Advertisement

The Relationship of Personality and Intelligence to Cognitive Learning Style and Achievement

  • Adrian Furnham
Chapter
Part of the Perspectives on Individual Differences book series (PIDF)

Abstract

Certain topics in psychology have always provoked passionate debate, often because of their sociopolitical implications. Although fashion may dictate which theoretical or methodological approach currently shapes researchers’ thinking and experimental work, it is often the implications of the practical application of the findings that cause the most debate.

Keywords

Academic Achievement Cognitive Style Learning Style Sensation Seek Attributional Style 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Abramson, L., Seligman, M., and Teasdale, J. (1978). Learned helplessness in humans: Critique and reformulation. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 87, 32–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Adorno, T., Frenkel-Brunswick, D., Levinson, D., and Sanford, R. (1950). The authoritarian personality. New York: Harper.Google Scholar
  3. Allison, C., and Hayes, J. (1988). The Learning Style Questionnaire: An alternative to Kolb’s inventory. Journal of Management Studies, 25, 269–281.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Aronson, E. (1972). The social animal. San Francisco: Freeman. Atkinson, G. (1988). Reliability of the Learning Style Inventory. Psychological Reports, 62, 755–768.Google Scholar
  5. Atkinson, G., Murrel, P., and Whiters, M. (1990). Career personality types and learning styles. Psychological Reports, 66, 160–162.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Broverman, D., Broverman, L., Vogel, W., Palmer, R., and Klainer, E. (1964). The automatization cognitive style and physical development. Child Development, 35, 1343–1359.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Burger, K. (1985). Computer assisted instruction: Learning style and academic achievement. Journal of Computer Based Instruction, 12, 21–22.Google Scholar
  8. Carne, J., and Kirton, M. (1982). Styles of creativity: Test scores correlations between the Kirton Adaption-Innovation Inventory and the Myers-Briggs Type Indicator. Psychological Reports, 50, 31–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Christensen, C., Massey, D., and Issacs, P. (1991). Cognitive strategies and study habits. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 61, 290–299.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Entwistle, N., and Ramsden, P. (1983). Understanding student learning. London: Croom Helm.Google Scholar
  11. Eysenck, H, and Eysenck, S. (1975). The Eysenck Personality Questionnaire. London: Hodder and Stoughton.Google Scholar
  12. Eysenck, M. (1981). Learning, memory and personality. In H. J.Google Scholar
  13. Eysenck (Ed.), A model for personality. Berlin: Springer-Verlag.Google Scholar
  14. Feather, N. (1983). Causal attributions for good and bad outcomes in achievement and affiliation situations. Australian Journal of Psychology, 35, 37–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Festinger, L. (1957). A theory of cognitive dissonance. Evanston, IL: Row and Peterson.Google Scholar
  16. Fillenbaum, S. (1959). Some stylistic aspects of categorizing behavior. Journal of Personality, 27, 187–195.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Furnham, A. (1992). Personality and learning style. Personality and Individual Differences, 13, 429–438.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Furnham, A. (1994). A content and correlational analysis of tolerance of ambiguity questionnaires. Personality and Individual Differences, 16, 403–410.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Fumham, A., and Ribchester, T. (in press). Tolerance of ambiguity: A review of the literature, Current Psychology.Google Scholar
  20. Furnham, A., Sadka, V., and Brewin, C. (1992). The development of an occupational attributional style questionnaire. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 13, 27–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Fumham, A., and Steele, H. (1993). Measuring locus of control. British Journal of Psychology, 84, 443–479.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Gardner, R., and Long, R. (1962). Cognitive control of attention and inhibition. British Journal of Pcyrhology, 53, 381–388.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Geiger, M. (1991). Performance during the first year of college.Psychological Reports, 68, 633–634.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Ginter, E., Brown, S., Scalise, J., and Ripley, W. (1989). Perceptual learning style: The link to academic performance, sex, age and academic standing. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 68, 1091–1094.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Glick, J. (1968). An experimental analysis of subject-object relationships in perception. In R. Haber (Ed.), Contemporary research and theory on visual perception. New York: Holt.Google Scholar
  26. Goldsmith, R. (1985). A factorial composition of the KAI Inventory. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 45, 245–250.Google Scholar
  27. Green, D., Snell, J., and Parimaneth, A. (1990). Learning styles in assessment of students. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 70, 363–369.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Guilford, J. (1980). Cognitive styles: What are they? Educational and Psychological Measurement, 40, 715–735.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Hayes, J., and Allison, C. (1988). Cultural differences in the learning styles of managers. Management International Review, 28, 75–80.Google Scholar
  30. Hayes, J., and Allison, C. (1993). Matching learning style and instructional strategy: An application of the person-environmental interaction paradigm. Perception and Motor Skills, 76, 63–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Hebb, D., and Foord, E. (1945). Errors of visual recognition and the nature of the trace. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 35, 335–348.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Heider, F. (1958). The psychology of interpersonal relationships. New York: Wiley.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Henderson, J., and Nutt, P. (1980). The influence of decision style on marketing behavior. Management Science, 26, 371–386.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Holzman, P., and Gardner, R. (1960). Levelling and sharpening and memory organization. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 61, 176–180.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Honey, P., and Mumford, A. (1982). The Manual of Learning Styles. Maidenhead, England: Honey Press.Google Scholar
  36. Hudson, L. (1966). Contrary imaginations: A psychological study of the young child. New York: Schocken.Google Scholar
  37. Hunt, R., Krzystofiak, F., Meindl, J., and Yousry, A. (1989). Cognitive style and decision making. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 44, 436–453.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Kelly, G. (1955). The psychology of personal constructs. New York: Norton.Google Scholar
  39. Kirton, M. (1976). Adaptors and innovators: A description and measure. Journal of Applied Psychology, 61, 622–629.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Kirton, M. (Ed.). (1989). Adaptors and innovators: Styles of creativity and problem-solving. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  41. Kirton, M., and De Ciantis, S. (1986). Cognitive style and person- ality. Personality and Individual Differences, 7, 141–146.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Kirton, M., and Pender, S. (1982). The adaption-innovation continuum: Occupational type and course selection. Psychological Reports, 51, 883–886.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Kolb, D. (1976). Learning Style Inventory: Technical manual. Boston: McBer.Google Scholar
  44. Kolb, D. (1984). Experimental learning. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
  45. McKenna, F. (1990). Learning implications of field dependence-independence in cognitive style versus cognitive ability. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 4, 425–437.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. McKenny, J., and Keen, P. (1974). How managers’ minds work. Harvard Business Review, 51, 79–90.Google Scholar
  47. Messick, S. (Ed.). (1976). Individuality and learning. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  48. Messick, S. (1984). The nature of cognitive styles: Problems and promise in educational practice. Educational Psychologist, 19, 59–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Metalsky, G., Abramson, L., Seligman, M., Semmel, A., and Peterson, C. (1982). Attributional styles and life events in the classroom: Vulnerability and invulnerability to depressive mood reactions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 43, 704–718.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Meyer, J., Parsons, P., and Dunne, T. (1990). Individual study orchestrations and their association with learning outcome. Higher Education, 20, 67–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Mitchell, J. (1990). Personality correlations of attributional style. Journal of Psychology, 123, 447–463.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Mitroff, I., and Kilmann, R. (1975). On evaluating scientific research. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 8, 163–174.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Mulowsky, G., and Freeman, M. (1979). The impact of managerial orientation on implementing decisions. Human Resource Management, 18, 6–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Pask, G. (1976). Styles and strategies of learning. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 46, 128–148.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Pask, G. (1988). Learning strategies, teaching strategies and conceptual or learning styles. In R. Schmeck (Ed.), Learning strategies and learning styles (pp. 48–76 ). New York: Plenum.Google Scholar
  56. Pettigrew, T. (1958). The measurement and correlates of category width as a cognitive variable. Journal of Personality, 26, 59–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Petzold, M. (1985). Cognitive styles and eidetic imagery. Psycholgie in Erziehung Untermicht, 32, 1–13.Google Scholar
  58. Phares, E. (1976). Locus of control in personality. Morristown, NJ: General Learning Press.Google Scholar
  59. Pinto, J., and Geiger, M. (1991). Changes in learning-style preferences. Psychological Reports, 68, 195–201.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Prociuk, T., and Lusier, R. (1975). Internal-external locus of control: An analysis and biography of two years of research (1973–1974). Psychological Reports, 37, 1323–1337.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Riding, R., and Sadler-Smith, E. (1992). Types of instructional material, cognitive style and learning performance. Educational Studies, 18, 323–329.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Rokeach, M. (1960). The open and closed mind. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  63. Rokeach, N., and Kliejunas, P. (1972). Behavior as a function of attitude-toward-object and attitude-toward-situation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 22, 194–201.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Rose, J., and Medway, F. (1980). Measurement of teachers’ beliefs in their control over student outcome. Journal of Educational Research, 77, 185–190.Google Scholar
  65. Rosenberg, M., and Abelson, R. (1960). An analysis of cognitive balancing. In M. Rosenberg (Ed.), Attitude organization and change. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
  66. Rotter, J. (1966). Generalized expectancies for internal versus external control of reinforcement. Psychological Monographs, 80, 1–28.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  67. Rotter, J. (1975). Some problems and misconceptions related to the construct of internal versus external control of reinforcement. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 43, 56–57Google Scholar
  68. Rotter, J. (1990). Internal versus external control of reinforcement: A case history of variables. American Psychologist, 45, 489–493.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Ruble, T., and Cosier, R. (1990). Effects of cognitive styles and decision setting on performance. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 46, 283–295.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Ryckman, D., Peckham, P., Mizokawa, D., and Sprague, D. (1990). The Survey of Achievement Responsibility: Reliability and validity data on an academic attribution scale. Journal of Personality Assessment, 54, 265–275.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Schroder, H. (1989). Managerial competence and style. In M. Kirton (Ed.), Adaptors and innovators. London: Rout-ledge.Google Scholar
  72. Seeman, M. (1963). Alienation and social learning in a reformatory. American Journal of Sociology, 69, 270–284.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Sein, M., and Robey, D. (1991). Learning style and the efficacy of computer training methods. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 72, 243–246.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Speth, C., and Brown, R. (1990). Effects of college students’learning styles and gender on their test preparation strategies. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 4, 189–202.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Streufert, S., and Nogami, G. (1989). Cognitive style and cornplexity: Implications for I O psychology. In C. Cooper and I. Robertson (Eds.), International review of industrial and organizational psychology (pp. 93–143 ). Chichester, England: Wiley.Google Scholar
  76. Strickland, B. (1977). Internal-external control of reinforcement. In T. Bass (Ed.), Personality Variables in Social Behavior (pp. 114–126 ). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  77. Thompson, M. (1988). Individualizing instructions with microcomputer produced text. Presented at the annual meeting of the Association for Educational Communication and Technology, New Orleans, LA.Google Scholar
  78. Tiedemann, J. (1989). Measures of cognitive styles: A critical review. Educational Psychologist, 24, 261–275.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. Titus, T., Bergandi, T., and Shryock, M. (1990). Adolescent learning styles. Journal of Research and Development in Education, 23, 165–171.Google Scholar
  80. van Overwalle, F., Segebarth, K., and Goldstein, M. (1989). Improving performance of freshmen through attributional testimonies from fellow students. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 59, 75–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. Whetten, D., and Cameron, K. (1984). Development management skills. London: Scott, Foresman.Google Scholar
  82. Witkin, H. (1976). Socialization and ecology in the development of cross-cultural and sex differences in cognitive style. Presented at the International Congress of Psychology, Paris.Google Scholar
  83. Witkin, H., Dyk, R., Faterson, H., Goodenough, D., and Karp, S. (1962). Psychological differentiation. New York:Google Scholar
  84. Wiley. Wulf, E. (1922). Uber die verandering von vorstellingen (gedachtins und gestalt). Psychologische Forsching, 1, 333–373.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  85. Zemore, R., and Veikle, G. (1989). Cognitive styles and proneness to depressive symptoms in university women. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 5, 426–438.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 1995

Authors and Affiliations

  • Adrian Furnham
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of PsychologyUniversity College LondonLondonEngland

Personalised recommendations