Abstract
As the study of biodiversity, the field of community ecology seeks to understand what factors govern the formation and maintenance of multispecies assemblages (i.e., how and why certain species coexist). The structure of communities is described by their diversity—comprised of richness (number of species present) and evenness (the relative abundance of each species)—and interactions among the constituent species. Communities are biotic components within ecosystems, and because cities can be viewed as an ecosystem (albeit one characterized by high-density human habitation and built structure), understanding how wildlife responds to the ever-increasing scope of urban development makes urban-community ecology an important component of contemporary wildlife science.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Adams, L. W. 1994. Urban wildlife habitats: A landscape perspective. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
Aizen, M. A., and P. Feinsinger. 2003. Bees not to be? Responses of insect pollinator faunas and flower pollination to habitat fragmentation. Ecological Studies 162:111–129.
Arnolds, E. 1991. Decline of ectomycorrhizal fungi in Europe. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment 35:209–244.
Baker, L. A., A. J. Brazel, N. Selover, C. Martin, N. McIntyre, F. R. Steiner, A. Nelson, and L. Musacchio. 2002. Urbanization and warming of Phoenix (Arizona, USA): Impacts, feedbacks and mitigation. Urban Ecosystems 6:183–203.
Begon, M., C. R. Townsend, and J. L. Harper. 2006. Ecology: From individuals to ecosystems. 4th ed. Malden: Blackwell.
Blair, R. B. 1999. Birds and butterflies along an urban gradient: Surrogate taxa for assessing biodiversity? Ecological Applications 9:164–170.
Blair, R. B. 2001. Creating a homogeneous avifauna. In Avian ecology and conservation in an urbanizing world, ed. J. Marzluff, R. Bowman, and R. Donnelly, 459–486. Boston: Kluwer.
Blair, R. B., and A. E. Launer. 1997. Butterfly diversity and human land-use: Species assemblages along an urban gradient. Biological Conservation 80:1132–125.
Boal, C. W., and R. W. Mannan. 1999. Comparative breeding ecology of Cooper’s Hawks in urban and exurban areas of southeastern Arizona. Journal of Wildlife Management 63: 77–84.
Bock, C. E., Z. F. Jones, and J. H. Bock. 2008. The oasis effect: Response of birds to exurban development in a southwestern savanna. Ecological Applications 18:1093–1106.
Brown, W. L., and E. O. Wilson. 1956. Character displacement. Systematic Zoology 5:49–65.
Buyantuyev, A., and J. G. Wu. 2009. Urbanization alters spatiotemporal patterns of ecosystem primary productivity: A case study of the Phoenix metropolitan region, USA. Journal of Arid Environments 73:512–520.
Chace, J. F., and J. J. Walsh. 2006. Urban effects on native avifauna: A review. Landscape and Urban Planning 74:46–68.
Connell, J. H. 1978. Diversity in tropical rain forests and coral reefs. Science 199:1302–1310.
Connell, J. H. 1980. Diversity and the coevolution of competitors, or the ghost of competition past. Oikos 35:131–138.
Crooks, K. R. 2002. Relative sensitivities of mammalian carnivores to habitat fragmentation. Conservation Biology 16:488–502.
Crooks, K. R., and M. E. Soulé. 1999. Mesopredator release and avifaunal extinctions in a fragmented system. Nature 400:563–566.
Crooks, K. R., S. P. D. Riley, S. D. Gehrt, T. E. Gosselink, and T. R. Van Deelen. 2010. Community ecology of urban carnivores. In Urban carnivores: Ecology, conflict, and conservation, ed. S. D. Gehrt, S. P. D. Riley, and B. L. Cypher, 185–196. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
Czech, B., P. R. Krausman, and P. K. Devers. 2000. Economic associations among causes of species endangerment in the United States. BioScience 50:593–601.
Diefenbach, L. M. G., and M. Becker. 1992. Carabid taxocenes of an urban park in subtropical Brazil. II. Specific diversity and similarity (Insecta: Coleoptera: Carabidae). Studies on Neotropical Fauna and Environment 27:189–200.
Faeth, S. H., P. S. Warren, E. Shochat, and W. A. Marussich. 2005. Trophic dynamics in urban communities. BioScience 55:399–407.
Gehrt, S. D., and J. E. Chelsvig. 2003. Bat activity and distribution patterns in an urban landscape. Ecological Applications 13:939–950.
Gehrt, S. D., and J. E. Chelsvig. 2004. Bat activity in an urban landscape: Species-specific patterns along an urban gradient. Ecological Applications 14:625–635.
Gehrt, S. D., and S. P. D. Riley. 2010. Coyotes (Canis latrans). In Urban carnivores: Ecology, conflict, and conservation, ed. S. D. Gehrt, S. P. D. Riley, and B. L. Cypher, 79–95. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
Gehrt, S. D., S. P. D. Riley, and B. L. Cypher, eds. 2010. Urban carnivores: Ecology, conflict, and conservation. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
Gorenzel, W. P., and T. P. Salmon. 1995. Characteristics of American crow urban roosts in California. Journal of Wildlife Management 59:638–645.
Gotelli, N. J. and D. J. McCabe. 2002. Species co-occurrence: A meta-analysis of J. M. Diamond’s assembly rules model. Ecology 83:2091–2096.
Hadidian, J., S. Prange, R. Rosatte, S. P. D. Riley, and S. D. Gehrt. 2010. Raccoons (Procyon lotor). In Urban carnivores: Ecology, conflict, and conservation, ed. S. D. Gehrt, S. P. D. Riley, and B. L. Cypher, 35–47. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
Hooper, D. U., F. S. Chapin, J. J. Ewel, A. Hector, P. Inchausti, S. Lavorel, J. H. Lawton, D. M. Lodge, M. Loreau, S. Naeem, B. Schmid, H. Setälä, A. J. Symstad, J. Vandermeer, and D. A. Wardle. 2005. Effects of biodiversity on ecosystem functioning: A consensus of current knowledge. Ecological Monographs 75:3–35.
Hope, D., C. Gries, W. Zhu, W. F. Fagan, C. L. Redman, N. B. Grimm, A. L. Nelson, C. Martin, and A. Kinzig. 2003. Socioeconomics drive urban plant diversity. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 100:8788–8792.
Hubbell, S. 2001. The unified neutral theory of biodiversity and biogeography. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Imhoff, M. L., L. Bounoua, R. DeFries, W. T. Lawrence, D. Stutzer, C. J. Tucker, and T. Ricketts. 2004. The consequences of urban land transformation on net primary productivity in the United States. Remote Sensing of Environment 89:434–443.
Kinzig, A. P., P. Warren, C. Martin, D. Hope, and M. Katti. 2005. The effects of human socioeconomic status and cultural characteristics on urban patterns of biodiversity. Ecology and Society 10:23 (http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol10/iss1/art23/).
Leston, L. F. V., and A. D. Rodewald. 2006. Are urban forests ecological traps for understory birds? An examination using Northern cardinals. Biological Conservation 131:666–674.
Liu, H., and S. Koptur. 2003. Breeding system and pollination of a narrowly endemic herb of the Lower Florida Keys: Impacts of the urban-wildland interface. American Journal of Botany 90:1180–1187.
Lotze, J., and S. Anderson. 1979. Procyon lotor. Mammalian Species 119:1–8.
MacArthur, R. H., and E. O. Wilson. 1967. The theory of island biogeography. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Magurran, A. E. 2004. Measuring biological diversity. Malden: Blackwell.
Marzluff, J. M. 2005. Island biogeography for an urbanizing world: How extinction and colonization may determine biological diversity in human-dominated landscapes. Urban Ecosystems 8:155–175.
May, R. M. 1972. Will a large complex system be stable? Nature 238:413–414.
McCann, K. S. 2000. The diversity-stability debate. Nature 405:228–233.
McCleery, R. A., R. R. Lopez, N. J. Silvy, and D. L. Gallant. 2008. Fox squirrel survival in urban and rural environments. Journal of Wildlife Management 72:133–137.
McIntyre, N. E. 2011. Urban ecology: Definitions and goals. In The Routledge handbook on urban ecology, ed. I. Douglas, D. Goode, M. Houck, and R. Wang, 7–16. New York: Routledge.
McIntyre, N. E., K. Knowles-Yanez, and D. Hope. 2000. Urban ecology as an interdisciplinary field: Differences in the use of “urban” between the social and natural sciences. Urban Ecosystems 4:5–24.
McKinney, M. L. 2002. Urbanization, biodiversity and conservation. BioScience 52:883–890.
McKinney, M. L. 2006. Urbanization as a major cause of biotic homogenization. Biological Conservation 127:247–260.
Milesi, C., C. D. Elvidge, R. R. Nemani, and S. W. Running. 2003. Assessing the impact of urban land development on net primary productivity in the southeastern United States. Remote Sensing of Environment 86:401–410.
Morin, P. J. 2011. Community ecology. 2nd ed. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.
Newbound, M., M. A. Mccarthy, and T. Lebel. 2010. Fungi and the urban environment: A review. Landscape and Urban Planning 96:138–145.
Niemelä, J., D. J. Kotze, S. Venn, L. Penev, I. Stoyanov, J. Spence, D. Hartley, and E. Montes de Oca. 2002. Carabid beetle assemblages (Coleoptera, Carabidae) across urban-rural gradients: An international comparison. Landscape Ecology 17:387–401.
Parker, T. S., and C. H. Nilon. 2008. Gray squirrel density, habitat suitability, and behavior in urban parks. Urban Ecosystems 11:243–255.
Perry, G., B. W. Buchanan, R. N. Fisher, M. Salmon, and S. E. Wise. 2008. Effects of artificial night lighting on amphibians and reptiles in urban environments. In Urban herpetology, ed. J. C. Mitchell, R. E. Jung Brown, and B. Bartholomew, 239–256. Salt Lake City: Society for the Study of Amphibians and Reptiles.
Pickett, S. T. A., M. L. Cadenasso, J. M. Grove, P. M. Groffman, L. E. Band, C. G. Boone, W. R. Burch, Jr., C. S. B. Grimmond, J. Hom, J. C. Jenkins, N. L. Law, C. H. Nilon, R. V. Pouyat, K. Szlavecz, P. S. Warren, and M. A. Wilson. 2008. Beyond urban legends: An emerging framework of urban ecology, as illustrated by the Baltimore Ecosystem Study. BioScience 58:139–150.
Pouyat, R. V., R. W. Parmelee, and M. M. Carreiro. 1994. Environmental effects of forest soil invertebrates and fungal densities in oak stands along an urban-rural land use gradient. Pedobiologia 38:385–399.
Pyšek, P., D. M. Richardson, M. Rejmánek, G. L. Webster, M. Williamson, and J. Kirschner. 2004. Alien plants in checklists and floras: Towards better communication between taxonomists and ecologists. Taxon 53:131–143.
Racey, G. D., and D. L. Euler. 1982. Small mammal and habitat response to shoreline cottage development in central Ontario, Canada. Canadian Journal of Zoology 60:865–880.
Ricketts, T., and M. Imhoff. 2003. Biodiversity, urban areas, and agriculture: Locating priority ecoregions for conservation. Conservation Ecology 8:1.
Ricklefs, R. E. 2006. The unified neutral theory of biodiversity: Do the numbers add up? Ecology 87:1424–1423.
Riley, S. P. D., J. Handidian, and D. A. Manski. 1998. Population density, survival and rabies in raccoons in an urban national park. Canadian Journal of Zoology 76:153–1164.
Rydell, J. 2006. Bats and their insect prey at streetlights. In Ecological consequences of artificial night lighting, ed. C. Rich and T. Longcore, 43–60. Washington, DC: Island Press.
Sale, P. F. 1978. Coexistence of coral reef fishes-a lottery for living space. Environmental Biology of Fishes 5:243–249.
Shochat, E. 2004. Credit or debit? Resource input changes population dynamics of city-slicker birds. Oikos 106:622–626.
Shochat, E., W. L. Stefanov, M. E. A. Whitehouse, and S. H. Faeth. 2004. Spider diversity in the greater Phoenix area: The influence of human modification to habitat structure and productivity. Ecological Applications 14:268–280.
Shochat, E., P. S. Warren, S. H. Faeth, N. E. McIntyre, and D. Hope. 2006. From patterns to emerging processes in mechanistic urban ecology. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 21:186–191.
Stratford, J. A., and W. D. Robinson. 2005. Distribution of Neotropical migratory bird species across an urbanizing landscape. Urban Ecosystems 8:59–77.
Tilman, D., and J. A. Downing. 1994. Biodiversity and stability in grasslands. Nature 367:363–365.
Valcarcel, A., and E. Fernández-Juricic. 2009. Anti-predator strategies of house finches: Are urban habitats safe spots from predators even when humans are around? Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology 63:673–685.
van der Maarel, E., and M. T. Sykes. 1993. Small-scale plant species turnover in a limestone grassland: The carousel model and some comments on the niche concept. Journal of Vegetation Science 4:178–188.
Williams, N., M. Schwartz, P. Vesk, M. McCarthy, A. K. Hahs, S. Clements, R. Corlett, R. Duncan, B. Norton, K. Thompson, and M. McDonnell. 2009. A conceptual framework for predicting the effects of urban environments on floras. Journal of Ecology 97:4–9.
Willig, M. R., D. M. Kaufmann, and R. D. Stevens. 2003. Latitudinal gradients of biodiversity: Pattern, process, scale and synthesis. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 34:273–309.
Xu, C., M. Liu, S. An, J. M. Chen, and P. Yan. 2007. Assessing the impact of urbanization on regional net primary productivity in Jinagyin County, China. Journal of Environmental Management 85:597–606.
Yang, Y., M. Fujihara, B. Li, X. Yuan, K. Hara, L. Da, M. Tomita, and Y. Zhao. 2011. Structure and diversity of remnant natural evergreen broad-leaved forests at three sites affected by urbanization in Chongqing metropolis, Southwest China. Landscape and Ecological Engineering. doi:10.1007/s11355-011-0160-5.
Zerbe, S., U. Maurer, S. Schmitz, and H. Sukopp. 2003. Biodiversity in Berlin and its potential for nature conservation. Landscape and Urban Planning 62:139–148.
Zhang, X. Y., M. A. Friedl, C. B. Schaaf, and A. H. Strahler. 2004. Climate controls on vegetation phenological patterns in northern mid- and high latitudes inferred from MODIS data. Global Change Biology 10:1133–1145.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Appendices
Conclusion
Managing diversity is a key focus of wildlife biology, but it is an even more challenging endeavor when conducted in urban areas. Challenges arise both from complex and poorly understood inter-species relationships and from the difficulty of influencing human behaviors that drive many ecosystem processes. Effective planning and design for urban wildlife and for positive human–wildlife interactions must therefore include a social component (Chap. 6). Cross-disciplinary, team efforts among wildlife biologists, landscape architects, and land-use planners will become more common as urbanization occurs. Although these efforts will require unprecedented emphasis on communication (McIntyre 2011, Chap. 11), the commonalities across the globe of factors that structure urban communities may facilitate making action plans for urban biodiversity conservation. This chapter provides a basic understanding of community ecology needed to shape urban wildlife communities, while later chapters provide detailed examples of how to manipulate wildlife communities in urban areas and productively engage urban residents in those endeavors.
Community ecology is the science of biodiversity , interested in explaining how certain species can coexist whereas other combinations cannot, and why certain assemblages are stable whereas others are susceptible to invasion and alteration. Urbanization brings together species to create novel assemblages subject to novel regulation. As perhaps the main sign of the Anthropocene, urban ecosystems present wildlife scientists with many research opportunities that combine the familiar with the unique.
Acknowledgments
Much of my thinking about urban communities has come from my association with the Central Arizona-Phoenix Long-Term Ecological Research Project at Arizona State University.
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2014 Springer Science+Business Media, LLC
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
McIntyre, N. (2014). Wildlife Responses to Urbanization: Patterns of Diversity and Community Structure in Built Environments. In: McCleery, R., Moorman, C., Peterson, M. (eds) Urban Wildlife conservation. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4899-7500-3_7
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4899-7500-3_7
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA
Print ISBN: 978-1-4899-7499-0
Online ISBN: 978-1-4899-7500-3
eBook Packages: Biomedical and Life SciencesBiomedical and Life Sciences (R0)