Minimum Energy Structures of Br2-ArN Clusters: Implications for Dynamics

  • François G. Amar


The dynamics of photexcited dihalide species such as I2 has been extensively studied (1) in small van der Waals molecules with emphasis placed on the role of intramolecular energy transfer (2). In fluids, the geminate recombination dynamics of I2 excited to several electronic states has been studied both experimentally by picosecond spectroscopy and theoretically by molecular dynamics (MD) and other techniques (3), In order to bridge the gap between van der Waals molecules and condensed phases it is necessary to study small clusters of between 5 and 100 molecules in molecular beams. Our previous MD simulation study of photoexcitation dynamics of Br2ArN neutrals under beam condition demonstrated a gradual transition between the small molecule limit and the condensed phase limit as the numberof argon atoms was increased from 6 to 70 (4). For clusters of less than about 20 atoms, the Br2 caging dynamics is extremely sensitive to cluster geometry and loss of argon atoms occurs by impulsive energy transfer from Br2. For two shell cluster (70 atoms), loss of argon occurs by evaporation after the whole cluster is heated.


Monte Carlo Argon Atom Minimum Energy Structure Intramolecular Energy Transfer Pentagonal Ring 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    D. Levy, Advances in Chemical Physics (Wiley, New York, 1981) vol. 47, pp. 323–362.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    J.A. Beswick and J. Jortner, Advances in Chemical Physics (Wiley, New York, 1981), vol. 47, p. 363ff and references contained therein.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    J.T. Hynes, Ann. Rev. Phys. Chem. (Academic Press, New York, 1985), vol. 36, pp. 574–578 for a review of this topic and recent references.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    F.G. Amar and B.J. Berne, J. Phys. Chem. 88, 6720 (1984).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    M.L. Alexander, M.A. Johnson, and W.C. Lineberger, J. Chem. Phys. 82, 5288 (1985).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    M.L. Alexander, M.A. Johnson, N.E. Levinger, and W.C. Lineberger, Phys. Rev Lett. 57, 976 (1986).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    W.C. Lineberger, M.L. Alexander, N.E. Levinger, and M.A. Johnson, presented at New York ACS Meeting—Symposium on Structure, Spectroscopy, and Dynamics of Atomic, Molecular and Ionic Clusters, abstract 16 (Division of Physical Chemistry), April 14–18, 1986.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    W.C. Lineberger, private communication.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    W.R. Wadt and P.J. Hay, J. Chem. Phys. 82, 284 (1985).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    J.G. Gay and B.J. Berne, Phys. Rev. Lett. 49, 194 (1982).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Press, New York 1987

Authors and Affiliations

  • François G. Amar
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of ChemistryUniversity of MaineOronoUSA

Personalised recommendations