Skip to main content

Abstract

The works on validation propose solutions to ensure the quality of knowledge based systems. We are interested in the validation of a specific model of knowledge representation: the conceptual graph model. We present a semantic validation of conceptual graphs based on constraints given by an expert. The semantic validation of a knowledge base composed of conceptual graphs consists in checking its quality according to two kinds of constraints. The existential constraints allow one to express knowledge which must be deduced or which must absolutely not be deduced from the knowledge base. The descriptive constraints characterize the properties a conceptual graph must verify in the knowledge base. Descriptive constraints can be minimal or maximal to express the notions of “at least” and “at most”. We introduce the notion of specification which is a combination of constraints linked by logical operators. The validation of a knowledge base is made according to these specifications, by means of a conceptual graph operation: the projection.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Bos, C., Botella, B., and Vanheeghe, P. (1997). Modelling and simulating human behaviours with conceptual graphs. In Proceedings of the 5th Int. Conference on Conceptual Structures, Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence 1257, pp 275 – 289, Seattle, U.S.A. Springer Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Chein, M. and Mugnier, M.L. (1992). Conceptual graphs: fundamental notions. Revue d’Intelligence Artificielle, 6(4), pp365–406.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Dibie, J. (1997). Validation des graphes conceptuels. Rapport de stage de DEA, Université Paris I X, Dauphine, Paris, Septembre.

    Google Scholar 

  4. JDibie, J. (1997). Une validation logique des graphes conceptuels. 4 th Rencontres Nationales des Jeunes Chercheurs en Intelligence Artificielle, pp85–88.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Dieng, R. (1997). Comparison of conceptual graphs for modelling knowledge of multiple experts: application to traffic accident analysis. Rapport de recherche 3161, INRIA, Sophia Antipolis.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Haemmerlé, O. (1995). CoGITo: une plate-forme de développement de logiciels sur les graphes conceptuels. PhD thesis, Université Montpellier I I.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Haouche, C. and Charlet, J. (1996). KBS validation: a knowledge acquisition perspective. ECAI, pp433–437.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Hors P. and Rousset, M.V. (1996) Modeling and verifying complex objects: A declarative approach based on description logics. ECAI’96.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Martin, P. and Alpay, L. (1996). Conceptual structures and structured documents. In Proceedings of the 4th Int. Conference on Conceptual Structures, Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence 1115, Springer-Verlag, Sydney, Australia, pp 145 – 159.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Mugnier, M.L. and Chein, M. (1996). Représenter des connaissances et raisonner avec des graphes. Revue d’Intelligence Artificielle, 10(1):7–56.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Palmer, G.J. and Craw, S. (1995). Utilising explanation to assist the refinment of knowledge-based systems. Proceedings of the 3rd European Symposium on the Validation and Verification of Knowledge Based Systems (EUROVAV’95), Chambery, France, pp 201 – 211.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Preece, A. and Zlaterava, N. (1994). A state of the art in automated validation of knowledge-based systems. Expert Systems with Applications, 7(2):151–167.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Rousset, M-C. (1994). Knowledge formal specifications for formal verification: a proposal based on the integration of different logical formalism. European Conference on Artificial Intelligence, pp739–743.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Sowa, J.F. (1984). Conceptual structures: information processing in mind and machine. Addison Wesley Publishing Company.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1999 Springer Science+Business Media New York

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Dibie-Barthélemy, J., Haemmerlé, O., Loiseau, S. (1999). Constraints for Validation of Conceptual Graphs. In: Vermesan, A., Coenen, F. (eds) Validation and Verification of Knowledge Based Systems. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4757-6916-6_6

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4757-6916-6_6

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4419-5107-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4757-6916-6

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics