterology. 2013;145(3):583–90.e1. doi:10.1053/j.gastro.2013.05.046.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Sharma SS, Bhargawa N, Govil A. Endoscopic management of pancreatic pseudocyst: a long-term follow-up. Endoscopy. 2002 ;34(3):203–7.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Lo SK, Rowe A. Endoscopic management of pancreatic pseudocysts. Gastroenterologist. 1997;5(1):10–25 (Review. PubMed PMID: 9074916).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Lee MJ, Wittich GR, Mueller PR. Percutaneous intervention in acute pancreatitis. Radiographics. 1998;18(3):711–24 (1998 Sep-Oct;18(5):1336. discussion 728. Review. Erratum in: Radiographics)

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Voss M, Ali A, Eubanks WS, Pappas TN. Surgical management of pancreaticocutaneous fistula. J Gastrointest Surg. 2003;7(4):542–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Baillie J, American Gastroenterological Association (AGA) Institute on “Management of Acute Pancreatits” Clinical Practice and Economics Committee; AGA Institute Governing Board. AGA Institute medical position statement on acute pancreatitis. Gastroenterology. 2007;132(5):2019–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. Tenner S, Baillie J, DeWitt J, Vege SS; American College of Gastroenterology. American College of Gastroenterology guideline: management of acute pancreatitis. Am J Gastroenterol. 2013;108(9):1400-15; 1416. doi:10.1038/ajg.2013.218 (Epub 2013 Jul 30. Erratum in: Am J Gastroenterol. 2014;109(2):302).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. Stiles GM, Berne TV, Thommen VD, Molgaard CP, Boswell WD. Fine needle aspiration of pancreatic fluid collections. Am Surg. 1990;56(12):764–8.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. Baron TH, Thaggard WG, Morgan DE, Stanley RJ. Endoscopic therapy for organized pancreatic necrosis. Gastroenterology. 1996;111(3):755–64.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. Seewald S, Groth S, Omar S, Imazu H, Seitz U, de Weerth A, Soetikno R, Zhong Y, Sriram PV, Ponnudurai R, Sikka S, Thonke F, Soehendra N. Aggressive endoscopic therapy for pancreatic necrosis and pancreatic abscess: a new safe and effective treatment algorithm (videos). Gastrointest Endosc. 2005;62(1):92–100.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. Ryou MK, Thompson CC. Translumenal access for endoscopic pancreatic necrosectomy: the safe entrance for necrosectomy sans electrocautery (SENSE) technique. Gastrointest Endosc. 2011;73(4, Supplement):AB182 (Digestive Disease Week; 2011; Chicago, Illinois).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  52. Gluck M, Ross A, Irani S, Lin O, Gan SI, Fotoohi M, Hauptmann E, Crane R, Siegal J, Robinson DH, Traverso LW, Kozarek RA. Dual modality drainage for symptomatic walled-off pancreatic necrosis reduces length of hospitalization, radiological procedures, and number of endoscopies compared to standard percutaneous drainage. J Gastrointest Surg. 2012;16(2):248–56. doi:10.1007/s11605-011-1759-4

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  53. Ross AS, Irani S, Gan SI, Rocha F, Siegal J, Fotoohi M, Hauptmann E, Robinson D, Crane R, Kozarek R, Gluck M. Dual-modality drainage of infected and symptomatic walled-off pancreatic necrosis: long-term clinical outcomes. Gastrointest Endosc. 2014;79(6):929–35. doi:10.1016/j.gie.2013.10.014.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  54. Trikudanathan G, Attam R, Arain MA, Mallery S, Freeman ML. Endoscopic interventions for necrotizing pancreatitis. Am J Gastroenterol. 2014;109(7):969–81. doi:10.1038/ajg.2014.130.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  55. Kumar N, Conwell DL, Thompson CC. Direct endoscopic necrosectomy versus step-up approach for walled-off pancreatic necrosis comparison of clinical: outcome and health care use. Pancreas. 2014;43(7):1334–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  56. Varadarajulu S, Phadnis MA, Christein JD, Wilcox CM. Multiple transluminal gateway technique for EUS-guided drainage of symptomatic walled-off pancreatic necrosis. Gastrointest Endosc. 2011;74(1):74–80. doi:10.1016/j.gie.2011.03.1122.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  57. Saxena P, Singh VK, Messallam A, Kamal A, Zaheer A, Kumbhari V, Lennon AM, Canto MI, Kalloo AN, Baron TH, Khashab MA. Resolution of walled-off pancreatic necrosis by EUS-guided drainage when using a fully covered through-the-scope self-expandable metal stent in a single procedure (with video). Gastrointest Endosc. 2014;80(2):319–24. doi:10.1016/j.gie.2014.04.041.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  58. Yamamoto N, Isayama H, Kawakami H, Sasahira N, Hamada T, Ito Y, Takahara N, Uchino R, Miyabayashi K, Mizuno S, Kogure H, Sasaki T, Nakai Y, Kuwatani M, Hirano K, Tada M, Koike K. Preliminary report on a new, fully covered, metal stent designed for the treatment of pancreatic fluid collections. Gastrointest Endosc. 2013;77(5):809–14. doi:10.1016/j.gie.2013.01.009.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  59. Aso A, Igarashi H, Matsui N, Ihara E, Takaoka T, Osoegawa T, Niina Y, Oono T, Akahoshi K, Nakamura K, Ito T, Takayanagi R. Large area of walled-off pancreatic necrosis successfully treated by endoscopic necrosectomy using a grasping-type scissors forceps. Dig Endosc. 2014;26(3):474–7. doi:10.1111/den.12134

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  60. van Brunschot S Fockens P Bakker OJ Besselink MG Voermans RP Poley JW Gooszen HG Bruno M van Santvoort HC. Endoscopic transluminal necrosectomy in necrotising pancreatitis: a systematic review. Surg Endosc. 2014;28(5):1425–38. doi:10.1007/s00464-013-3382-9

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  61. Papachristou GI, Takahashi N, Chahal P, Sarr MG, Baron TH. Peroral endoscopic drainage/debridement of walled-off pancreatic necrosis. Ann Surg. 2007;245(6):943–51.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  62. Spofford IS, Wu BU, Conwell D, Banks PA, Mortele KJ, Korasani R, Yu S, Thompson CC. Endoscopic versus surgical necrosectomy for patients with symptomatic pancreatic necrotic collections: a retrospective cohort study. Gastroenterology. 2011;140(5, Supplement 1):S-11–2 ( Digestive Disease Week; 2011; Chicago, IL).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  63. Bakker OJ, van Santvoort HC, van Brunschot S, Geskus RB, Besselink MG, Bollen TL, van Eijck CH, Fockens P, Hazebroek EJ, Nijmeijer RM, Poley JW, van Ramshorst B, Vleggaar FP, Boermeester MA, Gooszen HG, Weusten BL, Timmer R, Dutch Pancreatitis Study Group. Endoscopic transgastric vs surgical necrosectomy for infected necrotizing pancreatitis: a randomized trial. JAMA. 2012;307(10):1053–61. doi:10.1001/jama.2012.276.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  64. van Santvoort HC Besselink MG Bakker OJ Hofker HS Boermeester MA Dejong CH van Goor H Schaapherder AF van Eijck CH Bollen TL van Ramshorst B Nieuwenhuijs VB Timmer R Laméris JS Kruyt PM Manusama ER van der Harst E van der Schelling GP Karsten T Hesselink EJ van Laarhoven CJ Rosman C Bosscha K de Wit RJ Houdijk AP van Leeuwen MS Buskens E Gooszen HG, Dutch Pancreatitis Study Group. A step-up approach or open necrosectomy for necrotizing pancreatitis. N Engl J Med. 2010;362(16):1491–502. doi:10.1056/NEJMoa0908821.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Christopher C. Thompson MD, MSc, FACG, FASGE .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Video Caption

Video Caption

Video 12. 1 The initial steps of endoscopic necrosectomy are similar to pseudocyst drainage. After giving the patient antibiotics, sedating under general anesthesia, and using carbon dioxide insufflation, the first step is identification and puncture of the wall of the WOPN. EUS is used to identify the location of the WOPN and confirm debris within the collection

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2015 Springer Science+Business Media New York

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Abidi, W., Thompson, C. (2015). Endoscopic Management of Complications in Acute Pancreatitis. In: Lee, L. (eds) ERCP and EUS. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4939-2320-5_12

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4939-2320-5_12

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4939-2319-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4939-2320-5

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics